HP Omen 15 dizüstü bilgisayar incelemesi: Güçlü AMD işlemci Intel'i titretiyor

Name: HP Omen 15-en0375ng
Brand: HP

Full of surprises.

HP Omen 15'in AMD sürümü, kağıt üzerinde makul bir fiyata güçlü bileşenlerle puan alıyor. Test konfigürasyonunda GeForce RTX 2060'a bir Ryzen 7 4800H eşlik ediyor. Burada soğutma sisteminin oynayıp oynamadığını ve 15 inçlik cihazın başka hangi güçlü ve zayıf yönlerine sahip olduğunu öğrenin.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (Çeviren Aslinur Sarica), Published 02/06/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen)

HP'nin Omen 15'i çok geniş bir donanım portföyüne sahiptir. Yalnızca çeşitli Intel modelleri değil, aynı zamanda birkaç AMD çeşidi de vardır. Grafik kartı olarak Nvidia'nın Turing neslinden orta sınıf veya yüksek kaliteli bir çip kullanılır (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - RTX 2070). En iyi fiyat-performans oranlarından biri şu anda bizim tarafımızdan test edilen Omen 15-en0375ng tarafından yaklaşık 1.260 Euro karşılığında sunulmaktadır (~ 1530 $, başlangıçta belirtildiği gibi bir Ryzen 7 4800H ve GeForce RTX 2060 içerir). Oluşturulan resimler, 1.920 x 1.080 piksellik mat bir IPS panelinde görüntülenir. Ek olarak, çift kanal modunda 2x 8 GB DDR4-3,200 RAM ve yerden tasarruf sağlayan M.2 formatında 512 GB NVMe SSD vardır. Paket, işletim sistemi olarak Windows 10 Home 64 bit ile yuvarlanır.

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Omen 15-en0375ng

İşlemci

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 8 x 2.9 - 4.2 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Renoir-H (Zen 2)

Grafik kartı

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Çekirdek: 960 MHz, Bellek: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 452.41, Optimus

Bellek

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, Dual Channel

Görüntü

15.60 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE0852, IPS, Full-HD, parlak: hayır, 60 Hz

Anakart

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Harddisk

WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, 512 GB

, M.2 NVMe

Ses kartı

Realtek ALC245 @ AMD K17.6 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller

Bağlantılar

4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: Combo (Headset/Mic), Kart okuyucular: SD

Network

Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 23 x 358 x 240

Batarya

70.9 Wh Lithium-Ion, 6 Cells

İşletim sistemi

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: 2.0 Bang & Olufsen, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, 200 W Power Supply, Setup Guide, Command Center, 24 Ay Garanti

Ağırlık

2.16 kg, Güç kaynağı: 525 g

Fiyat

1260 EUR

Bağlantılar

HP anasayfa

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Omen 15-en0375ng'nin rakipleri arasında Schenker XMG Core 15, Asus TUF A15, Acer Predator Triton 300, Aorus 5 KB ve Lenovo Legion 5 gibi RTX 2060'a sahip diğer 15 inçlik bütçeli oyuncular yer alıyor. Bu dizüstü bilgisayarların her biri tabloda karşılaştırma cihazları olarak görünür.

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
82.8 % v7 ^(old)	02/2021	HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.2 kg	23 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.1 % v7 ^(old)		SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2 kg	19.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.7 % v7 ^(old)		Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.2 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.1 % v7 ^(old)		Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.1 kg	19.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.7 % v7 ^(old)		Aorus 5 KB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.1 kg	28 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.3 % v7 ^(old)	07/2020	Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.5 kg	26.1 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Şasi temelde birkaç ay önce test ettiğimiz Omen 15-ek0456ng ile aynıdır, bu nedenle şasiyi, ekipmanı ve giriş cihazlarını tekrar analiz etmekten kaçınırız. Ancak modeller tamamen aynı değil. Örneğin, AMD sürümünde kırmızı yerine beyaz klavye etiketi veya aydınlatması vardır. Alıcılar ayrıca Thunderbolt 3 bağlantı noktası olmadan da yapmak zorunda kalacak.

