Kısa inceleme: Asus ROG Zephyrus GX501 Laptop Review
Top 10
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebook listesi
» Top 10 oyun notebooku
» Top 10 bütçeye uygun Ofis/İş Notebook Listesi
» Top 10 Premium Ofis/İş notebookları
» Top 10 Çalışma istasyonu laptopları
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» Top 10 Ultrabooklar
» En iyi 10 dönüştürülebilir modeli
» Seçimi en iyi 10 tablet
» Notebookcheck Top 10 Windows Tabletleri
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından incelenen en iyi Notebook ekranları
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından seçilen 300 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 akıllı telefon listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 hafif oyun notebookları
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 |
|
Aydınlatma: 83 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 328 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1312:1 (Siyah: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.32 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.2 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5057 puan | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5289 puan | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5125 puan | |
Yardım |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus G701VIK-BA049T | |
Alienware 17 R4 | |
Aorus X7 v6 AO-S107Q716-PL-005 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Asus G701VIK-BA049T | |
Alienware 17 R4 | |
Aorus X7 v6 AO-S107Q716-PL-005 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus G701VIK-BA049T | |
Alienware 17 R4 | |
Aorus X7 v6 AO-S107Q716-PL-005 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 39562 puan | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 16821 puan | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 140964 puan | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 27935 puan | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14260 puan | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5390 puan | |
Yardım |
düşük | orta | yüksek | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 118 | 61.9 | 43.7 | |||
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 124 | 88 | 48 | |||
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 164 | 144 | 55.6 | |||
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) | 74.4 | 50.3 | 40 | |||
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 197 | 172 | 65.7 | |||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 125 | 105 | 43.6 | |||
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 92 | 87 | 41 | |||
The Division (2016) | 107 | 83.8 | 40.8 | |||
Doom (2016) | 134 | 128 | 53.9 | |||
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 106 | 97.8 | 38.8 | |||
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 87.3 | 47.9 | 29.6 | |||
Battlefield 1 (2016) | 130 | 113 | 49 | |||
Titanfall 2 (2016) | 131 | 113 | 46.6 | |||
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 123 | 118 | 63.7 | |||
Dishonored 2 (2016) | 78.2 | 66.5 | 43.4 | |||
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 86.7 | 66.7 | 34.9 | |||
Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 166 | 140 | 47.4 | |||
For Honor (2017) | 155 | 115 | 47.9 | |||
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 86.7 | 51.9 | 34.1 | |||
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) | 81.4 | 73.2 | 35.1 | |||
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) | 88 | 86 | 41.9 | |||
Prey (2017) | 135 | 131 | 50.5 | |||
Rocket League (2017) | 235 | 103 | ||||
Dirt 4 (2017) | 136 | 88.4 | ||||
Team Fortress 2 (2017) | 124 | 125 | ||||
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 125 | 111 | 104 | 79 | 27.1 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 130 | 86 | 64 | 27.2 | ||
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 66 | 38 | ||||
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 75 | 55.9 | 33.7 | |||
The Division 2 (2019) | 74 | 51.5 | 27.8 | |||
League of Legends (2019) | 145 | 144 |
Ses yüksekliği
Boşta |
| 32 / 33 / 34 dB |
Çalışırken |
| 39 / 46 dB |
| ||
30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 31 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).
Asus Zephyrus GX501 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigabyte Aero 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.7 / 0.9 Watt |
Boşta | 18 / 23 / 31 Watt |
Çalışırken |
79 / 196 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |