Notebookcheck Logo

Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop incelemesi

Core i7-10875H is the new Core i9-9980HK.

1300 $ XPS 15 ile 2400 $ XPS 15 arasındaki farklar nelerdir? Belirgin ekran çözünürlüğü ve performans avantajlarının yanı sıra, bazı küçük değişiklikler de var. Burada hepsini gözden geçiriyoruz.

(11 Haziran güncellemesi: Bu incelemeyi bitirdikten hemen sonra, Dell XPS 15 9500 için çok daha hızlı bir Core i9-10885H seçeneği açıkladı. Aşağıdaki orijinal metnimiz değişmeden kaldı.) Geçen hafta, en ucuz Dell XPS 15 9500 yapılandırmasını kontrol ettik dört çekirdekli Core i5-10300H CPU, entegre UHD Graphics 630 GPU ve mat FHD ekran ile 1300 USD karşılığında donatılmıştır. Bu hafta, en üst düzey sekiz çekirdekli Core i7-10875H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti ve 4K UHD dokunmatik ekran yapılandırmasına 2400 $ harcamak isteyen kullanıcılar için sistemin spektrumun diğer tarafından nasıl göründüğünü görmek için buradayız. 2020 XPS 15'in yeni şasi ve fiziksel özellikleri hakkında daha fazla bilgi için lütfen XPS 15 9500 Core i5 hakkındaki mevcut incelememize bakın. Bu inceleme Core i7 yapılandırmasının performansına ve temel Core i5 seçeneğinden ve eski XPS 15 7590 serisinden nasıl farklılaşacağına odaklanacak.Daha fazla Dell incelemesi: XPS 15 9500 Core i5 FHDXPS 15 7590 Core i9 4K UHDLatitude 7490Alienware m15 R2Vostro 15

Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD (XPS 15 9500 Seri)
İşlemci
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Grafik kartı
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Çekirdek: 1350 MHz, Bellek: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 446.16, Optimus
Bellek
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200, 21-21-21-47, Dual-Channel
Görüntü
15.60 inç 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 290 PPI, 10-point capacitive, Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, SHP14D0, Dell P/N: 90T02, parlak: evet, 60 Hz
Anakart
Intel WM490 (Comet Lake PCH-H)
Harddisk
SK Hynix PC611 512GB, 512 GB 
Ses kartı
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Bağlantılar
3 USB 3.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm combo, Kart okuyucular: SD reader, Brightness Sensor
Network
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s (ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 18 x 344.72 x 230.14
Batarya
86 Wh Lithium-Polymer
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: 2.5 W x2 subwoofers, 1.5 W x2 tweeters, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, USB Type-C to HDMI and USB Type-A adapter, Dell Update, Power Manager, Cinema GUide, Digital Delivery, Customer Connect, Mobile Connect, 12 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
1.974 kg, Güç kaynağı: 481 g
Fiyat
2400 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
90.1 %
v7 (old)
06/2020
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
i7-10875H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
2 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2400
86 %
v7 (old)
03/2020
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2 kg19.7 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.2 %
v7 (old)
03/2020
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
1.6 kg18.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.2 %
v7 (old)
12/2019
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
1.7 kg16 mm15.60"3840x2160
86.8 %
v7 (old)
06/2020
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630
1.8 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1200
89.7 %
v7 (old)
12/2019
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M
2 kg16.2 mm16.00"3072x1920

Durum

366 mm 234 mm 16 mm 1.7 kg355.2 mm 238.4 mm 19.7 mm 2 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 2 kg354 mm 220.4 mm 18.9 mm 1.6 kg354 mm 235 mm 16 mm 2 kg344.72 mm 230.14 mm 18 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Bağlantı

SD Kart Okuyucu

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.5 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
172.4 MB/s -13%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
149 MB/s -25%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
144 MB/s -27%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
207.8 MB/s +5%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197.9 MB/s
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
192.5 MB/s -3%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192.1 MB/s -3%

İletişim

Tüm SKU'lar, Wi-Fi 6 bağlantısı için Killer 1650'leri entegre eder. Netgear RAX200 yönlendiricimize bağlandığında herhangi bir sorunla karşılaşmadık.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1374 (720min - 1484max) MBit/s +31%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1049 (253min - 1334max) MBit/s 0%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1049 (862min - 1225max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
581 (533min - 616max) MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1446 (653min - 1555max) MBit/s
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1291 (1212min - 1379max) MBit/s -11%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1281 (1079min - 1478max) MBit/s -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
817 (806min - 821max) MBit/s -43%

Web kamerası

ColorChecker
8.1 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
11 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD: 6.87 ∆E min: 3.18 - max: 14.93 ∆E

Bakım

XPS 15 9500 Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti
XPS 15 9500 Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti

Giriş cihazları

Görüntüle

Mat FHD XPS 15 9500, Sharp LQ156N1 IPS panelini kullanırken, parlak 4K SKU'muz Sharp LQ156R1'i kullanıyor. Daha yüksek çözünürlük ve daha derin renkler hemen fark edilir, ancak bu, aşağıdaki karşılaştırma tablosumuzda gösterildiği gibi FHD sürümüne göre biraz daha yavaş tepki süreleri ve biraz daha sönük bir arka ışık maliyetiyle gelir. Küçük dezavantajlar, bunun şu anda başka hiçbir tüketici Ultrabook'ta bulunmayan benzersiz ve yüksek kaliteli bir 16:10 panel olduğu gerçeğinden uzaklaşmak için çok az şey yapıyor. Ek yükseklik, Apple MacBook Pro modellerindeki ekranlara benzer neredeyse tüm uygulamalar için paha biçilmez hale gelir. 2019 XPS 15'ten daha az belirgin bir yükseltme, hem FHD hem de 4K UHD XPS 15 9500 SKU'larda darbe genişliği modülasyonunun tamamen olmamasıdır. Titreşen ekranlara duyarlılık nedeniyle XPS 15 serisine devam eden kullanıcıların artık 2020 modeli için endişelenmesi gerekmeyecek.

Edge-to-edge glass with touchscreen support. The new 16:10 aspect ratio is one of the most important changes to the XPS 15 9500
Edge-to-edge glass with touchscreen support. The new 16:10 aspect ratio is one of the most important changes to the XPS 15 9500
Both FHD and 4K UHD are available, but OLED is no longer an option
Both FHD and 4K UHD are available, but OLED is no longer an option
Crisp RGB subpixels with visible touch-sensitive matrix
Crisp RGB subpixels with visible touch-sensitive matrix
Minor uneven backlight bleeding along the edges and corners
Minor uneven backlight bleeding along the edges and corners
530
cd/m²
559.2
cd/m²
555.7
cd/m²
537.4
cd/m²
557.9
cd/m²
559.7
cd/m²
511.3
cd/m²
526.8
cd/m²
530.9
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
Sharp LQ156R1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 559.7 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 541 cd/m² Minimum: 34.3 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 91 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 557.9 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1431:1 (Siyah: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.82
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
89.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.99
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2400
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Sharp LQ156N1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1200
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
LG Philips LP156WFC-SPU1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
BOE CQ NV156FHM-N63, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Sharp LQ156D1JW42, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
APPA044, IPS, 16", 3072x1920
Display
-10%
-25%
-26%
-5%
Display P3 Coverage
89.7
81.5
-9%
61.5
-31%
65
-28%
82
-9%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
92.7
-7%
86.2
-14%
98.3
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
99.8
79.6
-20%
63.6
-36%
62.9
-37%
96.2
-4%
Response Times
18%
0%
11%
-18%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
54 ?(26.4, 27.6)
42 ?(20, 22)
22%
48.4 ?(24.4, 24)
10%
45 ?(24, 21)
17%
60 ?(29.2, 30.8)
-11%
52.4 ?(23.9, 28.5)
3%
Response Time Black / White *
33.2 ?(19.2, 14)
28.8 ?(15.2, 13.6)
13%
36.4 ?(21.2, 15.2)
-10%
32 ?(18, 14)
4%
41.2 ?(22.8, 18.4)
-24%
34.9 ?(17.8, 17.1)
-5%
PWM Frequency
26040 ?(24)
131700
Screen
4%
-2%
-13%
0%
17%
Brightness middle
557.9
592
6%
484.8
-13%
299
-46%
464.5
-17%
519
-7%
Brightness
541
565
4%
463
-14%
280
-48%
451
-17%
477
-12%
Brightness Distribution
91
85
-7%
82
-10%
89
-2%
92
1%
86
-5%
Black Level *
0.39
0.46
-18%
0.26
33%
0.21
46%
0.5
-28%
0.39
-0%
Contrast
1431
1287
-10%
1865
30%
1424
0%
929
-35%
1331
-7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.54
3.19
30%
4.5
1%
4.76
-5%
3.36
26%
2.28
50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.92
5.45
31%
7.55
5%
9
-14%
7.06
11%
6.54
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.82
2.03
47%
1.19
69%
3.42
10%
0.86
77%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.2
3.9
-22%
5.7
-78%
3.53
-10%
1.3
59%
0.9
72%
Gamma
1.99 111%
2.25 98%
2.45 90%
2.3 96%
2.14 103%
2145 0%
CCT
6451 101%
6522 100%
6101 107%
7228 90%
6596 99%
6572 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.5
71.6
-20%
58.7
-34%
56
-37%
84.8
-5%
78
-13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
100
0%
92.8
-7%
86
-14%
98.3
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 3%
-9% / -6%
-9% / -13%
-8% / -3%
8% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

Temel FHD sürümü tüm sRGB'leri kapsarken, 4K UHD sürümümüz daha derin ve potansiyel olarak daha doğru renkler için tüm sRGB'yi ve neredeyse tüm AdobeRGB'yi kapsar.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Bir X-Rite kolorimetresi ile yapılan diğer ölçümler, kutunun dışında iyi kalibre edilmiş bir ekran gösterir. Paneli kendimiz kalibre etmek, gri tonlamayı ve renk deltaE değerlerini sadece çok az da olsa iyileştirecektir.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.2 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.4 ms rise
↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Mat FHD sürümünü parlak 4K sürümüne tercih etmek için herhangi bir neden varsa, dış mekan görünürlüğü için olurdu. Parlama burada daha ağırdır ve arka ışık, yukarıda belirtildiği gibi FHD sürümü kadar parlak değildir. Bununla birlikte, arka ışık ortalamanın üzerinde daha parlak olduğu için XPS, dış mekanlarda diğer Ultrabook'lardan daha iyidir. Intel Graphics Command Center uygulaması aracılığıyla ek ayarların değiştirilmesi gerektiğini veya pil gücüyle çalışırken maksimum parlaklığın 559 nit'den 474 nite düşeceğini unutmayın. Bu fenomen XPS 13 9300 serisinde de ortaya çıkacaktı.

Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Wide IPS viewing angles. Minor contrast and color changes from extreme angles
Wide IPS viewing angles. Minor contrast and color changes from extreme angles

Verim

Şu anda XPS 15 9500 için en üst düzey CPU seçeneği, burada sahip olduğumuz Comet Lake-H Core i7-10875H. Bu nedenle, XPS 15 7590'da aksine en azından şimdilik konuşacak Core i9 seçeneği yoktur. Bu muhtemelen en iyisi için Core i9-9980HK'nın Core i7-9750H'ye o kadar yakın bir performans göstereceği göz önüne alındığında Core i9 SKU'yu Core i7 SKU'ya önermek zor oldu. GPU için ise XPS 15 9500 bir Geçen yılki GTX 1650'nin yerini alacak olan ilk GeForce GTX 1650 Ti'yi taşıdı. Dell'in termal sınırlamalar nedeniyle daha da hızlı GTX 1660 Ti sunamadığından şüpheleniyoruz. Kullanıcıların, üst düzey GPU'ların bulunduğu Gigabyte Aero 15, Razer Blade 15 veya Eluktronics RP-15 gibi alternatifleri göz önünde bulundurmaları gerekecektir. Aşağıdaki tüm performans kıyaslama testleri, aksi belirtilmedikçe Dell'in Ultra Performans modunda gerçekleştirilmiştir. Optimus standart olarak geliyor.

İşlemci

Bir Core i7 olmasına rağmen, 10. nesil Core i7-10875H, 9. nesil Core i9-9880H veya Core i9-9980HK'nın ardışık olarak okta çekirdekli bir CPU olduğundan daha fazla görülebilir. . Aslında, CineBench kriterlerine göre performans geçen yılki XPS 15 7590'da Core i9-9980HK'ya zaten çok yakın. Temel dört çekirdekli Core i5-10300H veya orta sınıf Core i7-10750H'den yükseltme yapan kullanıcılar, sırasıyla bir döngüdeki çok yönlü performans artışlarını sırasıyla yüzde 50 ve yüzde 25 görecekler. modelleri. 1390 puanlık ilk puan düşerek sadece yüzde 7'lik bir performans düşüşünü göstermek için yaklaşık 1290 puana sabitlenecektir. Dell XPS serisi için hala AMD Ryzen seçeneği bulunmaması çok kötü. Örneğin Ryzen 7 4800H, herhangi bir mobil Intel 10. nesil Core i7 modelinden ve hatta birçok Core i9 modelinden daha iyi performans gösterebilir.

CineBench R15
CineBench R15
CineBench R20
CineBench R20
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1292 (1148.9-1390.72)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1314 (1090.6-1600.38)
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1496 (1486.55-1622.78)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1541 (1518.31-1635.12)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4663 Points +43%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3713 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1986 - 4176, n=32)
3455 Points +6%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK
3293 Points +1%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
3250 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16
Intel Core i9-9880H
3012 Points -7%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2924 Points -10%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
2600 Points -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
2562 Points -21%
SCHENKER Work 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
2272 Points -30%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
2107 Points -35%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1633 Points -50%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
498 Points +1%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
493 Points
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
489 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (430 - 524, n=32)
486 Points -1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
477 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
470 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16
Intel Core i9-9880H
465 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
458 Points -7%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK
457 Points -7%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
446 Points -10%
SCHENKER Work 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
409 Points -17%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
352 Points -29%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1995 (1946.66min - 1995.21max) Points +43%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1635 (1518.31min - 1635.12max) Points +18%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1600 (1090.6min, 1367.66P1 - 1369.3max) Points +15%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1003 - 1833, n=38)
1554 Points +12%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
1391 (1148.9min - 1390.72max) Points
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16
Intel Core i9-9880H
1317 Points -5%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1217 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
1166 (1047.18min - 1166.18max) Points -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
1138 Points -18%
SCHENKER Work 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
971 (541.45min - 977.59max) Points -30%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
889 (827.87min - 893.75max) Points -36%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
734 Points -47%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
204 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (190 - 220, n=37)
204 Points 0%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
203 Points 0%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK
201 Points -1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
201 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
193 Points -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points -7%
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
189 Points -7%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
186 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16
Intel Core i9-9880H
181 Points -11%
SCHENKER Work 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points -15%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
143 Points -30%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
508 Seconds * -44%
SCHENKER Work 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
473 Seconds * -34%
SCHENKER Work 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
473 Seconds * -34%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
423 Seconds * -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16
Intel Core i9-9880H
384 Seconds * -9%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
353 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (259 - 535, n=30)
327 Seconds * +7%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
295 Seconds * +16%
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
248 Seconds * +30%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5071 - 5780, n=31)
5360 MIPS 0%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
5335 MIPS
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5227 MIPS -2%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
5051 MIPS -5%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
4889 MIPS -8%
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4711 MIPS -12%
SCHENKER Work 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
4629 MIPS -13%
SCHENKER Work 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
4629 MIPS -13%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
53883 MIPS +48%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
43786 MIPS +20%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (29844 - 49562, n=31)
43117 MIPS +19%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
36383 MIPS
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
29009 MIPS -20%
SCHENKER Work 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
28826 MIPS -21%
SCHENKER Work 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
28826 MIPS -21%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
24388 MIPS -33%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
1318 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1233 - 1371, n=29)
1304 Points -1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1283 Points -3%
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1207 Points -8%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
1183 Points -10%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
1114 Points -15%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
874 Points -34%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
8672 Points +11%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
7799 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5715 - 8620, n=29)
7734 Points -1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
7634 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
5242 Points -33%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
4399 Points -44%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
3537 Points -55%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
14.1 fps +38%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.2 fps +20%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (7.27 - 14.1, n=27)
11.7 fps +15%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
10.2 fps
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
8.074 fps -21%
SCHENKER Work 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
7.8 fps -24%
SCHENKER Work 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
7.76 fps -24%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.28 fps -29%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
63.6 s * -21%
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
60.7 s * -15%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
Intel Core i7-10750H
53.2 s * -1%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
52.6 s *
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
52.4 s * -0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (30.2 - 84.3, n=30)
50.3 s * +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.646 sec * -11%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.592 sec * -1%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.584 sec *
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (0.546 - 0.662, n=29)
0.582 sec * -0%
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.574 sec * +2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6827
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6829 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
87.7 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1391 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
152 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
204 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3250 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
493 Points
Yardım

Sistem performansı

PCMark karşılaştırmaları, Core i5 XPS 15 9500 yapılandırmasının tutarlı bir şekilde önündeyken, geçen yıl Digital Creation karşılaştırmasında XPS 15 7590'ın gerisinde kalıyor. Bu özel alt test hiç bu kadar güvenilir olmamıştı ve bu nedenle çoğu durumda göz ardı edilebilir. Test ünitesi ile zamanımız boyunca hiçbir yazılım veya donanım sorunu yaşamadık. Ayrıca, XPS 15 9500 Core i5 birimimizde gördüğümüz tuhaf USB davranışını yeniden üretemedik.

PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10
Score
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
5469 Points +7%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB
5125 Points
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5009 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
4887 Points -5%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4490 Points -12%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
4329 Points -16%
Essentials
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
10539 Points +7%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
9874 Points +1%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB
9808 Points
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
9701 Points -1%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9048 Points -8%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8911 Points -9%
Productivity
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB
7994 Points
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
7494 Points -6%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7284 Points -9%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
7193 Points -10%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
6996 Points -12%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6832 Points -15%
Digital Content Creation
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
6110 Points +31%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5520 Points +18%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB
4662 Points
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
4178 Points -10%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3786 Points -19%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
3187 Points -32%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
4069 Points +9%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
3842 Points +3%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3799 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3761 Points +1%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB
3731 Points
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3546 Points -5%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
5359 Points +18%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
5271 Points +16%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5265 Points +16%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4762 Points +5%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB
4540 Points
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4483 Points -1%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3731 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4540 puan
PCMark 10 Score
5125 puan
Yardım

DPC Gecikmesi

LatencyMon, ana XPS 15 9500 Core i5 seçeneğiyle karşılaştırıldığında, ana sayfamızda birden çok tarayıcı sekmesi açarken daha DPC gecikme sorunlarını gösterir. Neyse ki, 4K UHD video oynatımı pürüzsüz kalır.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB
9856 μs *
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1916 μs * +81%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1521 μs * +85%
Eluktronics RP-15
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PM81000GPMQCN28BTF-E12S4 M.2 NVM SSD
515 μs * +95%

* ... smaller is better

Depolama aygıtları

Test birimimiz 512 GB SK Hynix PC611 NVMe SSD ile birlikte gelir ve 2x2 TB M.2 PCIe SSD yapılandırma seçenekleri bulunur. Bir Samsung veya Toshiba sürücüsü olmasa da, performans hala ilgili üst düzey modellerle neredeyse aynı. Tarihsel olarak, XPS sistemleri SK Hynix, Toshiba, Samsung ve Lite-On'dan SSD'ler taşımaktadır ve bu nedenle dördünden hangisini alabileceğinizi bilmek her zaman kolay değildir. Daha fazla karşılaştırma karşılaştırması için SSD'ler ve HDD'ler tablomuza bakın.

CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
AS SSD
AS SSD
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
SK Hynix PC611 512GB
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
AS SSD
32%
-25%
27%
30%
-69%
Seq Read
2072
1723
-17%
769
-63%
2643
28%
1274
-39%
1423
-31%
Seq Write
1486
1386
-7%
351.1
-76%
1533
3%
1395
-6%
766
-48%
4K Read
47.41
43.25
-9%
69.1
46%
49.12
4%
50.3
6%
42.21
-11%
4K Write
117.6
98.3
-16%
100.9
-14%
134.7
15%
119.8
2%
74.8
-36%
4K-64 Read
967
1078
11%
472
-51%
1028
6%
1599
65%
973
1%
4K-64 Write
715
1456
104%
948
33%
1353
89%
1455
103%
218.8
-69%
Access Time Read *
0.057
0.05
12%
0.071
-25%
0.033
42%
0.044
23%
0.125
-119%
Access Time Write *
0.096
0.039
59%
0.137
-43%
0.028
71%
0.092
4%
0.552
-475%
Score Read
1222
1294
6%
618
-49%
1342
10%
1777
45%
1157
-5%
Score Write
981
1693
73%
1084
10%
1641
67%
1714
75%
370
-62%
Score Total
2809
3638
30%
2024
-28%
3622
29%
4411
57%
2094
-25%
Copy ISO MB/s
1999
3182
59%
839
-58%
2226
11%
2830
42%
1151
-42%
Copy Program MB/s
627
984
57%
455.8
-27%
506
-19%
609
-3%
499.4
-20%
Copy Game MB/s
1001
1824
82%
969
-3%
1230
23%
1424
42%
733
-27%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
1%
2%
8%
-13%
-23%
Write 4K
123.3
104.3
-15%
102.2
-17%
138.1
12%
150.8
22%
93.3
-24%
Read 4K
41.85
45.23
8%
114.3
173%
45.89
10%
47.3
13%
45.9
10%
Write Seq
2054
1729
-16%
468.3
-77%
2147
5%
981
-52%
1211
-41%
Read Seq
1617
1861
15%
1236
-24%
2188
35%
976
-40%
1633
1%
Write 4K Q32T1
413
509
23%
556
35%
427.8
4%
442.7
7%
273.1
-34%
Read 4K Q32T1
377.5
388.5
3%
421.6
12%
404
7%
499.7
32%
356
-6%
Write Seq Q32T1
2705
2813
4%
1264
-53%
2396
-11%
1706
-37%
1198
-56%
Read Seq Q32T1
3442
2906
-16%
2239
-35%
3454
0%
1758
-49%
2269
-34%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
17% / 20%
-12% / -15%
18% / 20%
9% / 14%
-46% / -52%

* ... smaller is better

SK Hynix PC611 512GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3442 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2705 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 377.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 413 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1617 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2054 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.85 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 123.3 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU Performansı

Geçen yılki GTX 1650'den GTX 1650 Ti'ye performans artışı sadece yüzde 7 ila 16'da nispeten küçük, ancak yine de ölçülebilir. Fark, grafik gerektiren uygulamalar veya oyunlar çalıştırırken farkedilebilecek kadar büyük değil. Daha fazla teknik bilgi ve karşılaştırma karşılaştırmaları için GTX 1650 Ti'deki özel sayfamıza bakın. Genel olarak, kullanıcılar daha eski GTX 1060 cep telefonu ile performansın boydan boya olmasını bekleyebilirler.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Time Spy
Time Spy
 
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eluktronics RP-15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
16808 Points +69%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
14718 Points +48%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
14463 Points +46%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11332 Points +14%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H
9930 Points
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
9195 Points -7%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
8532 Points -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H
8391 Points -15%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H
7428 Points -25%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
1189 Points -88%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Eluktronics RP-15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
6280 Points +74%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5534 Points +54%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4734 Points +31%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3626 Points +1%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H
3601 Points
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
3492 Points -3%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
3353 Points -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H
3132 Points -13%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H
2278 Points -37%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
382 Points -89%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Eluktronics RP-15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
6600 Points +75%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5697 Points +51%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4763 Points +26%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
3839 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3795 Points +1%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H
3774 Points
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
3676 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H
3373 Points -11%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H
2513 Points -33%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
441 Points -88%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eluktronics RP-15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
22629 Points +76%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
19670 Points +53%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
18234 Points +42%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13759 Points +7%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H
12865 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
12620 Points -2%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
12388 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H
11991 Points -7%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H
9079 Points -29%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
1744 Points -86%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eluktronics RP-15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
13824 Points +6%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H
13027 Points
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
12192 Points -6%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
11707 Points -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H
10846 Points -17%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H
8877 Points -32%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
8855 Points -32%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
8801 Points -32%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
6839 Points -48%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
1783 Points -86%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
39720 puan
3DMark Vantage P Result
43517 puan
3DMark 11 Performance
13331 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
20269 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9222 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score
3774 puan
Yardım

1080p'de Witcher 3'te rölantide çalışırken kare hızları Yüksek ayarlar aşağıdaki grafikte gösterildiği gibi tutarlı değildir. ~ 62 FPS'den ~ 70 FPS'ye kadar, Ultra Performance profiile'sinde bile belirgin bir neden olmaksızın tekrarlayan küçük tümsekler var. İdeal olarak, kare hızları ani bir çarpma veya düşüş olmadan bir saatlik test boyunca sabit olmalıdır. XPS 15 bir oyun makinesi değil, bu yüzden büyük bir sorun değil, ancak GeForce GTX grafik kartlarına sahip bir PC için hala ideal değil.

