Kısa inceleme: Asus VivoBook S451LB Notebook
|
Aydınlatma: 91 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 208 cd/m²
Kontrast: 832:1 (Siyah: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.05 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.22% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.87% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
Asus VivoBook S451LB-CA072H GeForce GT 740M, 4200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680 | Lenovo IdeaPad U430 Touch 59372369 GeForce GT 730M, 4200U, Seagate ST500LX005-1CW162 500 GB + 16 GB Flash | Lenovo ThinkPad S440 Radeon HD 8670M, 4500U, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD256HAFV | Acer Aspire S3-392G GeForce GT 735M, 4200U, WDC WD10SPCX-22HWST0 + Kingston SMS151S324G 24 GB SSD Cache | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | 12% | 16% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.87 | 39.34 -1% | 44.61 12% | 46.35 16% |
sRGB Coverage | 59.9 | 57.5 -4% | 66.4 11% | 68.4 14% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.22 | 40.52 -2% | 46.11 12% | 48.07 17% |
Screen | -63% | -61% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 208 | 213 2% | 175 -16% | 284 37% |
Brightness | 197 | 196 -1% | 174 -12% | 260 32% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 85 -7% | 81 -11% | 87 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.5 -100% | 0.6214 -149% | 0.25 -0% |
Contrast | 832 | 426 -49% | 282 -66% | 1136 37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.11 | 10.84 -164% | 8.11 -97% | 4.39 -7% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.05 | 11.39 -181% | 9.94 -145% | 3.3 19% |
Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.23 99% | 2.61 84% | 2.52 87% |
CCT | 6968 93% | 14005 46% | 11564 56% | 6591 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 36 -5% | 42 11% | 43.6 15% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -33% /
-47% | -25% /
-41% | 16% /
16% |
* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus VivoBook S451LB-CA072H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad S440 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad U430 Touch 59372369 | |
Acer Aspire V5-552PG-X809 | |
Medion Akoya E6239T | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus VivoBook S451LB-CA072H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad S440 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad U430 Touch 59372369 | |
Acer Aspire V5-552PG-X809 | |
Medion Akoya E6239T |
PCMark 7 Score | 2834 puan | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated | 2405 puan | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated | 2704 puan | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated | 2934 puan | |
Yardım |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 9375 puan | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1819 puan | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 49333 puan | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4787 puan | |
Yardım |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
Asus VivoBook S451LB-CA072H | |
Asus N56VB-S4050H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad S440 | |
Sony VAIO Duo 13 | |
Acer Aspire S3-392G |
düşük | orta | yüksek | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anno 2070 (2011) | 94.2 | 43.6 | 25.8 | |
Tomb Raider (2013) | 60 | 39.1 | 21.2 | 16.8 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 60.1 | 46.65 | 30.37 | 15 () |
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 29.1 | 21.3 | 16.1 | |
GRID 2 (2013) | 112 | 61.4 | 45.8 | 16.97 |
Ses yüksekliği
Boşta |
| 30.9 / 31.1 / 31.3 dB |
HDD |
| 32.4 dB |
DVD |
| 36.8 / dB |
Çalışırken |
| 38.7 / 39.2 dB |
| ||
30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü |
||
min: , med: , max: Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm uzaklık) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.7 °C / 89.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.9 °C / -5.3 F).
Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
Boşta | 5.6 / 8.1 / 9.2 Watt |
Çalışırken |
39.8 / 46.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 |
Asus, küçük boyutlara büyük bir performansı sığdırmayı başarmış. Aluminyum kasa iyi bir izlenim bırakmasına karşın tamamen aluminyum olan kasalara karşı bir raki olamıyor.
Bizim için en büyük negatif nokta sabit disk oldu. Sadece sesli olması değil, aynı zamanda çalışırken çatırtı sesleri çıkartması ve sistemi yavaşlatması en büyük sorunları. Bir SSD veya SSHD daha iyi bir performans verirdi.
Yazının orjinali için tıklayın