Aorus 15P WB incelemede: Kompakt oyun güç merkezi çok iyi pil ömrü sunuyor

Name: Aorus 15P WB
Brand: Aorus

Successful.

Aorus 15P WB, tüm modern bilgisayar oyunlarını ekrana sorunsuz bir şekilde getirir (Full HD, IPS, 144 Hz). Ek olarak, bir NVMe SSD, 16 GB RAM (çift kanal modu) ve birçok ofis dizüstü bilgisayarının erişemediği pil çalışma süreleri vardır.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (Çeviren Aslinur Sarica), Published 02/06/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Comet Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

Aorus 15P WB, 15,6 inç formatında ince, kompakt bir dizüstü oyun bilgisayarıdır. Cihaz kesinlikle önceden gözden geçirilmiş Aorus 15G XB'nin sulandırılmış, daha düşük fiyatlı bir versiyonu olarak düşünülebilir. Bize sağlanan test modelinde bir Core i7-10750H işlemci ve bir GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q grafik çekirdeği bulunuyor. Rakipler arasında Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52, Dell G5 15 SE 5505 ve Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW gibi cihazlar yer alıyor.

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Aorus 15P WB (15P Seri)

İşlemci

Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, Comet Lake-H

Grafik kartı

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Çekirdek: 1125 MHz, Bellek: 1375 MHz, 90 W TDP, GDDR6, 27.21.14.6089 (Nvidia 460.89), Optimus

Bellek

16 GB

, DDR4-2666, dual-channel mode, two memory slots, both in use

Görüntü

15.60 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE HF NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, parlak: hayır, 144 Hz

Anakart

Intel HM470

Harddisk

ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT), 512 GB

, 2 M.2 2280 slots (1x NVMe/SATA, 1x NVMe), 408 GB Boş

Ses kartı

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Comet Point-LP PCH - cAVS

Bağlantılar

4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ses çıkışları: combined headset port, Kart okuyucular: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0

Network

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 23 x 357 x 244

Batarya

94.24 Wh, 6200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 15.2 V

İşletim sistemi

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: stereo, Klavye: chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, thermalpad, MS Office 365 (trial), 24 Ay Garanti

Ağırlık

2.07 kg, Güç kaynağı: 722 g

Fiyat

1 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.5 % v7 ^(old)	02/2021	Aorus 15P WB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.1 kg	23 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.1 % v7 ^(old)		Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.1 kg	19.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.4 % v7 ^(old)	02/2021	Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	2.3 kg	25.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.7 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M	2.4 kg	21.6 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Kasa - 15P için plastik bir kasa

15P, Aorus 15G XB ile oldukça güçlü benzerliğini gizleyemez, ancak iki cihaz yapım açısından aynı değildir. 15G'nin kasası metalden yapılırken, Gigabyte 15P için gümüş gri plastik kullanıyor. Cihazlar, çekiciliğine katkıda bulunan çok dar ekran çerçevesine sahip. Avuç içi dayanağı ve kapağın arkası pürüzsüz yüzeylere sahiptir. Dizüstü bilgisayarın bakım kapağı yok. Dahası, pil sağlam bir şekilde yerleştirilmiş. Dizüstü bilgisayar çoğunlukla iyi üretildiğini kanıtlıyor. Kapağın alt köşeleri ve taban ünitesinin arka tarafında bulunan iki "boynuzun" arka köşeleri eleştiriyi hak ediyor. Bunlar çok keskindir. Burada kesinlikle yaralanma riski vardır. Dahası, kasa genel olarak daha büyük bir sertliğe sahip olmalıdır. Menteşeler, kapağı sıkıca yerinde tutuyor, ancak biraz sallanmasına izin veriyorlar. Kapağı tek elle açmak mümkündür. Maksimum diyafram açısı yaklaşık 135 derecedir.

Karşılaştırma alanımızda, Aorus 15P, Acer Predator Triton 300 ile birlikte en kompakt ve en hafif cihazı temsil ediyor.

