Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Laptop İnceleme: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Graphics için 1000 $ USD Çok Fazla

Name: Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
Brand: Asus

Low performance-per-dollar.

Bugünlerde GeForce RTX 2060 grafiklerinde çalışan dizüstü bilgisayarlar yaklaşık 1000 ila 1200 dolar arasında perakende satışa başlıyor, ancak Asus'un ROG Strix G15 G512LI, neredeyse aynı fiyata daha yavaş GTX 1650 Ti ile geliyor. Bütün bu para nereye gidiyor?

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo, Published 07/26/2020 🇺🇸 🇪🇸 ...

Comet Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Asus, bu yıl oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarının çoğuna G14, G15 ve G17 son eklerini ekliyor, böylece alıcılar sırasıyla 14 inç, 15,6 inç ve 17,3 inç ekran boyutlarını daha kolay tanımlayabiliyor. Yeni ROG Strix G15 G512 serisi, 2019'dan beri mevcut olan ROG Strix GL531 / G531 serisinin daha ucuz versiyonudur. SKU'lar GeForce GTX 1650 Ti grafikli Core i5-10300H CPU ve Core'a kadar 144 Hz 1080p ekran RTX 2070 Süper grafik kartı ve 240 Hz 1080p ekran ile i7-10875H. İncelenen birimimiz, yaklaşık 1000 ila 1100 ABD Doları perakende satış için Core i7-10750H, GTX 1650 Ti ve 144 Hz paneliyle daha düşük bir yapılandırmadır. 15.6 inç G512 serisi ve 17.3 inç G712 serisi için resmi özellikler burada bulunabilir. 15,6 inç bütçe orta kademe segmenti Gigabyte Aorus 15G, MSI GP65 veya GF65, HP Pavilion gibi seçeneklerle dolu olduğu için rakipler çoktur. Gaming 15, Lenovo Legion Y540-15 ve Dell G5 15 serisi.Daha fazla Asus yorumu: ROG Strix Scar 17 G732LXSVivoBook 17 S712FATUF A15ZenBook Flip 14ProArt StudioBook Pro 17

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI (ROG Strix G15 G512 Seri)

İşlemci

Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, Comet Lake-H

Grafik kartı

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Çekirdek: 1350 MHz, Bellek: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 451.67, Optimus

Bellek

16 GB

, Samsung DDR4-3200, 21-21-21-47, Dual-Channel

Görüntü

15.60 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Panda LM156LF-2F01, IPS, parlak: hayır, 144 Hz

Anakart

Intel HM470

Harddisk

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, 512 GB

Ses kartı

Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS

Bağlantılar

4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm combo

Network

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 25.8 x 360 x 275

Batarya

48 Wh Lithium-Polymer

İşletim sistemi

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Ek özellikler

Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, Asus Armoury Crate, MyAsus, 12 Ay Garanti

Ağırlık

2.3 kg, Güç kaynağı: 434 g

Fiyat

1100 USD

Bağlantılar

Asus anasayfa
Asus notebook kısmı

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
80.8 % v7 ^(old)	07/2020	Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	2.3 kg	25.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.7 % v7 ^(old)		Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.2 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.1 % v7 ^(old)		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	2.4 kg	25 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.2 % v7 ^(old)	05/2020	MSI GP65 10SFK-047US i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	2.3 kg	27.5 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.7 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M	2.4 kg	21.6 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
81.5 % v7 ^(old)		HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	2.3 kg	25 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Durum

ROG G531'i alın, metal malzemelerini plastikle değiştirin ve kendinizi ROG G15 G512'ye sahip olacaksınız. G512, neredeyse aynı görsel tasarımı taşımasına rağmen, G531'e kıyasla dokunuşa daha ucuz görünüyor ve hissediyor. Ancak şasi sertliği, G531'den çok daha kötü görünmüyor. Asus, kapak hala istediğimizden daha esnekken nispeten güçlü kalıyor.Asus Keystone bu makineyle uyumlu değil, çünkü Asus sadece daha üst düzey ROG dizüstü bilgisayarlarda görünen bu daha az bilinen özellik hakkında kararlı.

Genişletilmiş arka kısmı nedeniyle, Strix G15 G512, Dell G5 15 SE, MSI GP65 ve hatta Asus'un kendi TUF A15'i de dahil olmak üzere diğer birçok oyun dizüstü bilgisayarından daha büyük. Neyse ki, sistem fiyat aralığı ve kategorisi için ortalama olarak yaklaşık 2,3 kg ağırlığında değildir.