0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB: Ø63.2 (55-72)
düşükortayüksekultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 209.9 100.8 65.6 38.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 150 139 130 120 51.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 109 78.2 63.3 45.8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 139 62 57 48
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 86 60 42 25
Apex Legends (2019) 144 91 84 74
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 73 57 58 51
Metro Exodus (2019) 91.6 48.7 35.9 27.9
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 247.3 92.7 74.6 44.8
The Division 2 (2019) 115 56 47 35
Anno 1800 (2019) 68.4 64.5 49.1 27.6
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 190.2 59.1 40.8 27.2
F1 2019 (2019) 206 105 89 76
Borderlands 3 (2019) 128.3 59.9 38.5 29.3
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 72 53 47 31
GRID 2019 (2019) 103.8 70.7 64.1 27.3
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 60.4 43.3 39 37.3
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 44.1 41.5 40.7
Escape from Tarkov (2020) 120.5 89.7 60.4 73
Hunt Showdown (2020) 150 58.5 47.5
Doom Eternal (2020) 149.5 90.7 66.6

Emisyonları

Sistem Gürültüsü

Core i5 incelememizde, sistemin 3DMark 06'nın ilk kıyaslama sahnesinde bile sessiz kalacağını belirtti. Ancak Core i7 GeForce yapılandırması için, fan gürültüsü, sonunda 46 dB (A) çarpana kadar yavaşça artacaktır. aynı kıyaslama sahnesi. Kimse daha hızlı yapılandırmanın temel Core i5 seçeneğinden daha yüksek sesle çalışmamasını şaşırtmamalı. Oyun oynarken, kullanıcılar işlem yüküne bağlı olarak 42 dB (A) ile 46 dB (A) arasında bir fan gürültüsü bekleyebilirler. Core i5 seçeneğinde "sadece" 41,9 dB (A) ile karşılaştırıldığında maksimum 47,1 dB (A) kaydedebiliyoruz.Çok teşekkürler, Core i7 sistemi çok düşük yükler çalıştırırken Core i5 sistemi kadar sessiz olabilir Dell Optimize edilmiş moda veya Sessiz moda ayarlandığında tarama, kelime işlemci veya video akışı gibi. Bu durumda fan gürültüsü, çoğu ortamda zar zor duyulabilmek için yalnızca 31,4 dB (A) seviyesine çıkma eğilimindedir.

Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
Noise
-2%
-0%
4%
3%
9%
off / environment *
28.4
28.2
1%
28.7
-1%
30.3
-7%
29.3
-3%
28
1%
Idle Minimum *
28.4
28.2
1%
28.7
-1%
30.3
-7%
30.1
-6%
28
1%
Idle Average *
28.4
28.2
1%
28.8
-1%
30.3
-7%
30.2
-6%
28
1%
Idle Maximum *
28.4
30.4
-7%
28.8
-1%
30.9
-9%
30.2
-6%
28
1%
Load Average *
46
43.8
5%
45
2%
31.3
32%
31.5
32%
28
39%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42
47.2
-12%
44.7
-6%
38.1
9%
37
12%
Load Maximum *
47.1
47.2
-0%
44.7
5%
38.2
19%
47
-0%
41.9
11%

* ... smaller is better

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB
Çalışırken
46 / 47.1 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm uzaklık)   environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)

Sıcaklık

Yüzey sıcaklıkları, temel Core i5 konfigürasyonundan daha belirgin şekilde daha sıcaktır. Örneğin, masaüstünde rölantide çalışırken, yüzey sıcak noktaları Core i5 SKU'daki 26 C'ye kıyasla 33 C kadar sıcak olabilir. Oyun oynarken, klavye merkezi neredeyse 50 C'ye ulaşabilirken, Core i5 SKU yaklaşık 43 C'dir. İyi haber şu ki avuç içi dayanakları, tıklama yüzeyi ve WASD tuşları asla rahatsız edici derecede ısınmaz ve AC adaptörünün Core i5 seçeneği için olan adaptörden daha sıcaktır. Dell, XPS 15 9500 yapılandırması ne olursa olsun aynı 130 W AC adaptörünü gönderir. Birincil NVMe SSD doğrudan altına takıldığından, klavyenin sol alt köşesine en yakın noktanın 40 ° C'nin üzerinde çok sıcak olabileceğini unutmayın. Tabii ki, bu sadece SSD'ye sürekli olarak erişilirse gerçekleşir.

