Kısa inceleme: Huawei P9 Plus

Name: Huawei P9 Plus
Brand: Huawei

Plus olunca her şey daha mı iyi? Huawei'nin yeni P9 Plus modeli standart P9 modelinin sadece daha büyük versionu değil aynı zamanda küçük kardeşinden tamamen farklı.

Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Tanja Hinum, Published 07/20/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei P9 Plus (P9 Seri)

İşlemci

HiSilicon Kirin 955 8 x 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53

Grafik kartı

ARM Mali-T880 MP4

Bellek

4 GB

, LPDDR4

Görüntü

5.50 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, capacitive, 10 touch points, AMOLED, parlak: evet

Harddisk

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 52 GB Boş

Bağlantılar

1 USB 2.0, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm audio, Kart okuyucular: microSD up to 128 GB, 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: Proximity, rotation, accelerometer and G-sensor, digital compass, step counter, USB-OTG, WiFi-Direct, Miracast

Network

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G GSM(850/900/1800/1900MHz), 3G UMTS (800/850/900/1900/2100 MHz), LTE Cat.6 (Bands 1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28), LTE, GPS

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 6.98 x 152.3 x 75.3

Batarya

3400 mAh Lithium-Polymer

İşletim sistemi

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Leica dual-camera, Summarit-H 27 mm f/2.2 ASPH, BSI CMOS, 2-tone LED-flash, Full-HD video)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.4)

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: stereo speakers, Klavye: virtual, Klavye ışığı: evet, Power adapter (10 Watts), USB cable, SIM tool, headset, protective cover, quick-start guide, EMUI 4.1, Phone Manager, HiCare, Health, Designs, Mirror, Compass, Recorder, Memo, 36 Ay Garanti, fanless

Ağırlık

162 g, Güç kaynağı: 74 g

Fiyat

699 Euro

Bağlantılar

Huawei anasayfa

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Apple iPhone 6S Plus Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Microsoft Lumia 950 XL OnePlus 3 Huawei P9 Plus Motorola Moto X Force Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Huawei P9 DIN A6 ❌

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


341 cd/m²	361 cd/m²	390 cd/m²
344 cd/m²	361 cd/m²	392 cd/m²
350 cd/m²	359 cd/m²	392 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 392 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 365.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.97 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 87 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 361 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Siyah: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24

	Huawei P9 Plus AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	Apple iPhone 6S Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7"	Motorola Moto X Force AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.4"	Sony Xperia Z5 Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5"	OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen		53%	36%	21%	19%	-20%	12%	29%
Brightness middle	361	554 53%	583 61%	297 -18%	337 -7%	560 55%	419 16%	582 61%
Brightness	366	552 51%	560 53%	297 -19%	336 -8%	541 48%	431 18%	563 54%
Brightness Distribution	87	96 10%	91 5%	93 7%	91 5%	85 -2%	84 -3%	91 5%
Black Level *			0.46			0.45		0.38
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.1	1.59 69%	3.55 30%	2.67 48%	3.99 22%	9.19 -80%	4.1 20%	4.4 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10	2.56 74%		3.98 60%	7.07 29%	15.01 -50%	12 -20%	7.4 26%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.5	2.01 63%	3.88 29%	2.81 49%	1.66 70%	10.58 -92%	3.3 40%	4.8 13%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.01 ^109%	2.2 ^100%	2.08 ^106%	2.32 ^95%	2.7 ^81%	2.1 ^105%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	7388 ^88%	6321 ^103%	7280 ^89%	6379 ^102%	6584 ^99%	9760 ^67%	6550 ^99%	6175 ^105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		82.12	59.05	66.31		73.19	89.38	77.78
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99.98	92.8	99.79			100	99.44
Contrast			1267			1244		1532

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	142090 Points +44%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	133626 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	128749 Points +31%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	98413 Points
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	95743 Points -3%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	94122 Points -4%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	89911 Points -9%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	78324 Points -20%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	6556 Points
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	6522 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	6480 (6415^min) Points -1%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	5645 Points -14%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	4791 Points -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	4492 Points -31%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	4429 Points -32%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	2538 Points +32%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	2398 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	2170 (2120^min) Points +12%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	1929 Points
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	1767 Points -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1335 Points -31%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1262 Points -35%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	2425 Points
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	1935 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	1811 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	3249 Points +300%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	2394 Points +194%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	813 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	2823 Points +196%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	2234 Points +134%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	954 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	2411 Points
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	1912 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	1773 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	4804 Points +340%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	3071 Points +181%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	1091 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	3595 Points +189%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	2641 Points +113%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	1242 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	2547 Points
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	2503 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	2121 (1594^min) Points -17%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	1892 Points -26%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	1676 Points -34%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1402 Points -45%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1351 Points -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	2864 Points +255%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	2601 Points +222%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	2229 (2043^min) Points +176%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	2067 Points +156%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1074 Points +33%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	829 Points +3%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	807 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	2571 Points +170%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	2318 Points +143%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	2204 (1923^min) Points +132%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1849 Points +94%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1132 Points +19%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	974 Points +2%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	952 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	2510 Points +7%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	2336 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	2002 (1539^min) Points -14%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	1789 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	1697 Points -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1348 Points -42%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1282 Points -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	4633 Points +345%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	4557 Points +337%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	3226 Points +210%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	3015 (2895^min) Points +189%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	2336 Points +124%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	1080 Points +4%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	1042 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	3424 Points +188%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	3316 Points +179%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	2710 (2421^min) Points +128%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	2413 Points +103%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	2009 Points +69%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	1237 Points +4%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	1188 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	21771 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	19610 Points +28%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	15517 Points +1%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	15331 Points
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	12854 Points -16%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	12852 Points -16%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	11963 Points -22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	41615 Points +91%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	38394 Points +76%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	37725 Points +73%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	34023 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	33031 Points +51%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	21807 Points
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	21577 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	30241 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	28671 Points +44%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	27795 Points +39%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	26380 Points +32%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	25751 Points +29%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	19936 Points
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	19854 Points 0%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	Points
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	Points
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	Points
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	Points
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	Points
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	60 fps +40%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	59 fps +37%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	52 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	51 fps +19%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	43 fps 0%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	43 fps
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	42 fps -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	18.75 fps -56%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	89 fps +117%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	81 fps +98%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	78.9 fps +92%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	58 fps +41%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	56 fps +37%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	41 fps
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	40 fps -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	27.11 fps -34%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	46 fps +142%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	38.4 fps +102%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	27 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	27 fps +42%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	19 fps 0%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	19 fps
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	17 fps -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	11.81 fps -38%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	47 fps +161%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	38.4 fps +113%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	38 fps +111%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	27 fps +50%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	25 fps +39%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	18 fps 0%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	18 fps
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	17.54 fps -3%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	30 fps +173%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	28 fps +155%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	19 fps +73%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	15 fps +36%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	12 fps +9%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	11 fps 0%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	11 fps
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	31 fps +210%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	28 fps +180%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	28 fps +180%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	20 fps +100%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	18 fps +80%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	10 fps 0%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	10 fps

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	12 fps
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	4.7 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	7.1 fps
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	2.5 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	19 fps
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	7.5 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	19 fps
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	6.9 fps
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	18 fps +165%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	7.9 fps +16%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	7.3 fps +7%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	7.1 fps +4%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	6.8 fps
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	6.1 fps -10%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	18 fps +190%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	15 fps +142%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	12 fps +94%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	6.5 fps +5%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	6.2 fps
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	5.8 fps -6%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 battery life
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	383 min
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	min
Work 2.0 performance score
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	5765 Points
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	5226 Points
Work performance score
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	7159 Points
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	7101 Points -1%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	7058 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	5365 Points -25%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	5094 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	4660 Points -35%

BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	1199 Points +14%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	1112 Points +6%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	1049 Points
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	1029 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	994 Points -5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	986 Points -6%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	939 Points -10%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	837 Points -20%
Graphics
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	4813 Points +218%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	4299 Points +184%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	3376 Points +123%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	3137 Points +107%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	2203 Points +46%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	2040 Points +35%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	1583 Points +5%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	1512 Points
Memory
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	2667 Points
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	2627 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	2072 Points -22%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	2052 Points -23%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1945 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	1124 Points -58%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1085 Points -59%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	876 Points -67%
System
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	4080 Points +4%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	3932 Points
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	3930 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	3925 Points 0%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	3537 Points -10%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	2878 Points -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	2737 Points -30%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1386 Points -65%
Overall
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	2496 Points +24%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	2206 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	2074 Points +3%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	2025 Points 0%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	2019 Points
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1774 Points -12%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1649 Points -18%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	1465 Points -27%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	5553 ms * -99%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	4377 ms * -57%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	4080 ms * -46%
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	2923 ms * -5%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	2921 ms * -5%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	2792 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	2564 ms * +8%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	1743 ms * +38%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	15967 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	13191 Points +9%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	12058 Points
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	11783 Points -2%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	9155 Points -24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	8851 Points -27%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	8699 Points -28%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	8059 Points -33%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	118.7 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	75.1 Points +7%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	70 Points
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	68.4 Points -2%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	54.4 Points -22%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	49.37 Points -29%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	48.2 Points -31%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	46 Points -34%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048	190 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Exynos 8890, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096	163 Points +25%
Huawei P9 Plus Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096	130 Points
Huawei P9 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072	128 Points -2%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144	122 Points -6%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	113 Points -13%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	106 Points -18%
Motorola Moto X Force 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072	103 Points -21%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei P9 Plus 64 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Motorola Moto X Force 32 GB eMMC Flash	Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 32 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus 3 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Huawei P9 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5		42%	-11%	-41%	60%	-12%
Sequential Read 256KB	284.3	487.3 71%	252 -11%	256.8 -10%	408.7 44%	281.3 -1%
Sequential Write 256KB	140.4	145.1 3%	47.99 -66%	99.4 -29%	153.3 9%	72.2 -49%
Random Read 4KB	39.33	86.7 120%	22.55 -43%	19.11 -51%	137.6 250%	39 -1%
Random Write 4KB	51.2	15.79 -69%	19.78 -61%	14.53 -72%	18.23 -64%	47.45 -7%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	62.5	76.4 22%	79 26%			55 -12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	24.95	50.4 102%	46.96 88%			24.83 0%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Ayarlar	Değer
	high	30 fps

... kıyaslama

Dead Trigger 2
	Ayarlar	Değer
	high	56 fps

... kıyaslama

Maksimum yük

Bekleme


40.9 °C	41.2 °C	36.1 °C
41.1 °C	40.8 °C	36.2 °C
39.6 °C	38.6 °C	36.4 °C

Maksimum: 41.2 °C
Ortalama: 39 °C


35.1 °C	36.4 °C	38 °C
35.1 °C	37 °C	38 °C
34.5 °C	36.8 °C	37.8 °C

Maksimum: 38 °C
Ortalama: 36.5 °C

Güç kaynağı 31.6 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.09 / 0.62 Watt
Boşta	0.87 / 1.2 / 1.27 Watt
Çalışırken	4.69 / 5.63 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	Huawei P9 Plus Mali-T880 MP4, 1920x1080	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, 2560x1440	Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 1920x1080	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 2560x1440	Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 2560x1440	Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 3840x2160	OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 1920x1080	Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, 1920x1080
Power Consumption		-7%	-14%	-138%	-26%	-60%	-18%	-27%
Idle Minimum *	0.87	0.63 28%	0.5 43%	2.85 -228%	0.96 -10%	0.83 5%	0.57 34%	0.77 11%
Idle Average *	1.2	1.1 8%	1.9 -58%	2.95 -146%	1.35 -13%	2.36 -97%	1.24 -3%	2.36 -97%
Idle Maximum *	1.27	1.56 -23%	2.2 -73%	3.26 -157%	1.4 -10%	2.42 -91%	1.36 -7%	2.37 -87%
Load Average *	4.69	5.95 -27%	3.2 32%	8.92 -90%	6.11 -30%	7.27 -55%	5.92 -26%	3.09 34%
Load Maximum *	5.63	6.7 -19%	6.4 -14%	9.39 -67%	9.43 -67%	9.18 -63%	10.53 -87%	5.35 5%

* ... smaller is better

Batarya ömrü

Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)		24h 06min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 51)		8h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 56min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)		4h 23min

	Huawei P9 Plus Wh, 3400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 13.86 Wh, 3600 mAh	Apple iPhone 6S Plus 10 Wh, 2750 mAh	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 13 Wh, 3340 mAh	Motorola Moto X Force Wh, 3760 mAh	Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 13 Wh, 3430 mAh	OnePlus 3 Wh, 3000 mAh	Huawei P9 11.46 Wh, 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		30%	-6%	-27%	2%	-27%	16%	-9%
Reader / Idle	1446	1663 15%	1655 14%	1078 -25%	1610 11%	1277 -12%	1338 -7%	1514 5%
H.264	776	914 18%	714 -8%	611 -21%	710 -9%	411 -47%	847 9%	568 -27%
WiFi v1.3	530	732 38%	513 -3%	369 -30%	426 -20%	372 -30%	840 58%	569 7%
Load	263	392 49%	197 -25%	179 -32%	330 25%	210 -20%	268 2%	206 -22%

Artılar

+ Hızlı sistem çipi

+ Genişletilebilir depolama alanı

+ Geniş frekans aralığı

+ İyi kameralar

+ Ses kalitesi

+ Kulaklık

+ Hızlı şarj

+ USB Type-C

+ Çok iyi batarya kullanım süresi

+ Press Touch

+ Kızıl ötesi

+ Kapak dahil

+ 3 yıl garanti

+ İyi hoparlörler

Eksiler

- Sadece USB 2.0

- Sadece LTE Cat. 6

- MHL veya SlimPort yok

- Yoğun kullanımda ufak takılmalar

- 4K video kaydı yok

- FM radyo yok

- Pahalı

In review: Huawei P9 Plus. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.

Huawei P9 Plus sadece standart P9 modelinin büyük hali değil. Üretici cihazı daha büyük ekran ve geniş batarya ile donatmayıp ek özellikler de yerleştirmiş. Hatta ekran teknolojisi bile farklı. Kızıl ötesi alıcı ve ek hoparlörler kesinlikle bazı kullanıcılar için ek değer olacaktır. Ancak Press Touch, Android için henüz o kadar kullanışlı değil.

Asıl soru elbette cihazın ek 130 Euroluk fiyat etiketine değip değmeyeceği. Cevap kolay değil, çünkü iki model de kasa, bağlantı olanakları, kamera, ses kalitesi ve performans yönünden benzer. Eğer depolama alanının artışı, daha fazla RAM, büyük ekran ve batarya gibi özellikler ilginizi çekiyorsa bizce değecek bir fiyat artışı. Tam olarak da bu yüzden her iki modeli de öneriyoruz.

Huawei P9 Plus, standart P9 modeline göre daha yüksek fiyat etiketinin karşılığını veriyor. Karşımızda çok iyi bir üst sınıf akıllı cihaz var. Sadece video özellikleri beklentilerimizi karşılayamıyor.

Cihaz elbette 700 Euroluk fiyat etiketi ile çok da ucuz değil. Cihazın sadece video kalitesi ve grafik performansı yönünden rakiplerinin biraz gerisinde olduğunu söyleyebiliriz. Cihazın puanının standart P9 modelinden daha düşük olmasının sebebi ise ekran ölçümlerinin biraz daha kötü olmasından ötürü.

Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.

Huawei P9 Plus - 2016-07-01 07/01/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

İşcilik

93%

Klavye

71 / 75 → 94%

Mouse

96%

Bağlanılabilirlik

55 / 60 → 92%

Ağırlık

91%

Batarya

93%

Görüntü

83%

Oyun performansı

48 / 63 → 77%

Uygulama performansı

63 / 70 → 89%

Isınma

89%

Ses

100%

Audio

79 / 91 → 87%

Camera

81%

Ortalama

80%

89%

Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: Huawei P9 Plus

Andreas Osthoff, 2016-07-20 (Update: 2016-07-20)