Chassis is all plastic with a faux brushed aluminum texture

The rear is large, but it should allow for better cooling on paper

Hinges are large are sufficiently firm, but they still creak a bit when adjusting the angle of the display

Display opened to maximum angle of just 130 degrees. The large rear prevents it from achieving wider angles

The red light bar extends across the front and side edges

Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 DIN A4 ❌

Bağlantı

Tüm USB-A bağlantı noktaları yalnızca sol kenardayken, bağlantı noktası konumlandırma bir dizüstü bilgisayar için gariptir. Bu muhtemelen, dizüstü bilgisayarın sağ tarafında bir fare ve fare altlığı için masa alanı istemesi daha muhtemel olan oyuncuları yatıştırmak için yapıldı. Thunderbolt 3 desteklenmez.

Rear: Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 2.0b, USB 3.2 Gen. 2 Type-C w/ DisplayPort, AC adapter

İletişim

Intel AX201, Wi-Fi 6 uyumluluğu için tüm SKU'larda standart olarak gelir. Netgear RAX200 test yönlendiricimizle eşleştirildiğinde hiçbir bağlantı sorunu yaşamadık.

Removable WLAN module is hidden underneath the primary M.2 2280 slot

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1447 (1167^min - 1677^max) MBit/s
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1427 (808^min - 1646^max) MBit/s -1%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1385 (1268^min - 1486^max) MBit/s -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	662 (553^min - 769^max) MBit/s -54%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1470 (1297^min - 1511^max) MBit/s +19%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1314 (949^min - 1439^max) MBit/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1237 (778^min - 1367^max) MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	630 (571^min - 641^max) MBit/s -49%

Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1237 (778-1367)

Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1447 (1167-1677)

Bakım

Alt panel, basit bir yıldız tornavida ile kolayca çıkarılabilir. Ancak, panel anakarta dikkatle kullanılması gereken iki hassas şerit kablo ile bağlanır. RAM, depolama veya WLAN'ı yükseltme basit bir işlemdir.

Be careful not to break the two ribbons connecting the bottom panel to the motherboard

Aksesuarlar ve Garanti

Kutuda, AC adaptörü ve normal evrak işleri dışında hiçbir ekstra yoktur. Standart bir yıllık sınırlı garanti geçerlidir.

Giriş cihazları

Klavye Düzeni ve geri bildirim, GL531'deki klavyeyle aynıdır ve bu nedenle mevcut yorumlarımız burada geçerlidir. Özellikle, diğer birçok dizüstü bilgisayar bu tuşları görmezden gelme eğiliminde olduğu için, sistemin üst kısmında bir dizi özel multimedya anahtarı ve sağ kenarında özel bir PgUp ve PgDn tuşları sütunu olmasını seviyoruz.

Dokunmatik

Dokunmatik yüzey, MSI GE65'inkinden biraz daha küçük (11 x 6.3 cm ve 10.9 x 6 cm). İmleç kontrolü hiçbir sorun olmadan güvenilirdir, ancak kayma özellikle düşük-orta hızlarda istediğimizden daha yapışkandır. Bu arada, özel fare düğmeleri, MSI GE65'teki daha yüksek ve "clickier" tuşlarının aksine, herhangi bir oyun dizüstü bilgisayarında gördüğümüz en sessizlerden bazıları.

Same keyboard as on the G531 but with 4-zone RGB lighting instead of per-key RGB

The mouse buttons are quiet when pressed with average feedback

Key clatter is slightly louder than on the GE65, but feedback is otherwise satisfactory and Ultrabook-like

Görüntüle

Asus, hem TUF A15 FA506IV hem de ROG Strix G15 G512LI için aynı Panda LM156LF-2F01 IPS panelini kullanıyor. Doğal 144 Hz yenileme hızı dikkate değer olsa da, tepki süreleri ortalamadır ve kontrast yalnızca yaklaşık 500: 1 oranında ortalıkta ve genel olarak sığ renkler için ortalamanın altında renk üretimi sağlar. Bu, Strix Scar III G531GW'de kullanılan Sharp panellerle karşılaştırıldığında ekonomik bir oyun paneli. Neyse ki, Asus bu şasi için daha yüksek 240 Hz / 3 ms'lik bir seçenek sunuyor.

