Dell Latitude 14 9410 2'si 1 Arada Dönüştürülebilir İnceleme: Temelde Latitude 7400
Bu yılın başlarında Dell, Latitude 7000 serisinden daha şık ve daha iyi olduğu ilan edilen Latitude 9000 serisi ultra ince üst düzey iş dizüstü bilgisayarlarını tanıttı. Ancak gerçekte, Dell mevcut Latitude 7400 2'si 1 arada modelini Latitude 9410 2'si 1 arada olarak yeniden adlandırdı ve ardından bir gün olarak adlandırdı çünkü bu iki sistem de neredeyse aynı kasa tasarımını ve iç aksamları paylaşıyor. Eski Whiskey Lake-U işlemcileri Comet Lake-U'ya yükseltildi, ancak başka pek bir şey değişmedi. Bu nedenle 2020 Latitude 9410 2'si 1 arada, 2019 Latitude 7400 2'si 1 arada küçük bir güncelleme olarak görülebilir. Kasa hakkında daha fazla bilgi için Latitude 7400 2'si 1 arada incelememize göz atmanızı öneririz. ve yorumlarımızın çoğu burada Latitude 9410 2'si 1 Arada için geçerli olduğundan fiziksel özellikleri. Doğrudan rakipler arasında Lenovo Yoga C940, Asus ZenBook Flip 14 veya HP EliteBook x360 1040 gibi diğer amiral gemisi 14 inç alt not defteri dönüştürülebilirleri yer alıyor.Daha fazla Dell incelemesi: Precision 7550XPS 17 9700Latitude 7410G5 15 SEAlienware m17 R2
Top 10
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebook listesi
» Top 10 oyun notebooku
» Top 10 bütçeye uygun Ofis/İş Notebook Listesi
» Top 10 Premium Ofis/İş notebookları
» Top 10 Çalışma istasyonu laptopları
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» Top 10 Ultrabooklar
» En iyi 10 dönüştürülebilir modeli
» Seçimi en iyi 10 tablet
» Notebookcheck Top 10 Windows Tabletleri
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından incelenen en iyi Notebook ekranları
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından seçilen 300 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 akıllı telefon listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 hafif oyun notebookları
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.7 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 14.89 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
88.2 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 14.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
90.5 % v7 (old) | 03/2019 | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
85 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Durum
Latitude 7400 2'si 1 Arada'da gözlemlediğimiz gibi, Latitude 9410 2'si 1 Arada sağlamlık ve tasarım açısından Dell'in Latitude serisindeki en güçlü ultra ince iş dizüstü bilgisayarlarından biri olmaya devam ediyor. Metal tabanı veya kapağı çevirirken hiçbir gıcırtı fark edemiyoruz ve sadece minimum eğrilme. Yepyeni bir görünüm olmayabilir, ancak neredeyse aynı ağırlığa sahipken HP EliteBook x360 1040, Lenovo Yoga C940 veya Asus ZenBook Flip 14 dahil olmak üzere birçok alternatiften biraz daha küçük olmaya devam ediyor.
Bağlantı
Bağlantı noktası seçenekleri ve konumlandırma, Latitude 7400 2'si 1 Arada ile aynıdır. Özellikle HP Spectre x360 13 veya Dell XPS 13 gibi bazı tüketici odaklı dizüstü bilgisayarlarla karşılaştırıldığında çeşitliliği takdir ediyoruz. Bununla birlikte, sol kenardaki bağlantı noktaları sıkışıktır ve bu nedenle daha kalın kablolar için uygun değildir. HP EliteBook ile karşılaştırıldığında. x360 1040 G5, Dell bir MicroSD kart okuyucuyu entegre ederken, HP bir ses yükselticiye sahiptir.
