Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarKısa inceleme: Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) Laptop
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aydınlatma: 86 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 545 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1239:1 (Siyah: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) APPA031, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 2880x1800, 15.4" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) APPA031, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Apple APPA030, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE BOE NV156QUM-N44, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 1% | 3% | -20% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 97.9 | 98.5 1% | 99 1% | 89.7 -8% | 69.7 -29% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 91.2 -9% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.9 | 86.4 1% | 87.3 2% | 100 16% | 66.8 -22% | |
| Response Times | 2% | -7% | -21% | -45% | -17% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48 ? | 47.3 ? 1% | 46.4 ? 3% | 46 ? 4% | 57.2 ? -19% | 38.4 ? 20% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33.8 ? | 31.2 ? 8% | 39.2 ? -16% | 56 ? -66% | 39.2 ? -16% | 24.8 ? 27% |
| PWM Frequency | 119000 ? | 117000 ? -2% | 119000 ? 0% | 962 -99% | 980 ? -99% | |
| Screen | 10% | 14% | -23% | -75% | -50% | |
| Brightness middle | 545 | 483 -11% | 568 4% | 420 -23% | 370.1 -32% | 317 -42% |
| Brightness | 523 | 465 -11% | 532 2% | 401 -23% | 356 -32% | 290 -45% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 92 7% | 83 -3% | 90 5% | 87 1% | 85 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.33 25% | 0.297 32% | 0.3 32% | 0.37 16% | 0.32 27% |
| Contrast | 1239 | 1464 18% | 1912 54% | 1400 13% | 1000 -19% | 991 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.4 12% | 1.4 12% | 3.33 -108% | 5.3 -231% | 3.6 -125% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.8 | 3 21% | 2.7 29% | 5.11 -34% | 9.9 -161% | 6.6 -74% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.5 21% | 2.3 -21% | 2.73 -44% | 4.6 -142% | 4.2 -121% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.34 94% | 2.29 96% | 2.48 89% | 2.31 95% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6834 95% | 6650 98% | 7165 91% | 6457 101% | 6284 103% | 6740 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 77.4 | 78.09 | 88.3 | 59.5 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.9 | 99.97 | 100 | 91.1 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
8% | 3% /
8% | -14% /
-17% | -39% /
-52% | -29% /
-37% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 119000 Hz | ≤ 80 % brightness setting |  |
| ≤ 210 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 119000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % (210 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 119000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. Flickering occurs even at high brightness setting and may have an effect on the user during everyday use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4054 puan | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4914 puan | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4648 puan | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4122 puan | |
Yardım | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) | |
| HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
| MSI PL62 MX150 7700HQ | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| MSI PL62 MX150 7700HQ | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) | |
| HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
| MSI PL62 MX150 7700HQ | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 26389 puan | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5566 puan | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15337 puan | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3430 puan | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1207 puan | |
Yardım | ||
Ses yüksekliği
| Boşta |
| 31.3 / 31.3 / 31.7 dB |
| Çalışırken |
| 39.7 / 48.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 30.9 dB(A) | ||
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) Radeon Pro 555, i7-7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) Radeon Pro 455, 6820HQ, Apple SSD SM0512L | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE Quadro M520, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 2% | 6% | -6% | 8% | |
| off / environment * | 30.9 | 30.4 2% | 30.4 2% | 29 6% | 28.4 8% | 29.2 6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.3 | 30.6 2% | 30.8 2% | 30.3 3% | 29 7% | 29.2 7% |
| Idle Average * | 31.3 | 30.6 2% | 30.8 2% | 30.3 3% | 29 7% | 29.2 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.7 | 30.6 3% | 30.8 3% | 30.3 4% | 32.2 -2% | 31.1 2% |
| Load Average * | 39.7 | 34.7 13% | 38.7 3% | 35.1 12% | 47.1 -19% | 36.7 8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.5 | 52 -46% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 48.6 | 46.3 5% | 48.8 -0% | 46 5% | 47.1 3% | 39.4 19% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) i7-7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, 76 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450, 76 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) 6820HQ, Radeon Pro 455, 76 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) 6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460, 76 Wh | Dell Precision 3520 i7-7820HQ, Quadro M620, 68 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE i7-7600U, Quadro M520, 104 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -5% | -6% | -3% | -1% | 20% | 162% | |
| H.264 | 511 | 516 1% | 547 7% | 483 -5% | 700 37% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 644 | 602 -7% | 637 -1% | 619 -4% | 455 -29% | 434 -33% | 712 11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 87 | ||||||
| Load | 60 | 55 -8% | 54 -10% | 52 -13% | 79 32% | 103 72% | 323 438% |
| Reader / Idle | 996 | 831 | 1581 |
Mevcut MacBook Pro 15 modeli genel izlenimlerimiz sonucu iyi bir ilk izlenim bırakıyor. Yeni Kaby Lake işlemci sayesinde artık rakipleri ile rekabet edebilecek düzeyde. Performans seviyesi de artık daha uzun süre korunabiliyor. Artık daha güçlü grafik kartı da standart olarak geliyor. Performansı Nvidia'nın Pascal grafik kartları ile yarışamasa da AMD çipleri de oldukça verimli.
Önümüzdeki günlerde detaylı analizimizi tamamlayacağız.
Price comparison