Bottom display bezel is very thick by today's standards

Matte subpixel array. The screen is slightly grainy, but not enough to be distracting

Moderate uneven backlight bleeding along the bottom edge


251.7 cd/m²	261.7 cd/m²	283.3 cd/m²
223.8 cd/m²	271.2 cd/m²	248.6 cd/m²
225.9 cd/m²	242.8 cd/m²	257.3 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

Panda LM156LF-2F01 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 283.3 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 251.8 cd/m² Minimum: 14.71 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 79 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 271.2 cd/m²
Kontrast: 512:1 (Siyah: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.26
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.06% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.73% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09

Download ICC Dosyası (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Panda LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	MSI GP65 10SFK-047US LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F BOE NV156FH, WVA, 15.6", 1920x1080	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng LGD05CE, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		-2%	65%	59%	55%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	39.73	38.92 -2%	66.2 67%	63.5 60%	63 59%	38.37 -3%
sRGB Coverage	59.8	58.5 -2%	97.1 62%	94.4 58%	90.1 51%	57.6 -4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	41.06	40.22 -2%	67.6 65%	65.1 59%	64.1 56%	39.69 -3%
Response Times		6%	61%	63%	50%	-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	33.6 ?(18.4, 15.2)	34 ?(16, 18) -1%	15 ?(8, 7) 55%	10.4 ?(6.4, 4) 69%	20.4 ?(10.8, 9.6) 39%	40 ?(21.2, 18.8) -19%
Response Time Black / White *	27.6 ?(15.6, 12)	24 ?(13, 11) 13%	9 ?(5, 4) 67%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) 57%	10.8 ?(6.4, 4.4) 61%	29.6 ?(17.2, 12.4) -7%
PWM Frequency			250 ?(20)		198.4 ?(99)
Screen		25%	29%	36%	36%	14%
Brightness middle	271.2	280 3%	309 14%	384.9 42%	292 8%	251 -7%
Brightness	252	254 1%	284 13%	358 42%	290 15%	232 -8%
Brightness Distribution	79	88 11%	88 11%	87 10%	77 -3%	76 -4%
Black Level *	0.53	0.15 72%	0.42 21%	0.67 -26%	0.27 49%	0.17 68%
Contrast	512	1867 265%	736 44%	574 12%	1081 111%	1476 188%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.04	5.89 -17%	3.99 21%	2.43 52%	3.99 21%	6.2 -23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	16.07	19 -18%	8.3 48%	4.58 71%	6.11 62%	18.6 -16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.26	4.79 -12%	1.12 74%	2.03 52%	3.02 29%	4.8 -13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.4	4.08 -20%	5.43 -60%	2.6 24%	3.3 3%	4.2 -24%
Gamma	2.09 ^105%	2.33 ^94%	2.57 ^86%	2.2 ^100%	2.25 ^98%	2.32 ^95%
CCT	7079 ^92%	7303 ^89%	7767 ^84%	6981 ^93%	7047 ^92%	7454 ^87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	37.8	37 -2%	63 67%	59.7 58%	58.1 54%	36.5 -3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	59.5	58 -3%	97 63%	93.9 58%	89.7 51%	57.4 -4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		10% / 18%	52% / 40%	53% / 44%	47% / 42%	-1% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Bütçe görüntüsünü göstermek için renk alanı sRGB'nin sadece yüzde 60'ında dar. Bu sonuçlar Asus TUF A15 FA506IV'de kaydettiklerimizle uyumluyken, ROG G531 gibi daha pahalı oyun modelleri daha derin ve daha doğru renkler için sRGB'yi neredeyse tamamen kaplıyor.

Bir kolorimetre ile yapılan diğer ölçümler kutudan aşırı soğuk bir renk sıcaklığı ortaya çıkarır. Ekranı kendimiz kalibre etmek sorunu ele alır, ancak yukarıda belirtilen sınırlı renk alanı nedeniyle renk doğruluğu neredeyse aynı kalır.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15.6 ms rise
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.4 ms rise
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Bu dizüstü bilgisayar dışarıda sık sık kullanılmak üzere tasarlanmadığından, dış mekan görünürlüğü gölgede iken ortalama olarak en iyisidir. Dar menteşe açısı dış mekan kullanımını da caydırır.

Wide IPS viewing angles. Contrast and color degradation is present from extreme angles

Verim

Asus, en iyi ihtimalle orta menzilli bir şasi için RTX 2070 Super'e kadar şaşırtıcı derecede yüksek GPU seçenekleri sunuyor. Core i9, AMD Ryzen veya RTX 2080 seçeneklerini arayan kullanıcıların G512 serisinin dışına ve TUF serisine veya ana ROG serisine bakması gerekecek.Aşağıdaki ölçümlerimizin ve numaralarımızın yalnızca incelemedeki yapılandırmamızı yansıttığını unutmayın. Daha güçlü RTX 2060 veya RTX 2070 Super'e sahip daha üst düzey SKU'lar, burada kaydettiğimizden daha yüksek ve / veya daha sıcak çalışacaktır.Nvidia Optimus, G-Sync seçenekleri olmadan standart olarak gelir.