Boyut karşılaştırması

Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Aorus 5 KB Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP HP Omen 15-en0375ng SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O DIN A4 ❌

SDCardreader

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)	95.6 MB/s +35%
Aorus 5 KB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	76 MB/s +7%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	71 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	36 MB/s -49%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)	119.4 MB/s +36%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	88 MB/s
Aorus 5 KB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	86 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	37 MB/s -58%

İletişim

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Aorus 5 KB Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1380 MBit/s +115%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1230 MBit/s +92%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1220 MBit/s +90%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	662 (553^min - 769^max) MBit/s +3%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	642 MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	566 (37^min - 647^max) MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1640 MBit/s +203%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1380 MBit/s +155%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1380 MBit/s +155%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	880 (772^min - 916^max) MBit/s +62%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	630 (571^min - 641^max) MBit/s +16%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	542 MBit/s

Web kamerası

ColorChecker HP Omen 15-en0375ng: 17.92 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 27.71 ∆E

Görüntüle

Doğrudan en büyük hayal kırıklıklarından birine geçelim: ekran. Intel varyantı testte 144 Hz'lik iyi bir panel ile gösteriş yaparken, AMD sürümü sadece vasat bir 60 Hz panele sahip.


279 cd/m²	269 cd/m²	268 cd/m²
274 cd/m²	297 cd/m²	268 cd/m²
260 cd/m²	286 cd/m²	271 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

BOE0852 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 297 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 274.7 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 88 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 297 cd/m²
Kontrast: 900:1 (Siyah: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 4.66
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.12% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.066

Download ICC Dosyası (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Omen 15-en0375ng BOE0852, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O LM156LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP BOE08FB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Aorus 5 KB LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		69%	0%	1%	61%	-1%
Display P3 Coverage	39.12	67.2 72%	38.92 -1%	39.51 1%	63.4 62%	38.8 -1%
sRGB Coverage	57.6	95.9 66%	58.5 2%	58.1 1%	92.8 61%	57.8 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	40.42	68.5 69%	40.22 0%	40.81 1%	64.8 60%	40.09 -1%
Response Times		61%	-14%	4%	50%	16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	30.4 ?(16.4, 14)	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 68%	34 ?(16, 18) -12%	29.2 ?(14.4, 14.8) 4%	14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) 53%	26 ?(12, 14) 14%
Response Time Black / White *	20.8 ?(11.6, 9.2)	9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2) 54%	24 ?(13, 11) -15%	20 ?(9.6, 10.4) 4%	11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4) 46%	17 ?(8, 9) 18%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(99)
Screen		0%	1%	-8%	33%	0%
Brightness middle	297	312 5%	280 -6%	279 -6%	318 7%	301 1%
Brightness	275	290 5%	254 -8%	257 -7%	298 8%	277 1%
Brightness Distribution	88	87 -1%	88 0%	89 1%	87 -1%	77 -12%
Black Level *	0.33	0.2 39%	0.15 55%	0.31 6%	0.3 9%	0.26 21%
Contrast	900	1560 73%	1867 107%	900 0%	1060 18%	1158 29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.54	4.84 -7%	5.89 -30%	5.84 -29%	2.49 45%	5.12 -13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	18.92	13.85 27%	19 -0%	21.8 -15%	5.06 73%	8.86 53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.66	1.77 62%	4.79 -3%	4.54 3%	1.53 67%	4.88 -5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.1	9 -329%	4.08 -94%	3.1 -48%	1.6 24%	3.47 -65%
Gamma	2.066 ^106%	2.105 ^105%	2.33 ^94%	2.116 ^104%	2.211 ^100%	2.37 ^93%
CCT	6291 ^103%	8099 ^80%	7303 ^89%	6577 ^99%	6714 ^97%	7062 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	40	68 70%	37 -7%	41 3%	65 63%	37 -7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	58	92 59%	58 0%	59 2%	89 53%	57 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		43% / 21%	-4% / -1%	-1% / -5%	48% / 41%	5% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Tepki süresinin yanı sıra, kontrast da çok daha kötü. AMD modelinin 1400: 1'den fazlası yerine yalnızca 900: 1 oranı vardır. Intel modeli, renk doğruluğu, siyah değeri veya parlaklık gibi diğer disiplinlerde de genellikle öndedir. Omen 15-en0375ng, yetersiz parlaklığı nedeniyle (yaklaşık 275 cd / m²) dış mekan kullanımı için pek uygun değildir.

Bununla birlikte, küçük renk alanı gözümüzdeki en büyük dezavantajdır:% 58 sRGB ve% 40 AdobeRGB, oldukça soluk ve farklılaşmamış resimlerle sonuçlanır. İyi görüş açısı kararlılığı, bu eksikliği ancak bir dereceye kadar telafi edebilir. Sonuç olarak, görüntü kalitesi dizüstü bilgisayarın fiyatına adil davranmıyor. Bütçe ürünü veya lüks bir makine olup olmadığına bakılmaksızın: Oyun dizüstü bilgisayarları için en az 300 cd / m² parlaklığa, en az 1000: 1 kontrasta ve en az% 80 sRGB kapsamına sahip yüksek kaliteli bir panel bekliyoruz - ve 120 Hz üstü 1.000 Euro için (~ 1214 $).

Ancak HP, düşük performansında yalnız değil. Schenker Core 15 ve Aorus 5 KB haricinde, yarışmanın görüntüleri de arzulanan çok şey bırakıyor. Dikkat:% 100 parlaklığın altında, ekran 200 Hz ile titriyor ve bu da hassas kişiler için sorunlara neden olabilir.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.6 ms rise
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.4 ms rise
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Test conditions

Tuning fans can let off steam in the pre-installed Command Center. Besides system monitoring, the tool also offers a network booster and performance control. The latter includes three profiles that affect the performance and the temperatures or volume. Our tests were always performed with the standard mode, which is supposed to be suitable for all task types and is active out of the box. The fans always ran in automatic mode (see screenshot #3).

Power

Although it is a budget device in terms of price, the Omen 15-en0375ng definitely belongs to the high-end segment. This is mainly due to the strong eight-core processor, which rarely has advantages over a fast four- or six-core in games so far, but shows its muscles in specialized applications and generally has more future-proofing.

Processor

The benchmarks impressively prove that AMD is currently setting the tone in the CPU sector and has overtaken Intel. Thanks to its many cores, the Ryzen 7 4800H, which can process up to 16 threads simultaneously via SMT, sprints about 50% past the Core i7-10750H, which is very popular among gaming laptops, in multi-core applications like Cinebench R15. The lead over the Core i5-10300H, for example in the Legion 5 15IMH05H, is even around 100%.

HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1886 (1812.99-1909.31)

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1866 (1840.26-1926.13)

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1753 (1601.6-1850.14)

Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1209 (1180.53-1317.18)

Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1145 (1045.12-1193.85)

Although the performance drops by a few percent under prolonged load, the Omen 15-en0375ng also cuts a good figure in the Cinebench loop. The clock is roughly on par with the 4800H competitor Schenker Core 15, whereas the Asus TUF A15 has to deal with a strongly fluctuating Turbo.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=196, last 2 years)	276 Points +47%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	203 Points +8%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	199 Points +6%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	188 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	187 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	187 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	186 Points -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=199, last 2 years)	3380 Points +77%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1926 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1909 (1812.99^min - 1909.31^max) Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1850 Points -3%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	1317 (1180.53^min - 1317.18^max) Points -31%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	1194 (1045.12^min - 1193.85^max) Points -37%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	898 Points -53%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	485.9 Seconds * -88%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	388 Seconds * -50%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	372 Seconds * -44%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	262.5 Seconds * -1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	259 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	255 Seconds * +2%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=187, last 2 years)	172.7 Seconds * +33%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=191, last 2 years)	6275 MIPS +35%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	5253 MIPS +13%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	5052 MIPS +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	4903 MIPS +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4666 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4664 MIPS +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4638 MIPS
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=191, last 2 years)	84293 MIPS +68%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	50075 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	48326 MIPS -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	45679 MIPS -9%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	35797 MIPS -29%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	34772 MIPS -31%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	24635 MIPS -51%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (427 - 855, n=192, last 2 years)	721 Points +48%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	486 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	485 Points 0%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	476 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	475 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	473 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	459 Points -6%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=192, last 2 years)	8202 Points +87%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4435 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4380 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4257 Points -3%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	3075 Points -30%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	2991 Points -32%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	2217 Points -49%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=192, last 2 years)	1880 Points +56%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	1316 Points +9%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	1286 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	1220 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1203 Points
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1188 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1166 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=192, last 2 years)	14832 Points +84%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	8073 Points
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	6906 Points -14%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	6397 Points -21%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	6365 Points -21%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	5920 Points -27%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	4640 Points -43%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=191, last 2 years)	23.2 fps +80%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	12.9 fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	12.1 fps -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	10.8 fps -16%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	9.61 fps -26%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	9.5 fps -26%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	7.69 fps -40%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	69.2 s *
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	60.2 s * +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	52.6 s * +24%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	49 s * +29%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=188, last 2 years)	47.6 s * +31%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	47.2 s * +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	28.6 s * +59%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Intel Core i5-10300H	0.634 sec * -10%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	0.607 sec * -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.603 sec * -5%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	0.602 sec * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.583 sec * -1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.575 sec *
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=192, last 2 years)	0.4405 sec * +23%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1909 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

