Kısa inceleme: Huawei Mate 9 Phablet
Top 10
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebook listesi
» Top 10 oyun notebooku
» Top 10 bütçeye uygun Ofis/İş Notebook Listesi
» Top 10 Premium Ofis/İş notebookları
» Top 10 Çalışma istasyonu laptopları
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» Top 10 Ultrabooklar
» En iyi 10 dönüştürülebilir modeli
» Seçimi en iyi 10 tablet
» Notebookcheck Top 10 Windows Tabletleri
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından incelenen en iyi Notebook ekranları
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından seçilen 300 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 akıllı telefon listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 hafif oyun notebookları
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
LG G5 |
|
Aydınlatma: 93 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 696 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1657:1 (Siyah: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.33
Huawei Mate 9 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9" | Huawei Mate 8 IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 6" | Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Google Pixel XL 2016 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | LG G5 IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3" | Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -8% | 23% | -10% | -14% | 7% | 4% | |
Brightness middle | 696 | 514 -26% | 557 -20% | 402 -42% | 784 13% | 394.8 -43% | 297 -57% |
Brightness | 680 | 513 -25% | 553 -19% | 408 -40% | 774 14% | 397 -42% | 297 -56% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 94 1% | 97 4% | 85 -9% | 91 -2% | 91 -2% | 93 0% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.35 17% | 0.35 17% | 0.43 -2% | |||
Contrast | 1657 | 1469 -11% | 1591 -4% | 1823 10% | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 5.08 -18% | 1.4 67% | 4 7% | 6.5 -51% | 1.49 65% | 2.67 38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.4 | 8.28 12% | 3.1 67% | 10.1 -7% | 11.7 -24% | 3.98 58% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 5.49 -14% | 1.3 73% | 3.2 33% | 8 -67% | 1.98 59% | 2.81 41% |
Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.08 106% | 2.21 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.19 100% | 2.08 106% |
CCT | 7255 90% | 7254 90% | 6667 97% | 7037 92% | 8699 75% | 6382 102% | 6379 102% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 79.95 | 63.1 | 68.08 | 66.31 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.84 | 99.83 | 97.46 | 99.79 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 43 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Huawei Mate 8 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei P9 |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei P9 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei P9 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Huawei Mate 8 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei P9 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Huawei Mate 8 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei P9 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Huawei Mate 8 | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei P9 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Huawei Mate 8 | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei P9 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Huawei Mate 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei P9 |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Huawei Mate 8 | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei P9 |
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Huawei Mate 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei P9 |
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Huawei Mate 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei P9 |
Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value) | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
Huawei Mate 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
Huawei P9 |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -17% | 25% | -10% | 28% | 145% | 44% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 594 | 238.3 -60% | 385.4 -35% | 258.2 -57% | 487.3 -18% | 439.7 -26% | 281.3 -53% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 142.9 | 124.8 -13% | 150.1 5% | 83.4 -42% | 145.1 2% | 168.3 18% | 72.2 -49% |
Random Read 4KB | 94.7 | 24.98 -74% | 90.3 -5% | 87.7 -7% | 86.7 -8% | 117.2 24% | 39 -59% |
Random Write 4KB | 8.77 | 15.74 79% | 20.42 133% | 14.56 66% | 15.79 80% | 74.9 754% | 47.45 441% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 54 | 76.4 41% | 78.5 45% | 55 2% | |||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 29.53 | 50.4 71% | 45.64 55% | 24.83 -16% |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Ayarlar | Değer | ||
high | 30 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Ayarlar | Değer | ||
high | 60 fps |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Mate 9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel XL 2016 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.02 / 0.15 Watt |
Boşta | 0.78 / 2.13 / 2.17 Watt |
Çalışırken |
6.32 / 6.49 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | Huawei Mate 8 4000 mAh | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | LG G5 2800 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | -88% | 20% | 29% | 25% | 4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.78 | 0.85 -9% | 2.85 -265% | 0.63 19% | 0.53 32% | 0.66 15% | 0.55 29% |
Idle Average * | 2.13 | 2.07 3% | 2.95 -38% | 1.1 48% | 1.07 50% | 1.01 53% | 1.37 36% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.17 | 2.28 -5% | 3.26 -50% | 1.56 28% | 1.12 48% | 1.09 50% | 2.25 -4% |
Load Average * | 6.32 | 3.91 38% | 8.92 -41% | 5.95 6% | 5.53 12% | 3.97 37% | 6.24 1% |
Load Maximum * | 6.49 | 4.69 28% | 9.39 -45% | 6.7 -3% | 6.26 4% | 8.34 -29% | 9.12 -41% |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | Huawei Mate 8 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh | Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 14% | -4% | -34% | -22% | 6% | |
Reader / Idle | 1538 | 1872 22% | 1835 19% | 1078 -30% | 1333 -13% | 1775 15% |
H.264 | 947 | 963 2% | 813 -14% | 611 -35% | 505 -47% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 758 | 865 14% | 587 -23% | 369 -51% | 505 -33% | 431 -43% |
Load | 219 | 256 17% | 225 3% | 179 -18% | 230 5% | 322 47% |
Artılar
Eksiler
Huawei'nin Mate 9 ürünü üst sınıf phablet ürününün biraz kısıtlı bir evrimi. Özellik ve performans yönünden ileriye dönük bir adım. Boyutuna rağmen kullanımı da oldukça iyi.
Teknik özellikleri harika. Kirin 960 oldukça hızlı ve diğer üst sınıf sistem çipleri ile rekabete hazır. 4 GB RAM ve 64 GB gibi geniş depolama alanına sahip. microSD ile bu alanı genişletme imkanı olsa da, Huawei'nin performans yönünden bu alanı geliştirmesi gerekli, çünkü transfer oranları sadece ortalama. 5.9 inçlik ekranı düşündüğümüzde çözünürlüğün daha yüksek olmasını beklerdik.
Huawei Mate 9 iyi dayanıklılıkla beraber güçlü teknolojiler ile geliyor. Phabletler gibi büyük cihazları seviyorsanız, Mate 9 ile hata yapmış olmazsınız.
Mate 9 kutudan çıktığı gibi bağlantı olanakları yönünden neredeyse her şeyi sunuyor. LTE Cat. 11 ve geniş frekans kapsamı ile tüm dünyada kullanım imkanınız var. Uygulama klonlama sayesinde çift SIM modelinde iki WhatsApp hesabı bile kullanabilirsiniz. WiFi kapsam alanı harika olsa dahi transfer oranları böylesi bir cihaz için daha iyi olmalıydı.
Güçlü batarya paketi tamamlıyor ve uzun kullanım süreleri sunuyor. Kısaca üst sınıf özelliklere sahip büyük bir akıllı telefon arıyorsanız, Mate 9 aradığınız cihaz.
Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.
Huawei Mate 9
-
11/08/2016 v5.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt