Kısa inceleme: HTC U11

Name: HTC U11
Brand: HTC

Tam gaz ileri. HTC üst sınıf cihazların arasında U11 ile kargaşa çıkarmaya çalışıyor. Birçok üst sınıf teknoloji çok farklı olmayan ama kendi eşsiz dokunuşlarına sahip bir kasanın içerisinde karşımızda.

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt, Published 07/28/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of HTC Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HTC U11 (U Seri)

İşlemci

Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 8 x 2.45 GHz, Kryo 280

Grafik kartı

Qualcomm Adreno 540, Çekirdek: 710 MHz

Bellek

4 GB

, LPDDR4

Görüntü

5.50 inç 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 534 PPI, capacitive, Super LCD5, 3D Corning Gorilla Glass 5, parlak: evet

Harddisk

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 53.39 GB Boş

Bağlantılar

1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ses çıkışları: USB Type-C, Kart okuyucular: microSD up to 2 TB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: proximity sensor, rotation, spin rate, edge and G-sensor, magnetometer, digital compass, sensor hub, Miracast, Wifi Direct, Chromecast, DLNA, AirPlay, VoLTE, Wi-Fi-Calling, OTG, BeiDou

Network

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (800, 900, 1900 and 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 15 (FDD Bands: 4, 12, 17, 28, 20, 5, 8, 3, 1, 7, 32; TDD Bands: 38-41), LTE, GPS

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 7.9 x 153.9 x 75.9

Batarya

3000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Konuşma süresi 3G (üreticiye göre): 24.5 h, Bekleme modu 3G (üreticiye göre): 336 h

İşletim sistemi

Android 7.1 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix ƒ/1.7, UltraSpeed Autofocus, Dual LED flash, 32 sec. long exposure, and RAW format support
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix ƒ/2.0, Voice Selfie

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: two speakers with HTC BoomSound, Klavye: virtual, silicon case, headset, USB to headphone adapter, power adapter, USB cabel, SIM tool, cleaning cloth, HTC Sense, 24 Ay Garanti, USB Type-C (USB 3.1 Gen. 1), IP67, Körper-SAR: 0,60 W/kg, Kopf-SAR: 0,45 W/kg, fanless

Ağırlık

169 g, Güç kaynağı: 80 g

Fiyat

749 Euro

Bağlantılar

HTC anasayfa

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy S8 Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	651 MBit/s +2%
HTC U11 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	639 MBit/s
Sony Xperia XZ Premium Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	494 MBit/s -23%
LG G6 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	220 MBit/s -66%
iperf3 receive AX12
Sony Xperia XZ Premium Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	501 MBit/s +27%
HTC U11 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	394 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S8 Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	329 MBit/s -16%
LG G6 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	325 MBit/s -18%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

Sony Xperia XZ Premium — Xperia XZ Premium

HTC U11: TouchPal keyboard - portrait mode

HTC U11: TouchPal keyboard - landscape mode


453 cd/m²	458 cd/m²	450 cd/m²
483 cd/m²	482 cd/m²	470 cd/m²
499 cd/m²	492 cd/m²	464 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 499 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 472.3 cd/m² Minimum: 6.07 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 90 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 482 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1461:1 (Siyah: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.22

	HTC U11 Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5"	HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2"	Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8"	Huawei P10 Plus LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.5"	OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Sony Xperia XZ Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5"
Screen		-13%	3%	5%	13%	23%	-11%
Brightness middle	482	445 -8%	566 17%	568 18%	426 -12%	557 16%	578 20%
Brightness	472	434 -8%	564 19%	562 19%	431 -9%	553 17%	568 20%
Brightness Distribution	90	93 3%	94 4%	92 2%	93 3%	97 8%	92 2%
Black Level *	0.33	0.36 -9%		0.43 -30%		0.35 -6%	0.62 -88%
Contrast	1461	1236 -15%		1321 -10%		1591 9%	932 -36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.2	2.8 12%	2.7 16%	2.4 25%	1.6 50%	1.4 56%	2.8 12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.4	5.8 -7%	5.4 -0%	3.8 30%	4.1 24%	3.1 43%	5.1 6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.2	3.7 -68%	3.1 -41%	2.5 -14%	1.7 23%	1.3 41%	2.8 -27%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.31 ^95%	2.15 ^102%	2.37 ^93%	2.25 ^98%	2.21 ^100%	2.15 ^102%
CCT	6581 ^99%	7164 ^91%	6335 ^103%	6779 ^96%	6329 ^103%	6667 ^97%	6728 ^97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)			81.57			63.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			99.87			99.83