Dual rear exhaust
Dual rear exhaust
Very warm AC adapter
Very warm AC adapter
Maksimum yük
 34.6 °C44 °C37.2 °C 
 33.2 °C40.2 °C37 °C 
 31.6 °C34 °C34.4 °C 
Maksimum: 44 °C
Ortalama: 36.2 °C
40 °C48.8 °C33.2 °C
47 °C45 °C34 °C
33.6 °C29 °C29 °C
Maksimum: 48.8 °C
Ortalama: 37.7 °C
Güç kaynağı  57 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.4 °C / 93.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.6 °C / -10.1 F).
System idle (top)
System idle (top)
System idle (bottom)
System idle (bottom)
Witcher 3 stress (top)
Witcher 3 stress (top)
Witcher 3 stress (bottom)
Witcher 3 stress (bottom)
Prime95+FurMark stress (top)
Prime95+FurMark stress (top)
Prime95+FurMark stress (bottom)
Prime95+FurMark stress (bottom)

Stress Test

We stress the laptop to identify for any potential throttling or stability issues. When running Prime95, clock rates would boost up to 4.2 GHz for about 15 seconds until hitting a core temperature of 99 C. Thereafter, clock rates would fall to the 3.4 to 3.5 GHz range in order to maintain a slightly cooler core temperature of 90 C. After a minute, however, clock rates and temperature would fall even further to 2.9 GHz and 73 C, respectively, as shown by our screenshots below. This would occur even when running on Dell's Ultra Performance mode. Keep in mind that the Core i7-10875H is rated for a maximum Turbo Boost clock rate of 4.3 GHz for all eight cores meaning that the steady-state 2.9 GHz Turbo Boost on the XPS 15 is likely thermally limited.

When running Witcher 3, both the CPU and GPU would each stabilize in the low 70 C range to be nearly identical to what we recorded on last year's XPS 15 7590 with the Core i9 CPU and GTX 1650 GPU. From what we can tell, it looks like Dell was aiming to keep temperatures relatively consistent gen-to-gen meaning that users shouldn't expect the XPS 15 9500 to run all that much cooler or warmer than previous generation models despite the significant chassis redesign.

Interestingly, GPU clock rates would alternative between ~1470 MHz and ~1650 MHz every few minutes when idling on Witcher 3 instead of remaining constant like on most other laptops. The cycling clock rates are likely responsible for the undesirable frame rate behavior mentioned in our Witcher 3 graph above.

Running on battery power will limit performance. A Fire Strike run on batteries returns Physics and Graphics scores of 17354 and 7956 points, respectively, compared to 21030 and 9930 points when on mains.

System idle
System idle
Witcher 3 stress
Witcher 3 stress
Prime95 stress
Prime95 stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
CPU Clock (GHz) GPU Clock (MHz) Average CPU Temperature (°C) Average GPU Temperature (°C)
System Idle -- -- ~40 ~40
Prime95 Stress 2.8 - 3.0 -- 73 64
Prime95 + FurMark Stress 800 - 1100 1.0 - 1.3 65 67
Witcher 3 Stress ~4.4 ~1470 - 1650 ~70 ~72

Speakers

Pink noise at maximum volume. The XPS 15 speakers are surprisingly balanced when compared to other Ultrabooks
Pink noise at maximum volume. The XPS 15 speakers are surprisingly balanced when compared to other Ultrabooks
Two speakers near the front corners with two more facing upwards along the sides of the keyboard
Two speakers near the front corners with two more facing upwards along the sides of the keyboard

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Our Core i7 configuration draws significantly more power than the base Core i5 configuration by over 2x when gaming or under other high loads. Performance-per-watt, however, is still very much in favor of the Core i7 SKU especially in terms of graphics power. Average rates are very close to what we recorded on the 2019 XPS 15 7590 Core i9 SKU which aligns with our temperature observations above.

When running Prime95, consumption would spike to 135 W for about 15 seconds before falling to ~120 W for about a minute thereafter. Consumption eventually stabilizes at 84.4 W for a behavior similar to what we observed during our Stress Test clock rate observations.

We're able to record a maximum consumption of 135.2 W when running both Prime95 and FurMark simultaneously. This would eventually drop and fluctuate before finally stabilizing at about 89 W.

