Kısa inceleme: Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC (Ryzen 5 1600, Radeon RX 580, FHD) Laptop
Top 10
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebook listesi
» Top 10 oyun notebooku
» Top 10 bütçeye uygun Ofis/İş Notebook Listesi
» Top 10 Premium Ofis/İş notebookları
» Top 10 Çalışma istasyonu laptopları
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» Top 10 Ultrabooklar
» En iyi 10 dönüştürülebilir modeli
» Seçimi en iyi 10 tablet
» Notebookcheck Top 10 Windows Tabletleri
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından incelenen en iyi Notebook ekranları
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından seçilen 300 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 akıllı telefon listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 hafif oyun notebookları
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Nexoc G739 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Nexoc G739 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
Nexoc G739 | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Nexoc G739 | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 |
|
Aydınlatma: 82 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 415 cd/m²
Kontrast: 988:1 (Siyah: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus GL702ZC-GC104T IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GF72VR 7RF TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Predator Helios 300 AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GL72 7RDX-602 TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Nexoc G739 IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w206ng IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | 34% | 3% | 8% | 7% | 9% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65.4 | 67.1 3% | 90.8 39% | 66.8 2% | 65.2 0% | 66.7 2% | 67.2 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 82.6 | 85.4 3% | 99.8 21% | 85.8 4% | 94.3 14% | 91 10% | 93.1 13% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 60.4 | 62.5 3% | 85.6 42% | 62.8 4% | 65.6 9% | 66.4 10% | 67.4 12% |
Response Times | -4% | 39% | 7% | 3% | -24% | -10% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 39.2 ? -9% | 24.4 ? 32% | 36 ? -0% | 29 ? 19% | 45 ? -25% | 38 ? -6% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 22.8 ? 1% | 12.6 ? 45% | 20 ? 13% | 26 ? -13% | 28 ? -22% | 26 ? -13% |
PWM Frequency | 122000 ? | 25000 ? | 119000 ? | 961 | 450 ? | 200 ? | |
Screen | 9% | -13% | 4% | -42% | 11% | 5% | |
Brightness middle | 415 | 379 -9% | 329.2 -21% | 384 -7% | 299 -28% | 312 -25% | 318 -23% |
Brightness | 365 | 354 -3% | 318 -13% | 373 2% | 274 -25% | 304 -17% | 295 -19% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 89 9% | 92 12% | 93 13% | 80 -2% | 85 4% | 79 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.31 26% | 0.4 5% | 0.35 17% | 0.25 40% | 0.23 45% | 0.25 40% |
Contrast | 988 | 1223 24% | 823 -17% | 1097 11% | 1196 21% | 1357 37% | 1272 29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.95 | 4.32 13% | 6.4 -29% | 4.81 3% | 12.92 -161% | 4.19 15% | 4.7 5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.34 | 8.56 8% | 11.7 -25% | 8.69 7% | 19.91 -113% | 8.7 7% | 8.8 6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.69 | 4 15% | 9.2 -96% | 5.33 -14% | 13.16 -181% | 3.72 21% | 5 -7% |
Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.47 89% | 2.18 101% | 2.45 90% | 2.36 93% | 2.29 96% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 6485 100% | 6984 93% | 10484 62% | 7137 91% | 15046 43% | 7104 91% | 7374 88% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54 | 56 4% | 76 41% | 56 4% | 60 11% | 59 9% | 61 13% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 82 | 85 4% | 92 12% | 86 5% | 94 15% | 91 11% | 93 13% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
6% | 20% /
3% | 5% /
4% | -10% /
-26% | -2% /
5% | 1% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2 | |
Guru Mars K | |
Coffee Lake: i7-8700K ve i5-8400 | |
Nexoc G739 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2 | |
Coffee Lake: i7-8700K ve i5-8400 | |
SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
Guru Mars K | |
Nexoc G739 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Coffee Lake: i7-8700K ve i5-8400 | |
SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
Guru Mars K | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Nexoc G739 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
Guru Mars K | |
Coffee Lake: i7-8700K ve i5-8400 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Nexoc G739 | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Coffee Lake: i7-8700K ve i5-8400 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
Coffee Lake: i7-8700K ve i5-8400 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Coffee Lake: i7-8700K ve i5-8400 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Coffee Lake: i7-8700K ve i5-8400 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Coffee Lake: i7-8700K ve i5-8400 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Coffee Lake: i7-8700K ve i5-8400 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T (Edge 15) | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF (Microsoft Edge 40.15063.674.0) | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T (Edge 41) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (Edge 40.15063.0.0) | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 (EDGE 38.14393.1066.0) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X (Edge 41) | |
Nexoc G739 (Edge 38.14393.0.0) | |
Eurocom Sky X9C (Edge 41.16299.15.0) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Eurocom Sky X9C (Edge 41.16299.15.0) | |
Nexoc G739 (Edge 38.14393.0.0) | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 (EDGE 38.14393.1066.0) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X (Edge 41) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (Edge 40.15063.0.0) | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T (Edge 15) | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T (Edge 41) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Eurocom Sky X9C (Edge 41.16299.15.0) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X (Edge 41) | |
Nexoc G739 (Edge 38.14393.0.0) | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF (Microsoft Edge 40.15063.674.0) | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 (EDGE 38.14393.1066.0) | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (Edge 40.15063.0.0) | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 (Edge 40) | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S (Edge 38) | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T (Edge 15) | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T (Edge 41) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 Score | 5444 puan | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4186 puan | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5608 puan | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4988 puan | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4440 puan | |
Yardım |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
Nexoc G739 | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172 | Acer Predator Helios 300 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | MSI GL72 7RDX-602 HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | Nexoc G739 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Omen 17-w206ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 37802% | 119% | 50561% | 47936% | |
Read Seq | 92.5 | 899 872% | 135.3 46% | 1666 1701% | 1606 1636% |
Write Seq | 105.1 | 569 441% | 127 21% | 1192 1034% | 1176 1019% |
Read 512 | 37.67 | 580 1440% | 45.57 21% | 857 2175% | 846 2146% |
Write 512 | 101.8 | 425.9 318% | 58.3 -43% | 827 712% | 805 691% |
Read 4k | 0.484 | 34.29 6985% | 0.582 20% | 60.7 12441% | 59.9 12276% |
Write 4k | 0.169 | 125.5 74160% | 1.022 505% | 154.5 91320% | 155.6 91971% |
Read 4k QD32 | 1.294 | 457.7 35271% | 1.068 -17% | 636 49050% | 588 45340% |
Write 4k QD32 | 0.221 | 404.5 182932% | 1.102 399% | 544 246054% | 505 228407% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 28909 puan | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 12626 puan | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28295 puan | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9866 puan | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3718 puan | |
Yardım |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Guru Mars K | |
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Coffee Lake: i7-8700K ve i5-8400 | |
Guru Mars K | |
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Score | |
Coffee Lake: i7-8700K ve i5-8400 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 |
düşük | orta | yüksek | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
X-Plane 10.25 (2013) | 72 | 42.2 | 21.8 | 20.6 |
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) | 163.5 | 102.6 | 81.3 | 54.1 |
GTA V (2015) | 120.4 | 115.5 | 83.4 | 39.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 173 | 121 | 68.9 | 36 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 86 | 77 | 76.3 | 69 |
World of Warships (2015) | 135.1 | 115 | 101 | 95.9 |
Anno 2205 (2015) | 98.6 | 95.4 | 65.5 | 25.7 |
XCOM 2 (2016) | 82 | 66 | 51.1 | 24.5 |
Hitman 2016 (2016) | 56.2 | 54.4 | 49.8 | 47.7 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 35.3 | 30 | 29.2 | |
Overwatch (2016) | 276.3 | 276 | 191.1 | 96.2 |
Mafia 3 (2016) | 55.9 | 45.9 | 35 | |
Civilization VI (2016) | 105.6 | 84.8 | 69.8 | 63.5 |
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) | 38.2 | 33.6 | 27.1 | 25.1 |
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) | 106.7 | 72.3 | 69.4 | 53.4 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017) | 108 | 105 | 102 | 101 |
FIFA 18 (2017) | 242.9 | 242.2 | 218.1 | 215.4 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 117 | 85 | 66 | 49 |
