Notebookcheck Logo

Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI Dizüstü Bilgisayar İncelemesi: Oyun Multimedya Hibrit

Part gamer, part multimedia workhorse.

Bu, VivoBook 15'in şu anda alabileceğiniz en güçlü sürümüdür, ancak bu mutlaka en iyisi olduğu anlamına gelmez. GeForce GTX ile çalışan bu dizüstü bilgisayar, ortalama pil ömrü ve renkleriyle geride kaldı.
Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Comet Lake Geforce

VivoBook serisi, Asus'un orta sınıf multimedya dizüstü bilgisayarlarına veya daha pahalı olan amiral gemisi ZenBook serisinden bir adım aşağı olacak şekilde tasarlanmış Ultrabook'lara ev sahipliği yapıyor. Bu durumda VivoBook 15 K571LI, HP Envy 15, MacBook Pro 15 veya Dell XPS 15'e yüzlerce dolar daha fazla harcamaya hazır olmayan performans kullanıcılarını hedefleyen ailede daha üst düzey bir modeldir. Bu özel sistem şunları sunar: Core H-serisi CPU'lar ve GeForce GTX-level GPU'lar da dahil olmak üzere aynı performans özelliklerinin birçoğu, bankayı bozmadan. Bugün test ünitemiz, yaklaşık 1100-1200 USD perakende için Computer Upgrade King tarafından tam donanımlı olarak geliyor. Core i7 CPU, 120 Hz 1080p ekran, 1 TB SSD ve 40 GB RAM içermeyen daha küçük SKU'lar da mevcuttur.Daha fazla Asus incelemesi: VivoBook 17 F712Zephyrus G15 GA502ROG Phone 3ZenBook 13 UX325Strix Scar 17

Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 (VivoBook 15 Seri)
İşlemci
Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Grafik kartı
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Çekirdek: 1350 MHz, Bellek: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 452.06, Optimus
Bellek
40 GB 
, 8 GB soldered + 32 GB DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Görüntü
15.60 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Panda LM156LF-GL03, IPS, parlak: hayır, 120 Hz
Anakart
Intel HM470
Harddisk
Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08, 1024 GB 
Ses kartı
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Bağlantılar
2 USB 2.0, 4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm combo, Kart okuyucular: SD reader, 1 Parmak izi okuyucu
Network
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 21.9 x 359 x 248
Batarya
42 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 3-cell
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: Harman Kardon stereo, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, MyAsus, 12 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
2.067 kg, Güç kaynağı: 434 g
Fiyat
1100 USD
Bağlantılar
Asus anasayfa
Asus notebook kısmı
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
78.6 %
v7 (old)
10/2020
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile		2.1 kg21.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83 %
v7 (old)
08/2020
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q		2 kg19 mm15.60"3840x2160
81.5 %
v7 (old)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
i5-10210U, GeForce MX250		1.7 kg17.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.2 %
v7 (old)
03/2020
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q		1.6 kg18.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.4 %
v7 (old)
03/2020
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
i5-10210U, GeForce MX250		1.9 kg17 mm15.60"1920x1080
79.7 %
v6 (old)
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
R7 3700U, Vega 10		1.8 kg19.5 mm15.60"1920x1080

Durum

VivoBook 15 K571 serisi, daha hızlı işlemci seçeneklerini barındırmak için VivoBook 15 F512 serisinden farklı bir kasa tasarımı kullanır. Şasi sertliği, hala çoğunlukla plastik olduğu için aynı kalır. Hem taban hem de kapak, HP Pavilion Gaming serisine kıyasla baskıya daha kolay eğilirken, Lenovo Legion Y540 serisinden biraz daha serttir. Kullanıcılar Razer, MacBook veya ZenBook metal malzemeleri beklemediği sürece 1000 dolarlık bir sistem için uygun.

Kasa boyutu ve ağırlığı, kısmen daha güçlü CPU ve GPU seçeneklerinden dolayı HP Envy, ZenBook 15 veya Lenovo IdeaPad S540 dahil olmak üzere diğer birçok multimedya dizüstü bilgisayardan daha büyüktür. Performans göz önüne alındığında nispeten kompakt olması için daha geleneksel Ultrabook'lar ile MSI GP65 veya TUF A15 serisi gibi giriş seviyesi oyun dizüstü bilgisayarları arasında oturur.

Smooth plastic keyboard deck and lid in contrast to the metal ZenBook
Smooth plastic keyboard deck and lid in contrast to the metal ZenBook
Fingerprints will accumulate quickly on the outer lid
Fingerprints will accumulate quickly on the outer lid
Base is raised slightly when the lid is opened all the way
Base is raised slightly when the lid is opened all the way
Ventilation grilles all along the rear edge of the system
Ventilation grilles all along the rear edge of the system
Hinge rigidity is satisfactory and uniform, but the maximum angle is quite low at about 140 degrees
Hinge rigidity is satisfactory and uniform, but the maximum angle is quite low at about 140 degrees
Open ventilation grilles on most of the bottom panel
Open ventilation grilles on most of the bottom panel
❌
364 mm 250 mm 17.9 mm 1.7 kg359 mm 248 mm 21.9 mm 2.1 kg359.1 mm 249 mm 19.5 mm 1.8 kg358 mm 237 mm 19 mm 2 kg358 mm 245 mm 17 mm 1.9 kg354 mm 220.4 mm 18.9 mm 1.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Bağlantı

Sistem iyi bir bağlantı noktası seçimini entegre etse de, bunların sıkı bir şekilde paketlendiğini ve bu nedenle daha kalın kablolar için pek uygun olmadığını unutmayın. USB-C ile harici bir monitörü bağlamayı denedik, ancak başarısız oldu.