SD Kart Okuyucu
Entegre MicroSD okuyucudan aktarım hızları hızlıdır ve XPS serisiyle karşılaştırılabilir. 1 GB'lık resimleri UHS-II test kartımızdan masaüstüne taşımak, Asus ZenBook Flip 14'tekinden 6 kat daha hızlıdır.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
İletişim
Kablosuz, Wi-Fi 6 uyumluluğu için Latitude 9410'umuzda geçen yılki Latitude 7400'de Intel 9560'tan Intel AX201'e yükseltildi. Netgear RAX200 test yönlendiricimize bağlanırken herhangi bir sorun yaşamadık.
Web kamerası
Güvenlik
VPro, IR, Noble Lock ve bir parmak izi okuyucunun yanı sıra sistem, belirli Dell dizüstü bilgisayarlara özgü bir yakınlık sensörü taşır. Bir kullanıcının yakında olduğunu otomatik olarak algılayabilir ve ardından eller serbest ExpressSign-in için IR kamerayı başlatabilir. Bununla birlikte, web kamerası deklanşör seçeneği yoktur.
Bakım
Alt panel, 10 Philips vidayı gevşettikten sonra çıkarılması nispeten kolaydır. M.2 depolama yuvası ve kablosuz modül, RAM sabitken çıkarılabilir. WAN yuvası da mevcuttur ancak WAN dışı konfigürasyonumuzda işe yaramaz hale getirilmiştir.
Aksesuarlar ve Garanti
Kutuda evrak işi ve AC adaptörü dışında hiçbir ekstra yok. İsteğe bağlı aksesuarlar arasında Premium Active Pen (PN579X) ve Latitude taşıma kılıfı bulunur. Üç yıllık sınırlı garanti, birçok uzatma seçeneğiyle standart olarak gelir.
Giriş cihazları
KeyboardKey düzeni ve geribildirimi Latitude 7400 2'si 1 Arada ile aynı kalıyor, bu da eski Latitude'daki yazma deneyimini bir subnotebook dönüştürülebilir için en iyilerden biri olarak bulduğumuz için kötü bir şey değil. Geri bildirimler, Dell'in kendi XPS 13 serisi de dahil olmak üzere diğer Ultrabook'ların çoğundan daha net ve daha derin bir seyahat ile. Tuş takırtı biraz daha yüksek, ancak bu daha rahat tuşlar için adil bir değiş tokuş. F9 tuşunun ikincil bir işlevi olmaya devam ediyor. En son HP Envy serilerindeki gibi bir elektronik web kamerası kapağı burada görmek harika olurdu.
Dokunmatik yüzey
Precision cam tıklama paneli (~ 10,5 x 6 cm) pürüzsüzdür ve düşük hızlarda kayarken bile neredeyse hiç yapışmaz. Entegre fare düğmeleri, geri bildirim ve takırdama açısından orta düzeydedir ve XPS serisindeki daha yumuşak tıklama yüzeylerine göre kullanımı daha kolay hissederler. Clickpad'in biraz daha büyük olmasını diliyoruz, ancak küçük yüzey alanı küçük ekranla iyi eşleştiği için bu büyük bir sorun değil.
Görüntüle
Latitude 9410 2'si 1 Arada, geçen yılki Latitude 7400 2'si 1 Arada ile aynı Sharp SHP14D2 denetleyiciyi ve Sharp LQ140M1 IPS dokunmatik ekranı kullanır. Bu nedenle, iki model arasında tepki süreleri, kontrast oranları, renk kapsamı, parlaklık ve hatta darbe genişliği modülasyon frekansları gibi doğuştan gelen özelliklerin neredeyse aynı olduğunu bulmak şaşırtıcı değildir. Ekran hala mükemmel olsa da, HP'nin bazı rakip EliteBook'larda sunduğu gibi, daha yüksek çözünürlük seçenekleri veya daha parlak bir arka ışık gibi yıldan yıla iyileştirmeler görmemek biraz hayal kırıklığı yaratıyor. Tüm sRGB'yi ve AdobeRGB'nin yaklaşık yüzde 64'ünü kapsıyor. çoğu üst düzey Ultrabook'tan farklı değil.
|
Aydınlatma: 92 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 293.4 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1544:1 (Siyah: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.88
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G Sharp LQ140M1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL LP140WF9-SPE2, IPS LED, 14", 1920x1080 | LG Gram 14T90N LG Philips LP140WFA-SPY1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 AU Optronics AUO533D, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 SHP14A2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T AU AUO323D, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -4% | -6% | 1% | -13% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.1 | 66 -3% | 65 -5% | 64.3 -6% | 68.6 1% | 60.1 -12% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.2 | 97.9 -1% | 95.7 -4% | 94.1 -5% | 99.6 0% | 85.5 -14% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.4 | 67.3 -3% | 66.7 -4% | 65.5 -6% | 70 1% | 61.1 -12% |
Response Times | 17% | 10% | -23% | 1% | 32% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 58.4 ? | 49.6 ? 15% | 54 ? 8% | 70.8 ? -21% | 56 ? 4% | 36 ? 38% |
Response Time Black / White * | 37.2 ? | 30 ? 19% | 32.8 ? 12% | 34.4 ? 8% | 38 ? -2% | 28 ? 25% |
PWM Frequency | 1667 ? | 735 ? -56% | 1667 ? 0% | |||
Screen | -27% | -45% | -32% | -26% | -69% | |
Brightness middle | 293.4 | 384 31% | 322.2 10% | 416.3 42% | 277.2 -6% | 280 -5% |
Brightness | 290 | 363 25% | 301 4% | 400 38% | 263 -9% | 286 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 90 -2% | 86 -7% | 89 -3% | 83 -10% | 78 -15% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.17 11% | 0.25 -32% | 0.29 -53% | 0.2 -5% | 0.208 -9% |
Contrast | 1544 | 2259 46% | 1289 -17% | 1436 -7% | 1386 -10% | 1346 -13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.29 | 3.5 -171% | 3.62 -181% | 2.69 -109% | 2.1 -63% | 3.97 -208% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.61 | 5.5 -52% | 6.9 -91% | 4.95 -37% | 5.91 -64% | 8.29 -130% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.88 | 1 -14% | 1.22 -39% | 2.13 -142% | 1.03 -17% | 3.42 -289% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 4.6 -171% | 3.9 -129% | 2.9 -71% | 3.4 -100% | 2.83 -66% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.32 95% | 2.43 91% | 2.4 92% | 2.241 98% | 2.34 94% |
CCT | 6394 102% | 6884 94% | 6344 102% | 6623 98% | 6030 108% | 6556 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.8 | 62 -3% | 61.3 -4% | 60.1 -6% | 64 0% | 56 -12% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.1 | 97.7 -1% | 95.6 -4% | 94.5 -5% | 100 1% | 85 -14% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-17% | -13% /
-30% | -20% /
-26% | -8% /
-16% | -17% /
-46% |
* ... smaller is better
X-Rite kolorimetre ölçümleri, sırasıyla yalnızca 1,7 ve 1,29 ortalama gri tonlama ve renk deltaE değerleri ile kutudan çıkar çıkmaz iyi kalibre edilmiş bir ekran ortaya çıkarır. Paneli kendimiz daha da kalibre etmek, daha da düşük deltaE değerlerinin herhangi bir alt not defterinde gördüğümüz en doğru renk doğruluğuna sahip sRGB ekranlardan biri olmasına neden olur.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise | |
↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
58.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise | |
↘ 32.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1667 Hz | ≤ 44 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1667 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 44 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1667 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Outdoor visibility hasn't changed from the Latitude 7400 2-in-1 since they use the same Sharp IPS panel with almost equal brightness. Dell's own XPS 13 convertible comes equipped with a noticeably brighter display than what is offered here on the Latitude (550 nits vs. 300 nits).
Performance
Most people might assume that the Core i7-10610U will perform faster than the Core i7-10510U based on their product names alone. However, the Core i7-10610U and Core i7-10510U are differentiated by vPro support and not raw performance much like the last generation Core i7-8665U and Core i7-8565U. Dell offers no other options outside of Core i5 and Core i7 Comet Lake-U processors.
All benchmarks below were performed on Dell's Ultra Performance power profile for the highest scores possible.
Processor
Raw CPU performance is not all that different from the lesser Core i5-10210U, i5-10310U, or even the last generation Core i7-8565U. Users will have to configure with the higher-end hexa-core Core i7-10810U option for any appreciable gains in this regard.
Running CineBench R15 xT in a loop returns fluctuating scores as shown by our graph below due to the cycling core clock rates and temperatures when the system is subjected to extreme stress. In comparison, most other laptops have a high initial burst in speed before falling and stabilizing at fixed clock rates and temperatures. This behavior is explained in more detail in our Stress Test section below.
See our dedicated page on the Core i7-10610U for more technical information and benchmarks.
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (1271 - 1663, n=6) | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
LG Gram 14T90N |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (349 - 482, n=6) | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
LG Gram 14T90N |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (548 - 738, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
LG Gram 14T90N |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (133 - 200, n=6) | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
LG Gram 14T90N |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (641 - 816, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (3653 - 4853, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (15369 - 20332, n=6) | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
LG Gram 14T90N |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (1155 - 1261, n=6) | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (3731 - 4622, n=6) | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
LG Gram 14T90N |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (4.54 - 5.66, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 14T90N |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (56.1 - 106, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (0.637 - 0.855, n=6) | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
PCMark results are in the same ballpark as other 14-inch subnotebooks equipped with UHD Graphics and Core U-series CPUs. Scores are consistently higher than the older Latitude 7400 2-in-1 albeit just marginally. We didn't experience any software or hardware issues during our time with the test unit.
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3725 puan | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5071 puan | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4410 puan | |
Yardım |
DPC Latency
LatencyMon shows DPC latency issues when opening multiple tabs on our homepage. 4K60 video playback is not perfect either with 49 dropped frames during our minute-long YouTube test.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
Our test unit comes configured with a Micron 2200S NVMe SSD in contrast to the Toshiba XG6 drive on our older Latitude 7400 2-in-1. Sequential read rates are fast at just over 3000 MB/s, but it can take many read iterations to reach such speeds as exemplified by our DiskSpd loop test below. Write rates are much slower at about 1500 MB/s compared to almost twice that on the Samsung PM981 series.
See our table of HDDs and SSDs for more benchmark comparisons.
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G Micron 2200S 512GB | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | LG Gram 14T90N Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 48% | 60% | 38% | -24% | -16% | |
Seq Read | 1117 | 2525 126% | 1829 64% | 1816 63% | 2289 105% | 1336 20% |
Seq Write | 969 | 1253 29% | 2048 111% | 1270 31% | 1163 20% | 653 -33% |
4K Read | 41.93 | 59.1 41% | 54.2 29% | 46.25 10% | 22.29 -47% | 26.65 -36% |
4K Write | 76.4 | 134.1 76% | 120.5 58% | 104.1 36% | 28.92 -62% | 52.7 -31% |
4K-64 Read | 827 | 1010 22% | 1512 83% | 1342 62% | 415.6 -50% | 644 -22% |
4K-64 Write | 792 | 1461 84% | 1573 99% | 1209 53% | 199.5 -75% | 482.9 -39% |
Access Time Read * | 0.055 | 0.052 5% | 0.046 16% | 0.043 22% | 0.122 -122% | 0.074 -35% |
Access Time Write * | 0.366 | 0.029 92% | 0.091 75% | 0.035 90% | 0.143 61% | 0.072 80% |
Score Read | 981 | 1322 35% | 1749 78% | 1569 60% | 667 -32% | 804 -18% |
Score Write | 966 | 1721 78% | 1899 97% | 1440 49% | 345 -64% | 601 -38% |
Score Total | 2450 | 3670 50% | 4560 86% | 3790 55% | 1300 -47% | 1786 -27% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1290 | 2016 56% | 1891 47% | 2034 58% | 1767 37% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 661 | 542 -18% | 569 -14% | 450.3 -32% | 379.4 -43% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1271 | 1278 1% | 1425 12% | 1024 -19% | 1055 -17% | |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 30% | 42% | 20% | -29% | -32% | |
