Kısa inceleme: Huawei Mate 9 Phablet

Name: Huawei Mate 9
Brand: Huawei

Büyük düşün! Büyük üst sınıf phabletleri seviyorsanız Huawei'nin en son ürününe bakmalısınız. Yeni Kirin 960 sistem çipinin yanısıra çift kamera, modern Android 7.0 ve büyük bir bataryaya sahip. En göze çarpan özelliği ise 5.9 inçlik IPS ekranı. İyi bir cihaz olduğu kesin, ama hangi yönleri zayıf?

Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Manuel Masiero, Published 11/11/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen Phablet

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei Mate 9 (Mate Seri)

İşlemci

HiSilicon Kirin 960 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53

Grafik kartı

ARM Mali-G71 MP8, Çekirdek: 900 MHz

Bellek

4 GB

, LPDDR4-1800

Görüntü

5.90 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 373 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, 10 multi-touch points, IPS, Blaulichtfiler (Nachtmodus), parlak: evet

Harddisk

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 49.55 GB Boş

Bağlantılar

1 USB 2.0, Ses çıkışları: combined headphones and microphone port (3.5 mm stereo jack), Kart okuyucular: MicroSD up to 256 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: Position, accelerometer, orientation and G sensor, digital compass, barometer, OTG, DLNA, Miracast, IR transmitter

Network

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSP/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 19), LTE Cat. 11 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29 (all FDD), 38, 39, 40, 41 (TDD)), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 7.9 x 156.9 x 78.9

Batarya

4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Konuşma süresi 3G (üreticiye göre): 30 h, Bekleme modu 3G (üreticiye göre): 504 h

İşletim sistemi

Android 7.0 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 20 MPix Monochrome sensor + 12 MP RGB sensor Leica dual-camera, Hyprid-AF, OIS, Hybrid-Zoom, 2-tone flash, Ultra HD-video
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (AF, 1080p-Video)

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: two speakers, Klavye: virtual, Power adapter, USB cable, SIM tool, OTG adapter, quick-start guide, protective case, EMUI 5.0, Phone Manager, HiCare, Facebook, Smart Controller, Twitter, Todolist, WPS Office, 24 Ay Garanti, USB Type-C, quick-charge, 4 microphones with noise suppression, SAR head: 1.64 W/kg, SAR body: 1.36 W/kg, fanless

Ağırlık

192 g, Güç kaynağı: 101 g

Fiyat

699 Euro

Bağlantılar

Huawei anasayfa

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Apple iPhone 7 Plus Huawei Mate 8 Huawei Mate 9 Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Microsoft Lumia 950 XL DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)	485 MBit/s +194%
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	435 MBit/s +164%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	335 MBit/s +103%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	256 MBit/s +55%
Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	165 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)	532 MBit/s +105%
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	515 MBit/s +99%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	281 MBit/s +8%
Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	259 MBit/s
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	257 MBit/s -1%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


681 cd/m²	675 cd/m²	692 cd/m²
683 cd/m²	696 cd/m²	700 cd/m²
686 cd/m²	657 cd/m²	653 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 700 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 680.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.3 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 93 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 696 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1657:1 (Siyah: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.33

	Huawei Mate 9 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9"	Huawei Mate 8 IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 6"	Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Google Pixel XL 2016 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	LG G5 IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3"	Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7"	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7"
Screen		-8%	23%	-10%	-14%	7%	4%
Brightness middle	696	514 -26%	557 -20%	402 -42%	784 13%	394.8 -43%	297 -57%
Brightness	680	513 -25%	553 -19%	408 -40%	774 14%	397 -42%	297 -56%
Brightness Distribution	93	94 1%	97 4%	85 -9%	91 -2%	91 -2%	93 0%
Black Level *	0.42	0.35 17%	0.35 17%		0.43 -2%
Contrast	1657	1469 -11%	1591 -4%		1823 10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.3	5.08 -18%	1.4 67%	4 7%	6.5 -51%	1.49 65%	2.67 38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.4	8.28 12%	3.1 67%	10.1 -7%	11.7 -24%		3.98 58%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.8	5.49 -14%	1.3 73%	3.2 33%	8 -67%	1.98 59%	2.81 41%
Gamma	2.33 ^94%	2.08 ^106%	2.21 ^100%	2.19 ^100%	2.22 ^99%	2.19 ^100%	2.08 ^106%
CCT	7255 ^90%	7254 ^90%	6667 ^97%	7037 ^92%	8699 ^75%	6382 ^102%	6379 ^102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		79.95	63.1		68.08		66.31
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99.84	99.83		97.46		99.79

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 43 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	124087 Points
Huawei Mate 8	93767 Points -24%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	94122 Points -24%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	165399 Points +33%
Google Pixel XL 2016	138641 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	128749 Points +4%
Lenovo Moto Z	129197 Points +4%
Huawei P9	95743 Points -23%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	1947 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3476 Points +79%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1513 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	1840 Points -5%
Lenovo Moto Z	1480 Points -24%
Huawei P9	1755 Points -10%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	5629 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	5630 Points 0%
Google Pixel XL 2016	4167 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	5503 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto Z	3946 Points -30%
Huawei P9	4904 Points -13%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	27364 Points
Huawei Mate 8	19179 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	24020 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	37746 Points +38%
Google Pixel XL 2016	27766 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28671 Points +5%
Lenovo Moto Z	25135 Points -8%
Huawei P9	19854 Points -27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	35626 Points
Huawei Mate 8	20537 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	26964 Points -24%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	63386 Points +78%
Google Pixel XL 2016	32652 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	33031 Points -7%
Lenovo Moto Z	26659 Points -25%
Huawei P9	21577 Points -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	15104 Points
Huawei Mate 8	15575 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	17380 Points +15%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	15626 Points +3%
Google Pixel XL 2016	18222 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	19610 Points +30%
Lenovo Moto Z	20948 Points +39%
Huawei P9	15517 Points +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	2367 Points
Huawei Mate 8	1244 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	1488 Points -37%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3034 Points +28%
Google Pixel XL 2016	3180 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2710 (2421^min) Points +14%
Lenovo Moto Z	3023 Points +28%
Huawei P9	1237 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	2448 Points
Huawei Mate 8	1092 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	1471 Points -40%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	4235 Points +73%
Google Pixel XL 2016	3935 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	3015 (2895^min) Points +23%
Lenovo Moto Z	3718 Points +52%
Huawei P9	1080 Points -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	2123 Points
Huawei Mate 8	2432 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	1552 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1522 Points -28%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1902 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2002 (1539^min) Points -6%
Lenovo Moto Z	1828 Points -14%
Huawei P9	2510 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	2240 Points
Huawei Mate 8	945 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	1232 Points -45%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2560 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2204 (1923^min) Points -2%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points -2%
Huawei P9	974 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	2294 Points
Huawei Mate 8	801 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	1155 Points -50%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2820 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2229 (2043^min) Points -3%
Lenovo Moto Z	2336 Points +2%
Huawei P9	829 Points -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	2117 Points
Huawei Mate 8	2552 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	1606 Points -24%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1935 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2121 (1594^min) Points 0%
Lenovo Moto Z	1797 Points -15%
Huawei P9	2503 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	2343 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3371 Points +44%
Google Pixel XL 2016	3483 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2641 Points +13%
Lenovo Moto Z	3151 Points +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	2421 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	5141 Points +112%
Google Pixel XL 2016	4406 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	3071 Points +27%
Lenovo Moto Z	3930 Points +62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	2104 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1528 Points -27%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2009 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	1773 Points -16%
