2020 Razer Blade Pro 17 incelemesi: 300Hz bir laptopa gerçekten ihtiyacınız var mı?

Name: Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Brand: Razer

Fast display for a fast laptop.

240 Hz'den daha yüksek yenileme hızı seçenekleri sunan ilk 17,3 inç oyun dizüstü bilgisayarıdır. Bununla birlikte, süper bir meraklı değilseniz, 300 Hz ile geçen yılın 240 Hz paneli arasındaki farkı söylemek zor olacak.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo, Published 06/29/2020 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...

Comet Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Razer, son zamanlarda 10.3 Core Core i7 işlemciler, isteğe bağlı GeForce Super Max-Q GPU'lar, daha fazla ekran seçeneği ve daha uzun bir Shift tuşu ile 17.3 inç Blade Pro 17 serilerini 2020 için yeniledi. Buradaki birimimiz, geçen yılki modelde "sadece" 240 Hz yerine 300 Hz ekran için dikkat çeken en son modelin en ucuz yapılandırmasıdır. 2020 Blade Pro 17, işlemci, ekran ve hafif klavye farklılıklarından başka aslında 2019 Blade Pro 17 ile aynı özellikler ve tasarım. Bu nedenle, dizüstü bilgisayarın şasi, bağlantı noktaları ve diğer fiziksel özellikleri hakkında daha fazla bilgi edinmek için 2019 modelindeki mevcut incelememize göz atmanızı öneririz. MSI GS75, Asus Zephyrus S GX701, Dell Alienware m17 R2 veya Eluktronics RP-17 gibi diğer yüksek kaliteli ultra ince 17,3 inç oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarını içerir: Daha fazla Razer yorumu: Blade Pro 17 4K UHDBlade 15 Studio EditionBlade StealthRazer Phone 2

The 2020 Blade Pro 17 series (Image source: Razer)

Test device courtesy of Razerzone.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Blade Pro 17 Seri)

İşlemci

Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H

Grafik kartı

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Çekirdek: 1420 MHz, Bellek: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 442.53, Manual

Bellek

16 GB

, Samsung DDR4-3200, 21-21-21-47, Dual-Channel, 2x SODIMM

Görüntü

17.30 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, SHP14D8, parlak: hayır, 300 Hz

Anakart

Intel HM470

Harddisk

Lite-On CA5-8D512, 512 GB

Ses kartı

Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller

Bağlantılar

5 USB 3.0, 5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 5 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm combo, Kart okuyucular: SD reader (UHS-III)

Network

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 19.9 x 395 x 260

Batarya

70 Wh Lithium-Polymer

İşletim sistemi

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: Stereo, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, Razer Synapse, 12 Ay Garanti

Ağırlık

2.718 kg, Güç kaynağı: 784 g

Fiyat

2600 USD

Bağlantılar

Razer anasayfa

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.7 kg	19.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
81.2 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2.7 kg	18.7 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
82.9 % v7 ^(old)	07/2019	MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2.3 kg	18.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
84.2 % v7 ^(old)		Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2.6 kg	20.5 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.5 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Aorus 17G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.7 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Durum

Aorus 17G XB Alienware m17 R2 P41E Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG DIN A4 ❌

SD Kart Okuyucu

One of the few laptops to integrate a UHS-III SD card reader

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 17G XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	212 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	208.5 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	198.5 MB/s -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	181.3 MB/s -13%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	181 MB/s -13%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 17G XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	247 MB/s +19%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	208.3 MB/s
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	204 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	198 MB/s -5%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	197.9 MB/s -5%

İletişim

Intel AX201, Bluetooth 5.1 ve Wi-Fi 6 bağlantısı için standarttır. Netgear RAX200 test yönlendiricimize bağlandığında herhangi bir sorunla karşılaşmadık.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1283 (1089^min - 1413^max) MBit/s
Aorus 17G XB Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1260 MBit/s -2%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	880 MBit/s -31%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	623 (577^min - 656^max) MBit/s -51%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	496 (459^min - 531^max) MBit/s -61%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1520 MBit/s +29%
Aorus 17G XB Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1260 MBit/s +7%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1182 (1085^min - 1338^max) MBit/s
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	638 (625^min - 645^max) MBit/s -46%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	634 (621^min - 646^max) MBit/s -46%

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1182 (1085-1338)

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1283 (1089-1413)

Web kamerası

ColorChecker Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz: 8.71 ∆E min: 1.66 - max: 21.72 ∆E