102 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

188 Points

Yardım

... kıyaslama

System performance

The Omen 15 is also a frontrunner when it comes to system performance. 5,766 points in PCMark 10 catapult the 15-incher to the top position.

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=169, last 2 years)	7765 Points +35%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	5766 Points
Aorus 5 KB GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	5452 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5427 Points -6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	5193 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	5095 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	4887 Points -15%

DPC latencies

In terms of latencies, the notebook also does not have to listen to any criticism. According to the LatencyMon tool, the system is well suited for real-time content and applications.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1781 μs * -130%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	1767 μs * -128%
Aorus 5 KB GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	1218 μs * -57%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	797 μs * -3%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	776 μs *
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	723 μs * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Mass storage

Buyers can also look forward to a fast mass storage device. The 512 GB model WDC PC SN730 installed in the review sample achieves more than 2000 MB/s in sequential read and write, which is a very good result. No wonder, since it is a modern PCIe/NVMe drive.

	HP Omen 15-en0375ng WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	Aorus 5 KB ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		28%	-13%	-0%	10%	-18%	3%
Write 4K	119.6	233 95%	219.8 84%	117.5 -2%	162.1 36%	145.4 22%	164.3 ?(106.9 - 242, n=21) 37%
Read 4K	47.4	54.5 15%	50.2 6%	47.36 0%	60.7 28%	51.6 9%	48.2 ?(36.8 - 57.9, n=21) 2%
Write Seq	2677	3050 14%	979 -63%	2748 3%	2366 -12%	1007 -62%	2096 ?(1025 - 2707, n=21) -22%
Read Seq	2220	3042 37%	1990 -10%	2084 -6%	2633 19%	1145 -48%	2123 ?(1356 - 2553, n=21) -4%
Write 4K Q32T1	427.4	520 22%	516 21%	407.3 -5%	428.2 0%	468.4 10%	451 ?(237 - 671, n=21) 6%
Read 4K Q32T1	549	546 -1%	298.3 -46%	474.6 -14%	582 6%	528 -4%	509 ?(333 - 838, n=21) -7%
Write Seq Q32T1	2706	3241 20%	982 -64%	3069 13%	2480 -8%	1381 -49%	2551 ?(1087 - 2721, n=21) -6%
Read Seq Q32T1	2869	3538 23%	1907 -34%	3154 10%	3121 9%	2291 -20%	3330 ?(2869 - 3426, n=21) 16%
AS SSD		15%	-29%	-3%	-17%	-36%	-16%
Seq Read	2255	2836 26%	1682 -25%	2369 5%	2795 24%	2012 -11%	2605 ?(1786 - 3021, n=21) 16%
Seq Write	2129	2452 15%	904 -58%	2446 15%	2172 2%	1261 -41%	1905 ?(993 - 2486, n=21) -11%
4K Read	49.5	60.4 22%	60.2 22%	40.61 -18%	53.3 8%	43.66 -12%	45.8 ?(34.7 - 53.4, n=21) -7%
4K Write	175.1	190.5 9%	164.8 -6%	103.2 -41%	121.3 -31%	109.3 -38%	155.6 ?(96.9 - 217, n=21) -11%
4K-64 Read	1463	1283 -12%	472.5 -68%	1637 12%	714 -51%	851 -42%	1181 ?(615 - 1483, n=21) -19%
4K-64 Write	2061	2298 11%	845 -59%	1961 -5%	1376 -33%	780 -62%	1372 ?(677 - 2346, n=21) -33%
Access Time Read *	0.138	0.034 75%	0.087 37%	0.06 57%	0.049 64%	0.117 15%	0.0801 ?(0.05 - 0.138, n=21) 42%
Access Time Write *	0.022	0.02 9%	0.02 9%	0.036 -64%	0.036 -64%	0.036 -64%	0.04195 ?(0.018 - 0.091, n=21) -91%
Score Read	1738	1627 -6%	701 -60%	1915 10%	1046 -40%	1096 -37%	1488 ?(895 - 1838, n=21) -14%
Score Write	2449	2734 12%	1101 -55%	2309 -6%	1714 -30%	1016 -59%	1718 ?(948 - 2721, n=21) -30%
Score Total	5075	5184 2%	2143 -58%	5205 3%	3279 -35%	2643 -48%	3938 ?(2834 - 5376, n=21) -22%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		22% / 20%	-21% / -22%	-2% / -2%	-4% / -6%	-27% / -28%	-7% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2869 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2706 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 549 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 427.4 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2220 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2677 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119.6 MB/s

Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Graphics card

The GeForce RTX 2060 is the perfect companion for gamers who want to invest at most 1,500 Euros (~$1820) in a notebook. The DirectX 12 model is located between the mid- and upper-range in terms of performance and, in contrast to its cheaper brothers, can boast "real" ray-tracing capabilities.

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=197, last 2 years)	31168 Points +101%
Aorus 5 KB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	16362 Points +6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	16355 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	15967 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	15746 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	15609 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	15499 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=192, last 2 years)	12978 Points +123%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	6164 Points +6%
Aorus 5 KB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	6123 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	6043 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	6012 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	5848 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	5819 Points
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=116, last 2 years)	8616 Points +162%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	3531 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	3445 Points +5%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	3286 Points

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=187, last 2 years)	43380 Points +111%
Aorus 5 KB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	22138 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	21748 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	21542 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	21480 Points +5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	21338 Points +4%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	20535 Points

While the CPU power is - as already explained - above average, the GPU speed falls behind the competition a bit. The Omen 15-en0375ng brings up the rear in the 3DMark tests, but the difference is often marginal and subjectively hardly noticeable. The same applies to the subtle frame rate drop in the Witcher 3 test (about 1 hour @FHD/Ultra), which simulates a longer 3D load.

HP Omen 15-en0375ng GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G: Ø57.4 (51-62)

3DMark 11 Performance		18798 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		38655 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score		14526 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score		6161 puan
Yardım

... kıyaslama

Gaming performance

The combination of Ryzen 7 4800H and GeForce RTX 2060 is fast enough to play most current games smoothly with 1,920 x 1,080 pixels and maximum details. Only very demanding and/or poorly optimized games, such as Watch Dogs Legion, Dirt 5 and Cyberpunk 2077, drop the Avg FPS below the 40 mark.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=126, last 2 years)	238 fps +122%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H	124.8 fps +17%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	107 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	105 (90^min - 115^max) fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	105 fps -2%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	126.6 fps +124%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H	68.3 fps +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	60.5 (51^min - 68^max) fps +7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H	59.1 (49^min) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	58.8 (48^min) fps +4%
Aorus 5 KB GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H	57 (47^min) fps +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H	56.4 fps

	düşük	orta	yüksek	ultra
GTA V (2015)	165	159	127	70.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)			107	56.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	123	115	109	104
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	91.5	81.9	68.8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)			83	73
Battlefield V (2018)			102	93.1
Borderlands 3 (2019)			61.9	48.1
Valorant (2020)			177
Crysis Remastered (2020)			52.9	40
FIFA 21 (2020)			163	161
Watch Dogs Legion (2020)			66	36
Dirt 5 (2020)			59.2	38.7
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020)			53	46
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War (2020)			62.2	57.1
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020)			71.8	64.1
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020)			54	51
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020)			45.3	38.8

Emissions

Noise emissions

The fan control leaves a decent impression when idling and during simple activities (office, web, etc.). Although there can be short upsurges every now and then, the fans usually stand still, which leads to silent operation. Under load, however, the 15-incher clearly attracts attention. 48 dB(A) in the Witcher 3 test is similar to the noise level of the competition, which reaches 47 to 51 dB(A).

