Kısa inceleme: EVGA SC15 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1060) Laptop
Top 10
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebook listesi
» Top 10 oyun notebooku
» Top 10 bütçeye uygun Ofis/İş Notebook Listesi
» Top 10 Premium Ofis/İş notebookları
» Top 10 Çalışma istasyonu laptopları
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» Top 10 Ultrabooklar
» En iyi 10 dönüştürülebilir modeli
» Seçimi en iyi 10 tablet
» Notebookcheck Top 10 Windows Tabletleri
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından incelenen en iyi Notebook ekranları
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından seçilen 300 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 akıllı telefon listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 hafif oyun notebookları
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
EVGA SC15 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
EVGA SC15 | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) |
|
Aydınlatma: 73 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 281.5 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1043:1 (Siyah: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
EVGA SC15 ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, , 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus GX501 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) APPA031, IPS, 15.4", 2880x1800 | Gigabyte Aero 15 N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Aorus X5 v6 IPS, 15.6", 2880x1620 | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | 34% | 4% | -2% | -21% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 62.3 | 64.8 4% | 97.9 57% | 65.2 5% | 62.5 0% | 48.21 -23% |
sRGB Coverage | 89.6 | 91.8 2% | 99.9 11% | 92.5 3% | 86.2 -4% | 72.6 -19% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.6 | 65.9 4% | 85.9 35% | 66.5 5% | 62.5 -2% | 49.81 -22% |
Response Times | 13% | -13% | -4% | 7% | 28% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41.6 ? | 40.4 ? 3% | 48 ? -15% | 42.8 ? -3% | 34 ? 18% | 28 ? 33% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30.8 ? | 24 ? 22% | 33.8 ? -10% | 32 ? -4% | 32 ? -4% | 23.6 ? 23% |
PWM Frequency | 119000 ? | 26000 ? | 198.4 | 1351 ? | ||
Screen | -7% | 41% | -9% | -5% | -47% | |
Brightness middle | 281.5 | 328 17% | 545 94% | 320 14% | 280.4 0% | 274.2 -3% |
Brightness | 253 | 305 21% | 523 107% | 316 25% | 271 7% | 263 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 73 | 83 14% | 86 18% | 90 23% | 83 14% | 92 26% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.25 7% | 0.44 -63% | 0.36 -33% | 0.249 8% | 0.44 -63% |
Contrast | 1043 | 1312 26% | 1239 19% | 889 -15% | 1126 8% | 623 -40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 6.02 -54% | 1.6 59% | 4.62 -18% | 4.94 -27% | 8 -105% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.1 | 10.14 -43% | 3.8 46% | 9.75 -37% | 8.13 -15% | 14.6 -106% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 6.32 -66% | 1.9 50% | 6 -58% | 5.13 -35% | 9.1 -139% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.28 96% | 2.26 97% | 2.46 89% | 2.26 97% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 7322 89% | 8194 79% | 6834 95% | 6761 96% | 7433 87% | 5020 129% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57.8 | 60 4% | 60 4% | 55.9 -3% | 45.7 -21% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89.3 | 92 3% | 92 3% | 85.9 -4% | 72.1 -19% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
-2% | 21% /
31% | -3% /
-6% | 0% /
-3% | -13% /
-32% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.6 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
EVGA SC15 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
EVGA SC15 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
EVGA SC15 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
EVGA SC15 | |
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
EVGA SC15 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
EVGA SC15 | |
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
EVGA SC15 | |
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
EVGA SC15 | |
Aorus X5 v6 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
EVGA SC15 | |
Aorus X5 v6 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Aorus X5 v6 | |
EVGA SC15 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5085 puan | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 7505 puan | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5400 puan | |
Yardım |
EVGA SC15 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Aorus X5 v6 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Aorus X7 DT v6 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 37% | -56% | 9% | 17% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 977 | 1082 11% | 1073 10% | 540 -45% | 1134 16% |
Copy Program MB/s | 442.3 | 401.9 -9% | 351.5 -21% | 411.5 -7% | 502 13% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1071 | 1666 56% | 351.1 -67% | 1272 19% | 1482 38% |
Score Total | 2474 | 3756 52% | 1630 -34% | 2810 14% | 2695 9% |
Score Write | 896 | 1468 64% | 514 -43% | 1022 14% | 665 -26% |
Score Read | 1081 | 1549 43% | 756 -30% | 1206 12% | 1353 25% |
Access Time Write * | 0.035 | 0.029 17% | 0.025 29% | 0.034 3% | 0.025 29% |
Access Time Read * | 0.054 | 0.041 24% | 0.367 -580% | 0.034 37% | 0.047 13% |
4K-64 Write | 706 | 1185 68% | 272.5 -61% | 789 12% | 366.9 -48% |
4K-64 Read | 822 | 1229 50% | 521 -37% | 962 17% | 1107 35% |
4K Write | 95.5 | 127.6 34% | 131.3 37% | 112.2 17% | 149.1 56% |
4K Read | 39.13 | 48.01 23% | 44.6 14% | 41.34 6% | 48.93 25% |
Seq Write | 943 | 1550 64% | 1099 17% | 1207 28% | 1494 58% |
Seq Read | 2203 | 2719 23% | 1904 -14% | 2026 -8% | 1971 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
EVGA SC15 | |
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics | |
Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
EVGA SC15 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
EVGA SC15 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
EVGA SC15 | |
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
EVGA SC15 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T |
3DMark 11 Performance | 13148 puan | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 110194 puan | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24201 puan | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9750 puan | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 5165 puan | |
Yardım |
düşük | orta | yüksek | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 110 | |||
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 82.7 | |||
Thief (2014) | 79 | |||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 66 | 39.6 | ||
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 89 | 62 | ||
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 60 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 117.9 | |||
Fallout 4 (2015) | 70.8 | |||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 66.8 | |||
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 63.7 | 59.2 | ||
Doom (2016) | 98.4 | |||
Overwatch (2016) | 103.9 | |||
Mafia 3 (2016) | 41 | |||
Prey (2017) | 110.3 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
EVGA SC15 | |
Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
EVGA SC17 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV |
Ses yüksekliği
Boşta |
| 31.9 / 32 / 32 dB |
Çalışırken |
| 36.5 / 53.4 dB |
| ||
30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 28 dB(A) |
EVGA SC15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) Radeon Pro 555, i7-7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Gigabyte Aero 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | 1% | -3% | -4% | -14% | |
off / environment * | 28 | 31 -11% | 30.9 -10% | 28.8 -3% | 31 -11% | 29.3 -5% |
Idle Minimum * | 31.9 | 32 -0% | 31.3 2% | 33.1 -4% | 32 -0% | 33.4 -5% |
Idle Average * | 32 | 33 -3% | 31.3 2% | 33.1 -3% | 33 -3% | 35.2 -10% |
Idle Maximum * | 32 | 34 -6% | 31.7 1% | 34 -6% | 34 -6% | 35.2 -10% |
Load Average * | 36.5 | 39 -7% | 39.7 -9% | 37.2 -2% | 39 -7% | 53.3 -46% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.3 | 42 -4% | 35.5 12% | 46.1 -14% | 43 -7% | |
Load Maximum * | 53.4 | 46 14% | 48.6 9% | 47.1 12% | 50 6% | 57.6 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.9 °C / -1.6 F).
EVGA SC15 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (61.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.43 / 0.68 Watt |
Boşta | 25.8 / 26.6 / 26.7 Watt |
Çalışırken |
80.3 / 159.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
EVGA SC15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus GX501 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) i7-7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, Apple SSD SM0256L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4" | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus X5 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 2880x1620, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | 46% | 21% | -33% | |
Idle Minimum * | 25.8 | 18 30% | 3.4 87% | 12 53% | 25 3% |
Idle Average * | 26.6 | 23 14% | 13.9 48% | 15 44% | 28.9 -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.7 | 31 -16% | 17.6 34% | 20 25% | 30.1 -13% |
Load Average * | 80.3 | 79 2% | 71.1 11% | 82 -2% | 167.3 -108% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 121.2 | 148 -22% | 57.9 52% | 111 8% | |
Load Maximum * | 159.3 | 196 -23% | 88.5 44% | 161 -1% | 222.6 -40% |
* ... smaller is better
EVGA SC15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 62 Wh | Asus Zephyrus GX501 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 50 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) i7-7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, 76 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | Aorus X5 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -28% | 130% | 35% | 126% | 15% | |
Reader / Idle | 222 | 188 -15% | 386 74% | 638 187% | 249 12% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 167 | 130 -22% | 644 286% | 232 39% | 422 153% | 182 9% |
Load | 81 | 44 -46% | 60 -26% | 75 -7% | 112 38% | 100 23% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 87 |
Artılar
Eksiler
SC15, dengeli bir GTX 1060 oyun cihazından isteyebileceğiniz her şeye neredeyse sahip. Kasa harika, fan sesi çok yüksek değil, işlemci performansı tutarlı, ve G-Sync ile 120 Hz yenileme oranı standart olarak geliyor. Rakiplerine göre daha sağlam, hafif ve aynı zamanda sessiz ve serin kalabiliyor. İncelik konusunda neredeyse daha iyi bir alternatifi yok.
En iyi cihaz olabilmek adına elbette eksiklikleri var. Belki en büyük eksikliği farklı ekran seçeneklerinin olmayışı olabilir. 5ms veya 3ms seçenekleri çok büyük bir avantaj katabilirdi. Kendi ekranı ise 18ms. 120 Hz hoş olsa da yüksek cevap süresi ve daha güçlü bir ekran kartına ihtiyaç duyulması bu avantajı çok kullanışlı kılmıyor.
Ekran hakkında şikayetlerimiz burada bitmiyor. Mat ekran biraz kalın. Bu her ne kadar daha sağlam bir ekran kapağı sunsa da, ekran üzerinde kalın bir tabaka hissi yaratması mümkün.
Diğer bazı eksiklikler ise toplamda öne çıkmaya başlıyor. Zayıf hoparlörler, dahili SD kart okuyucunun olmayışı, zayıf batarya ömrü, bekleme modunda yüksek güç tüketimi ve yüksek ağırlık. Apple cihazları gibi yüksek fiyat hoş özellikler demek yerine genel anlamda üst sınıf kalite için konulmuş.
SC15 sağlam, sessiz ve serin. Bu boyuttaki diğer cihazlara göre bir adım önde denebilir. Yavaş ekran cevap süresi ise bu özelliklerini bir oyun cihazı için biraz gölgelemekte.
EVGA SC15
- 07/05/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo