Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarKısa inceleme: Huawei Matebook X Pro (i5-8250U, MX150) Laptop
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aydınlatma: 84 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 442.7 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1428:1 (Siyah: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 9.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.42
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 3000x2000 | Huawei MateBook X Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 13.3", 2160x1440 | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD ID: Sharp SHP148B, Name: LQ133D1, Dell P/N: 8XDHY, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T Chi Mei CMN14D2 / N140HCE-EN1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 APPA033, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600 | Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 ID: MEI96A2, Name: Panasonic VVX14T092N00, IPS, 13.5", 2256x1504 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 4% | 1% | 28% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.9 | 65.8 0% | 68.9 5% | 65.6 0% | 99.2 51% | 67.8 3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.2 | 96.2 1% | 98.4 3% | 97.4 2% | 99.9 5% | 94.3 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.6 | 66.8 -1% | 69.5 3% | 67.8 0% | 87.1 29% | 69.5 3% |
| Response Times | 12% | -72% | 14% | -10% | -36% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.4 ? | 33 ? 18% | 69.6 ? -72% | 30 ? 26% | 42.8 ? -6% | 50.8 ? -26% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 24 ? 6% | 44 ? -72% | 25 ? 2% | 28.8 ? -13% | 37.2 ? -45% |
| PWM Frequency | 3759 ? | |||||
| Screen | 9% | -5% | -30% | 21% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 442.7 | 408 -8% | 478.5 8% | 377 -15% | 588 33% | 384.2 -13% |
| Brightness | 428 | 395 -8% | 466 9% | 339 -21% | 561 31% | 378 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 88 5% | 86 2% | 76 -10% | 92 10% | 90 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.45 -45% | 0.43 -39% | 0.4 -29% | 0.45 -45% | 0.36 -16% |
| Contrast | 1428 | 907 -36% | 1113 -22% | 943 -34% | 1307 -8% | 1067 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.24 | 1.55 31% | 3.09 -38% | 3.33 -49% | 1.7 24% | 1.8 20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.19 | 2.19 70% | 5.94 17% | 8.02 -12% | 3.5 51% | 4.2 42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.11 | 2.06 -86% | 3.5 -215% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.7 | 1.91 80% | 2.4 75% | 4.89 50% | 1.9 80% | 1.2 88% |
| Gamma | 1.42 155% | 2.34 94% | 2.063 107% | 2.37 93% | 2.33 94% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6227 104% | 6491 100% | 6883 94% | 7620 85% | 6738 96% | 6708 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.6 | 61 -1% | 69.47 13% | 62 1% | 77.92 26% | 63.7 3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95 | 96 1% | 98.36 4% | 98 3% | 99.94 5% | 94.2 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
8% | -24% /
-12% | -5% /
-19% | 13% /
18% | -8% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3478 puan | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4747 puan | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4339 puan | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3445 puan | |
Yardım | ||
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Huawei MateBook X LITEON CB1-SD256 | HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Microsoft Surface Book 2 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Apple SSD AP0128 | Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -22% | 32% | 2% | 3% | 8% | |
| Write 4K | 116.5 | 68.1 -42% | 142.4 22% | 140.6 21% | 16.02 -86% | 121.4 4% |
| Read 4K | 42.18 | 28.95 -31% | 44.08 5% | 43.62 3% | 22.9 -46% | 33.42 -21% |
| Write Seq | 1079 | 529 -51% | 1520 41% | 343.3 -68% | 722 -33% | 385.3 -64% |
| Read Seq | 1030 | 711 -31% | 1351 31% | 1452 41% | 1807 75% | 1958 90% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 225.7 | 306.4 36% | 436.6 93% | 344.4 53% | 416.5 85% | 375.7 66% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 302.9 | 501 65% | 426.6 41% | 457.2 51% | 538 78% | 364.1 20% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1174 | 496.9 -58% | 1572 34% | 344.3 -71% | 733 -38% | 1069 -9% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3394 | 1297 -62% | 3112 -8% | 2885 -15% | 3121 -8% | 2564 -24% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3782 puan | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 33063 puan | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9120 puan | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2507 puan | |
Yardım | ||
| düşük | orta | yüksek | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 162 | 86.2 | 74.2 | 27.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 18 | |||
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 43 | 38 | 20 | 17 |
| Overwatch (2016) | 95.2 | 43 | 25.1 |
Ses yüksekliği
| Boşta |
| 27.9 / 27.9 / 27.9 dB |
| Çalışırken |
| 36.2 / 45.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 27.9 dB(A) | ||
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128 | Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA | HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | 2% | -2% | 4% | 5% | |
| off / environment * | 27.9 | 30 -8% | 29.1 -4% | 30.2 -8% | 28.2 -1% | 28.3 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 27.9 | 30 -8% | 29.1 -4% | 30.2 -8% | 28.2 -1% | 28.3 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 27.9 | 30 -8% | 29.1 -4% | 30.2 -8% | 28.2 -1% | 28.3 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27.9 | 33.1 -19% | 29.1 -4% | 30.2 -8% | 29 -4% | 29.3 -5% |
| Load Average * | 36.2 | 37.6 -4% | 32.2 11% | 32.9 9% | 30.3 16% | 32.2 11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 45.2 | 37.6 17% | 37.3 17% | 39.3 13% | 39.3 13% | 34.5 24% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 3.2 °C / 38 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 5.3 °C / 42 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.4 °C / 93.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.59 / 0.62 Watt |
| Boşta | 3.5 / 8.9 / 12.3 Watt |
| Çalışırken |
54.2 / 52.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Apple SSD AP0128, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | 3% | 32% | 20% | 2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 4.6 -31% | 5 -43% | 3.2 9% | 3.7 -6% | 4.5 -29% |
| Idle Average * | 8.9 | 11 -24% | 8.3 7% | 6.5 27% | 5.2 42% | 7.8 12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.3 | 12 2% | 8.8 28% | 6.8 45% | 7.6 38% | 8.1 34% |
| Load Average * | 54.2 | 39.5 27% | 46.4 14% | 28.2 48% | 41.6 23% | 52 4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 52.1 | 34.6 34% | 48.6 7% | 36 31% | 50.5 3% | 59 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -25% | -23% | 3% | -10% | -7% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1243 | 512 -59% | 819 -34% | 1351 9% | 1367 10% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 557 | 337 -39% | 465 -17% | 602 8% | 681 22% | 485 -13% |
| Load | 133 | 162 22% | 109 -18% | 124 -7% | 78 -41% | 108 -19% |
Artılar
Eksiler
Huawei, akıllı telefon pazarında kendine yer edinmeyi başardı ve aynı başarıyı ikinci nesil MateBook X modelleri ile notebook piyasasında kazanmak istiyor. Sadece görüntüsel değişiklik yerine MateBook X Pro önceki modele kıyasla biraz daha kalınlaşıp harici grafik kartı, daha geniş batarya ve farkedilir şekilde daha iyi bir performans ile dönüyor. Sonuç olarak ise hem tasarım hem performans yönünden dengeli bir model var. Huawei, notebook piyasasında yeni bir oyuncu, ancak XPS, Spectre ve Zenbook serileri ile yarışabilecek bir model üretmeyi başarıyor.
Elbette rekabetle kıyaslanabilmek için daha fazlasını yapmak gerek. Söz konusu fiyat olunca giriş seviyesi MateBook X Pro modelinde i5-8250U işlemci ve dahili grafik kartlı modeli 1200 dolar gibi bir fiyattan edinmek mümkün. Elbette rakiplerine kıyasla çok daha ucuz. Harici grafik kartlı model için ise 1500 dolar civarında bir tutarı gözden çıkarmak gerekiyor.
Elbette MateBook X serisi için halen geliştirilebilecek alanlar mevcut. Bunu 3. jenerasyonda daha iyi bir modelle göreceğimize inanıyoruz. Daha hafif, daha iyi bir webcame sahip, Gorilla Glass dokunmatik ekranı olan ve 360 derecelik menteşelere sahip bir model çok daha tatmin edici olabilirdi. Kart okuyucunun olmaması çok büyük bir sorun olmayabilir. Ama RAM lehimlemesi olası bir güncellemenin önüne geçiyor. Eğer NFC, kızıl ötesi ve SIM kartı gibi özellikler olsa belki iş kullanıcıları için de ilgi çekici bir alternatif olabilirdi.
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
- 05/20/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