Lenovo Moto Z	1860 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	2108 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	2629 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2234 Points +6%
Lenovo Moto Z	2363 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	2142 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	2863 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2394 Points +12%
Lenovo Moto Z	2588 Points +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	1997 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	2044 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	1811 Points -9%
Lenovo Moto Z	1813 Points -9%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	60 fps
Huawei Mate 8	44 fps -27%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	18.75 fps -69%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	57.7 fps -4%
Google Pixel XL 2016	55 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	51 fps -15%
Lenovo Moto Z	53 fps -12%
Huawei P9	43 fps -28%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	80 fps
Huawei Mate 8	41 fps -49%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	27.11 fps -66%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	92 fps +15%
Google Pixel XL 2016	91 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	81 fps +1%
Lenovo Moto Z	77 fps -4%
Huawei P9	40 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	37 fps
Huawei Mate 8	19 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	11 fps -70%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	11.81 fps -68%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	55.2 fps +49%
Google Pixel XL 2016	30 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	27 fps -27%
Lenovo Moto Z	26 fps -30%
Huawei P9	19 fps -49%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	34 fps
Huawei Mate 8	18 fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	18 fps -47%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	17.54 fps -48%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	58.7 fps +73%
Google Pixel XL 2016	48 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	38 fps +12%
Lenovo Moto Z	41 fps +21%
Huawei P9	18 fps -47%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	28 fps
Huawei Mate 8	11 fps -61%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	41.5 fps +48%
Google Pixel XL 2016	17 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps -46%
Lenovo Moto Z	15 fps -46%
Huawei P9	11 fps -61%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	24 fps
Huawei Mate 8	10 fps -58%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	41.3 fps +72%
Google Pixel XL 2016	32 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28 fps +17%
Lenovo Moto Z	27 fps +13%
Huawei P9	10 fps -58%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	7403 Points
Huawei Mate 8	7344 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	5113 Points -31%
Google Pixel XL 2016	4739 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4660 Points -37%
Lenovo Moto Z	7637 Points +3%
Huawei P9	7058 Points -5%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	2772 Points
Huawei Mate 8	2046 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	1746 Points -37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1465 Points -47%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3097 Points +12%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2378 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2074 Points -25%
Lenovo Moto Z	2356 Points -15%
Huawei P9	2025 Points -27%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	3616 Points
Huawei Mate 8	4064 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	3305 Points -9%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1386 Points -62%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	6582 Points +82%
Google Pixel XL 2016	3889 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4080 Points +13%
Lenovo Moto Z	3398 Points -6%
Huawei P9	3930 Points +9%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	3850 Points
Huawei Mate 8	2339 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	1138 Points -70%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1945 Points -49%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1319 Points -66%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1677 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2072 Points -46%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points -43%
Huawei P9	2627 Points -32%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	3939 Points
Huawei Mate 8	1636 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	2476 Points -37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	2040 Points -48%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	6875 Points +75%
Google Pixel XL 2016	5017 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2203 Points -44%
Lenovo Moto Z	4321 Points +10%
Huawei P9	1583 Points -60%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	1076 Points
Huawei Mate 8	1127 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	998 Points -7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	837 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1542 Points +43%
Google Pixel XL 2016	977 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	994 Points -8%
Lenovo Moto Z	959 Points -11%
Huawei P9	1029 Points -4%