The Evil Within 2 (2017) | 56.4 | 47.1 | 45.4 | 44.3 |
ELEX (2017) | 117.1 | 80 | 63.5 | 48.6 |
Destiny 2 (2017) | 97.6 | 91.4 | 83.3 | 69.7 |
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 50 | 44 | 43 | 37 |
Call of Duty WWII (2017) | 132.3 | 128.8 | 68 | 39.1 |
Need for Speed Payback (2017) | 92.8 | 86 | 78.5 | 75.6 |
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 62 | 53.9 | 45.6 | 45.7 |
Fortnite (2018) | 238.5 | 183.1 | 80.6 | 59.5 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
PC Zentrum Defiance IV | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Guru Mars K | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
Saelic Vidi G771D | |
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L | |
PC Zentrum Defiance IV | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
Nexoc G739 | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 |
World of Warships - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:High FX AF:16x | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L |
Need for Speed Payback - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
PC Zentrum Defiance IV |
Call of Duty WWII - 1920x1080 High / On AA:Filmic 1X SM | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
PC Zentrum Defiance IV | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Civilization VI - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
HP Omen 17-w100ng |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Hitman 2016 - 1920x1080 Ultra / On AA:SM AF:16x | |
MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF |
Mafia 3 - 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Saelic Vidi G771D | |
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Star Wars Battlefront 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
PC Zentrum Defiance IV | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Destiny 2 - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:SM AF:16x | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
PC Zentrum Defiance IV | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Ses yüksekliği
Boşta |
| 30.6 / 32.7 / 32.7 dB |
HDD |
| 31.2 dB |
Çalışırken |
| 38.9 / 50.6 dB |
| ||
30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.3 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 4 °C / 39 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 6.2 °C / 43 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.3 / 0.9 Watt |
Boşta | 49 / 60 / 68 Watt |
Çalışırken |
150 / 262 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
Nexoc G739 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Artılar
Eksiler
The gaming notebook from Asus can run most games smoothly at Full HD resolution and with high graphics settings. Only a few titles require lowering the resolution and/or graphics settings. AMD’s FreeSync Technology creates a smooth gaming experience on the 60Hz screen. The matte IPS display delights with a high contrast ratio, good brightness and stable viewing angles.
The built-in hexa-core processor has made a good impression.
It offers more than enough computing power for all modern applications. In terms of multi-core performance, the CPU does better than the competition from Intel - actually it was only beaten by the Core i7-8700K. However, the Core i7-8700K is a 95-watt chip, which does not compete directly with the Ryzen processor. Furthermore, the Core i7-8700K costs significantly more than the Ryzen CPU.
The laptop offers plenty of storage space. Asus has equipped the device with a 1 TB hybrid drive. In order to achieve the lowest possible price, Asus has decided to forgo an SSD. However, an SSD can be added after purchase, because the notebook comes with an empty M.2-2280 slot.
Because the laptop comes only with a powerful dedicated GPU, it needs a lot of power, even during idle operation. Therefore, users who would like to use the notebook for day-to-day office work should stay away from it. Here, the Asus laptop lacks an energy-efficient, integrated GPU. Furthermore, the laptop produces too much noise for office use.
Asus asks 1200 Euros (~$1485) for the entry-level model in the GL702ZC line. Therefore, price-wise, it is comparable to the notebooks that come equipped with an Intel Core processor and an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 graphics card. However, such devices are often useable in everyday scenarios, because, as a rule, they come with both a dedicated GPU and an integrated GPU. As a result, these devices have a significantly lower power draw during idle and produce considerably less noise - here, for example, we have in mind the Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G. Therefore, the GL702ZC is for those who want as much multi-core performance as possible for a relatively low price and who put a premium on the ability to replace the CPU.
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
- 02/02/2018 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck