Kısa inceleme: Dell XPS 12 9250 4K dönüştürülebilir
Top 10
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebook listesi
» Top 10 oyun notebooku
» Top 10 bütçeye uygun Ofis/İş Notebook Listesi
» Top 10 Premium Ofis/İş notebookları
» Top 10 Çalışma istasyonu laptopları
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» Top 10 Ultrabooklar
» En iyi 10 dönüştürülebilir modeli
» Seçimi en iyi 10 tablet
» Notebookcheck Top 10 Windows Tabletleri
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından incelenen en iyi Notebook ekranları
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından seçilen 300 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 akıllı telefon listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 hafif oyun notebookları
|
Aydınlatma: 81 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 437 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1249:1 (Siyah: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.67 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2 | Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -37% | -44% | -18% | -27% | -47% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 83.9 | 52.9 -37% | 44.4 -47% | 67.5 -20% | 59.1 -30% | 42.63 -49% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 71.8 -28% | 66.4 -33% | 96.6 -3% | 85.5 -14% | 63.6 -36% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.1 | 52.6 -46% | 45.91 -53% | 69 -30% | 61 -38% | 44.1 -55% |
Response Times | -3% | -37% | 20% | |||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 47 ? -31% | 46 ? -28% | 38 ? -6% | ||
Response Time Black / White * | 35 ? | 26 ? 26% | 31 ? 11% | 27 ? 23% | ||
PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 50 ? -95% | 1429 ? 43% | |||
Screen | -40% | -51% | -4% | -19% | -71% | |
Brightness middle | 437 | 353 -19% | 364 -17% | 389.2 -11% | 390 -11% | 342 -22% |
Brightness | 399 | 347 -13% | 331 -17% | 392 -2% | 352 -12% | 301 -25% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 91 12% | 84 4% | 92 14% | 81 0% | 76 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.44 -26% | 0.44 -26% | 0.27 23% | 0.69 -97% | 0.393 -12% |
Contrast | 1249 | 802 -36% | 827 -34% | 1441 15% | 565 -55% | 870 -30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.56 | 6.09 -71% | 7.32 -106% | 3.61 -1% | 3.04 15% | 9.69 -172% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.3 | 7.01 25% | ||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.67 | 6.24 -134% | 7.37 -176% | 3.8 -42% | 2.88 -8% | 9.27 -247% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.41 91% | 2.03 108% | 2.16 102% | 2.43 91% | 2.95 75% |
CCT | 6681 97% | 7238 90% | 6479 100% | 5969 109% | 6848 95% | 6010 108% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 86 | 46 -47% | 42.2 -51% | 63 -27% | 55 -36% | 40.4 -53% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 71 -29% | 66.1 -34% | 97 -3% | 85 -15% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -27% /
-34% | -48% /
-49% | -20% /
-13% | -9% /
-14% | -59% /
-64% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise | |
↘ 27 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
Storage Score v2 | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K |
PCMark 7 | |
Score | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Productivity | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
Entertainment | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
System Storage | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K |
PCMark 7 Score | 4318 puan | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2277 puan | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2903 puan | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3084 puan | |
Yardım |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1115 puan | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 27409 puan | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3457 puan | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 553 puan | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 277 puan | |
Yardım |
düşük | orta | yüksek | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 33.28 | 17.37 | 20.1 | 4.67 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 24.81 | 17.88 | 11.94 | 6.67 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 8.3 | 5.67 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.4 °C / 106.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-13.3 °C / -23.9 F).
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2 | Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 20% | 52% | 21% | 33% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.4 | 4.5 17% | 1.5 72% | 4.2 22% | 2.4 56% |
Idle Average * | 10.2 | 7.7 25% | 4 61% | 8.4 18% | 4.6 55% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.5 | 8.3 34% | 5 60% | 8.9 29% | 5.6 55% |
Load Average * | 21.4 | 19.8 7% | 13.9 35% | 15.9 26% | 15.6 27% |
Load Maximum * | 24.4 | 20.6 16% | 16.9 31% | 22.5 8% | 30.7 -26% |
* ... smaller is better
Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.39 / 2.7 Watt |
Boşta | 5.4 / 10.2 / 12.5 Watt |
Çalışırken |
21.4 / 24.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K 28 Wh | HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA 42 Wh | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 54 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 38 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 45 Wh | Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C 72 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 95% | 192% | 88% | 112% | 275% | |
Reader / Idle | 370 | 954 158% | 1063 187% | 791 114% | 1013 174% | 1616 337% |
WiFi v1.3 | 243 | 361 49% | 675 178% | 488 101% | 402 65% | 760 213% |
Load | 93 | 166 78% | 288 210% | 138 48% | 182 96% | 348 274% |
Artılar
Eksiler
Dell'in XPS 12 9250 modeli ince 12.5 inçlik bir dönüştürülebilir model. Kullanılan Intel Core m7 6Y75 işlemci rutin işlemler için yeterli performansa sahip. SSD yüksek okuma hızı ile hızlı performans sunuyor.Yüksek çözünürlüklü ekran yüksek kontrastı, renk gamı ve stabilitesi ile göz dolduruyor.
İlk bakışta elegant duran cihaz özelliklere baktıkça daha ilginç hale geliyor. Akla takılan soru ise Dell'in fiyatı çok yüksek tutmuş olması.
Tüm bunlara rağmen elbette eleştiriden kaçış yok. Ekran tam oturuş pozisyonu için ayarlanamıyor. Test cihazımızda en güçlü işlemci olmasına karşın performansın tamamen kullanılabildiğini söyleyemiyoruz. Microsoft'un Surface Pro 4 modeli Core m3 işlemci ile daha hızlı. Daha uzun batarya kullanımı da görmek istediklerimiz arasında.
Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K
-
04/18/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Bade