Basemark X 1.1
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	42176 Points
Huawei Mate 8	29659 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	36533 Points -13%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	33082 Points -22%
Google Pixel XL 2016	34695 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	41091 Points -3%
Lenovo Moto Z	41445 Points -2%
Huawei P9	29662 Points -30%
High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	31104 Points
Huawei Mate 8	16688 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	26108 Points -16%
Google Pixel XL 2016	30724 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	32273 Points +4%
Lenovo Moto Z	33028 Points +6%
Huawei P9	16610 Points -47%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	699 Points
Huawei Mate 8	347 Points -50%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1177 Points +68%
Google Pixel XL 2016	621 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	733 Points +5%
Lenovo Moto Z	542 Points -22%
Huawei P9	328 Points -53%

ANDEBench PRO
Device Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	16616 Points
Huawei Mate 8	11703 Points -30%
Google Pixel XL 2016	14128 Points -15%
Lenovo Moto Z	15951 Points -4%
Huawei P9	13100 Points -21%
CoreMark-PRO/HPC (Base) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	5902 Points
Huawei Mate 8	5664 Points -4%
Google Pixel XL 2016	5452 Points -8%
Lenovo Moto Z	4834 Points -18%
Huawei P9	5919 Points 0%
Memory Bandwidth (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	20696 MB/s
Huawei Mate 8	10559 MB/s -49%
Google Pixel XL 2016	18672 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Moto Z	19176 MB/s -7%
Huawei P9	8721 MB/s -58%
Memory Latency (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	6318 KOps/s
Huawei Mate 8	4981 KOps/s -21%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1948 KOps/s -69%
Lenovo Moto Z	5740 KOps/s -9%
Huawei P9	4614 KOps/s -27%
Storage (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	12783 KB/s
Huawei Mate 8	9634 KB/s -25%
Google Pixel XL 2016	19319 KB/s +51%
Lenovo Moto Z	14580 KB/s +14%
Huawei P9	10534 KB/s -18%
Platform (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	489 Points
Huawei Mate 8	286 Points -42%
Google Pixel XL 2016	253.2 Points -48%
Lenovo Moto Z	404.1 Points -17%
Huawei P9	435.2 Points -11%
3D (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	46.18 fps
Huawei Mate 8	30.14 fps -35%
Google Pixel XL 2016	67.4 fps +46%
Lenovo Moto Z	58.9 fps +28%
Huawei P9	31.59 fps -32%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9	19.14 fps
Huawei Mate 8	7.9 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A	6.6 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13.31 fps -30%
Lenovo Moto Z	24.33 fps +27%
Huawei P9	7.9 fps -59%

Legend

Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Huawei Mate 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe

Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	152 Points
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	139 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	96 Points -37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	113 Points -26%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe	204 Points +34%
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	126 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	163 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	112 Points -26%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	128 Points -16%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	11897 Points
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11329 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	7534 Points -37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8059 Points -32%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe	26053 Points +119%
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8690 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	13191 Points +11%
Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7771 Points -35%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11783 Points -1%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2734 ms *
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3643 ms * -33%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5089 ms * -86%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5553 ms * -103%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe	1103 ms * +60%
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2654 ms * +3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2564 ms * +6%
Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3155 ms * -15%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2923 ms * -7%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	68.6 Points
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	65 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	48.82 Points -29%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46 Points -33%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe	168.1 Points +145%
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.4 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	75.1 Points +9%
Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.5 Points -31%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	68.4 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1076 Points
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1127 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	998 Points -7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	837 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe	1542 Points +43%
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	977 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	994 Points -8%
Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	959 Points -11%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1029 Points -4%

Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7565 Points
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7008 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	4666 Points -38%
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6271 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	7198 (6255^min) Points -5%
Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5344 Points -29%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6580 (6523^min) Points -13%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5		-17%	25%	-10%	28%	145%	44%
Sequential Read 256KB	594	238.3 -60%	385.4 -35%	258.2 -57%	487.3 -18%	439.7 -26%	281.3 -53%
Sequential Write 256KB	142.9	124.8 -13%	150.1 5%	83.4 -42%	145.1 2%	168.3 18%	72.2 -49%
Random Read 4KB	94.7	24.98 -74%	90.3 -5%	87.7 -7%	86.7 -8%	117.2 24%	39 -59%
Random Write 4KB	8.77	15.74 79%	20.42 133%	14.56 66%	15.79 80%	74.9 754%	47.45 441%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	54				76.4 41%	78.5 45%	55 2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	29.53				50.4 71%	45.64 55%	24.83 -16%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Ayarlar	Değer
	high	30 fps
	very low	30 fps

... kıyaslama

Dead Trigger 2
	Ayarlar	Değer
	high	60 fps

... kıyaslama

Maksimum yük

Bekleme


44.4 °C	42.9 °C	40.2 °C
43.5 °C	43.1 °C	41.7 °C
41 °C	40.8 °C	40.9 °C

Maksimum: 44.4 °C
Ortalama: 42.1 °C


38 °C	40.4 °C	41.6 °C
38.4 °C	39.5 °C	40.6 °C
38.8 °C	40 °C	40.1 °C

Maksimum: 41.6 °C
Ortalama: 39.7 °C

Güç kaynağı 36.4 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Huawei Mate 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel XL 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.02 / 0.15 Watt
Boşta	0.78 / 2.13 / 2.17 Watt
Çalışırken	6.32 / 6.49 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh	Huawei Mate 8 4000 mAh	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh	Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh	Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh	LG G5 2800 mAh
Power Consumption		11%	-88%	20%	29%	25%	4%
Idle Minimum *	0.78	0.85 -9%	2.85 -265%	0.63 19%	0.53 32%	0.66 15%	0.55 29%
Idle Average *	2.13	2.07 3%	2.95 -38%	1.1 48%	1.07 50%	1.01 53%	1.37 36%
Idle Maximum *	2.17	2.28 -5%	3.26 -50%	1.56 28%	1.12 48%	1.09 50%	2.25 -4%
Load Average *	6.32	3.91 38%	8.92 -41%	5.95 6%	5.53 12%	3.97 37%	6.24 1%
Load Maximum *	6.49	4.69 28%	9.39 -45%	6.7 -3%	6.26 4%	8.34 -29%	9.12 -41%

* ... smaller is better

Batarya ömrü

Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)		25h 38min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 47min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)		3h 39min

	Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh	Huawei Mate 8 4000 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh	Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A mAh
Battery Runtime		14%	-4%	-34%	-22%	6%
Reader / Idle	1538	1872 22%	1835 19%	1078 -30%	1333 -13%	1775 15%
H.264	947	963 2%	813 -14%	611 -35%	505 -47%
WiFi v1.3	758	865 14%	587 -23%	369 -51%	505 -33%	431 -43%
Load	219	256 17%	225 3%	179 -18%	230 5%	322 47%

Artılar

+ Hızlı kamera,

+ Hibrid yaklaştırmaya sahip harika kamera

+ Hızlı depolama alanı

+ 3 yıla kadar garanti

+ LTE Cat. 11

+ Geniş frekans aralığı

+ Ses temizleme özelliği ile harika ses kalitesi

+ Uygulama klonlama

+ Kızıl ötesi

+ Çift sim

Eksiler

- Çift SIM için hibrit slot kullanmak gerekli

- microSD kartlar dahili depolama alanı olarak kullanılamıyor

- App2SD yok

- Güç adaptörü

- Yavaş SD slotu

- Ortalama WiFi performansı

In review: Huawei Mate 9. Test model courtesy of Huawei.

Huawei'nin Mate 9 ürünü üst sınıf phablet ürününün biraz kısıtlı bir evrimi. Özellik ve performans yönünden ileriye dönük bir adım. Boyutuna rağmen kullanımı da oldukça iyi.

Teknik özellikleri harika. Kirin 960 oldukça hızlı ve diğer üst sınıf sistem çipleri ile rekabete hazır. 4 GB RAM ve 64 GB gibi geniş depolama alanına sahip. microSD ile bu alanı genişletme imkanı olsa da, Huawei'nin performans yönünden bu alanı geliştirmesi gerekli, çünkü transfer oranları sadece ortalama. 5.9 inçlik ekranı düşündüğümüzde çözünürlüğün daha yüksek olmasını beklerdik.

Huawei Mate 9 iyi dayanıklılıkla beraber güçlü teknolojiler ile geliyor. Phabletler gibi büyük cihazları seviyorsanız, Mate 9 ile hata yapmış olmazsınız.

Mate 9 kutudan çıktığı gibi bağlantı olanakları yönünden neredeyse her şeyi sunuyor. LTE Cat. 11 ve geniş frekans kapsamı ile tüm dünyada kullanım imkanınız var. Uygulama klonlama sayesinde çift SIM modelinde iki WhatsApp hesabı bile kullanabilirsiniz. WiFi kapsam alanı harika olsa dahi transfer oranları böylesi bir cihaz için daha iyi olmalıydı.

Güçlü batarya paketi tamamlıyor ve uzun kullanım süreleri sunuyor. Kısaca üst sınıf özelliklere sahip büyük bir akıllı telefon arıyorsanız, Mate 9 aradığınız cihaz.

Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.

Huawei Mate 9 - 11/08/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

İşcilik

91%

Klavye

73 / 75 → 97%

Mouse

97%

Bağlanılabilirlik

53 / 60 → 89%

Ağırlık

89%