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.8 ms rise
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.8 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC U11	175032 Points
HTC 10	131866 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S8	171884 Points -2%
Huawei P10 Plus	138326 Points -21%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	173403 Points -1%
LG G6	151751 Points -13%
Lenovo Moto Z	129197 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 6	181909 Points +4%
OnePlus 5	177156 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	165399 Points -6%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC U11	8295 Points
HTC 10	5809 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S8	6035 Points -27%
Huawei P10 Plus	7377 Points -11%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	7695 Points -7%
LG G6	5703 Points -31%
Lenovo Moto Z	7637 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 6	7548 Points -9%
OnePlus 5	7826 Points -6%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
HTC U11	6828 Points
HTC 10	4549 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S8	5370 Points -21%
Huawei P10 Plus	6157 Points -10%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	6433 Points -6%
LG G6	5152 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 6	6686 Points -2%
OnePlus 5	6579 Points -4%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC U11	1906 Points
HTC 10	1654 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8	1997 Points +5%
Huawei P10 Plus	1852 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	1904 Points 0%
LG G6	1831 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 6	1938 Points +2%
OnePlus 5	1973 Points +4%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC U11	6443 Points
HTC 10	4021 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8	6711 Points +4%
Huawei P10 Plus	6267 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	6491 Points +1%
LG G6	4369 Points -32%
Xiaomi Mi 6	6714 Points +4%
OnePlus 5	6799 Points +6%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC U11	40014 Points
HTC 10	27176 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S8	31532 Points -21%
Huawei P10 Plus	26156 Points -35%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	32302 Points -19%
LG G6	29276 Points -27%
Lenovo Moto Z	25135 Points -37%
Xiaomi Mi 6	41172 Points +3%
OnePlus 5	40229 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	37746 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC U11	55725 Points
HTC 10	30061 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy S8	36347 Points -35%
Huawei P10 Plus	33307 Points -40%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	52358 Points -6%
LG G6	32128 Points -42%
Lenovo Moto Z	26659 Points -52%
Xiaomi Mi 6	58228 Points +4%
OnePlus 5	58001 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	63386 Points +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC U11	20140 Points
HTC 10	20344 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8	21543 Points +7%
Huawei P10 Plus	14934 Points -26%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	13800 Points -31%
LG G6	22335 Points +11%
Lenovo Moto Z	20948 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 6	20330 Points +1%
OnePlus 5	19411 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	15626 Points -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
HTC U11	4744 Points
HTC 10	3157 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S8	4015 Points -15%
Huawei P10 Plus	2229 Points -53%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	3407 Points -28%
LG G6	3282 Points -31%
Lenovo Moto Z	3023 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi 6	4978 Points +5%
OnePlus 5	4219 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3034 Points -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U11	5877 Points
HTC 10	4581 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S8	4923 Points -16%
Huawei P10 Plus	2469 Points -58%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	5107 Points -13%
LG G6	4121 Points -30%
Lenovo Moto Z	3718 Points -37%
Xiaomi Mi 6	6231 Points +6%
OnePlus 5	4765 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	4235 Points -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
HTC U11	2832 Points
HTC 10	1512 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy S8	2440 Points -14%
Huawei P10 Plus	1662 Points -41%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	1574 Points -44%
LG G6	1961 Points -31%
Lenovo Moto Z	1828 Points -35%
Xiaomi Mi 6	2921 Points +3%
OnePlus 5	3012 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1522 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
HTC U11	3590 Points
HTC 10	2495 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3194 Points -11%
Huawei P10 Plus	1747 Points -51%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	2895 Points -19%
LG G6	2669 Points -26%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points -39%
Xiaomi Mi 6	3775 Points +5%
OnePlus 5	3566 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U11	3883 Points
HTC 10	2889 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3472 Points -11%
Huawei P10 Plus	1767 Points -54%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	3723 Points -4%
LG G6	2980 Points -23%
Lenovo Moto Z	2336 Points -40%
Xiaomi Mi 6	4072 Points +5%
OnePlus 5	3757 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
HTC U11	2841 Points
HTC 10	1688 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy S8	2494 Points -12%
Huawei P10 Plus	1679 Points -41%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	1628 Points -43%
LG G6	1955 Points -31%
Lenovo Moto Z	1797 Points -37%