Boyut karşılaştırması

Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Aorus 15P WB DIN A4 ❌

Bağlantı - Dahili Thunderbolt yok

15,6 inçlik çok yönlü bir arayüz yelpazesi sağlar. Dört USB bağlantı noktası (3x Tip-A, 1x Tip-C) USB 3.2 Gen 1 standardına göre çalışır. Ek olarak, iki video çıkışı (HDMI 2.0, Mini DisplayPort 1.4), birleşik ses bağlantı noktası ve bir Gigabit Ethernet bağlantı noktası vardır. Dizüstü bilgisayar Thunderbolt sunmuyor.

Left side: HDMI, Mini DisplayPort, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), combo audio, Gigabit Ethernet

Right side: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-C), memory card reader (SD), power supply

SD kart okuyucu

SD bellek kartı okuyucusu (referans kartı: Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) maksimum 208 MB / sn (her biri 5 MB 250 jpg görüntü dosyası aktaran) ve 243 MB / sn ( büyük veri bloklarının kopyalanması). Hafıza kartlarını tam olarak barındırmaz; iyi bir 14 mm çıkıntı yaparlar.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 15P WB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	208 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s -54%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	36.6 MB/s -82%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 15P WB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	243 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)	120 MB/s -51%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	37.9 MB/s -84%

İletişim

WLAN yongası (Intel AX200), 802.11a / b / g / n / ac / ax standartlarını destekler ve Bluetooth 5 işlevselliği sunar. Optimum koşullar altında belirlenen veri hızları (yakınlarda başka WLAN cihazları yok, dizüstü bilgisayar ve sunucu PC arasında kısa mesafe) çok iyidir. Kablolu ağ bağlantıları, Realtek'in RTL8168 / 8111 ailesinden bir Gigabit Ethernet denetleyicisi tarafından yönetilir. Görevlerini sorunsuz yerine getirir.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1385 (1268^min - 1486^max) MBit/s +24%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1220 MBit/s +9%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1120 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (447 - 1645, n=127)	1104 MBit/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	790 (647^min - 869^max) MBit/s -29%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1470 (1297^min - 1511^max) MBit/s +14%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1380 MBit/s +7%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1290 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (523 - 1684, n=128)	1191 MBit/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1152 (586^min - 1283^max) MBit/s -11%

Web kamerası

Web kamerası (0,9 MP), maksimum 1280x720 piksel çözünürlüğe sahip görüntüler üretir. Dahası, renk doğruluğuyla ilgili sorunlar var. Neredeyse 18'lik bir renk sapması ile hedef (Delta E 3'ten küçük) kaçırılır. Kamera, ekran çerçevesinde değil, bunun yerine ana ünitede, klavyenin üzerinde bulunur.

ColorChecker Aorus 15P WB: 17.89 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 28.86 ∆E

Aksesuarlar

Dizüstü bilgisayar, normal belgelerle birlikte gelir: Hızlı başlangıç kılavuzu ve garanti bilgileri. Ayrıca, kutuda ikinci bir M.2 SSD için bir termal ped bulunur.

Bakım

Dizüstü bilgisayarın bakım kapağı yok. İçeriye erişmek için alt kapağın çıkarılması gerekiyor. Cihazın alt tarafındaki tüm vidaları çıkardıktan sonra, alt kapak çıkarılabilir - en azından test cihazımızda durum böyleydi. Her ihtimale karşı bir harç bitirme aleti veya düz bir spatula hazır bulundurulmalıdır.

Garanti

Gigabyte, dizüstü bilgisayara iki yıllık garanti verir. Herhangi bir garanti uzantısı bulamadık.

Giriş aygıtları - Arkadan aydınlatmalı klavyeye sahip Aorus dizüstü bilgisayar

Klavye 15P, sayısal tuş takımı içeren arkadan aydınlatmalı bir çiklet klavyeyle birlikte gelir. Yumuşak tuşlar, orta bir hareket ve net bir basınç noktası sunar. Oldukça net tuş direnci sevindirici. Dahası, klavye yazarken biraz eğiliyor. Yine de aşırı derecede sinir bozucu olduğu kanıtlanmadı. Genel olarak, Gigabyte burada günlük kullanım için uygun bir klavye sunar.

Dokunmatik yüzey

Çoklu dokunma özellikli bir ClickPad (10,6 x 7,1 cm), fare yerine geçme işlevi görür. Pürüzsüz yüzeyi parmakların üzerinde kaymasını kolaylaştırır. Ayrıca köşelerdeki girdilere de yanıt verir. Ped, kısa bir hareket ve net bir basınç noktası sunar.

Ekran - 144 Hz IPS

Mat 15,6 inç ekran, 1920x1080 piksel doğal çözünürlüğe sahiptir. Kontrast (833: 1) ve parlaklık (267,7 cd / m²) çok düşük. Sırasıyla 1.000: 1 ve 300 cd / m²'nin ötesindeki değerlerin iyi olduğunu düşünüyoruz. Burada kullanılan 144 Hz panel, hızlı tepki sürelerine sahip puanlar.


273 cd/m²	279 cd/m²	267 cd/m²
268 cd/m²	275 cd/m²	270 cd/m²
255 cd/m²	262 cd/m²	260 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

BOE HF NV156FHM-N4G tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 279 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 267.7 cd/m² Minimum: 26 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 91 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 275 cd/m²
Kontrast: 833:1 (Siyah: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.09
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.266

Download ICC Dosyası (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Aorus 15P WB BOE HF NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP BOE08FB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Sharp LQ156M1JW09, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F BOE NV156FH, WVA, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		-37%	7%	-1%
Display P3 Coverage	63	39.51 -37%	67.8 8%	63 0%
sRGB Coverage	91.3	58.1 -36%	98.3 8%	90.1 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64.6	40.81 -37%	68.5 6%	64.1 -1%
Response Times		-175%	-48%	-75%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)	29.2 ?(14.4, 14.8) -232%	16 ?(8.4, 7.6) -82%	20.4 ?(10.8, 9.6) -132%
Response Time Black / White *	9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4)	20 ?(9.6, 10.4) -117%	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2) -13%	10.8 ?(6.4, 4.4) -17%
PWM Frequency			23580 ?(29)	198.4 ?(99)
Screen		-65%	-19%	-12%
Brightness middle	275	279 1%	300.9 9%	292 6%
Brightness	268	257 -4%	289 8%	290 8%
Brightness Distribution	91	89 -2%	92 1%	77 -15%
Black Level *	0.33	0.31 6%	0.31 6%	0.27 18%
Contrast	833	900 8%	971 17%	1081 30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.72	5.84 -115%	3.54 -30%	3.99 -47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.45	21.8 -390%	9.82 -121%	6.11 -37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.09	4.54 -117%	1 52%	3.02 -44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.3	3.1 -35%	5.9 -157%	3.3 -43%
Gamma	2.266 ^97%	2.116 ^104%	2.37 ^93%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6933 ^94%	6577 ^99%	7456 ^87%	7047 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	65	41 -37%	63.3 -3%	58.1 -11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	90	59 -34%	98.3 9%	89.7 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-92% / -74%	-20% / -18%	-29% / -18%

* ... smaller is better

Already out of the box, the display shows good color reproduction. With a color deviation of 2.72, the target (Delta E less than 3) is met. The display doesn't suffer from a blue tint. Moreover, improvements are achieved by means of calibration: The color deviation drops to 2.09, and the grayscales are displayed in a more balanced way. The AdobeRGB (65%) and sRGB (90%) color spaces are not completely reproduced.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.8 ms rise
9.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.4 ms rise
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

The viewing-angle stable IPS panel can be read from any position. Outdoors, reading the display is possible when the sun doesn't shine too brightly.

The Aorus 15P outdoors (shot in bright sunshine)

Performance - Enough for the coming years

With the Aorus 15P WB, Gigabyte has a 15.6-inch gaming laptop in its range that brings every modern game smoothly onto the screen and also cuts a fine figure in all other application areas.

Test conditions

The preinstalled Aorus Control Center offers the option to set an energy profile, among other things. We use the "Auto" option here (with active AI function). Subsequently, the Control Center chooses the appropriate settings itself.

Processor

The Core i7-10750H hexa-core processor (Comet Lake) operates at a base clock of 2.6 GHz. An increase to 4.3 GHz (six cores) and 5 GHz (one core) is possible via Turbo. Hyper-Threading (two threads per core) is supported.

The processor executes the multithread test of the Cinebench R15 benchmark at 4.2 to 4.3 GHz. The single-thread test is run at 4.3 to 5 GHz. On battery power, the CPU operates at 2 GHz (multithread and single-thread).

We verify if the CPU Turbo is consistently used when plugged in by running the Cinebench R15 benchmark's multithread test in a continuous loop for at least 30 minutes. Turbo is used at a fairly high level.

Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1227 (1214.14-1343.01)

Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1209 (1180.53-1317.18)

Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1328 (1277.18-1346.3)

Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1845 (1564.03-1971.71)

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

198 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1343 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

140.6 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

2941 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

489 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1270 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

7739 Points

Yardım

... kıyaslama

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +40%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H	206 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	199 Points +1%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H	198 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (184 - 213, n=45)	196.7 Points -1%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	188 Points -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3433 Points +156%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1972 (1142.92^min - 1972^max) Points +47%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H	1346 (1277.18^min - 1346.3^max) Points 0%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H	1343 Points
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	1317 (1180.53^min - 1317.18^max) Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (804 - 1418, n=50)	1263 Points -6%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (322 - 587, n=43)	389 Seconds * -7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	372 Seconds * -2%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H	363 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H	326 Seconds * +10%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	276 Seconds * +24%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)	169.7 Seconds * +53%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)	6318 MIPS +17%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H	5391 MIPS
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H	5277 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4504 - 5470, n=43)	5114 MIPS -5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	5052 MIPS -6%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4666 MIPS -13%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)	85566 MIPS +134%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	49685 MIPS +36%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H	36831 MIPS +1%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H	36524 MIPS
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	34772 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (26040 - 37345, n=43)	33946 MIPS -7%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)	727 Points +49%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H	489 Points
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	482 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H	480 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	473 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (431 - 504, n=43)	473 Points -3%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)	8336 Points +183%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4396 Points +49%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H	3325 Points +13%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	2991 Points +2%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H	2941 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1749 - 3325, n=43)	2848 Points -3%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)	1897 Points +45%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H	1329 Points +2%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H	1309 Points
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	1286 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1114 - 1333, n=43)	1263 Points -4%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1158 Points -12%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)	15073 Points +138%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	7775 Points +23%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H	6650 Points +5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	6365 Points 0%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H	6336 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4443 - 6674, n=43)	6135 Points -3%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)	23.6 fps +129%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	12.6 fps +22%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H	11.3 fps +10%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H	10.3 fps
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	9.61 fps -7%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (5.54 - 11.6, n=43)	9.61 fps -7%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	69.1 s * -35%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43)	53.3 s * -4%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H	51.1 s *
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=183, last 2 years)	48.1 s * +6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	47.2 s * +8%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H	46.9 s * +8%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=42)	0.611 sec * -4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	0.607 sec * -4%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H	0.601 sec * -3%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H	0.586 sec *
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.569 sec * +3%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)	0.4368 sec * +25%

* ... smaller is better

System performance

The laptop offers enough computing power for all common application areas for the next few years. Gaming, video-editing, and image-editing don't pose a big challenge for the device. Furthermore, the system runs well and smoothly. This is accompanied by very good results in the PCMark benchmarks.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4410 puan
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		6169 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5556 puan
PCMark 10 Score		6301 puan
Yardım

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)	7803 Points +24%
Aorus 15P WB GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	6301 Points
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	5936 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (5208 - 6301, n=3)	5584 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	5479 Points -13%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	5193 Points -18%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=19, last 2 years)	5222 Points +18%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	4894 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	4589 Points +4%
Aorus 15P WB GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	4410 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (3409 - 4410, n=3)	3838 Points -13%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=17, last 2 years)	6098 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	5964 Points +7%
Aorus 15P WB GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	5556 Points
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	5352 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (4396 - 5556, n=3)	4886 Points -12%

DPC latencies

In our standardized latency monitor test (web surfing, 4K video playback, high-load Prime95), we didn't observe any abnormalities with the DPC latencies. The system seems to be suitable for real-time video and audio-editing.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	4349 μs * -444%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	2216 μs * -177%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	1767 μs * -121%
Aorus 15P WB GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	799 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Storage

An NVMe SSD (M.2 2280) from Adata serves as the system drive. It provides 512 GB of storage space and delivers good transfer rates. The laptop can accommodate a total of two M.2 2280 SSDs (1x NVMe, 1x NVMe/SATA). RAID 0/1 is not supported, though.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3068 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2373 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 590 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 475.1 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2533 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2273 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 131.7 MB/s

	Aorus 15P WB ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	Average ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-3%	-31%	-23%	-1%
Write 4K	131.7	117.5 -11%	116.5 -12%	142.1 8%	149.5 ?(131.7 - 162.1, n=4) 14%
Read 4K	55.7	47.36 -15%	27.6 -50%	46.43 -17%	53.6 ?(37.6 - 60.7, n=4) -4%
Write Seq	2273	2748 21%	1020 -55%	1108 -51%	2346 ?(2273 - 2378, n=4) 3%
Read Seq	2533	2084 -18%	1999 -21%	1622 -36%	2501 ?(2141 - 2696, n=4) -1%
Write 4K Q32T1	475.1	407.3 -14%	375.9 -21%	467 -2%	419 ?(355 - 475, n=4) -12%
Read 4K Q32T1	590	474.6 -20%	398.5 -32%	525 -11%	520 ?(362 - 590, n=4) -12%
Write Seq Q32T1	2373	3069 29%	1015 -57%	1203 -49%	2463 ?(2373 - 2526, n=4) 4%
Read Seq Q32T1	3068	3154 3%	3049 -1%	2288 -25%	2997 ?(2556 - 3242, n=4) -2%
AS SSD		47%	-44%	-35%	8%
Seq Read	2241	2369 6%	1933 -14%	1386 -38%	2688 ?(2241 - 2873, n=4) 20%
Seq Write	2121	2446 15%	787 -63%	1234 -42%	1888 ?(1017 - 2240, n=4) -11%
4K Read	52.3	40.61 -22%	26.4 -50%	41.32 -21%	53.3 ?(52.3 - 53.9, n=4) 2%
4K Write	116.2	103.2 -11%	109.8 -6%	128 10%	124.8 ?(116.2 - 140.2, n=4) 7%
4K-64 Read	713	1637 130%	848 19%	854 20%	714 ?(713 - 716, n=4) 0%
4K-64 Write	827	1961 137%	923 12%	721 -13%	1114 ?(827 - 1376, n=4) 35%
Access Time Read *	0.054	0.06 -11%	0.044 19%	0.098 -81%	0.05575 ?(0.043 - 0.077, n=4) -3%
Access Time Write *	0.031	0.036 -16%	0.158 -410%	0.095 -206%	0.03125 ?(0.027 - 0.036, n=4) -1%
Score Read	989	1915 94%	1067 8%	1034 5%	1036 ?(989 - 1057, n=4) 5%
Score Write	1155	2309 100%	1112 -4%	973 -16%	1428 ?(1155 - 1714, n=4) 24%
Score Total	2659	5205 96%	2669 0%	2536 -5%	2968 ?(2659 - 3279, n=4) 12%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		22% / 26%	-38% / -39%	-29% / -30%	4% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Graphics card

The dedicated GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q graphics core is a high-end GPU. This is an efficiency-tuned version of the regular RTX 2070 that is intended for thin and light laptops. The GPU is supported by fast GDDR6 memory (8,192 MB). The 3DMark results are at a normal level for the GPU installed here. The UHD Graphics 630 GPU integrated into the processor is active, and the laptop works with Nvidia's Optimus graphics-switching solution. The GeForce GPU can be disabled in the computer's BIOS.

Nvidia specifies a clock range between 900 MHz (base) and 1,125 MHz (boost) for this DirectX 12 GPU. Higher speeds are feasible when a predetermined temperature and/or energy threshold is not reached. We register a maximum of 1,939 MHz. Our The Witcher 3 test is run at an average of 1,383 MHz.

3DMark 11 Performance		19910 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		39445 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score		16759 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score		6920 puan
Yardım

... kıyaslama

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43810 Points +84%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	27298 Points +15%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M	25706 Points +8%
Aorus 15P WB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	23780 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (14723 - 27694, n=31)	22548 Points -5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	21338 Points -10%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	143583 Points +20%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	125143 Points +5%
Aorus 15P WB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	119655 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (39014 - 134255, n=28)	94310 Points -21%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M	72335 Points -40%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31415 Points +69%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	21004 Points +13%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M	18807 Points +1%
Aorus 15P WB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	18582 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (11563 - 21191, n=31)	17489 Points -6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	16355 Points -12%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)	13118 Points +91%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	7826 Points +14%
Aorus 15P WB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6871 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (5948 - 8065, n=28)	6745 Points -2%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M	6312 Points -8%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	6012 Points -13%

Gaming performance

The installed hardware brings all modern games smoothly onto the screen at Full HD resolution and high to maximum quality settings. Higher resolutions (a suitable monitor would have to be plugged in for this) often require lowering the quality level.

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +84%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	78.2 (73^min - 82^max) fps +12%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	69.8 (54^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (56 - 83.8, n=31)	66.3 fps -5%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	66.1 (62^min - 70^max) fps -5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	59.1 (49^min) fps -15%

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=101, last 2 years)	131 fps +35%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	97 (79^min - 112^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (67 - 101, n=7)	88.7 fps -9%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	83 fps -14%

Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (160.9 - 179, n=2, last 2 years)	170 fps +30%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	131.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (125.6 - 137.9, n=4)	130.4 fps -1%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	114.6 fps -13%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=194, last 2 years)	108.4 fps +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (61.6 - 85.3, n=11)	79 fps 0%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	78.8 fps
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	77.6 fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	77.5 fps -2%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	33.7 fps -57%

Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War - 1920x1080 Highest Settings
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	64.1 (40.3^min, 45.3^P0.1, 49.2^P1 - 177^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q ()	64.1 fps 0%

Yakuza Like a Dragon - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (109.6 - 152.3, n=2, last 2 years)	131 fps +82%
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	72 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q ()	72 fps 0%

Star Wars Squadrons - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	172.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q ()	172.4 fps 0%

In order to verify whether the frame rates remain largely constant over a prolonged period of time, we let the game The Witcher 3 run for about 60 minutes at Full HD resolution and maximum quality settings. The character is not moved. A drop in frame rates wasn't found.

Aorus 15P WB GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT): Ø74.3 (68-78)

Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00: Ø55.8 (52-61)

Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04: Ø70.2 (66-77)

GPU measurements during our The Witcher 3 test

	düşük	orta	yüksek	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	275.4	222.4	129.2	69.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	150.7	136.2	124.8	115.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	106	93.3	78.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	132	109	102	97
Doom Eternal (2020)	260.8	152.7	136.4	131.1
Crysis Remastered (2020)	196	117	56.6	43
Star Wars Squadrons (2020)	272.2	192.7	182.4	172.4
Watch Dogs Legion (2020)	107	88	77	51
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020)	113	75	63	55
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War (2020)	159	79.3	70.5	64.1
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020)	111.1	80.8	81.1	72
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020)	117	78	66	61
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020)	106	62	51.5	43.8

Emissions - Noise levels are acceptable

Noise emissions

The two fans work consistently at low speeds in idle mode. The resulting noise is completely acceptable. Under load, the fans turn up, though. We register maximum sound pressure levels of 45 dB(A) (stress test) and 43 dB(A) (our The Witcher 3 test), respectively. The whole situation manifests itself in a constant, tolerable fan noise. A headset is not an absolute necessity.

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta		29 / 30 / 31 dB
Çalışırken		41 / 45 dB

	30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	Aorus 15P WB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M	Average of class Gaming
Noise		-3%	-7%	1%	1%
off / environment *	25	25 -0%	25.7 -3%	28 -12%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=155, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Minimum *	29	25 14%	25.7 11%	28 3%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=156, last 2 years) 12%
Idle Average *	30	29 3%	29.7 1%	28 7%	27.3 ?(23 - 37.5, n=156, last 2 years) 9%
Idle Maximum *	31	34 -10%	34 -10%	28 10%	30.4 ?(23 - 47, n=156, last 2 years) 2%
Load Average *	41	44 -7%	38.9 5%	28 32%	42.8 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=156, last 2 years) -4%
Witcher 3 ultra *	43	49 -14%	54.1 -26%	50.6 -18%
Load Maximum *	45	49 -9%	57.4 -28%	50.6 -12%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=155, last 2 years) -19%

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

Our stress test (Prime95 and FurmMark run for at least an hour) is run by the CPU and GPU at 2.8 to 2.9 GHz and 1,230 MHz, respectively. The stress test is an extreme scenario that doesn't occur in everyday use. We perform this test to check whether the system remains stable even under full load.

The Aorus laptop heats up considerably under load. During the stress test, we registered temperatures above 60 °C (~140 °F) at several measuring points on the underside. Furthermore, the temperature increases slightly less during our The Witcher 3 test. The laptop should not be placed on the lap in either case. In everyday use, however, the temperatures are within the green range.

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


42 °C	43 °C	47 °C
33 °C	45 °C	43 °C
27 °C	28 °C	30 °C

Maksimum: 47 °C
Ortalama: 37.6 °C


61 °C	62 °C	47 °C
62 °C	60 °C	43 °C
33 °C	29 °C	32 °C

Maksimum: 62 °C
Ortalama: 47.7 °C

Güç kaynağı 46 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


24 °C	25 °C	24 °C
24 °C	26 °C	26 °C
25 °C	24 °C	24 °C

Maksimum: 26 °C
Ortalama: 24.7 °C


25 °C	26 °C	25 °C
26 °C	27 °C	26 °C
25 °C	25 °C	24 °C

Maksimum: 27 °C
Ortalama: 25.4 °C

Güç kaynağı 33 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


39 °C	42 °C	43 °C
32 °C	44 °C	43 °C
29 °C	32 °C	29 °C

Maksimum: 44 °C
Ortalama: 37 °C


59 °C	57 °C	44 °C
58 °C	55 °C	42 °C
38 °C	34 °C	33 °C

Maksimum: 59 °C
Ortalama: 46.7 °C

Güç kaynağı 44 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 62 °C / 144 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).

	Aorus 15P WB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-18%	-4%	-7%	-4%
Maximum Upper Side *	47	55 -17%	53.4 -14%	53 -13%	46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=154, last 2 years) 2%
Maximum Bottom *	62	65 -5%	49 21%	57.6 7%	49.1 ?(33.6 - 66, n=154, last 2 years) 21%
Idle Upper Side *	26	32 -23%	29.6 -14%	27.4 -5%	31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=154, last 2 years) -20%
Idle Bottom *	27	34 -26%	29.4 -9%	31 -15%	32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=154, last 2 years) -20%

* ... smaller is better

Speakers

The stereo speakers are located in the front area of the device's underside. They produce a decent sound that lacks bass. A better sound experience can be achieved with headphones or external speakers.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Aorus 15P WB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy management - Aorus laptop offers very good battery life

Energy consumption

The gaming laptop doesn't have any surprises in store in terms of energy consumption. We register a maximum power consumption of 19 watts in idle usage. The stress test and our The Witcher 3 test let the demand rise up to 249 watts and to an average of 150 watts, respectively. The power adapter's output is 230 watts.

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.4 / 0.9 Watt
Boşta	13 / 15 / 19 Watt
Çalışırken	100 / 249 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Aorus 15P WB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		22%	-33%	27%	-16%
Idle Minimum *	13	4 69%	16.2 -25%	6.5 50%	13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=155, last 2 years) -5%
Idle Average *	15	10 33%	24.1 -61%	10.6 29%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=155, last 2 years) -27%
Idle Maximum *	19	19 -0%	30.8 -62%	11 42%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=155, last 2 years) -41%
Load Average *	100	96 4%	127.6 -28%	84.1 16%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) -6%
Witcher 3 ultra *	150	136 9%	187.5 -25%	152.9 -2%
Load Maximum *	249	214 14%	239 4%	180.4 28%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years) -0%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

The Aorus 15P achieves runtimes of 7:07 hours and 8:04 hours in our WLAN test (accessing websites using a script) and video test (the short film Big Buck Bunny (H.264 encoding, Full HD) running in a loop), respectively. During both tests, the laptop's power-saving functions are disabled, and the display brightness is set to about 150 cd/m². In addition, the wireless modules are disabled for the video test.