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz

Bakım

Easy access to RAM and storage with a T5 Torx screwdriver

Giriş cihazları

Keyboard feedback remains identical to the 2019 model. Secondary symbols may not be lit depending on region

Shift key is now longer at the expense of smaller Up and Down arrow keys

Görüntüle

Yeni 1080p 300 Hz ekran, 2020 Blade Pro 17'yi önceki sürümlerden ayıran ayırt edici bir faktördür. Dizüstü bilgisayar, Blade 15 veya Gigabyte Aero 17'de "sadece" 240 Hz ile karşılaştırıldığında Sharp LQ173M1JW02 IPS paneliyle gelen ilk veritabanımızdır. Geçen yılın 4K UHD 120 Hz panelini tercih eden kullanıcılar bunun yerine 2020'de hala bu seçeneğe sahipler 1080p300 panel, belirgin çözünürlük ve yenileme hızı farklılıkları dışında yukarıda belirtilen parlak 4K120 panel ile karşılaştırıldığında bazı avantajlara ve dezavantajlara sahiptir. Parlaklık aralarında neredeyse aynı olmasına rağmen, 4K panel, daha derin ve daha doğru renkler için 300 Hz panelimizden daha geniş bir renk kapsamı ile biraz daha yüksek bir kontrast oranı sunar. Buna karşılık, 300 Hz panel gölgelenmeyi sınırlamak için daha hızlı siyah-beyaz ve gri-gri tepki sürelerine sahiptir. Söylemeye gerek yok, görsel deneyim günlük iş yüklerinde 240 Hz'den daha iyi hissetmese de 300 Hz yenileme hızı ipeksi bir pürüzsüzlük hissi veriyor.

Once you become accustomed to 120 Hz or faster monitors, it's hard going back to 60 Hz

Side bezels are much narrower than the top and bottom bezels

Minor uneven backlight bleeding along the corners and bottom edge

Matte panel exhibits very little graininess, but it's still not going to be as crisp as the glossy 4K option


368.4 cd/m²	356.9 cd/m²	367 cd/m²
323.2 cd/m²	328 cd/m²	332 cd/m²
287.1 cd/m²	293.1 cd/m²	308.3 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

Sharp LQ173M1JW02 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 368.4 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 329.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.4 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 78 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 328 cd/m²
Kontrast: 937:1 (Siyah: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.12
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download ICC Dosyası (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Alienware m17 R2 P41E Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Aorus 17G XB AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160
Display		-2%	-10%	-1%	-1%	18%
Display P3 Coverage	72.2	70 -3%	62.6 -13%	70.8 -2%	70.6 -2%	84.8 17%
sRGB Coverage	98.5	96.6 -2%	93.5 -5%	98.5 0%	97.2 -1%	99.9 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	73	72.3 -1%	64.7 -11%	72.2 -1%	72.8 0%	98.6 35%
Response Times		11%	-17%	-110%	-106%	-90%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	5.6 ?(2.6, 3)	5.6 ?(2.4, 3.2) -0%	7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4) -29%	17.2 ?(8.8, 8.4) -207%	16 ?(7.6, 8.4) -186%	15.2 ?(8.4, 6.8) -171%
Response Time Black / White *	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)	7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2) 21%	10 ?(5.2, 4.8) -4%	10.8 ?(6, 4.8) -13%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -25%	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2) -8%
PWM Frequency			25510 ?(17)	26320 ?(25)
Screen		23%	31%	32%	31%	3%
Brightness middle	328	288 -12%	366 12%	384.2 17%	293 -11%	346.7 6%
Brightness	329	276 -16%	343 4%	357 9%	285 -13%	332 1%
Brightness Distribution	78	93 19%	91 17%	90 15%	95 22%	91 17%
Black Level *	0.35	0.24 31%	0.29 17%	0.29 17%	0.24 31%	0.27 23%
Contrast	937	1200 28%	1262 35%	1325 41%	1221 30%	1284 37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.74	1.92 59%	1.51 68%	1.35 72%	1.27 73%	5.62 -19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.99	4.57 49%	3.22 64%	3.45 62%	2.24 75%	9.36 -4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.12	1.14 46%	0.71 67%	1.42 33%	1.06 50%	3.81 -80%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.8	3.08 55%	1.93 72%	1.2 82%	1.34 80%	5.5 19%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.42 ^91%	2.38 ^92%	2.23 ^99%	2.38 ^92%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6446 ^101%	7055 ^92%	6881 ^94%	6580 ^99%	6542 ^99%	6175 ^105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	64.8	65 0%	60 -7%	65.5 1%	73 13%	87.2 35%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	98.6	96 -3%	94 -5%	98.5 0%	94 -5%	100 1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		11% / 17%	1% / 18%	-26% / 8%	-25% / 8%	-23% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

Renk alanı 4K UHD 120 Hz seçeneğinden daha dardır. Kullanıcılar 4K alternatifinde tam AdobeRGB yerine tam sRGB kapsamı bekleyebilirler. Bunun şu anda piyasada tam AdobeRGB kapsamı olan 15.6 inç 300 Hz paneller bulunmadığından şüpheleniyoruz.

Ekran kutudan daha iyi kalibre edilmiş olabilir. Renk sıcaklığı biraz fazla sıcaktır ve bunun gibi amiral gemisi bir dizüstü bilgisayar için ortalama 6.8 gri tonlamalı DeltaE nispeten yüksektir. Paneli kendimiz kalibre etmek, daha doğru bir ekran için sorunları giderir.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.6 ms rise
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Dış mekan görünürlüğü, 2019 modelinden veya bu konudaki diğer oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarından çok daha iyi veya daha kötü değildir. ~ 300 nit ekran, mat katmana bakılmaksızın böyle parlak ortam aydınlatmasının üstesinden gelecek şekilde tasarlanmamıştır.

Verim

Tüm 2020 seçenekleri, geçen yılki 9. nesil altıgen çekirdekli Core i7-9750H'yi başarmak için 10. nesil sekiz çekirdekli Core i7-10875H ile standart olarak geliyor. Diğer oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarının aksine Razer, hexa-core Core i7-10750H'yi sunmaz. Core i9 da burada mevcut değil, ancak bu ince ve hafif oyun dizüstü bilgisayarları için MSI GS66'da gördüklerimize dayanarak önerebileceğimiz bir şey değil.RAM DDR4-2667'den DDR4-2933'e yükseltildi . İki erişilebilir SODIMM yuvası 64 GB'a kadar izin verir.Nvidia Optimus dahil değildir, ancak kullanıcılar Razer Synapse yazılımı aracılığıyla entegre ve ayrık GPU'lar arasında manuel olarak geçiş yapabilir. Her seferinde yeniden başlatma gerekecektir. Manuel grafik geçişi genellikle G-Sync desteği anlamına gelir, ancak burada mevcut değildir. Rahatsız edici bir şekilde, sistemi kablosuz devre dışı bırakıldığında Razer Synapse her zaman giriş ekranında sıkışacaktır. Kablosuz ekranını yeniden etkinleştirmeniz ve ardından giriş ekranını geçmek için Synapse'i tamamen yeniden başlatmanız gerekir.

Synapse window for controlling fans, power profile, display refresh rate, and graphics switching

İşlemci

CPU performansı, veritabanımızdaki ortalama Core i7-10875H işlemciden biraz daha yavaştır. Yine de, ham çok iş parçacıklı performans, Core i7-9750H ile geçen yılki Blade Pro 17'ye göre yaklaşık yüzde 45 daha hızlı. Bu elbette yüzde 45 daha hızlı kare hızlarına dönüşmeyecek, ancak içerik oluşturucular neredeyse kesinlikle ek çekirdeklerden daha fazla faydalanacak. AMD'nin bugüne kadar etkileyici Ryzen serisi ile Intel'e çok fazla baskı yaptığı için Razer'ın Ryzen 7 4800H seçenekleri sunmaması çok kötü. CineBench R15 Multi-Thread'ı bir döngüde çalıştırırken, 1494'ün ilk yüksek puanı yaklaşık yüzde 9'luk bir performans düşüşünü temsil etmek için ikinci döngü 1360 puana iner. Daha fazla teknik bilgi ve karşılaştırma karşılaştırmaları için Core i7-10875H'deki özel sayfamıza bakın.

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1362 (1352.68-1494.38)

Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1773 (1724.58-1815.79)

Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)

Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1572 (1548.11-1671.4)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	4288 Points +27%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	4136 Points +23%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4132 Points +23%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	3843 Points +14%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	3712 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1986 - 4176, n=32)	3455 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	3367 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	3224 Points -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	2888 Points -14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Intel Core i7-9750H	2328 Points -31%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	1906 Points -43%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	495 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (430 - 524, n=32)	486 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	483 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	478 Points -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	478 Points -1%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	477 Points -1%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	476 Points -1%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	441 Points -9%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	437 Points -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Intel Core i7-9750H	431 Points -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	428 Points -11%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	1863 Points +20%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1816 (1724.58^min - 1815.79^max) Points +17%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	1754 Points +13%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	1721 Points +11%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1708 (1581.15^min - 1708.45^max) Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1003 - 1833, n=38)	1554 Points 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	1549 (1352.68^min - 1494.38^max) Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	1398 (1313.46^min - 1397.77^max) Points -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	1308 Points -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Intel Core i7-9750H	1094 Points -29%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	839 (755.39^min - 839.42^max) Points -46%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	206 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (190 - 220, n=37)	204 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	200 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	195.8 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	195 Points -2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	193 Points -3%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	189 Points -5%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	189 Points -5%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	180 Points -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	178 Points -11%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Intel Core i7-9750H	175 Points -12%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	555 Seconds * -71%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	379.1 Seconds * -17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	345 Seconds * -6%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (259 - 535, n=30)	327 Seconds * -1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	324 Seconds *
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	297 Seconds * +8%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	293 Seconds * +10%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	278 Seconds * +14%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	271 Seconds * +16%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	5463 MIPS +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5071 - 5780, n=31)	5360 MIPS +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	5245 MIPS
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	5086 MIPS -3%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	4924 MIPS -6%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4717 MIPS -10%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	4662 MIPS -11%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	4634 MIPS -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	4471 MIPS -15%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	48837 MIPS +45%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	48577 MIPS +44%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	46976 MIPS +40%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	46591 MIPS +38%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (29844 - 49562, n=31)	43117 MIPS +28%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	36693 MIPS +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	33674 MIPS
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	32386 MIPS -4%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	22139 MIPS -34%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1352 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1233 - 1371, n=29)	1304 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	1278 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	1227 Points -4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	1218 Points -5%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1189 Points -7%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	1143 Points -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	1108 Points -13%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	8104 Points +8%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	7782 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5715 - 8620, n=29)	7734 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	7675 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	7531 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	6317 Points -16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	5260 Points -30%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	4032 Points -46%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	13 fps
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	12.2 fps
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	12.19 fps
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	11.86 fps
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (7.27 - 14.1, n=27)	11.7 fps
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	9.41 fps
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	9.27 fps
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	6.34 fps

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	64.1 s * -11%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	61.4 s * -6%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	58.9 s * -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	57.8 s *
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	53.4 s * +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (30.2 - 84.3, n=30)	50.3 s * +13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	50.2 s * +13%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	0.676 sec *
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	0.626 sec *
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	0.626 sec *
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.596 sec *
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (0.546 - 0.662, n=29)	0.582 sec *
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.564 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1549 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

166 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

200 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

3367 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

483 Points

Yardım

... kıyaslama

Sistem performansı

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	6571 Points +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	6290 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6202 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6049 Points -4%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	5804 Points -8%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	5502 Points -13%
Essentials
Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	10239 Points +4%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	9933 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9927 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	9831 Points
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	9501 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9405 Points -4%
Productivity
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	8253 Points +3%
Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	8237 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	8028 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7654 Points -5%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	7622 Points -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7357 Points -8%
Digital Content Creation
Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	9128 Points +7%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8862 Points +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	8560 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8344 Points -3%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	7330 Points -14%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	5514 Points -36%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5319 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	5217 Points
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	4461 Points -14%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	4384 Points -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4255 Points -18%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6593 Points +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	6317 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	5818 Points -8%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	5716 Points -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4755 Points -25%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5217 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6317 puan
PCMark 10 Score		6290 puan
Yardım

DPC Gecikmesi

LatencyMon, ana sayfamızda birden çok sekme açarken DPC gecikme sorunlarını gösterir, ancak gecikme Asus veya MSI'dan diğer bazı oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarında kaydettiğimiz kadar kötü değildir. YouTube'da 4K video oynatımı, atlanan kareler olmadan düzgün kalır.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	8852 μs * -759%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	2952 μs * -187%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	2841 μs * -176%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	1030 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Depolama aygıtları

Hemen hemen tüm Razer dizüstü bilgisayarlar bir Samsung veya Lite-On SSD ile birlikte gelir, ancak ikisinden hangisini alabileceğinizi bilmek zordur. Özel ünitemiz, Samsung SSD PM981a'dan genellikle daha yavaş performans için 512 GB Lite-On CA5-8D512 NVMe sürücüyle donatılmıştır. Bununla birlikte, çok sayıda küçük dosyayla çalışan bir içerik oluşturucu değilseniz, muhtemelen farkı fark etmeyeceksiniz.

Empty secondary M.2 2280 bay for expansion

	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Lite-On CA5-8D512	MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	Alienware m17 R2 P41E 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	Aorus 17G XB Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
AS SSD		41%	26%	68%	54%
Seq Read	2019	2855 41%	1938 -4%	1791 -11%	1881 -7%
Seq Write	1314	2687 104%	2094 59%	2193 67%	2354 79%
4K Read	46.61	30.31 -35%	25.88 -44%	50.7 9%	43.42 -7%
4K Write	90.2	96.3 7%	100.8 12%	116.8 29%	104.1 15%
4K-64 Read	665	1460 120%	1217 83%	1525 129%	1805 171%
4K-64 Write	813	1224 51%	1137 40%	1958 141%	1775 118%
Access Time Read *	0.058	0.054 7%	0.051 12%	0.07 -21%	0.049 16%
Access Time Write *	0.167	0.038 77%	0.107 36%	0.032 81%	0.106 37%
Score Read	913	1776 95%	1437 57%	1755 92%	2037 123%
Score Write	1034	1589 54%	1447 40%	2294 122%	2115 105%
Score Total	2392	4259 78%	3624 52%	4972 108%	5215 118%
Copy ISO MB/s	1715	2226 30%	1926 12%		1877 9%
Copy Program MB/s	622	426.4 -31%	626 1%		539 -13%
Copy Game MB/s	1506	1152 -24%	1533 2%		1368 -9%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		4%	-3%	5%	-10%
Write 4K	119	95.5 -20%	110.6 -7%	123.4 4%	121.7 2%
Read 4K	51.9	42.59 -18%	41.46 -20%	45.02 -13%	43.81 -16%
Write Seq	2258	2851 26%	2378 5%	2526 12%	1276 -43%
Read Seq	2283	2696 18%	2114 -7%	2062 -10%	1183 -48%
Write 4K Q32T1	491	402.6 -18%	445.4 -9%	497.9 1%	527 7%
Read 4K Q32T1	540	443.9 -18%	509 -6%	579 7%	592 10%
Write Seq Q32T1	2253	3420 52%	2735 21%	2982 32%	2379 6%
Read Seq Q32T1	3172	3514 11%	3206 1%	3440 8%	3213 1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		23% / 28%	12% / 15%	37% / 41%	22% / 31%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Lite-On CA5-8D512

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3172 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2253 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 540 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 491 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2283 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2258 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU Performansı

Geçmişte, eski Max-Q ve daha yeni Super Max-Q GeForce GPU'lar arasındaki performans farklarının o kadar dar olabileceğini, eski Max-Q GPU'larına sahip bazı dizüstü bilgisayarların bazen daha yeni Super Max-Q muadillerinden daha iyi performans gösterebileceğini kaydettik. Bu durumda, Razer'ımızdaki RTX 2070 Max-Q, Aorus 17G'deki yeni RTX 2070 Süper Max-Q'yu ve hatta MSI GS66'daki RTX 2080 Süper Max-Q'yu sürekli olarak geride bırakabilir. Razer bir RTX 2080 Super Max-Q seçeneği de sunuyor, ancak RTX 2070 Max-Q ile "yerleşmeye" karar verirseniz çok fazla kaybolacağınızı düşünmeyin. GeForce RTX 2070 Max'deki özel sayfamıza bakın. -Q daha teknik bilgi ve oyun kriterleri için.

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	25497 Points +20%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	23032 Points +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	21191 Points
Aorus 17G XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	21004 Points -1%
MSI GS66 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	20117 Points -5%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	19338 Points -9%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	19230 Points -9%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	18807 Points -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (11563 - 21191, n=31)	17489 Points -17%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	14753 Points -30%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	12038 Points -43%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H	9621 Points -55%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	9854 Points +22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	8844 Points +10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	8065 Points
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	7732 Points -4%
MSI GS66 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	7618 Points -6%
Aorus 17G XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	7358 Points -9%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	7294 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (5948 - 8065, n=28)	6745 Points -16%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	6312 Points -22%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5335 Points -34%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	3749 Points -54%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H	3461 Points -57%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	10012 Points +22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	8460 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	8236 Points
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	7878 Points -4%
Aorus 17G XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	7633 Points -7%
MSI GS66 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	7475 Points -9%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	7261 Points -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (5989 - 8236, n=28)	6746 Points -18%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	6610 Points -20%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5406 Points -34%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	3751 Points -54%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H	3554 Points -57%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	34846 Points +26%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	30910 Points +12%
Aorus 17G XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	27955 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	27694 Points
MSI GS66 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	26855 Points -3%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	26413 Points -5%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	25706 Points -7%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	24465 Points -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (14723 - 27694, n=31)	22548 Points -19%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	19329 Points -30%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	15145 Points -45%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H	13168 Points -52%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	18934 Points +22%
Aorus 17G XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	16266 Points +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	15564 Points
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	13742 Points -12%
MSI GS66 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	13592 Points -13%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	13126 Points -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (9107 - 17603, n=30)	12665 Points -19%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	12170 Points -22%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	11416 Points -27%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	10270 Points -34%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H	8969 Points -42%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7358 Points -53%

3DMark 11 Performance		23306 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		48701 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score		18543 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score		8236 puan
Yardım

... kıyaslama

The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Aorus 17 YA Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	95.4 (80^min) fps +18%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	85.1 (71^min) fps +5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	81 (72^min - 91^max) fps 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	80.9 (75^min - 90^max) fps
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	74.3 fps -8%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	73.6 (62^min) fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (56 - 83.8, n=31)	66.3 fps -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	63 fps -22%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	55.6 (53^min - 60^max) fps -31%
EVGA SC15 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	39.6 fps -51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	37.4 fps -54%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	161 (133^min) fps +6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	151.4 (144^min - 166^max) fps
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	145 (127^min - 163^max) fps -4%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	142.7 fps -6%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	142 (118^min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (86.5 - 151.4, n=22)	121 fps -20%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	108.9 fps -28%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	103 (98^min - 108^max) fps -32%
EVGA SC15 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	66 fps -56%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	66 fps -56%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Aorus 17 YA Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	133.8 (117.2^min) fps +6%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	129 (112.4^min) fps +2%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	126 (109.6^min) fps 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	126 (108.2^min) fps
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	119.6 (103.2^min) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (105.8 - 126, n=13)	119.2 fps -5%
EVGA SC15 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	117.9 fps -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	116.8 (99^min) fps -7%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	116 (101.2^min) fps -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	107.5 (90.7^min) fps -15%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	104 (91^min) fps -17%

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512: Ø150.6 (141-160)

	düşük	orta	yüksek	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	355.6	254.3	151.4	80.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	143	138	135	126
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	112	101	85.3

Emissions

System Noise

Fan noise and behavior are essentially the same as last year's model since the vapor chamber remains untouched. Fan noise is quiet at just 30.5 dB(A) if only browsing or video streaming on the Balanced profile. Meanwhile, gaming on High Performance mode can be as loud as 45 dB(A) to 53 dB(A) depending on CPU and GPU utilization. The Razer doesn't run all that much quieter or louder than its competitors despite its unique cooling solution.

Expect a fan noise of around 50 dB(A) when gaming

Twin 35 - 40 mm fans directly underneath the clickpad

	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Noise		-3%	-6%	-3%	-12%	1%
off / environment *	28.2	30 -6%	30 -6%	29.1 -3%	30 -6%	28.2 -0%
Idle Minimum *	28.2	32 -13%	31 -10%	29.4 -4%	35 -24%	28.2 -0%
Idle Average *	28.2	33 -17%	32 -13%	29.4 -4%	36 -28%	28.2 -0%
Idle Maximum *	30.5	34 -11%	38 -25%	31.5 -3%	41 -34%	30.8 -1%
Load Average *	42.2	40 5%	47 -11%	49.7 -18%	47 -11%	42 -0%
Witcher 3 ultra *	53	49 8%	48 9%	49.5 7%	48 9%	51 4%
Load Maximum *	55.5	50 10%	49 12%	53.3 4%	49 12%	53 5%

* ... smaller is better

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta		28.2 / 28.2 / 30.5 dB
Çalışırken		42.2 / 55.5 dB

	30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)

Temperature

Surface temperatures are warm even when idling on desktop despite having four fans inside. The system is automatically set to run as quietly as possible when there is not much onscreen activity meaning that surface temperatures will be warmer than expected. Thankfully, it's not too warm to be uncomfortable when simply browsing or playing videos. It's possible to turn the fans on high manually during undemanding loads for cooler surface temperatures if desired.

When gaming, hot spots can become as warm as 45 C on both the top and bottom of the laptop. These areas are toward the rear of the chassis away from the palm rests and WASD keys. Interestingly, the larger form factor of the Blade Pro 17 doesn't mean that its hot spots are cooler than on the smaller Blade 15. Rather, its WASD keys and palm rests can be kept cooler instead since these areas are naturally further away from the processors.