Xiaomi Mi 6	3007 Points +6%
OnePlus 5	3026 Points +7%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11	58 fps
HTC 10	43 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy S8	60 fps +3%
Huawei P10 Plus	40 fps -31%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	60 fps +3%
LG G6	46 fps -21%
Lenovo Moto Z	53 fps -9%
Xiaomi Mi 6	60 fps +3%
OnePlus 5	60 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	57.7 fps -1%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11	91 fps
HTC 10	73 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S8	121 fps +33%
Huawei P10 Plus	56 fps -38%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	109 fps +20%
LG G6	75 fps -18%
Lenovo Moto Z	77 fps -15%
Xiaomi Mi 6	119 fps +31%
OnePlus 5	115 fps +26%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	92 fps +1%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC U11	29 fps
HTC 10	24 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S8	41 fps +41%
Huawei P10 Plus	29 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	46 fps +59%
LG G6	27 fps -7%
Lenovo Moto Z	26 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mi 6	56 fps +93%
OnePlus 5	56 fps +93%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	55.2 fps +90%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11	51 fps
HTC 10	39 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8	62 fps +22%
Huawei P10 Plus	19 fps -63%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	47 fps -8%
LG G6	38 fps -25%
Lenovo Moto Z	41 fps -20%
Xiaomi Mi 6	63 fps +24%
OnePlus 5	61 fps +20%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	58.7 fps +15%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11	15 fps
HTC 10	14 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S8	23 fps +53%
Huawei P10 Plus	12 fps -20%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	37 fps +147%
LG G6	16 fps +7%
Lenovo Moto Z	15 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6	42 fps +180%
OnePlus 5	41 fps +173%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	41.5 fps +177%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11	33 fps
HTC 10	24 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy S8	24 fps -27%
Huawei P10 Plus	22 fps -33%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	35 fps +6%
LG G6	29 fps -12%
Lenovo Moto Z	27 fps -18%
Xiaomi Mi 6	43 fps +30%
OnePlus 5	42 fps +27%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	41.3 fps +25%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11	13 fps
HTC 10	10 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8	13 fps 0%
Huawei P10 Plus	10 fps -23%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	25 fps +92%
LG G6	11 fps -15%
Lenovo Moto Z	9.8 fps -25%
Xiaomi Mi 6	26 fps +100%
OnePlus 5	25 fps +92%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11	24 fps
HTC 10	18 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy S8	25 fps +4%
Huawei P10 Plus	15 fps -37%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	23 fps -4%
LG G6	20 fps -17%
Lenovo Moto Z	16 fps -33%
Xiaomi Mi 6	26 fps +8%
OnePlus 5	25 fps +4%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
HTC U11	3034 Points
HTC 10	2193 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3277 Points +8%
Huawei P10 Plus	2563 Points -16%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	3506 Points +16%
LG G6	2496 Points -18%
Lenovo Moto Z	2356 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 6	3694 Points +22%
OnePlus 5	3790 Points +25%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3097 Points +2%
System (sort by value)
HTC U11	5570 Points
HTC 10	2806 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy S8	5386 Points -3%
Huawei P10 Plus	3572 Points -36%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	5857 Points +5%
LG G6	3646 Points -35%
Lenovo Moto Z	3398 Points -39%
Xiaomi Mi 6	5857 Points +5%
OnePlus 5	5902 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	6582 Points +18%
Memory (sort by value)
HTC U11	2085 Points
HTC 10	1772 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3039 Points +46%
Huawei P10 Plus	3331 Points +60%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	3444 Points +65%
LG G6	1930 Points -7%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi 6	4054 Points +94%
OnePlus 5	4423 Points +112%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1319 Points -37%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U11	5976 Points
HTC 10	5009 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S8	6096 Points +2%
Huawei P10 Plus	3438 Points -42%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	6045 Points +1%
LG G6	5138 Points -14%
Lenovo Moto Z	4321 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi 6	6206 Points +4%
OnePlus 5	6144 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	6875 Points +15%
Web (sort by value)
HTC U11	1221 Points
HTC 10	928 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8	1156 Points -5%
Huawei P10 Plus	1054 Points -14%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	1239 Points +1%
LG G6	1073 Points -12%
Lenovo Moto Z	959 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi 6	1263 Points +3%
OnePlus 5	1287 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1542 Points +26%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
HTC U11	812 Points
HTC 10	608 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S8	1276 Points +57%
LG G6	647 Points -20%
Lenovo Moto Z	542 Points -33%
Xiaomi Mi 6	733 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1177 Points +45%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
HTC U11	36.58 fps
Samsung Galaxy S8	30.64 fps -16%
LG G6	24.34 fps -33%
Lenovo Moto Z	24.33 fps -33%
Xiaomi Mi 6	32.14 fps -12%

