Kısa inceleme: Asus ROG GU501GM (i7-8750H, GTX 1060) Laptop
Top 10
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebook listesi
» Top 10 oyun notebooku
» Top 10 bütçeye uygun Ofis/İş Notebook Listesi
» Top 10 Premium Ofis/İş notebookları
» Top 10 Çalışma istasyonu laptopları
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» Top 10 Ultrabooklar
» En iyi 10 dönüştürülebilir modeli
» Seçimi en iyi 10 tablet
» Notebookcheck Top 10 Windows Tabletleri
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından incelenen en iyi Notebook ekranları
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından seçilen 300 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 akıllı telefon listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 hafif oyun notebookları
|
Aydınlatma: 92 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 286.7 cd/m²
Kontrast: 735:1 (Siyah: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.274
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 AU Optronics AUO45ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Aorus X5 v8 AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | 5% | 4% | 6% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63.4 | 66.2 4% | 66.1 4% | 63.6 0% | 67.1 6% | 62.5 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 87.7 | 92.1 5% | 92.7 6% | 93.8 7% | 93.4 6% | 88.7 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.2 | 67.2 | 64.9 | 68.1 | 63.5 | |
Response Times | 49% | 71% | 52% | 48% | -26% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30.8 ? | 17.6 ? 43% | 6.6 ? 79% | 16.8 ? 45% | 18.8 ? 39% | 44.8 ? -45% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.6 ? | 12.8 ? 54% | 10.4 ? 62% | 11.2 ? 59% | 12 ? 57% | 29.6 ? -7% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 21% | -13% | 27% | 23% | -13% | |
Brightness middle | 286.7 | 254 -11% | 307 7% | 313 9% | 271 -5% | 291 1% |
Brightness | 281 | 262 -7% | 296 5% | 300 7% | 259 -8% | 277 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 89 -3% | 89 -3% | 78 -15% | 87 -5% | 84 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.22 44% | 0.25 36% | 0.33 15% | 0.27 31% | 0.22 44% |
Contrast | 735 | 1155 57% | 1228 67% | 948 29% | 1004 37% | 1323 80% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.17 | 2.37 43% | 5.74 -38% | 1.29 69% | 1.81 57% | 5.52 -32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.22 | 4.71 35% | 11.32 -57% | 2.04 72% | 3.33 54% | 10.72 -48% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 1.58 37% | 6.44 -158% | 0.69 72% | 1.09 56% | 6.59 -164% |
Gamma | 2.274 97% | 2.48 89% | 2.48 89% | 2.43 91% | 2.45 90% | 2.44 90% |
CCT | 6885 94% | 6785 96% | 8395 77% | 6550 99% | 6435 101% | 7816 83% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 60 5% | 60 5% | 60 5% | 61 7% | 58 2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 87 | 92 6% | 93 7% | 94 8% | 93 7% | 89 2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.84 | 1.94 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 25% /
22% | 21% /
2% | 28% /
27% | 26% /
24% | -13% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.6 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (29664 - 35307, n=25) | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (6236 - 6645, n=25) | |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 | |
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Average of class Gaming (64 - 1021, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7390 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 | |
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (125.5 - 180.5, n=6) | |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4119 puan | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5454 puan | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5111 puan | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5092 puan | |
Yardım |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Aorus X5 v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 253% | 213% | 129% | 121% | 207% | 3% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 419.3 | 369 ? -12% | |||||
Copy Program MB/s | 269.2 | 209 ? -22% | |||||
Copy ISO MB/s | 773 | 549 ? -29% | |||||
Score Total | 900 | 4122 358% | 3649 305% | 2536 182% | 2515 179% | 3282 265% | 1014 ? 13% |
Score Write | 345 | 2051 494% | 1446 319% | 939 172% | 954 177% | 1243 260% | 365 ? 6% |
Score Read | 377 | 1346 257% | 1471 290% | 1092 190% | 1061 181% | 1350 258% | 443 ? 18% |
Access Time Write * | 0.058 | 0.035 40% | 0.041 29% | 0.046 21% | 0.044 24% | 0.041 29% | 0.06829 ? -18% |
Access Time Read * | 0.278 | 0.073 74% | 0.046 83% | 0.119 57% | 0.166 40% | 0.062 78% | 0.2317 ? 17% |
4K-64 Write | 237 | 1760 643% | 1198 405% | 742 213% | 773 226% | 913 285% | 259 ? 9% |
4K-64 Read | 270.3 | 1170 333% | 1218 351% | 847 213% | 856 217% | 1057 291% | 317 ? 17% |
4K Write | 67.1 | 107.2 60% | 90.2 34% | 80.4 20% | 84.5 26% | 93 39% | 65.5 ? -2% |
4K Read | 22.62 | 48.94 116% | 43.42 92% | 23.36 3% | 23.21 3% | 41.47 83% | 28.2 ? 25% |
Seq Write | 404.7 | 1834 353% | 1580 290% | 1163 187% | 966 139% | 2372 486% | 404 ? 0% |
Seq Read | 841 | 1266 51% | 2091 149% | 2213 163% | 1813 116% | 2517 199% | 973 ? 16% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (26770 - 86193, n=68) | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
Asus FX504GD | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=192, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (10708 - 12298, n=77) | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
Asus FX504GD | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (105935 - 613731, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Asus FX504GD | |
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (33205 - 257260, n=33) |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 33570 puan | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 13082 puan | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30938 puan | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10370 puan | |
Yardım |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (51 - 68.8, n=37) |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (sort by value) | |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (24 - 42.3, n=60) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) |
düşük | orta | yüksek | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 194 | 173 | 162 | 99 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 166 | 120 | 66 | 39 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 163 | 120 | 71 | 57 |
Hitman 2016 (2016) | 71 | 70 | 59 | 46 |
Ses yüksekliği
Boşta |
| 31.4 / 31.4 / 34.2 dB |
Çalışırken |
| 42.8 / 50.9 dB |
| ||
30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A) |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | -1% | -3% | -7% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 28.6 | 30 -5% | 29 -1% | 29 -1% | 30 -5% | 31 -8% |
Idle Minimum * | 31.4 | 30 4% | 30 4% | 30 4% | 33 -5% | 33 -5% |
Idle Average * | 31.4 | 31 1% | 31 1% | 31 1% | 35 -11% | 34 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 34.2 | 34 1% | 33 4% | 35 -2% | 40 -17% | 40 -17% |
Load Average * | 42.8 | 43 -0% | 49 -14% | 49 -14% | 45 -5% | 41 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.9 | 42 17% | 50 2% | 51 -0% | 50 2% | 43 16% |
Load Maximum * | 50.9 | 44 14% | 52 -2% | 54 -6% | 55 -8% | 48 6% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | -6% | -10% | -7% | -21% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 49 -14% | 52 -21% | 53 -23% | 50 -16% | 61 -42% |
Maximum Bottom * | 46.6 | 63 -35% | 49 -5% | 65 -39% | 62 -33% | 69 -48% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.2 | 24 18% | 31 -6% | 26 11% | 27 8% | 29 1% |
Idle Bottom * | 34 | 25 26% | 31 9% | 30 12% | 29 15% | 32 6% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.08 / 0.8 Watt |
Boşta | 12.35 / 19.98 / 25.44 Watt |
Çalışırken |
94.28 / 140.63 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus FX503VM-EH73 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus X5 v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Predator Triton 700 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 15% | 13% | -20% | -3% | -52% | -55% | |
Idle Minimum * | 12.35 | 12.8 -4% | 7 43% | 16 -30% | 14 -13% | 25 -102% | 28 -127% |
Idle Average * | 19.98 | 15.4 23% | 11 45% | 19 5% | 18 10% | 31 -55% | 33 -65% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.44 | 15.9 37% | 20 21% | 26 -2% | 22 14% | 33 -30% | 41 -61% |
Load Average * | 94.28 | 78 17% | 98 -4% | 103 -9% | 91 3% | 102 -8% | 94 -0% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 132.9 | 107.3 19% | 132 1% | 164 -23% | 142 -7% | 194 -46% | 160 -20% |
Load Maximum * | 140.63 | 143.4 -2% | 182 -29% | 223 -59% | 173 -23% | 239 -70% | 222 -58% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 55 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 55 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Aorus X5 v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 92.24 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 700 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 54 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 73% | 4% | 181% | 51% | -10% | |
Reader / Idle | 271 | 507 87% | 237 -13% | 762 181% | 294 8% | 150 -45% |
WiFi v1.3 | 240 | 362 51% | 164 -32% | 513 114% | 144 -40% | |
Load | 45 | 81 80% | 70 56% | 156 247% | 87 93% | 70 56% |
Artılar
Eksiler
GU501GM, Zephyrus M serisinin en iyi özelliklerini düşük bir fiyata sunmaya çalışıyor. Çoğunlukla da başarıyor.
Ama malesef işlemci durumu biraz karıştırıyor. Artan performans çoğu iş için harika ama işlemci yoğun kullanımda tutarlılığını yitiriyor. Fan sesi ise bir diğer mesele. O kadar tizleşebiliyor ki, kulaklığı çıkarmamak daha iyi bir tercih olabiliyor. İşlemci bu durumdayken sistem çökebiliyor, ama bunun dışındaki durumlarda sorun çıkarmıyor. Farklı fan modları ile fan sesini önlemek mümkün.
Tüm bunlarla beraber GU501GM hakkında sevilmeyecek başka bir şey kalmıyor. Fiyatı düşünüldüğünde ise 1900$ etiketi bizce çok fazla. Bu fiyata daha güçlü donanımlı modeller bulmak mümkün.
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
- 07/07/2018 v6 (old)
Sam Medley