Keep in mind that the AC adapter for the Blade series can run much hotter than most other AC adapters when gaming.

AC adapter after running Witcher 3 for over an hour

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


38.4 °C	40.8 °C	34.8 °C
34.2 °C	36 °C	30.8 °C
32.2 °C	26.8 °C	30.4 °C

Maksimum: 40.8 °C
Ortalama: 33.8 °C


40.4 °C	48.4 °C	42.2 °C
35.6 °C	43 °C	39 °C
33 °C	36.6 °C	34.8 °C

Maksimum: 48.4 °C
Ortalama: 39.2 °C

Güç kaynağı 62 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


34 °C	36.8 °C	35.2 °C
33.6 °C	34.6 °C	31.4 °C
33.2 °C	29.8 °C	31.4 °C

Maksimum: 36.8 °C
Ortalama: 33.3 °C


37.4 °C	41.2 °C	38.4 °C
33.6 °C	39.2 °C	37.6 °C
32 °C	38 °C	34.2 °C

Maksimum: 41.2 °C
Ortalama: 36.8 °C

Oda sıcaklığı 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


40.4 °C	44.2 °C	38 °C
33 °C	38.6 °C	31.6 °C
33 °C	28 °C	31.6 °C

Maksimum: 44.2 °C
Ortalama: 35.4 °C


45.6 °C	51.4 °C	45.2 °C
36.4 °C	46 °C	39.6 °C
34.2 °C	39.4 °C	35.4 °C

Maksimum: 51.4 °C
Ortalama: 41.5 °C

Güç kaynağı 65 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 22.8 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.2 °C / 91.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.3 °C / -7.8 F).

Stress Test

When running Prime95, clock rates would boost to 3.8 to 4 GHz for about 20 seconds until hitting a core temperature of 75 C. Afterwards, clock rates would drop to 3.2 GHz in order to maintain a cooler core temperature of 66 C.

Both CPU and GPU temperatures stabilize at only 70 C each when running Witcher 3 to be close to what we recorded on last year's Blade Pro 17 with RTX 2080 Max-Q graphics.

Running on batteries will limit performance. A Fire Strike run on battery power returns Physics and Graphics scores of 10831 and 10128 points, respectively, compared to 20414 and 21191 points when on mains.

	CPU Clock (GHz)	GPU Clock (MHz)	Average CPU Temperature (°C)	Average GPU Temperature (°C)
System Idle	--	--	47	44
Prime95 Stress	3.2 - 3.3	--	66	51
Prime95 + FurMark Stress	3.4 - 3.5	1140	80	67
Witcher 3 Stress	2.6 - 2.7	1635	71	70

Speakers

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Idling on desktop will consume about 21.7 W when the integrated GPU is active or 38 W when the Nvidia GPU is active. Thus, it's worth manually switching to the iGPU if battery conservation is important.

Power consumption when running Witcher 3 is lower than what we recorded on last year's Blade Pro 17 with the more demanding 4K UHD display, but it's otherwise in line with other GeForce RTX-powered 17.3-inch gaming laptops. We're able to measure a maximum draw of 219.9 W from the relatively compact (~17 x 7 x 2.5 cm) 230 W AC adapter.

Steady consumption when running the first benchmark scene of 3DMark 06

Steady consumption when idling on Witcher 3

Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Note the spike to 150.7 W for approximately 30 seconds of high Turbo Boost before falling and stabilizing at 113 W

Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. The system spikes to 219.9 W and it's able to maintain the very high draw over long periods

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.44 / 0.85 Watt
Boşta	19.6 / 21.7 / 36.1 Watt
Çalışırken	115.6 / 219.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Lite-On CA5-8D512, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Aorus 17G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Power Consumption		-14%	16%	-39%	-3%	-32%
Idle Minimum *	19.6	32 -63%	13 34%	24.7 -26%	20 -2%	34.2 -74%
Idle Average *	21.7	34 -57%	17 22%	35.9 -65%	23 -6%	37.2 -71%
Idle Maximum *	36.1	36 -0%	25 31%	69.6 -93%	38 -5%	50 -39%
Load Average *	115.6	95 18%	96 17%	141.8 -23%	105 9%	106.1 8%
Witcher 3 ultra *	157	155 1%	156 1%	185.8 -18%	158 -1%	178.7 -14%
Load Maximum *	219.9	187 15%	239 -9%	235.4 -7%	243 -11%	223.6 -2%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Same AC adapter as on the 2019 Blade Pro 17

Runtimes are still average at just under 5 hours of real-world WLAN use when set to the Balanced profile with the integrated GPU active. Gaming laptops with larger batteries like the Aorus 17G or MSI GS66 are able to last for much longer.

The system can be recharged via a USB Type-C cable of at least 20 V much like on the Asus Zephyrus G14. Such a feature was not available on previous generation Blade models. Of course, charging this way will be much slower and gaming performance will be impacted.

Batarya ömrü


WiFi Websurfing		4h 56min

	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh	MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh	Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh	Aorus 17G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh	Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Battery Runtime		-39%	21%	-2%	52%	-25%
WiFi v1.3	296	182 -39%	357 21%	290 -2%	450 52%	223 -25%
Reader / Idle		246	461	426	598
Load		69	74	31	134

Artılar

+ etkileyici GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q performansı

+ 2019 modeliyle aynı şık şasi tasarımı

+ erişilebilir 2x M.2 2280 ve 2x SODIMM

+ son derece hızlı 300 Hz yenileme hızı

+ entegre UHs-III SD kart okuyucu

+ manuel grafik değiştirme

+ tam sRGB kapsamı

+ daha uzun Shift tuşu

+ büyük tıklama alanı

+ IR kamera

Eksiler

- 4K seçeneğine göre daha dar gamut ve daha düşük kontrast oranı

- bölgeye bağlı olarak ikincil anahtar sembolleri yanmayabilir

- AC adaptörü hala yük altında süper sıcak çalışıyor

- klavye tuşları daha sıkı ve derin olabilir

- parmak izi okuyucusu veya web kamerası deklanşörü yok

- daha küçük Yukarı / Aşağı ok tuşları

- oyun oynarken yüksek hayranlar

- Optimus veya G-Sync yok

- yumuşak clickpad tuşları

Verdict

In review: Razer Blade Pro 17 RZ09-03297E42. Test unit provided by Razer

Much like how the 2020 Blade 15 is just a relatively minor update to the 2019 Blade 15, the 2020 Blade Pro 17 is another minor update to the 2019 Blade Pro 17. The new 8-core CPU, Super Max-Q GPUs, and 300 Hz display are the main reasons to own a 2020 model over the 2019 model which comes with a 6-core CPU, Max-Q GPU, and 240 Hz display instead. The internal updates improve the gaming experience only marginally meaning that users won't be missing much by opting for last year's model. Keep in mind that you don't have to reach 300 FPS when gaming to exploit a 300 Hz monitor.

The more surprising aspect of the Blade Pro 17 isn't the 10th gen Core CPU or 300 Hz display, but it's how fast the system can run the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q GPU. 3DMark results are about 20 percent faster than the average GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q in our database. Thus, the RTX 2070 Max-Q in the Blade Pro 17 is able to offer faster graphics performance than even the newer RTX 2070 Super Max-Q or RTX 2080 Super Max-Q on some other gaming laptops. If you're going with this 2020 Blade Pro 17 model, then you can at least rest easy knowing that it is one of the fastest options out there with the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q GPU.

The 300 Hz refresh rate is a luxury that only the most hardcore gamers will really want. For everyone else, even 240 Hz will be more than enough. The 2019 Blade Pro series appeals better to wider audiences for this reason especially since the pricier 2020 version doesn't offer that much of a performance advantage year-over-year.

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz - 06/27/2020 v7 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

İşcilik

94 / 98 → 95%

Klavye

82%

Mouse

92%

Bağlanılabilirlik

71 / 80 → 88%

Ağırlık

58 / 10-66 → 86%

Batarya

63 / 95 → 66%

Görüntü

82%

Oyun performansı

97%

Uygulama performansı

93%

Isınma

85 / 95 → 89%

Ses

78 / 90 → 86%

Audio

80%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Ortalama

78%

87%

Gaming - Ortalama Ağırlık

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5249 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Translator: Aslinur Sarica - Translator - 155 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > 2020 Razer Blade Pro 17 incelemesi: 300Hz bir laptopa gerçekten ihtiyacınız var mı?

Allen Ngo, 2020-06-29 (Update: 2020-06-29)

Durum

SD Kart Okuyucu

İletişim

Web kamerası

Bakım

Giriş cihazları

Görüntüle

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Verim

İşlemci

Sistem performansı

DPC Gecikmesi

Depolama aygıtları

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPU Performansı

Emissions

System Noise

Temperature

Stress Test

Speakers

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Battery Life

Artılar

Eksiler

Verdict

More articles related to this device

Price comparison