Legend

HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Huawei P10 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Sony Xperia XZ Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Mi 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe

WebXPRT 2015 | Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	162 Points
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)	108 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)	194 Points +20%
Huawei P10 Plus	140 Points -14%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)	149 Points -8%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)	122 Points -25%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)	112 Points -31%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	161 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	204 Points +26%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	11781 Points
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)	8905 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)	12941 Points +10%
Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)	10213 Points -13%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)	10672 Points -9%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)	9113 Points -23%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)	7771 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)	11909 Points +1%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	11945 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)	26053 Points +121%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	69.5 Points
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)	52.1 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)	65.8 Points -5%
Huawei P10 Plus	58.4 Points -16%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)	61.5 Points -12%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)	56.6 Points -19%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)	47.5 Points -32%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)	70.5 Points +1%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	71.6 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)	168.1 Points +142%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	2760 ms *
HTC 10 (Chrome 49)	3146 ms * -14%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)	1887 ms * +32%
Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)	3107 ms * -13%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)	3199 ms * -16%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)	2464 ms * +11%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)	3155 ms * -14%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)	2668 ms * +3%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	2622 ms * +5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)	1103 ms * +60%

* ... smaller is better

	HTC U11	HTC 10	Samsung Galaxy S8	Huawei P10 Plus	Sony Xperia XZ Premium	LG G6	Lenovo Moto Z	Xiaomi Mi 6	OnePlus 5
AndroBench 3-5		-32%	-5%	20%	-30%	-21%	-4%	-4%	-5%
Sequential Read 256KB	717	275.1 -62%	793 11%	733 2%	687 -4%	428.7 -40%	439.7 -39%	728 2%	748 4%
Sequential Write 256KB	206.4	115.6 -44%	193.2 -6%	182.6 -12%	194 -6%	122.8 -41%	168.3 -18%	196.7 -5%	201.5 -2%
Random Read 4KB	91.4	29.92 -67%	127.2 39%	173.1 89%	74.1 -19%	95.2 4%	117.2 28%	143.5 57%	141 54%
Random Write 4KB	80	15.89 -80%	15.25 -81%	149.8 87%	17.2 -78%	16.58 -79%	74.9 -6%	25.19 -69%	19.3 -76%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	68.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	83.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 21%	63.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -7%	54 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -22%	36.79 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -47%	77.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 13%	78.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	46.25 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	65.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 41%	53.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 16%	33.61 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -27%	33.31 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -28%	53.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 15%	45.64 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -1%

Maksimum yük

Bekleme


40 °C	41.1 °C	41.2 °C
40.8 °C	40.7 °C	46.3 °C
40.6 °C	40.2 °C	40.7 °C

Maksimum: 46.3 °C
Ortalama: 41.3 °C


35.1 °C	38.5 °C	40.2 °C
35 °C	38.3 °C	39.7 °C
36.1 °C	37.5 °C	39.2 °C

Maksimum: 40.2 °C
Ortalama: 37.7 °C

Güç kaynağı 30.1 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

HTC U11 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P10 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

no name audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (98.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.03 / 0.27 Watt
Boşta	0.73 / 1.96 / 1.98 Watt
Çalışırken	4.82 / 7.15 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HTC U11 3000 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh	Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh	Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh	OnePlus 5 3300 mAh
Power Consumption		-11%	24%	-41%	-11%	-8%	21%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	0.73	0.68 7%	0.78 -7%	1.03 -41%	0.62 15%	0.77 -5%	0.66 10%	0.73 -0%
Idle Average *	1.96	1.49 24%	1.1 44%	2.61 -33%	2.44 -24%	2.04 -4%	1.01 48%	1.44 27%
Idle Maximum *	1.98	1.91 4%	1.16 41%	2.83 -43%	2.59 -31%	2.24 -13%	1.09 45%	1.5 24%
Load Average *	4.82	7.4 -54%	4.15 14%	7.03 -46%	4.94 -2%	4.69 3%	3.97 18%	6.91 -43%
Load Maximum *	7.15	9.71 -36%	5.12 28%	10.08 -41%	7.91 -11%	8.66 -21%	8.34 -17%	8.51 -19%

* ... smaller is better

Batarya ömrü

Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)		20h 50min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 18min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)		3h 32min

	HTC U11 3000 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh	Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh	LG G6 3300 mAh	Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 6 3350 mAh
Battery Runtime		1%	35%	26%	30%	34%	36%	20%	32%
Reader / Idle	1250	1273 2%	1667 33%	1655 32%	1835 47%	1754 40%	1789 43%	1371 10%
H.264	498	648 30%	771 55%	756 52%	813 63%	802 61%	779 56%	724 45%
WiFi v1.3	560	413 -26%	719 28%	760 36%	587 5%	695 24%	692 24%	407 -27%	739 32%
Load	212	203 -4%	264 25%	174 -18%	225 6%	236 11%	252 19%	320 51%

PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	768 min +61%
Huawei Mate 9	677 min +42%
Samsung Galaxy S8	527 min +11%
Sony Xperia XZ	482 min +1%
HTC U11	476 min
HTC 10	387 min -19%

Artılar

+ Alışılmadık genişlikte renkler

+ Hızlı Snapdragon işlemci

+ UFS 2.1 depolama alanı

+ Harika kamera

+ Tutarlı GPS

+ İyi ekran

+ Genişletilebilir depolama alanı

+ Gigabit-LTE

+ Video çıkışı ile hızlı USB

+ Harika kulaklık

+ IP sertifikalı

Eksiler

- Yoğun kullanımda işlemci tıkanmaları

- microSD sadece ortalama hızda

- aptX desteği yok

- Video kaydederken tüm fonksiyonlar mevcut değil

In Review: HTC U11, courtesy of HTC Germany.

HTC'nin tasarımla çok oynamamasına karşın U11, HTC 10 modelinden farklı gözüküyor. Kullanılan farklı materyal ve renklerin de bunda etkisi var. Teknik özellikler yönünden ise cihaz üst segmentte. Üst sınıf işlemci ve yeterli depolama alanı sunuluyor.

Ses her daim HTC'nin güçlü alanlarından biri olsa da U11 bu alandaki en iyisi artık değil Elbette ses teknolojisi yine mevcut, ancak USB tabanlı bir ses arayüzüne neden geçildiğini anlamak zor. Halbuki pakette gelen kulaklık oldukça iyi. Bluetooth kulaklık kullanmak isteyenler ise hayal kırıklığına uğrayabilir, zira aptX desteklenmiyor.

HTC U11 alışılmadık renkleri ile etkiliyor. Harika bir kamera, sistem performansı ise diğer sundukları arasında. Batarya ömrü ise, aradıklarımız arasında.

HTC U11, harika fotoğraflar çekiyor ve sınıfının lideri Galaxy S8'den düşük ışık performansında daha iyi. Yine de birincilik için yeterli değil.

U11 rakiplerine kıyasla büyük olmasına karşın sadece 3000 mAh batarya kullanılmış. Daha geniş bir tercih elbette daha iyi olurdu, çünkü kullanım süreleri rakiplerine göre çok iyi değil. Yine de HTC U11 olağanüstü bir cihaz.

Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.

HTC U11 - 07/22/2017 v6 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

İşcilik

89%

Klavye

67 / 75 → 90%

Mouse

95%

Bağlanılabilirlik

66 / 60 → 100%

Ağırlık

91%