Consumption when running the first benchmark scene of 3DMark 06
Consumption when running the first benchmark scene of 3DMark 06
Witcher 3 stress. Consumption cycles between 86 W and 106 W instead of remaining constant likely because of the fluctuating GPU clock rates. This is unlike most other laptops
Witcher 3 stress. Consumption cycles between 86 W and 106 W instead of remaining constant likely because of the fluctuating GPU clock rates. This is unlike most other laptops
Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike to 135 W before falling to ~120 W and then finally to 84.4 W
Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike to 135 W before falling to ~120 W and then finally to 84.4 W
Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike to 135 W before falling and fluctuating
Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike to 135 W before falling and fluctuating
Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.13 / 1.09 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 5.7 / 13.5 / 19.6 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 114.1 / 135.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
i7-10875H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, SK Hynix PC611 512GB, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6"
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.6"
Power Consumption
4%
6%
41%
14%
49%
Idle Minimum *
5.7
6.2
-9%
5.2
9%
2.8
51%
6.1
-7%
2.9
49%
Idle Average *
13.5
9.6
29%
10.7
21%
7.7
43%
13.2
2%
7.6
44%
Idle Maximum *
19.6
21.2
-8%
24.3
-24%
9.4
52%
19.2
2%
8
59%
Load Average *
114.1
104.3
9%
84.4
26%
57
50%
75
34%
41.7
63%
Witcher 3 ultra *
93
91.7
1%
83.9
10%
62
33%
74
20%
Load Maximum *
135.2
135.3
-0%
142.8
-6%
116
14%
89.7
34%
94.8
30%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Higher-end XPS 15 9500 configurations come with an 86 Wh battery compared to the smaller 56 Wh battery on SKUs without the GeForce GPU. The larger capacity balances out the more demanding hardware quite well as runtimes between our Core i5 and Core i7 SKUs are very close to one another. When both systems are set to the same WLAN conditions, we're able to reach just over 9 hours of constant use before automatic shutdown on each unit.

Charging, on the other hand, will take noticeably longer on the 86 Wh battery. Whereas the 56 Wh module would charge in just 1.5 hours, the 86 Wh battery would take a little over two hours from empty to full capacity.

The 86 Wh battery occupies the same volume as the lesser 56 Wh battery. It's technically possible to swap out one battery for another regardless of SKU.

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
23h 02min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 06min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
2h 01min
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
i7-10875H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 86 Wh
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 69 Wh
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 71 Wh
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
i5-8305G, Vega M GL / 870, 75 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630, 56 Wh
Battery Runtime
5%
-22%
24%
-10%
-28%
-2%
Reader / Idle
1382
910
-34%
1092
-21%
1629
18%
1147
-17%
663
-52%
1581
14%
WiFi v1.3
546
467
-14%
583
7%
743
36%
456
-16%
564
3%
556
2%
Load
121
199
64%
59
-51%
142
17%
125
3%
78
-36%
93
-23%

Artılar

+ Ultrabook için mükemmel ses kalitesi
+ parlak, yüksek kaliteli 16:10 ekran
+ saygın CPU performansı
+ 2x M.2 2280 PCIe yuvası
+ düşük yükler altında sessiz
+ hızlı SD kart okuyucu
+ çok büyük tıklama alanı
+ uzun pil ömrü
+ PWM yok

Eksiler

- sıcaklık veya gürültü konusunda büyük bir gen-gen artışı yok
- ortalama görüntüleme tepki süreleri; oyun oynarken gölgelenme
- GPU performansı ve kare hızları daha istikrarlı olabilir
- entegre tıklama yüzeyi tuşları süngerimsi tarafta
- ekran FHD versiyonundan biraz daha sönük
- entegre USB-A veya HDMI yok
- WLAN kullanıcı tarafından yükseltilemez
- yüksek DPC gecikmesi

Verdict

In review: Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD. Test unit provided by Dell
In review: Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD. Test unit provided by Dell

The XPS 15 9500 with Core i7-10875H and GTX 1650 Ti graphics serves to directly replace last year's XPS 15 with Core i9-9980HK and GTX 1650 graphics. Performance-wise, the newer model is marginally faster without needing to run any warmer or louder. Users who were hoping for a quieter or cooler experience will have to mend their original expectations as power consumption and noise have remained steady gen-over-gen.

The best reason for choosing the XPS 15 9500 over the older XPS 15 7590 is still for its 16:10 display because this change will be immediately noticeable and beneficial to the end-user in relation to the minor CPU or GPU performance upgrades. Other physical changes like the smaller dimensions, larger clickpad, improved audio, and better keyboard feedback help to make the newer model that much better to use than the 2019 model. Our main gripes with the system relate mostly to the over-reliance of USB Type-C and the average performance sustainability of the GPU when gaming. Fortunately, the former can be addressed with adapters while anyone bothered by the latter can choose from plenty of other options ranging from Alienware to MSI where GPU performance is both steadier and oftentimes faster.

The 2016 XPS 15 was a catalyst for narrow-bezel Ultrabook designs and the 2020 XPS 15 will likely do the same for 16:10 displays. This alone separates the XPS 15 9500 from other Core-H-powered Ultrabooks much more so than any processor differences you can find.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD - 06/09/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

İşcilik
92 / 98 → 94%
Klavye
89%
Mouse
94%
Bağlanılabilirlik
67 / 80 → 83%
Ağırlık
63 / 20-72 → 83%
Batarya
86 / 95 → 90%
Görüntü
87%
Oyun performansı
89 / 90 → 98%
Uygulama performansı
90 / 90 → 100%
Isınma
85%
Ses
85 / 95 → 89%
Audio
95%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Ortalama
82%
90%
Multimedia - Ortalama Ağırlık

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop incelemesi
Allen Ngo, 2020-06-18 (Update: 2020-06-18)