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta		24 / 25 / 37 dB
Çalışırken		45 / 51 dB

	30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Aorus 5 KB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Noise		-2%	-6%	-2%	-8%	-6%	1%
off / environment *	24	25 -4%	30.2 -26%	25 -4%	25 -4%	30.7 -28%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=158, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Minimum *	24	26 -8%	30.2 -26%	25 -4%	26 -8%	30.7 -28%	25.4 ?(22.8 - 35, n=159, last 2 years) -6%
Idle Average *	25	30 -20%	30.2 -21%	29 -16%	30 -20%	30.7 -23%	27.1 ?(23 - 37.5, n=159, last 2 years) -8%
Idle Maximum *	37	32 14%	30.2 18%	34 8%	34 8%	30.7 17%	30.1 ?(23 - 47, n=159, last 2 years) 19%
Load Average *	45	46 -2%	40 11%	44 2%	53 -18%	36.6 19%	42.4 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=159, last 2 years) 6%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48	48 -0%	49 -2%	49 -2%	51 -6%	47 2%
Load Maximum *	51	48 6%	49 4%	49 4%	56 -10%	50.9 -0%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=159, last 2 years) -5%

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

The temperature development of the chassis varies a lot. While the case's bottom heats up to over 50 °C (122 °F) in some places under full load, the top only reaches a maximum of 42 °C (107.6 °F) - a moderate rate. Under the hood, the processor in particular heats up. After 60 minutes of stress testing with the Furmark and Prime95 tools, the Ryzen 7 4800H made itself comfortable at around 86 °C (186.8 °F). The GeForce RTX 2060 stayed noticeably cooler with just under 70 °C (158 °F). The values in the Witcher 3 test can be seen in the first screenshot.

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


39 °C	41 °C	42 °C
38 °C	42 °C	39 °C
30 °C	32 °C	33 °C

Maksimum: 42 °C
Ortalama: 37.3 °C


53 °C	54 °C	50 °C
48 °C	48 °C	33 °C
32 °C	29 °C	28 °C

Maksimum: 54 °C
Ortalama: 41.7 °C

Güç kaynağı 55 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


27 °C	27 °C	27 °C
28 °C	28 °C	27 °C
26 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Maksimum: 28 °C
Ortalama: 27.1 °C


28 °C	28 °C	29 °C
27 °C	28 °C	28 °C
26 °C	25 °C	26 °C

Maksimum: 29 °C
Ortalama: 27.2 °C

Güç kaynağı 26 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


39 °C	42 °C	42 °C
39 °C	43 °C	41 °C
32 °C	35 °C	35 °C

Maksimum: 43 °C
Ortalama: 38.7 °C


53 °C	52 °C	50 °C
51 °C	51 °C	38 °C
33 °C	30 °C	30 °C

Maksimum: 53 °C
Ortalama: 43.1 °C

Güç kaynağı 53 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).

	HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Aorus 5 KB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-14%	4%	-21%	-11%	2%	-6%
Maximum Upper Side *	42	51 -21%	42.9 -2%	55 -31%	50 -19%	46.3 -10%	46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=158, last 2 years) -10%
Maximum Bottom *	54	64 -19%	49.9 8%	65 -20%	49 9%	44.4 18%	49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=158, last 2 years) 9%
Idle Upper Side *	28	29 -4%	27.8 1%	32 -14%	35 -25%	28.1 -0%	31.1 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=158, last 2 years) -11%
Idle Bottom *	29	32 -10%	27 7%	34 -17%	31 -7%	29.4 -1%	32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=158, last 2 years) -11%

* ... smaller is better

Loudspeaker

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Omen 15-en0375ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power management

Energy absorption

For a gaming notebook, the power consumption is within limits. The Omen 15-en0375ng is relatively frugal with 4 to 22 watts in idle mode, which promises good battery runtimes. Even under load, the consumption rates are usually better than those of the competition. There are many indications that the Ryzen 7 4800H is more energy-efficient than its Intel counterparts - thanks to the modern manufacturing process (7 vs 14 nm).