İşlemci

Core i7-10750H, aynı işlemciyle veritabanımızdaki diğer dizüstü bilgisayarlara göre olmasını beklediğimiz yerde performans sergiliyor. Çok iş parçacıklı performans, rakip Ryzen 5 4600H'den biraz daha yavaşken, söz konusu dizüstü bilgisayara bağlı olarak son nesil Core i7-9750H'den yaklaşık yüzde 10 ila 30 daha hızlı olacaktır. Sekiz çekirdekli Core i7-10875H'ye yükseltme, yaklaşık yüzde 25 daha hızlı performans sağlayacaktır. Daha fazla teknik bilgi ve karşılaştırma karşılaştırmaları için Core i7-10750H'deki özel sayfamıza bakın.

Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1253 (1225.64-1341.61)

Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1069 (1047.18-1166.18)

Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1177 (1160.19-1270.77)

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1341 (1313.46-1397.77)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4396 Points +44%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	4288 Points +41%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	3843 Points +26%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	3801 Points +25%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	3505 Points +15%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	3224 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H	3049 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1749 - 3325, n=43)	2848 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	2410 Points -21%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	2217 Points -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	1825 Points -40%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	1737 Points -43%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	511 Points +13%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	495 Points +9%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	482 Points +6%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	476 Points +5%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	474 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (431 - 504, n=43)	473 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	459 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H	454 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	428 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	421 Points -7%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	418 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	340 Points -25%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1972 (1142.92^min - 1972^max) Points +47%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	1863 Points +39%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	1818 (1544.4^min - 1818.6^max) Points +35%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1708 (1581.15^min - 1708.45^max) Points +27%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	1623 Points +21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	1398 (1313.46^min - 1397.77^max) Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H	1342 (1225.64^min - 1341.61^max) Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (804 - 1418, n=50)	1263 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	1156 (1010.13^min - 1155.97^max) Points -14%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	898 Points -33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	805 Points -40%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	797 Points -41%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	213 Points +11%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	206 Points +7%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H	198 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (184 - 213, n=45)	196.7 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	193 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H	192 Points
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	188 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	187 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	178 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	174 Points -9%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	173 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	144 Points -25%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	584 Seconds * -60%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	485.9 Seconds * -33%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	450 Seconds * -24%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (322 - 587, n=43)	389 Seconds * -7%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H	364 Seconds *
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	345 Seconds * +5%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	297 Seconds * +18%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	285 Seconds * +22%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	278 Seconds * +24%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	276 Seconds * +24%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	5463 MIPS +10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	5457 MIPS +10%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4504 - 5470, n=43)	5114 MIPS +3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H	4951 MIPS
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	4903 MIPS -1%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4666 MIPS -6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	4634 MIPS -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	4622 MIPS -7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	4471 MIPS -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	3511 MIPS -29%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	49685 MIPS +36%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	48577 MIPS +33%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	47170 MIPS +29%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	46976 MIPS +29%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	36693 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H	36453 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (26040 - 37345, n=43)	33946 MIPS -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	33899 MIPS -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	24635 MIPS -32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	18689 MIPS -49%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1352 Points +19%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	1347 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1114 - 1333, n=43)	1263 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	1220 Points +7%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	1218 Points +7%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1158 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	1141 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H	1136 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	1108 Points -2%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	8104 Points +30%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	8087 Points +30%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	7775 Points +25%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	7675 Points +23%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H	6243 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4443 - 6674, n=43)	6135 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	6068 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	5260 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	4640 Points -26%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	13 fps +30%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	13 fps +30%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	12.6 fps +26%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	12.19 fps +22%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H	10 fps
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (5.54 - 11.6, n=43)	9.61 fps -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	9.27 fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	9.1 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	7.69 fps -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	4.352 fps -56%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	69.1 s * -38%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	64.1 s * -28%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	53.4 s * -7%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43)	53.3 s * -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	52.6 s * -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	52.4 s * -5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H	49.9 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H	0.664 sec * -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	0.634 sec * -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	0.626 sec * -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H	0.618 sec *
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=42)	0.611 sec * +1%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.569 sec * +8%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.564 sec * +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	0.547 sec * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1342 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