Batarya ömrü

Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)		11h 20min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 87)		7h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 04min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)		2h 16min

	Aorus 15P WB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 58.7 Wh	Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M, 51 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-23%	-10%	-17%	-20%
Reader / Idle	680	575 -15%		671 -1%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years) -17%
H.264	484				409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) -15%
WiFi v1.3	427	329 -23%	385 -10%	372 -13%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years) -12%
Load	136	92 -32%		87 -36%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) -37%

Artılar

+ mat IPS ekran

+ 144 Hz paneli

+ kompakt kasa

+ dar ekran çerçevesi

+ iyi sistem performansı

+ NVMe SSD

+ ikinci bir SSD için yer

+ arkadan aydınlatmalı klavye (RGB)

+ çok iyi WLAN aktarım oranları

+ yıldırım hızında bellek kartı okuyucu

+ çok iyi pil ömrü

Eksiler

- ekran kontrastı ve parlaklığı daha yüksek olmalıdır

- kasadaki keskin kenarlar

- yük altında sıcak

- Thunderbolt yok

Verdict

The Aorus 15P WB-7DE1130SH, provided by Gigabyte Germany.

With the Aorus 15P WB, Gigabyte has released a compact 15.6-inch gaming laptop that brings all modern games smoothly onto the screen thanks to the Core i7-10750H processor and the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q graphics core. Full HD resolution and high to maximum quality settings can usually be selected.

All in all, the Aorus 15P WB is a well-rounded gaming laptop that doesn't have any major weaknesses.

The hardware is supported by 16 GB of RAM (2x 8 GB, dual-channel mode, max. 64 GB) and a 512 GB NVMe SSD. The storage capacity is not exactly generous for a gaming laptop. A second NVMe SSD can be retrofitted if necessary, though. Since the bottom cover can be removed without any difficulty, upgrades should be easy.

The display (Full HD, IPS, 144 Hz) offers stable viewing angles, a matte surface, fast response times, good color reproduction, and decent color-space coverage. However, the maximum brightness and contrast should be higher. The keyboard (RGB backlighting) proved to be suitable for everyday use. Furthermore, the excellent battery life shouldn't go unmentioned. One battery charge is enough for practical runtimes of 7 to 8 hours - many office laptops can't pull this off.

Price and availability

The Aorus 15P WB is currently available in the WB-7DE1130SH configuration (Core i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 16 GB of RAM, 512 GB SSD) at a price of just under 1,540 Euros (~$1,891) at Computeruniverse.net.

Aorus 15P WB - 01/02/2021 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

İşcilik

79 / 98 → 81%

Klavye

82%

Mouse

87%

Bağlanılabilirlik

62 / 80 → 78%

Ağırlık

63 / 10-66 → 94%

Batarya

75 / 95 → 79%

Görüntü

86%

Oyun performansı

94%

Uygulama performansı

91%

Isınma

81 / 95 → 85%

Ses

80 / 90 → 89%

Audio

66%

Camera

41 / 85 → 48%

Ortalama

76%

85%

Gaming - Ortalama Ağırlık

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 571 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Aslinur Sarica - Translator - 155 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Aorus 15P WB incelemede: Kompakt oyun güç merkezi çok iyi pil ömrü sunuyor

Sascha Mölck, 2021-02- 6 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Kasa - 15P için plastik bir kasa

Boyut karşılaştırması

Bağlantı - Dahili Thunderbolt yok

SD kart okuyucu

İletişim

Web kamerası

Aksesuarlar

Bakım

Garanti

Giriş aygıtları - Arkadan aydınlatmalı klavyeye sahip Aorus dizüstü bilgisayar

Dokunmatik yüzey

Ekran - 144 Hz IPS

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Performance - Enough for the coming years

Test conditions

Processor

System performance

DPC latencies

Storage

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Graphics card

Gaming performance

Emissions - Noise levels are acceptable

Noise emissions

Temperature

Speakers

Aorus 15P WB audio analysis

Energy management - Aorus laptop offers very good battery life

Energy consumption

Battery life

Artılar

Eksiler

Verdict

Price and availability

More articles related to this device

Price comparison