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.1 / 0.1 Watt
Boşta	4 / 9 / 22 Watt
Çalışırken	102 / 182 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Aorus 5 KB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-43%	-5%	-4%	-31%	12%	-83%
Idle Minimum *	4	12 -200%	5.4 -35%	4 -0%	8 -100%	3.2 20%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=158, last 2 years) -238%
Idle Average *	9	14 -56%	10 -11%	10 -11%	12 -33%	8.3 8%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=158, last 2 years) -111%
Idle Maximum *	22	20 9%	10.5 52%	19 14%	21 5%	8.7 60%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=158, last 2 years) -21%
Load Average *	102	103 -1%	135 -32%	96 6%	128 -25%	82 20%	106.7 ?(32.1 - 201, n=157, last 2 years) -5%
Witcher 3 ultra *	119	125 -5%	144 -21%	136 -14%	138 -16%	151 -27%
Load Maximum *	182	193 -6%	147 19%	214 -18%	217 -19%	195 -7%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=158, last 2 years) -38%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

One of the biggest strengths of the Omen 15-en0375ng is its battery life. Up to 20 hours in the ideal case (minimum load & display brightness) and about 10.5 hours of Internet surfing via WLAN (brightness reduced to about 150 d/m²) are outstanding in the gaming segment. Only Lenovo's Legion 5 can come close to these rates. However, the performance also drops significantly in battery mode. The frame rate dropped by almost 90(!)% in the Witcher 3 test without a power supply. However, performance or not: 70.9 Wh battery capacity should be a model for the competition (48 to 62 Wh).

Batarya ömrü

Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)		20h 00min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 28min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)		1h 48min

	HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 70.9 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 62 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 58.7 Wh	Aorus 5 KB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48.96 Wh	Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-41%	-28%	-38%	-52%	-27%	-38%
Reader / Idle	1200	469 -61%	587 -51%	575 -52%	538 -55%	848 -29%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) -53%
WiFi v1.3	628	354 -44%	370 -41%	329 -48%	285 -55%	433 -31%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) -40%
Load	108	87 -19%	116 7%	92 -15%	58 -46%	84 -22%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) -21%
H.264		371	322			554	408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)

Artılar

+ iyi fiyat-performans oranı

+ pratik komuta merkezi

+ dengeli donanım

+ mükemmel pil ömrü

+ şık tasarım

Eksiler

- alışması biraz zaman alan klavye düzeni

- geçerli USB bağlantı noktası yok

- yüksek gürültü gelişimi

- Zayıf yönleri olan ekran

- dengesiz kapak

- yetersiz WLAN

Conclusion

HP Omen 15-en0375ng: Test device provided by HP Germany

If you can put up with a color-poor 60 Hz display and a high noise level in 3D mode, the Omen 15-en0375ng is a powerful and not too expensive gaming notebook.

We consider around 1,260 Euros (~$1530) for a Ryzen 7 4800H, a GeForce RTX 2060, a 512 GB SSD and 16 GB dual-channel RAM to be a good offer that appeals to price-conscious gamers. Very high details are rarely a problem in the native resolution of 1,920 x 1,080. Buyers will also be spoiled with a top-notch battery life that even beats most other notebook classes.

If HP now improves the speed of the WLAN module, the stability of the case and the repeatedly criticized picture quality, the competition will have to dress extra warmly.

Note: Other AMD models of the Omen 15 offer a (probably better) 144 Hz panel.

Availability

The tested model with the suffix en0375ng is only listed by very few online stores (e.g. Mediamarkt & Saturn) and is unfortunately not available there at the moment.

HP Omen 15-en0375ng - 2020-12-29 12/29/2020 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

İşcilik

74 / 98 → 75%

Klavye

83%

Mouse

75%

Bağlanılabilirlik

60 / 80 → 75%

Ağırlık

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Batarya

88 / 95 → 93%

Görüntü

82%

Oyun performansı

90%

Uygulama performansı

93%

Isınma

84 / 95 → 89%

Ses

75 / 90 → 83%

Audio

77%

Camera

41 / 85 → 48%

Ortalama

76%

83%

Gaming - Ortalama Ağırlık

Price comparison

▶ load Youtube video

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 450846 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Translator: Aslinur Sarica - Translator - 155 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > HP Omen 15 dizüstü bilgisayar incelemesi: Güçlü AMD işlemci Intel'i titretiyor

Florian Glaser, 2021-02- 6 (Update: 2024-08-15)