140 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

192 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

3049 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

454 Points

Yardım

... kıyaslama

Sistem performansı

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6254 Points +14%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	5936 Points +9%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5625 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5466 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	5095 Points -7%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	4873 Points -11%
Essentials
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	10017 Points +8%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	9461 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	9296 Points
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	8912 Points -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8806 Points -5%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	8575 Points -8%
Productivity
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8193 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	8130 Points
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	7507 Points -8%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	7319 Points -10%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	7261 Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	7156 Points -12%
Digital Content Creation
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	8197 Points +40%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8088 Points +38%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	7221 Points +23%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5864 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	5695 Points -3%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	5044 Points -14%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	4894 Points +11%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4860 Points +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	4698 Points +6%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4516 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4420 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	3691 Points -16%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5894 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	5773 Points +3%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5697 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5587 Points
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	5352 Points -4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	5107 Points -9%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4420 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5587 puan
PCMark 10 Score		5466 puan
Yardım

DPC Gecikmesi

Bizim birim Wdf01000.sys yüksek yürütme süreleri ile DPC gecikme sorunları gösterir. YouTube'da 4K video oynatımı, aksi takdirde pürüzsüzdür ve atlanan kareleri yoktur.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	2216 μs * -77%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	1877 μs * -50%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1423 μs * -14%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1249 μs *
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI	1000 μs * +20%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	935 μs * +25%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	905 μs * +28%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	797 μs * +36%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	723 μs * +42%
Eluktronics RP-15 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PM81000GPMQCN28BTF-E12S4 M.2 NVM SSD	515 μs * +59%

* ... smaller is better

Depolama aygıtları

Strix G15, diğer Bütçe oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarının sunduklarından daha fazla olan üç adede kadar M.2 SSD'yi destekler. Ünitemizdeki Intel 660p, daha pahalı Samsung PM981 serisine kıyasla vasat aktarım hızlarına sahip ekonomik bir NVMe sürücüsüdür. Yine de, hala tüm SATA III alternatiflerinden daha hızlı ligler. Daha fazla karşılaştırma karşılaştırması için HDD ve SSD tablolarımıza bakın.

Two additional empty M.2 bays for expansion

	Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
AS SSD		17%	-18%	150%	32%	99%
Seq Read	1157	1682 45%	1163 1%	2066 79%	1386 20%	2955 155%
Seq Write	675	904 34%	919 36%	2418 258%	1234 83%	2440 261%
4K Read	49.99	60.2 20%	48.88 -2%	54.2 8%	41.32 -17%	40.56 -19%
4K Write	114	164.8 45%	90.1 -21%	129 13%	128 12%	118.6 4%
4K-64 Read	322.2	472.5 47%	323.8 0%	1865 479%	854 165%	1283 298%
4K-64 Write	759	845 11%	403.8 -47%	1878 147%	721 -5%	1538 103%
Access Time Read *	0.07	0.087 -24%	0.24 -243%	0.042 40%	0.098 -40%	0.084 -20%
Access Time Write *	0.137	0.02 85%	0.046 66%	0.091 34%	0.095 31%	0.032 77%
Score Read	488	701 44%	489 0%	2126 336%	1034 112%	1619 232%
Score Write	940	1101 17%	586 -38%	2249 139%	973 4%	1901 102%
Score Total	1673	2143 28%	1332 -20%	5482 228%	2536 52%	4323 158%
Copy ISO MB/s	939	675 -28%	1269 35%	2927 212%	1284 37%	1418 51%
Copy Program MB/s	489.9	248.4 -49%	452.8 -8%	728 49%	401.9 -18%	392.5 -20%
Copy Game MB/s	895	535 -40%	755 -16%	1614 80%	1013 13%	907 1%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		19%	-2%	69%	22%	51%
Write 4K	125.4	219.8 75%	133.3 6%	145 16%	142.1 13%	112.1 -11%
Read 4K	52.7	50.2 -5%	55.3 5%	46.84 -11%	46.43 -12%	42.01 -20%
Write Seq	943	979 4%	980 4%	2377 152%	1108 17%	1964 108%
Read Seq	1383	1990 44%	1406 2%	2185 58%	1622 17%	2065 49%
Write 4K Q32T1	437.9	516 18%	286.3 -35%	463.5 6%	467 7%	318.2 -27%
Read 4K Q32T1	334.9	298.3 -11%	331.5 -1%	527 57%	525 57%	406.7 21%
Write Seq Q32T1	960	982 2%	976 2%	2395 149%	1203 25%	2534 164%
Read Seq Q32T1	1530	1907 25%	1520 -1%	3470 127%	2288 50%	3438 125%
Write 4K Q8T8		981	748
Read 4K Q8T8		300.9	344.6
Total Average (Program / Settings)		18% / 18%	-10% / -13%	110% / 121%	27% / 28%	75% / 81%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1530 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 960 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 334.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 437.9 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1383 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 943 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.4 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU Performansı

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti en son nesil mobil GTX 1060 ile karşılaştırılabilir. GTX 1660 Ti, RTX 2060 veya RTX 2070 Süper SKU'lara yükseltme, kullanıcıları yaklaşık olarak yüzde 45, yüzde 60 ve yüzde 110 daha hızlı grafik performansı ile netleştirecek. Daha fazla teknik bilgi ve kıyaslama karşılaştırması için GTX 1650 Ti'deki özel sayfamıza bakın. GTX 1650 Ti genellikle çoğu oyunu 144 FPS'de çalıştırmak için yeterince hızlı değildir, ancak 144 Hz monitörün avantajlarından yararlanmak için 144 FPS'de oyun çalıştırmanıza gerek yoktur.

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK	22836 Points +114%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	19338 Points +81%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	18807 Points +76%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	18166 Points +70%
Eluktronics RP-15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	16808 Points +58%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	14718 Points +38%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	14394 Points +35%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	11332 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	10663 Points
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H	10550 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (9691 - 10733, n=9)	10133 Points -5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	6792 Points -36%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK	8328 Points +117%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	7732 Points +101%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	6722 Points +75%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	6312 Points +64%
Eluktronics RP-15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	6280 Points +63%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5534 Points +44%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	4548 Points +18%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	3841 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (3554 - 3904, n=9)	3689 Points -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	3626 Points -6%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H	3539 Points -8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	1990 Points -48%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK	8419 Points +104%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	7878 Points +91%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	6610 Points +60%
Eluktronics RP-15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	6600 Points +60%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	6527 Points +58%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5697 Points +38%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	4396 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	4131 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (3738 - 4201, n=9)	3918 Points -5%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H	3872 Points -6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	3795 Points -8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	2196 Points -47%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK	30309 Points +113%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	26413 Points +86%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	25706 Points +81%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	23326 Points +64%
Eluktronics RP-15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	22629 Points +59%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	19670 Points +38%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	18205 Points +28%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H	14437 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	14231 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (12865 - 14415, n=8)	13515 Points -5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	12620 Points -11%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	8304 Points -42%
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK	16523 Points +27%
Eluktronics RP-15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	13824 Points +6%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	13742 Points +6%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	13126 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H	12993 Points
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	12192 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H	11818 Points -9%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H	11620 Points -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (9749 - 13027, n=8)	11529 Points -11%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	7763 Points -40%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	7573 Points -42%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	6839 Points -47%

3DMark 11 Performance		14000 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		33407 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9710 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score		4131 puan
Yardım

... kıyaslama

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	79.1 (64^min) fps +97%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	78.4 fps +96%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	72.7 (61^min - 82^max) fps +81%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	72 (61^min - 84^max) fps +80%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	68.3 fps +70%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	66.1 (62^min - 70^max) fps +65%
Eluktronics RP-15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	62.4 fps +56%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	61.9 (58^min - 69^max) fps +54%
Maingear Vector 15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	61.3 fps +53%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	60.5 (51^min - 68^max) fps +51%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	58.4 fps +46%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	50.2 fps +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	48.8 fps +22%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	40.1 (37^min - 44^max) fps
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	40 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (34.7 - 42.3, n=8)	38.9 fps -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	38.3 (29^min) fps -4%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M	38.3 (31^min) fps -4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	37 fps -8%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	30.4 (24^min) fps -24%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	23.1 fps -42%

Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø65.9 (49-70)

	düşük	orta	yüksek	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	223.5	135.5	76.1	40.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	148	132	122	115
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	98.9	82.7	71.8

Emissions

System Noise

Much like what we discovered on some other Asus gaming laptops, fan noise is never actually silent even when set to "silent" mode. We're able to record a fan noise of 34 dB(A) against a background of 27.7 dB(A) despite having no applications running. Most other gaming laptops are able able to remain quieter for longer than our Asus as shown by the comparison table below.

Fan noise tops out at 48 to 49 dB(A) when running high loads like gaming on Turbo mode. If on Performance mode, fan noise becomes just slightly quieter at 46.2 dB(A). These results are about normal for a gaming laptop of this size.

Twin ~45 mm fans and two copper heat pipes

Annoyingly, fans are always active even when set to Silent mode

Two accessible SODIMM slots for up to 32 GB DDR4-3200

We can notice some slight electronic noise or coil whine from our unit, but the constant fan noise is enough to overwhelm it

	Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
Noise		6%	4%	-2%	13%	16%
off / environment *	27.7	30.2 -9%	30 -8%	29.3 -6%	28 -1%	28.8 -4%
Idle Minimum *	34.2	30.2 12%	30.6 11%	31.9 7%	28 18%	28.8 16%
Idle Average *	36	30.2 16%	30.6 15%	31.9 11%	28 22%	29.5 18%
Idle Maximum *	36.6	30.2 17%	37.7 -3%	33.5 8%	28 23%	31.1 15%
Load Average *	44.3	40 10%	36.5 18%	47 -6%	28 37%	35.2 21%
Witcher 3 ultra *	47.9	49 -2%	52.1 -9%	53.8 -12%	50.6 -6%	35.2 27%
Load Maximum *	49.3	49 1%	48.1 2%	56.7 -15%	50.6 -3%	41 17%

* ... smaller is better

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta		34.2 / 36 / 36.6 dB
Çalışırken		44.3 / 49.3 dB

	30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 27.7 dB(A)

Temperature

Surface temperatures never become uncomfortably warm no matter the onscreen load. Though hot spots can be as warm as 46 C to 53 C when gaming, these areas are towards the rear away from the keyboard keys and palm rests.

AC adapter after running Witcher 3 for over an hour

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


36.2 °C	46.2 °C	37 °C
28.6 °C	35.2 °C	30 °C
22.6 °C	24.4 °C	24.4 °C

Maksimum: 46.2 °C
Ortalama: 31.6 °C


50.4 °C	53.6 °C	53.2 °C
29.2 °C	37.8 °C	27.2 °C
25.6 °C	25.2 °C	24 °C

Maksimum: 53.6 °C
Ortalama: 36.2 °C

Güç kaynağı 52 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 20.2 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


26.4 °C	27.4 °C	26 °C
26.2 °C	26.4 °C	26.2 °C
25 °C	25.4 °C	25 °C

Maksimum: 27.4 °C
Ortalama: 26 °C


27.8 °C	28.2 °C	28.6 °C
26.8 °C	28.2 °C	28 °C
26.8 °C	27.4 °C	27.8 °C

Maksimum: 28.6 °C
Ortalama: 27.7 °C

Oda sıcaklığı 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


33.2 °C	41.4 °C	37.8 °C
27.6 °C	36 °C	36.8 °C
22.8 °C	24.6 °C	25.8 °C

Maksimum: 41.4 °C
Ortalama: 31.8 °C


45.2 °C	39.4 °C	47.6 °C
32.8 °C	40.4 °C	34.6 °C
38.4 °C	29 °C	27 °C

Maksimum: 47.6 °C
Ortalama: 37.2 °C

Güç kaynağı 52 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.6 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.8 °C / 78.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+3.1 °C / 5.6 F).

Stress Test

When running Prime95, the CPU can be observed boosting up to 4.2 GHz for about 90 seconds until hitting a core temperature of 91 C. After reaching this temperature ceiling, clock rates would drop to 3.8 GHz in order to maintain a cooler core temperature of 83 C.

Running Witcher 3 on Asus' Turbo mode results in the CPU and GPU stabilizing at 61 C and 60 C, respectively, with a GPU clock rate of 1755 MHz. GPU clock rate drops just slightly to 1695 MHz when running in performance mode without much of a change in fan noise so users may as well game on Turbo mode whenever possible. These running temperatures are relatively low since this particular chassis was built to handle faster GPU options up to the RTX 2070 Super.

Running on battery power will limit performance. A Fire Strike run on batteries would return Physics and Graphics scores of 12489 and 7647 points, respectively, compared to 18318 and 10663 points when on mains.

	CPU Clock (GHz)	GPU Clock (MHz)	Average CPU Temperature (°C)	Average GPU Temperature (°C)
System Idle	--	--	31	30
Prime95 Stress	3.8	--	83	52
Prime95 + FurMark Stress	3.5	1245	83	68
Witcher 3 Stress (Turbo Mode)	~4.4	1755	61	60

Speakers

Pink noise at maximum volume. Bass reproduction could be better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Idling on desktop demands between 5 W and 21 W depending on the brightness level and power profile. Running Witcher 3 consumes about 95 W compared to 125 W to 130 W on most GTX 1060-powered laptops. Thus, the GTX 1650 Ti is able to offer similar graphics performance at a much higher performance-per-watt than the last generation Pascal GPU.

We're able to record a maximum draw of 161 W from the medium-sized 150 W AC adapter. This maximum is only temporary as shown by our graphs below. Configurations with the GTX 1660 Ti GPU or higher will ship with a larger 230 W AC adapter instead.