Write 4K | 81.2 | 128.4 58% | 181.4 123% | 122.7 51% | 35.06 -57% | 54.6 -33% |
Read 4K | 45.41 | 46.37 2% | 52.5 16% | 46.57 3% | 23.64 -48% | 28.19 -38% |
Write Seq | 1190 | 1863 57% | 1592 34% | 1725 45% | 1537 29% | 840 -29% |
Read Seq | 1766 | 2340 33% | 1617 -8% | 2392 35% | 1782 1% | 905 -49% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 436 | 451.1 3% | 556 28% | 470.6 8% | 100.3 -77% | 409.5 -6% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 374.4 | 415.3 11% | 539 44% | 313.2 -16% | 62.7 -83% | 292.4 -22% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1582 | 2985 89% | 2955 87% | 1869 18% | 2698 71% | 1038 -34% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3017 | 2565 -15% | 3270 8% | 3380 12% | 1073 -64% | 1607 -47% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 451.4 | |||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1004 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 39% /
42% | 51% /
53% | 29% /
32% | -27% /
-26% | -24% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
The UHD Graphics 620 hasn't changed in years which is fine if you mainly plan on video streaming, web browsing, or emailing. Nonetheless, it's too bad that Dell isn't offering any Ice Lake, Ryzen, or GeForce MX options which would have boosted graphics performance significantly for those who want it.
See our dedicated page on the UHD Graphics 620 for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (927 - 2505, n=244) | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2206 puan | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9933 puan | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1218 puan | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 486 puan | |
Yardım |
düşük | orta | yüksek | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 59.1 | 48.4 | 20.5 | 18.7 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 12 | 10.9 | 10.5 |
Emissions
System Noise
Whereas the fan in our Latitude 7400 2-in-1 test unit was unusually lethargic, the fan in our Latitude 9410 2-in-1 behaves more normally. The fan is barely audible at just 31.7 dB(A) at worst when browsing or video streaming and with no annoying pulsing behavior. Running higher loads like 3DMark 06 will bump fan noise to almost 40 dB(A) near the end of the 90-second benchmark to be louder than competitors, but it quickly becomes almost silent again once the heavy processing load stops.
Interestingly, fan noise when under heavy loads like CineBench or Prime95 is constant despite the cycling clock rates and temperatures as detailed in our Stress Test section below.
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Micron 2200S 512GB | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | LG Gram 14T90N UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | -5% | 1% | 6% | -1% | |
off / environment * | 26.1 | 29.3 -12% | 29 -11% | 28.3 -8% | 28.2 -8% | 30.1 -15% |
Idle Minimum * | 26.1 | 29.3 -12% | 30 -15% | 28.3 -8% | 28.2 -8% | 30.1 -15% |
Idle Average * | 26.1 | 29.3 -12% | 30 -15% | 28.3 -8% | 28.2 -8% | 30.1 -15% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.1 | 29.3 -12% | 30 -15% | 28.3 -8% | 28.3 -8% | 30.1 -15% |
Load Average * | 39.9 | 33.3 17% | 35.2 12% | 32.6 18% | 28.2 29% | 30.1 25% |
Load Maximum * | 44.7 | 33.3 26% | 37 17% | 36.6 18% | 28.8 36% | 32.02 28% |
* ... smaller is better
Ses yüksekliği
Boşta |
| 26.1 / 26.1 / 26.1 dB |
Çalışırken |
| 39.9 / 44.7 dB |
| ||
30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 26.1 dB(A) |
Temperature
Surface temperatures will always be warmer on the left half of the laptop than the right due to the positioning of the processor within. Hot spots in this region can reach a toasty 48 C to 56 C as shown by our temperature maps below, but this is thankfully away from the frontal quadrants of the chassis and most of the keyboard keys.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.2 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
Stress Test
When running Prime95 to stress the CPU, clock rates would boost to about 3.6 GHz for the first couple of seconds until core temperature reaches 98 C. Clock rates would then stabilize at around 3.0 to 3.1 GHz for the next minute or so before finally cycling between 2.2 GHz and 3.3 GHz and 79 C to 98 C as shown by our screenshots below. This cycling behavior is not observed on most other laptops where fixed clock rates and temperatures are more common, but Dell favors it for the faster burst clock rates even if they are only temporary.