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD card reader, USB-A 2.0, Kensington Lock
Right: SD card reader, USB-A 2.0, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, RJ-45 (Gigabit), HDMI, USB-A 3.0, USB-C 3.1 Gen. 1
Left: AC adapter, RJ-45 (Gigabit), HDMI, USB-A 3.0, USB-C 3.1 Gen. 1

SD Kart Okuyucu

Aktarım hızları 20 MB / sn'nin biraz altında. 1 GB'lık resmi UHS-II test kartımızdan masaüstüne taşımak neredeyse tam bir dakika sürer.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77 MB/s +301%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
67.8 MB/s +253%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.7 MB/s +96%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.2 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
87.8 MB/s +278%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84 MB/s +262%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.6 MB/s +62%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.2 MB/s

İletişim

Intel AX201, Wi-Fi 6 ve Bluetooth 5.1 bağlantısı için standart olarak gelir. Netgear RAX200 test yönlendiricimize bağlanırken herhangi bir sorun yaşamadık.

Removable WLAN module
Removable WLAN module
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1260 (579min - 1376max) MBit/s +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1251 (1073min - 1334max) MBit/s
Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
671 (233min - 843max) MBit/s -46%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
290 MBit/s -77%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
Intel Wireless AC 9462
122 MBit/s -90%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1490 (1420min - 1568max) MBit/s
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1400 (782min - 1528max) MBit/s -6%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
743 (462min - 930max) MBit/s -50%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
309 MBit/s -79%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
Intel Wireless AC 9462
119 MBit/s -92%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1490 (1420-1568)
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1251 (1073-1334)

Web kamerası

ColorChecker
8.5 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
7 ∆E
8 ∆E
9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71: 8.78 ∆E min: 2.74 - max: 16.49 ∆E

Bakım

Alt panel, ikisi arka lastik ayakların altına gizlenmiş altı vidayla sabitlenmiştir. Kullanıcılar ana bataryaya, SODIMM yuvasına, WLAN modülüne ve her iki depolama bölmesine doğrudan erişime sahiptir.

Aksesuarlar ve Garanti

Kutuda AC adaptörü ve evrak dışında hiçbir ekstra yok. Standart bir yıllık sınırlı garanti, CUKUSA tarafından kurulan bağımsız bileşenler üç yıl süreyle geçerlidir.

Giriş cihazları

Arkadan aydınlatmalı klavyede KeyboardType, tatmin edici tuş geribildirimi ve sığ seyahatiyle rahattır. Hala HP Envy, Spectre, MSI SteelSeries veya Lenovo ThinkPad T serisinin daha sıkı ve daha derin tuşlarını tercih ediyoruz, ancak bu tür dizüstü bilgisayarlar da çok daha pahalı. Bununla birlikte, ok tuşlarına ve NumPad tuşlarına güvenirseniz, bu entegre tuşlar ana QWERTY tuşlarından daha süngerimsi ve daha küçük olduğundan, bir USB klavyeyle daha iyi durumda olursunuz.

Dokunmatik yüzey

Düzgün tıklama paneli (10,5 x 7,5 cm), HP Envy 15'tekinden (12,5 x 7,5 cm) daha küçüktür. Yavaş hızlarda süzülürken doğru miktarda yapışma ile temel imleç kontrolü için yeterince iyi çalışıyor, ancak entegre fare düğmeleri daha sıkı olabilirdi. Sürükle ve bırak eylemleri, yüzeyde iki veya daha fazla parmak varken imleç bazen yerinde zıplayacağı veya donacağı için zorlaştırılır. Çoklu dokunma tanıma özelliği bu açıdan kesinlikle daha iyi olabilir.

Layout is identical to other VivoBook laptops. The key caps, however, are slight sharper around the corners this time
Layout is identical to other VivoBook laptops. The key caps, however, are slight sharper around the corners this time
Clickpad is spongy is feedback with shallow travel and a loud click
Clickpad is spongy is feedback with shallow travel and a loud click
Clatter is relatively quiet with average feedback. Some may find travel to be too shallow or feedback a bit too soft
Clatter is relatively quiet with average feedback. Some may find travel to be too shallow or feedback a bit too soft
NumPad and arrow keys are smaller and more cramped than the QWERTY keys
NumPad and arrow keys are smaller and more cramped than the QWERTY keys

Görüntüle

Panda LM156LF IPS paneli, ROG Strix G GL531GV, TUF FX505DY, ROG Strix G15 G512LI veya Acer Nitro 5 AN515'te bulunanlara benzer. Ultra pürüzsüz imleç kontrolü ve hareketi için 120 Hz doğal yenileme hızı ile dikkat çekicidir, ancak renkleri ve yanıt süreleri LG veya BOE'nin diğer yüksek yenileme hızı ekranlarından daha düşüktür. Bu fiyat aralığındaki diğer dizüstü bilgisayarlara kıyasla gölgelenmenin daha belirgin olmasını ve renklerin o kadar canlı olmamasını bekleyin. Asus, daha geniş renk kapsamına sahip bir ekran seçeneği sunuyor, ancak 120 Hz'mizden farklı olarak 60 Hz yenileme hızı ile sınırlı olacak panel burada. Kullanıcılar, her ikisi için de seçenek olmadan birini veya diğerini seçmek zorunda kalacak.

Users can choose between 1080p 60 Hz or 120 Hz with no 4K UHD or touchscreen options
Users can choose between 1080p 60 Hz or 120 Hz with no 4K UHD or touchscreen options
Narrow side bezels with thicker top and bottom bezels
Narrow side bezels with thicker top and bottom bezels
Display is just slightly grainy due to the matte overlay
Display is just slightly grainy due to the matte overlay
Moderate uneven backlight bleeding
Moderate uneven backlight bleeding
258.2
cd/m²		250.4
cd/m²		253.3
cd/m²
239.1
cd/m²		263.9
cd/m²		230.4
cd/m²
230.1
cd/m²		250
cd/m²		235
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
Panda LM156LF-GL03 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 263.9 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 245.6 cd/m² Minimum: 15.32 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 87 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 263.9 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1015:1 (Siyah: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Panda LM156LF-GL03, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Samsung SDC4145, AMOLED, 15.6", 3840x2160		Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
LG Display LP156WFC SPD1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
BOE CQ NV156FHM-N63, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE06FB), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
LG Philips 156WFC, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display
109%
-16%
52%
54%
-7%
Display P3 Coverage
40.2
88.5
120%
33.78
-16%
65
62%
66.8
66%
37.31
-7%
sRGB Coverage
60.4
100
66%
50.8
-16%
86.2
43%
86.5
43%
56.2
-7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
41.56
99.9
140%
34.9
-16%
62.9
51%
63.2
52%
38.55
-7%
Response Times
93%
-16%
-46%
-60%
-7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
28.4 ?(16.8, 11.6)
0.8 ?(0.4, 0.4)
97%
36 ?(19, 17)
-27%
45 ?(24, 21)
-58%
49.6 ?(22.4, 27.2)
-75%
28.4 ?(10.4, 18)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
24 ?(13.2, 10.8)
2.7 ?(1.3, 1.4)
89%
25 ?(16, 9)
-4%
32 ?(18, 14)
-33%
34.8 ?(18.8, 16)
-45%
27.2 ?(16.4, 10.8)
-13%
PWM Frequency
242.7 ?(44)
202 ?(99)
Screen
45%
6%
28%
25%
-1%
Brightness middle
263.9
374.3
42%
248
-6%
299
13%
299
13%
253.6
-4%
Brightness
246
379
54%
238
-3%
280
14%
278
13%
227
-8%
Brightness Distribution
87
91
5%
86
-1%
89
2%
87
0%
84
-3%
Black Level *
0.26
0.23
12%
0.21
19%
0.25
4%
0.27
-4%
Contrast
1015
1078
6%
1424
40%
1196
18%
939
-7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.56
5.47
2%
5.05
9%
4.76
14%
4.32
22%
6.05
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
16.11
8.22
49%
14.34
11%
9
44%
9.3
42%
14.03
13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.3
4.61
-7%
4.76
-11%
2.58
40%
4.97
-16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.8
2.3
60%
1.37
76%
3.53
39%
4.21
27%
3.2
45%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.09 105%
2.4 92%
2.3 96%
2.39 92%
2 110%
CCT
7828 83%
6340 103%
6592 99%
7228 90%
6799 96%
6820 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38.2
87.8
130%
32
-16%
56
47%
57
49%
35.5
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
60.1
100
66%
51
-15%
86
43%
86
43%
55.6
-7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
82% / 65%
-9% / -1%
11% / 23%
6% / 20%
-5% / -3%

* ... smaller is better

Renk alanı, ucuz bir panelin göstergesi olması için sırasıyla sRGB ve AdobeRGB'nin yalnızca yüzde 60'ı ve yüzde 38'i ile sınırlıdır. Bu fiyat aralığındaki çoğu Ultrabook, daha derin ve daha doğru renkler için yüzde 95'in üzerinde sRGB kapsamı sunar.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Ekran, aşırı soğuk renk sıcaklığı ve 5,8'lik nispeten yüksek gri tonlama deltaE değeri ile kutudan çıkarıldığında iyi bir şekilde kalibre edilmemiştir. Bu eksiklikler, paneli kendimiz kalibre ettikten sonra gözle görülür şekilde iyileşir, ancak yukarıda bahsedilen sınırlı renk alanı nedeniyle renkler hala daha yüksek doygunluk seviyelerinde giderek daha yanlış hale gelir.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Yetersiz 250 nit arka ışık ve kaçınılmaz ortam parlaması nedeniyle dış mekan görüşü en iyi ihtimalle ortalama düzeydedir. ZenBooks ve özellikle Dell XPS 15 veya MacBook Pro 15 daha parlak ekranlara sahip olacak.

Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Wide IPS viewing angles. Contrast and color changes if only viewing from extreme angles
Wide IPS viewing angles. Contrast and color changes if only viewing from extreme angles

Verim

Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti ve 120 Hz ekran VivoBook 15 K571 serisinin belirleyici özellikleridir. Bu tür bileşenler giriş seviyesi oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarında yaygın olsa da, genel amaçlı performans kullanıcıları, özellikle normal Core U serisinden veya entegre grafik çözümlerinden daha hızlı bir şey isteyenler için donanımı takdir edebilir. Hem lehimli hem de çıkarılabilir RAM, çok benzer bazı Asus ROG dizüstü bilgisayarlarda. 4 GB veya 8 GB, birleşik maksimum 40 GB için 32 GB'a kadar destekleyen tek bir SODIMM yuvasının yanı sıra yapılandırmaya bağlı olarak lehimlenmiş olarak gelir.Optimus, otomatik grafik değiştirme için standart olarak gelir. Aşağıdaki herhangi bir performans karşılaştırmasını çalıştırmadan önce ünitemiz Yüksek Performans moduna ayarlanmıştır.

İşlemci

CPU performansı, aynı Core i7-10750H CPU ile donatılmış veritabanımızdaki ortalama dizüstü bilgisayardan yaklaşık yüzde 15 ila 20 daha yavaş olmasıyla hayal kırıklığı yaratıyor. Bu açık, Asus'umuzu Core i7-10750H'nin yerini alması gereken son nesil Core i7-9750H'nin altına koymak için yeterli. Turbo Boost potansiyeli, aşağıdaki CineBench R15 xT döngü sonuçlarımızda gösterildiği gibi zayıftır. Bununla birlikte, çoklu iş parçacığı performansı, daha düşük olan Core i5-10300H seçeneğinden yaklaşık yüzde 20 daha hızlı olacaktır.Daha fazla teknik bilgi ve kıyaslama için Core i7-10750H'deki özel sayfamıza bakın.

07014021028035042049056063070077084091098010501120119012601330Tooltip
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1030 (968.55-1038.53)
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1285 (1270.12-1293.49)
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1253 (1225.64-1341.61)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1205 (1105.06-1307.79)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4396 Points +78%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3871 Points +57%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3271 Points +33%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
3250 Points +32%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (1749 - 3325, n=43)
2848 Points +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
2562 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H
2467 Points
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
2107 Points -15%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U
1827 Points -26%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H
1821 Points -26%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
493 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
490 Points +5%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
482 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (431 - 504, n=43)
473 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H
467 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U
461 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
458 Points -2%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
446 Points -4%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
436 Points -7%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H
404 Points -13%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1972 (1142.92min - 1972max) Points +90%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1733 (1604.75min - 1733.1max) Points +67%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1418 Points +36%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
1391 (1148.9min - 1390.72max) Points +34%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (804 - 1418, n=50)
1263 Points +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
1138 Points +10%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H
1039 (968.55min - 1038.53max) Points
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
889 (827.87min - 893.75max) Points -14%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U
835 Points -20%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H
818 Points -21%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
211 Points +8%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
204 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (184 - 213, n=45)
196.7 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H
196 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points -4%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
188 Points -4%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U
186 Points -5%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
186 Points -5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
176 Points -10%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H
169 Points -14%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
508 Seconds * -18%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H
431 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (322 - 587, n=43)
389 Seconds * +10%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
353 Seconds * +18%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
337.2 Seconds * +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
279 Seconds * +35%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
276 Seconds * +36%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5525 MIPS +8%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
5335 MIPS +4%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H
5118 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (4504 - 5470, n=43)
5114 MIPS 0%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
4889 MIPS -4%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4666 MIPS -9%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4414 MIPS -14%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
49685 MIPS +60%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
47806 MIPS +54%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
37625 MIPS +21%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
36383 MIPS +17%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (26040 - 37345, n=43)
33946 MIPS +10%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H
30990 MIPS
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
24388 MIPS -21%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1368 Points +8%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
1318 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H
1265 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (1114 - 1333, n=43)
1263 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U
1198 Points -5%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
1183 Points -6%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1158 Points -8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1116 Points -12%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8586 Points +39%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
7799 Points +26%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7775 Points +26%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H
6187 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (4443 - 6674, n=43)
6135 Points -1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5739 Points -7%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U
4416 Points -29%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
4399 Points -29%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps +52%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.6 fps +47%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
10.4 fps +21%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
10.2 fps +19%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (5.54 - 11.6, n=43)
9.61 fps +12%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H
8.57 fps
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.28 fps -15%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
73.3 s * -56%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
69.1 s * -47%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
63.6 s * -36%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (43.1 - 99.2, n=43)
53.3 s * -14%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
52.6 s * -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
48.4 s * -3%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H
46.9 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.646 sec * -6%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (0.578 - 0.708, n=42)
0.611 sec * -0%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.61 sec * -0%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.608 sec *
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.584 sec * +4%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.569 sec * +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.565 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1039 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
131 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
196 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2467 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
467 Points
Yardım

Sistem performansı

PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
5553 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
  (4837 - 5466, n=3)
5163 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08
4837 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4490 Points -7%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4292 Points -11%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3903 Points -19%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
3825 Points -21%
Essentials
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08
9592 Points
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
9359 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
  (9096 - 9592, n=3)
9328 Points -3%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9236 Points -4%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8911 Points -7%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
7864 Points -18%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7692 Points -20%
Productivity
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
  (7557 - 8130, n=3)
7775 Points +2%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
7767 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08
7639 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7284 Points -5%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
7217 Points -6%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
6298 Points -18%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5859 Points -23%
Digital Content Creation
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
6395 Points +53%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
  (4193 - 5864, n=3)
5187 Points +24%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08
4193 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3786 Points -10%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3581 Points -15%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
3220 Points -23%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
3067 Points -27%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
  (4090 - 4420, n=3)
4215 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08
4090 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3761 Points -8%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3504 Points -14%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
3463 Points -15%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
  (5343 - 5610, n=3)
5513 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08
5343 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5265 Points -1%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
4448 Points -17%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4429 Points -17%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4090 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5343 puan
PCMark 10 Score
4837 puan
Yardım

DPC Gecikmesi

LatencyMon, ana sayfamızda birden çok sekme açarken DPC gecikme sorunlarını gösteriyor. 4K60 video kayıttan yürütme başka şekilde akıcıdır ve kare atlanmadan.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB
9856 μs * -1017%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
5214 μs * -491%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
2216 μs * -151%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1521 μs * -72%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
1475 μs * -67%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
1249 μs * -42%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08
882 μs *
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 4600H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
685 μs * +22%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
675 μs * +23%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

The system supports one M.2 2280 SSD and a second 2.5-inch SATA III drive which sits underneath the right palm rest. CUKUSA has configured our unit with a 1 TB Mushkin Helix MKNSSDHL1TB-08 NVMe SSD, but different drives are likely if purchased from other retailers. The Mushkin SSD is a mid-range NVMe drive with sequential read and write rates of 2110 MB/s and 1700 MB/s, respectively, to be in line with other budget to mid-range multimedia laptops like the Acer Aspire 5. Costlier laptops like Asus' own ZenBook series tend to ship with the faster Samsung PM981 drive instead.

CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
AS SSD
AS SSD
Primary M.2 2280 slot
Primary M.2 2280 slot
Secondary 2.5-inch SATA III bay for additional storage
Secondary 2.5-inch SATA III bay for additional storage
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08		HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)		Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1		Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
AS SSD
-5%
31%
63%
119%
-0%
Seq Read
1323
1005
-24%
1405
6%
2643
100%
2642
100%
398.9
-70%
Seq Write
1572
436.8
-72%
953
-39%
1533
-2%
2433
55%
884
-44%
4K Read
38.09
51.5
35%
54
42%
49.12
29%
58
52%
34.54
-9%
4K Write
127.4
88
-31%
93
-27%
134.7
6%
145.3
14%
82.1
-36%
4K-64 Read
812
517
-36%
959
18%
1028
27%
1431
76%
647
-20%
4K-64 Write
276
839
204%
772
180%
1353
390%
1753
535%
985
257%
Access Time Read *
0.035
0.088
-151%
0.051
-46%
0.033
6%
0.072
-106%
0.072
-106%
Access Time Write *
0.411
0.151
63%
0.044
89%
0.028
93%
0.027
93%
0.047
89%
Score Read
983
669
-32%
1153
17%
1342
37%
1753
78%
721
-27%
Score Write
561
970
73%
961
71%
1641
193%
2142
282%
1155
106%
Score Total
2066
1972
-5%
2695
30%
3622
75%
4790
132%
2279
10%
Copy ISO MB/s
2846
1173
-59%
2226
-22%
862
-70%
Copy Program MB/s
728
769
6%
506
-30%
457
-37%
Copy Game MB/s
1610
1045
-35%
1230
-24%
902
-44%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-5%
-27%
15%
11%
-43%
Write 4K
169.7
100.2
-41%
100.4
-41%
138.1
-19%
170.7
1%
105.9
-38%
Read 4K
53.2
112.8
112%
47.16
-11%
45.89
-14%
49.51
-7%
36.56
-31%
Write Seq
1679
537
-68%
993
-41%
2147
28%
1156
-31%
1165
-31%
Read Seq
1698
1270
-25%
1176
-31%
2188
29%
1136
-33%
423.2
-75%
Write 4K Q32T1
450.7
480.6
7%
354.7
-21%
427.8
-5%
420.5
-7%
332.1
-26%
Read 4K Q32T1
577
364.9
-37%
473
-18%
404
-30%
527
-9%
229.3
-60%
Write Seq Q32T1
1657
1224
-26%
1034
-38%
2396
45%
2984
80%
1460
-12%
Read Seq Q32T1
1851
2635
42%
1635
-12%
3454
87%
3550
92%
472.5
-74%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-5% / -5%
2% / 7%
39% / 45%
65% / 74%
-22% / -16%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1851 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1657 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 577 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 450.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1698 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1679 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 169.7 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU Performance

The mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti straddles the line between a multimedia GPU and a full-fledged gaming GPU. Overall performance is most similar to the mobile GTX 1060 especially when running DX12 titles. Graphics performance is where we expect it to be relative to other laptops with the same GPU option.

See our dedicated page on the mobile GTX 1650 Ti for more technical information and benchmarks.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Time Spy
Time Spy
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
 
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
19338 Points +100%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
18807 Points +94%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H
15578 Points +61%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
14922 Points +54%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
14463 Points +49%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
12441 Points +28%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
11494 Points +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
  (9691 - 10733, n=9)
10133 Points +5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 4600H
9778 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
9691 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i5-1035G1
4457 Points -54%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i5-10210U
3824 Points -61%
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U
3239 Points -67%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7732 Points +116%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
6312 Points +77%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H
5914 Points +65%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5607 Points +57%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4734 Points +32%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
4298 Points +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
  (3554 - 3904, n=9)
3689 Points +3%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3584 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
3576 Points
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 4600H
3515 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i5-1035G1
1370 Points -62%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i5-10210U
1169 Points -67%
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U
932 Points -74%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7878 Points +107%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
6610 Points +74%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H
6052 Points +59%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5724 Points +51%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4763 Points +25%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
4105 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
  (3738 - 4201, n=9)
3918 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
3801 Points
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 4600H
3765 Points -1%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3594 Points -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i5-1035G1
1522 Points -60%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i5-10210U
1292 Points -66%
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U
1047 Points -72%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
26413 Points +103%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
25706 Points +98%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H
20572 Points +58%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
19924 Points +53%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
18234 Points +40%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
16335 Points +26%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
14942 Points +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
  (12865 - 14415, n=8)
13515 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
12997 Points
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 4600H
12946 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i5-1035G1
6448 Points -50%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i5-10210U
4832 Points -63%
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U
4713 Points -64%
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13742 Points +32%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
13126 Points +26%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H
13033 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
12501 Points +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
  (9749 - 13027, n=8)
11529 Points +11%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 4600H
10473 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
10384 Points
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
8855 Points -15%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
7957 Points -23%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
7309 Points -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i5-1035G1
5296 Points -49%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i5-10210U
4561 Points -56%
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U
4297 Points -59%
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark 11 Performance
12523 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29531 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8903 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score
3801 puan
Yardım
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | The Witcher 3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
151.9 (95min - 175max) fps +46%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
139 fps +34%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
104 fps
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
90.9 fps -13%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
99.6 (73min - 132max) fps +81%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
79 fps +44%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
57.7 fps +5%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
54.9 fps
1920x1080 High Quality
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
72.6 (31min - 114max) fps +85%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
61.3 fps +56%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
39.3 fps
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
30.8 fps -22%
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
368.7 (345min - 388max) fps +85%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
310.8 (287min - 329max) fps +56%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
286.7 (265min - 336max) fps +44%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
277 fps +39%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
266.4 (247min - 284max) fps +34%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
223.5 (198min - 240max) fps +12%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
218.5 (183min - 242max) fps +10%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
209.9 (199min - 226max) fps +5%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
199.3 (164min - 224max) fps
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
189.4 fps -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
188 fps -6%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
176 (138min) fps -12%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
173.6 fps -13%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
144.6 fps -27%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
80.5 fps -60%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
62.3 (43min) fps -69%
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
60 fps -70%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
53.8 fps -73%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
17.3 fps -91%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30, Intel HD Graphics 515
7.4 fps -96%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
256.5 (233min - 278max) fps +103%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
209.6 (199min - 218max) fps +66%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
204.5 (163min - 231max) fps +62%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
188.3 fps +49%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
156.7 (137min - 179max) fps +24%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
135.5 (127min - 143max) fps +7%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
129 fps +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
126.6 (116min - 135max) fps
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
118.5 fps -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
114.8 fps -9%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
110 (89min) fps -13%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
100.8 (73min - 114max) fps -20%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
87.2 fps -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
46.2 fps -64%
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
36.7 fps -71%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
35.9 (28min) fps -72%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
31.5 fps -75%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
10.8 fps -91%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
168 (155min - 175max) fps +126%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
135.7 (113min - 150max) fps +82%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
119 (110min - 132max) fps +60%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
108.9 fps +46%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
103.6 (92min - 110max) fps +39%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
101 (84min) fps +36%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
93.2 (84min - 103max) fps +25%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
76.1 (71min - 80max) fps +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
74.5 (69min - 79max) fps
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
73.3 fps -2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
68.9 fps -8%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
68 fps -9%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
65.6 (60min - 69max) fps -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
60.4 fps -19%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
59.8 (50min) fps -20%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
48.7 fps -35%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
27.8 fps -63%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
20.6 (16min) fps -72%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
18.8 fps -75%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
18.1 fps -76%
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
16.8 fps -77%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
85.7 (80min - 91max) fps +121%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
72.7 (61min - 82max) fps +87%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
66.1 (62min - 70max) fps +70%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
63 fps +62%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
62.9 (58min - 67max) fps +62%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
54.2 (42min) fps +40%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
51.5 (45min - 58max) fps +33%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
44.7 fps +15%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
40.1 (37min - 44max) fps +3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
39.8 (28min) fps +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
38.8 (36min - 41max) fps
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
38.3 fps -1%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
38.1 (34min - 43max) fps -2%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
34.4 (26min) fps -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
34.4 fps -11%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
28.1 fps -28%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
16.4 fps -58%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
14.5 fps -63%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
11.5 fps -70%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
11 fps -72%
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
10.1 fps -74%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | The Witcher 3
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08: Ø67.9 (62-75)
düşükortayüksekultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 199.3 126.6 74.5 38.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 138 124 115 109
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 104 54.9 39.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 95.6 80.5 71

Emissions

System Noise

Fan noise is always active at a minimum of 31.9 dB(A) against a background of 25.7 dB(A) even when on the Power Saver profile. Though not loud enough to be bothersome, it's still audible when working in quieter environments like classrooms or libraries compared to newer Ultrabooks which are usually silent on Power Saver mode.

Running higher loads like games will induce a fan noise of 43.9 dB(A) up to even 50 dB(A) to be more like a gaming laptop than a multimedia laptop. The HP Pavilion Gaming 15 behaves similarly when under gaming loads but it is generally quieter across the board.

Cooling solution consists of two 45 to 50 mm fans and two copper heat pipes between them
Cooling solution consists of two 45 to 50 mm fans and two copper heat pipes between them
Fans are unfortunately always active and never truly silent no matter the onscreen load
Fans are unfortunately always active and never truly silent no matter the onscreen load
CPU and GPU share the same cooling solution equally
CPU and GPU share the same cooling solution equally
Single SODIMM expansion slot. The soldered RAM modules sit on the motherboard directly underneath
Single SODIMM expansion slot. The soldered RAM modules sit on the motherboard directly underneath
Fan noise profile (White: Background, Red: System idle, Blue: 3DMark 06, Orange: Witcher 3, Green: Prime95+FurMark)
Fan noise profile (White: Background, Red: System idle, Blue: 3DMark 06, Orange: Witcher 3, Green: Prime95+FurMark)
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08		HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)		Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1		Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Noise
-8%
7%
9%
1%
11%
off / environment *
25.7
26.4
-3%
29.8
-16%
30.3
-18%
30
-17%
28.3
-10%
Idle Minimum *
31.9
32.2
-1%
29.8
7%
30.3
5%
30
6%
28.3
11%
Idle Average *
31.9
32.2
-1%
29.8
7%
30.3
5%
32
-0%
28.3
11%
Idle Maximum *
31.9
32.2
-1%
29.8
7%
30.9
3%
37
-16%
28.3
11%
Load Average *
44.2
48.3
-9%
37.3
16%
31.3
29%
41
7%
31.4
29%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43.9
53.7
-22%
38.1
13%
39
11%
41.4
6%
Load Maximum *
50.7
58.8
-16%
40.1
21%
38.2
25%
42
17%
41.4
18%

* ... smaller is better

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
31.9 / 31.9 / 31.9 dB
Çalışırken
44.2 / 50.7 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm uzaklık)   environment noise: 25.7 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.734.731.334.132.3253833.832.333.533.13134.930.931.529.7314029.224.122.323.826.15027.424.424.523.722.16326.730.630.430.825.28025.624.623.824.226.610025.124.922.620.926.812522.322.419.718.725.516022.822.617.418.126.72002424.316.617.227.925025.825.516.816.729.831526.726.916.217.331.640026.225.615.315.732.450027.728.21614.834.763028.627.92213.83480031.131.128.113.635.1100030.430.625.513.235.5125030.931.318.812.937.7160033.533.717.413.139.5200034.634.9161340.4250036.136.516.213.542.1315034.534.51613.540.2400031.431.91613.541.1500028.629.11513.440.363002626.615.313.436.880002222.913.613.232.51000020.919.413.313.326.91250023.325.413.713.122.21600027.227.113.912.219.3SPL43.944.131.925.750.7N4.24.31.40.77.1median 27.2median 27.1median 16.2median 13.5median 34Delta3.43.31.81.86.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71

Temperature

Surface temperatures are quite warm even when simply idling on desktop with hot spots reaching over 32 C and 38 C on the top and bottom, respectively. These same spots can become as warm as 44 C to even 70 C on the bottom since the heat pipes are touching the bottom plate. These areas are thankfully toward the rear of the chassis and away from the palm rests, though we still recommend using a flat desk when running such extreme loads.

Rear exhaust
Rear exhaust
AC adapter after running Witcher 3 for over an hour
AC adapter after running Witcher 3 for over an hour
Maksimum yük
 40.4 °C53 °C36.2 °C 
 35.4 °C47.8 °C33.4 °C 
 26 °C29 °C27 °C 
Maksimum: 53 °C
Ortalama: 36.5 °C
42.4 °C72 °C43 °C
30.2 °C68.4 °C36 °C
29.8 °C33.2 °C30.6 °C
Maksimum: 72 °C
Ortalama: 42.8 °C
Güç kaynağı  58 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 72 °C / 162 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
System idle (top)
System idle (top)
System idle (bottom)
System idle (bottom)
Witcher 3 stress (top)
Witcher 3 stress (top)
Witcher 3 stress (bottom)
Witcher 3 stress (bottom)
Prime95+FurMark stress (top)
Prime95+FurMark stress (top)
Prime95+FurMark stress (bottom)
Prime95+FurMark stress (bottom)

Stress Test

When running Prime95, CPU clock rates would boost to 4.2 GHz until hitting a core temperature of 95 C about 10 seconds later. Thereafter, clock rates drop to the 3.1 to 3.2 GHz range in order to maintain a cooler temperature of 76 C. The Alienware m15 R3 with the same Core i7-10750H stabilizes at a much higher 4.2 GHz when under similar conditions which explains our slower-than-average CineBench results above for the Asus.

When gaming, CPU and GPU temperatures would stabilize at 87 C and 78 C, respectively, compared to 71 C and 68 C on the HP Pavilion Gaming 15. Such temperatures are very warm to suggest that the cooling solution was tailored specifically for the TDP levels of the Core H-series CPU and GTX 1650 Ti GPU and not any higher.

Running on batteries will limit performance. A Fire Strike test on battery power would return Physics and Graphics scores of 10274 and 7804 points, respectively, compared to 16969 and 9691 points when on mains.

System idle
System idle
Witcher 3 stress
Witcher 3 stress
Prime95 stress
Prime95 stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
CPU Clock (GHz) GPU Clock (MHz) Average CPU Temperature (°C) Average GPU Temperature (°C)
System Idle -- -- 40 39
Prime95 Stress 3.1 - 3.2 -- 76 58
Prime95 + FurMark Stress 3.2 - 3.3 1125 94 80
Witcher 3 Stress ~4.2 1530 ~87 78

Speakers

Pink noise at maximum volume. Audio is more balanced than expected from a mid-range laptop
Pink noise at maximum volume. Audio is more balanced than expected from a mid-range laptop
Stereo speakers near front corners. There are almost no vibrations on the palm rests even when set to a high volume
Stereo speakers near front corners. There are almost no vibrations on the palm rests even when set to a high volume
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.431.333.42535.632.335.63132.231.532.24027.222.327.25025.524.525.56321.930.421.98026.123.826.110027.122.627.112527.819.727.816037.217.437.220044.316.644.325061.116.861.131566.816.266.840064.215.364.250063.91663.963066.22266.28007028.170100071.625.571.6125069.418.869.4160068.317.468.3200068.91668.9250064.816.264.83150631663400061.31661.3500062.81562.8630061.815.361.8800061.713.661.71000060.813.360.81250060.413.760.41600061.213.961.2SPL78.731.978.7N441.444median 62.8median 16.2median 62.8Delta7.21.87.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Idling on desktop would consume between 6 W and 19 W to be less power efficient than most Ultrabooks. The high consumption also explains the short battery life numbers in our next section below.

Overall power consumption is more similar to gaming machines like the ROG Strix G15 G512LI rather than other multimedia machines. Gaming will draw at least 99 W from the small-medium (~13.8 x 6.8 x 2.4 cm) 150 W AC adapter and the charging rate will slow if running more demanding loads.

Power consumption when running 3DMark 06 fluctuates between 75 W and 123 W
Power consumption when running 3DMark 06 fluctuates between 75 W and 123 W
Constant consumption when idling on Witcher 3
Constant consumption when idling on Witcher 3
Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Consumption spikes to 142.6 W for only a few seconds before falling and stabilizing at 82.5 W due to limited Turbo Boost performance
Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Consumption spikes to 142.6 W for only a few seconds before falling and stabilizing at 82.5 W due to limited Turbo Boost performance
Prime95+FurMark intiaited at 10s mark. Interestingly, consumption would fluctuate wildly for about a minute before finally stabilizing at 138.7 W
Prime95+FurMark intiaited at 10s mark. Interestingly, consumption would fluctuate wildly for about a minute before finally stabilizing at 138.7 W
Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.1 / 0.9 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 6.4 / 10.6 / 18.4 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 103.7 / 154.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), AMOLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"		Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
R7 3700U, Vega 10, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption
-23%
52%
40%
42%
55%
Idle Minimum *
6.4
9.2
-44%
3.4
47%
2.8
56%
5
22%
4.2
34%
Idle Average *
10.6
14.5
-37%
6.4
40%
7.7
27%
7
34%
6.8
36%
Idle Maximum *
18.4
18
2%
9.2
50%
9.4
49%
10
46%
7
62%
Load Average *
103.7
110.9
-7%
38
63%
57
45%
64
38%
36.5
65%
Witcher 3 ultra *
99.1
125.5
-27%
62
37%
44
56%
37.9
62%
Load Maximum *
154.9
194.6
-26%
59
62%
116
25%
67
57%
44
72%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Battery capacity is small at just 42 Wh which, when combined with the high power consumption rates above, result in short runtimes. Expect just over 3.5 hours of real-world WLAN use when set to the Balanced power profile with the integrated GPU active. Users may be able to squeeze out more from the battery if set to Power Saver mode.

Charging from empty to full capacity takes about 1.5 hours. The system cannot be recharged via USB-C.

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
10h 11min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 40min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
0h 55min
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 42 Wh		HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, 83 Wh		Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G
i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh		Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 71 Wh		Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 70 Wh		Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
R7 3700U, Vega 10, 42 Wh
Battery Runtime
62%
143%
188%
157%
59%
Reader / Idle
611
900
47%
1629
167%
1810
196%
856
40%
WiFi v1.3
220
361
64%
534
143%
743
238%
724
229%
421
91%
Load
55
97
76%
142
158%
81
47%
81
47%

Artılar

+ kasa boyutu ve kategorisine göre yüksek performans
+ pürüzsüz 120 Hz yerel yenileme hızı
+ nispeten ucuz
+ ikili depolama seçenekleri
+ iyi ses kalitesi
+ iyi liman seçenekleri
+ genişletilebilir RAM

Eksiler

- ortalama tepki süreleri ve renk üretimi
- orta derecede düzensiz arka ışık kanaması
- yük altındayken yüksek sıcaklıklar
- sıkışık NumPad ve ok tuşları
- ortalamanın altında CPU performansı
- küçük pil; kısa pil ömrü
- USB-C ile şarj edilemiyor
- yavaş SD kart okuyucu
- sabit fan sesi
- süngerimsi tıklama alanı

Verdict

In review: Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71. Test unit provided by CUKUSA.com
In review: Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71. Test unit provided by CUKUSA.com

The VivoBook 15 K571 is at its best for students who want an affordable laptop for both gaming and classwork that's also relatively portable. It's powerful for the size and weight and as a middle-ground solution between a traditional Ultrabook and an entry-level gaming laptop. Very few laptops in this price range come with a 120 Hz panel option as well.

If you don't have any use for a Core H-series CPU or GTX 1650 Ti GPU, then a ZenBook would be the better option. Battery life, fan noise, and temperatures are just average at best on the VivoBook 15 due to the demanding processors within.

We recommend choosing the display carefully. Asus offers three options: 1080p120 45% NTSC, 1080p60 45% NTSC, or 1080p60 72% NTSC. The 1080p120 45% NTSC option will be best for gaming even after accounting for the average black-white response times. For editing and graphics work, the 1080p60 72% NTSC option will be better for its deeper colors.

The Asus VivoBook 15 K571 doesn't particularly excel at one singular aspect, but it balances being a multimedia machine and gaming machine fairly well for its inexpensive price.

Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 - 09/13/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

İşcilik
72 / 98 → 73%
Klavye
79%
Mouse
68%
Bağlanılabilirlik
57 / 80 → 71%
Ağırlık
63 / 20-72 → 82%
Batarya
56 / 95 → 59%
Görüntü
79%
Oyun performansı
88 / 90 → 97%
Uygulama performansı
91 / 90 → 100%
Isınma
79%
Ses
71 / 95 → 75%
Audio
72%
Camera
38 / 85 → 45%
Ortalama
70%
79%
Multimedia - Ortalama Ağırlık

More articles related to this device

Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 (VivoBook 15 Seri)
İnceleme
•
Asus VivoBook 17 S712FA Laptop...

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI Dizüstü Bilgisayar İncelemesi: Oyun Multimedya Hibrit
Allen Ngo, 2020-10- 3 (Update: 2020-10- 3)