Constant consumption when running 3DMark 06

Constant consumption when running Witcher 3

Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Consumption spikes to 127 W for about 90 seconds before falling and stabilizing at 104 W. The length of the spike matches our clock rates observations during our Stress Test section above

Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Consumption spikes to 161 W for about 90 seconds before falling and stabilizing at 141 W

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.11 / 5.7 Watt
Boşta	5.7 / 9.3 / 20.9 Watt
Çalışırken	105.1 / 160.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI GP65 10SFK-047US i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU, WVA, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		-4%	-66%	-6%	22%	14%
Idle Minimum *	5.7	5.4 5%	14.2 -149%	6.5 -14%	4.04 29%	5.5 4%
Idle Average *	9.3	10 -8%	18.8 -102%	10.6 -14%	7.2 23%	8.5 9%
Idle Maximum *	20.9	10.5 50%	23.9 -14%	11 47%	11.4 45%	11.9 43%
Load Average *	105.1	135 -28%	96.9 8%	84.1 20%	80.8 23%	94 11%
Witcher 3 ultra *	94.5	144 -52%	185 -96%	152.9 -62%	93.6 1%	86 9%
Load Maximum *	160.8	147 9%	233.4 -45%	180.4 -12%	144.5 10%	144 10%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

At 4.5 hours of real-world WLAN use, battery life is about average for its category and size class. Battery capacity is quite small at just 48 Wh compared to 99 Wh on something like the MSI GS66.

Recharging from empty to full capacity takes about 1.5 hours. The system cannot be recharged via USB-C unlike on the Asus Zephyrus M GU502.

Batarya ömrü

Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)		13h 17min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 31min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)		1h 21min

	Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh	Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh	MSI GP65 10SFK-047US i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 51 Wh	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M, 51 Wh	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 52.5 Wh
Battery Runtime		18%	23%	-19%	9%	16%
Reader / Idle	797	587 -26%			671 -16%	951 19%
WiFi v1.3	271	370 37%	333 23%	220 -19%	372 37%	385 42%
Load	81	116 43%			87 7%	71 -12%
Witcher 3 ultra						59

Artılar

+ nispeten soğuk çalışma sıcaklıkları

+ sessiz özel fare düğmeleri

+ 3x M.2 2280 bölme, 2x SODIMM

+ benzersiz RGB ışık çubuğu

+ sessiz fare tuşları

+ 144 Hz ekran

Eksiler

- "Sessiz" modda bile sesli fan gürültüsü

- gözle görülür gölgelenme; ortalama tepki süreleri

- ortalama pil ömrü; küçük pil kapasitesi

- trackpad bir parmak izi mıknatısı

- ortalama renk üretimi

- sınırlı menteşe açısı

- kalın alt çerçeve

- büyük boyutlar

- web kamerası yok

Verdict

The features that stick out the most are the support for 3x M.2 2280 SSDs, baseline 144 Hz display option, and the LED bar around the bottom edges of the chassis for visual flair. Most other laptops in this size class can house just two storage drives only. Otherwise, performance is somewhat disappointing for a $1000 gaming machine because users can get pretty much the same graphics performance out of an older and cheaper GTX 1060 laptop or even almost 50 percent faster performance from systems running on the GTX 1660 Ti by spending just $100 to $200 more.

Additionally, the 144 Hz display here sounds good on paper, but this particular Panda panel has major trade-offs including its more limited color space, more noticeable ghosting, and low contrast ratio. The gaming experience is therefore not as smooth or colorful as it could have been unless if users are willing to spend more on the 144 Hz option.

For $1000 USD, the Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI doesn't offer a compelling enough GPU to make it worthwhile especially now that gaming laptops with AMD Ryzen are taking off. Users are going to be happier with the performance of an Asus TUF model or GTX 1660 Ti alternative for around this same price.

Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI - 11/04/2020 v7 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

İşcilik

81 / 98 → 82%

Klavye

85%

Mouse

86%

Bağlanılabilirlik

58 / 80 → 73%

Ağırlık

61 / 10-66 → 91%

Batarya

61 / 95 → 64%

Görüntü

79%

Oyun performansı

89%

Uygulama performansı

90%

Isınma

88 / 95 → 93%

Ses

66 / 90 → 73%

Audio

80%

Ortalama

71%

81%

Gaming - Ortalama Ağırlık

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5243 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Translator: Aslinur Sarica - Translator - 155 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Laptop İnceleme: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Graphics için 1000 $ USD Çok Fazla

Allen Ngo, 2020-07-26 (Update: 2020-07-26)

Durum

Bağlantı

İletişim

Bakım

Aksesuarlar ve Garanti

Giriş cihazları

Dokunmatik

Görüntüle

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Verim

İşlemci

Sistem performansı

DPC Gecikmesi

Depolama aygıtları

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPU Performansı

Emissions

System Noise

Temperature

Stress Test

Speakers

Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Battery Life

Artılar

Eksiler

Verdict

More articles related to this device

Price comparison