Running on battery will limit CPU performance. A 3DMark 11 run on battery power would return Physics and Graphics scores of 7118 and 1975 points, respectively, compared to 8315 and 1965 points when on mains.
CPU Clock (GHz) | GPU Clock (MHz) | Average CPU Temperature (°C) | |
System Idle | -- | -- | 38 |
Prime95 Stress | 2.2 - 3.2 | -- | 79 - 98 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 0.9 - 1.4 | 650 - 1050 | 74 - 92 |
Speakers
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management
Power Consumption
Dell Latitude laptops have always been very power efficient due in part to having no discrete GPU options. Idling on desktop draws only between 2 W and 5 W even when on to the maximum brightness setting.
Interestingly, power consumption can be very high for an ULV subnotebook when under demanding loads because of the included 90 W (~13 x 6.8 x 2.2 cm) AC adapter. In comparison, most Ultrabooks come with 45 W or 60 W adapters instead. When running extreme loads like Prime95, consumption can spike to as high as 76 W which is good because that means the processor can run at higher Turbo Boost clock rates even if only for very short periods.
Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.4 / 1.1 Watt |
Boşta | 2.6 / 3.9 / 4.6 Watt |
Çalışırken |
38.9 / 76.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 2200S 512GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -40% | -9% | -37% | -3% | -42% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 3.2 -23% | 2.9 -12% | 2.7 -4% | 2.6 -0% | 3.6 -38% |
Idle Average * | 3.9 | 7 -79% | 5.8 -49% | 6.5 -67% | 4.3 -10% | 7.5 -92% |
Idle Maximum * | 4.6 | 8.9 -93% | 6.2 -35% | 11.5 -150% | 5.5 -20% | 9.4 -104% |
Load Average * | 38.9 | 47.6 -22% | 32.9 15% | 38.7 1% | 32 18% | 42 -8% |
Load Maximum * | 76.2 | 63.1 17% | 48.5 36% | 50.5 34% | 78.8 -3% | 51 33% |
* ... smaller is better
Battery Life
Battery capacity is large for a 14-inch convertible form factor at 78 Wh. We're able to record 19 hours of real-world WLAN use before automatic shutdown to be a lot longer than most other subnotebooks. A smaller 52 Wh option is available for users who want a lighter system.
Charging from empty to full takes about two hours.
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -56% | -30% | -31% | -36% | -60% | |
Reader / Idle | 2892 | 1966 -32% | 1673 -42% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 1141 | 636 -44% | 751 -34% | 623 -45% | 732 -36% | 461 -60% |
Load | 202 | 64 -68% | 153 -24% | 187 -7% |
Artılar
Eksiler
Verdict
The good news is that the Latitude 9410 2-in-1 isn't all that different from the already excellent Latitude 7400 2-in-1. Dell didn't mess with a good thing and instead simply upgraded some components like the CPU and WLAN to remain competitive against the HP EliteBook x360 and Lenovo Yoga convertible series.
On the other hand, the bad news is that the Latitude 9410 2-in-1 isn't all that different from the already excellent Latitude 7400 2-in-1. It's a double-edged sword because users can purchase last year's Latitude 7400 2-in-1 for essentially the same experience and performance as the pricier 2020 Latitude 9410 2-in-1. Minor drawbacks like the lack of a proper webcam or brighter display options haven't been addressed and GPU options are still nonexistent, but they don't detract from a superb chassis design that's barely a year old.
Don't let the brand new name fool you because the Latitude 9410 2-in-1 is just a minor refresh of the already excellent Latitude 7400 2-in-1. It's still one of the best 14-inch business convertibles you can get right now even though it may not have the brightest display out there.
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
- 08/31/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo