Kısa inceleme: Huawei P9

Name: Huawei P9
Brand: Huawei

Leica tarzı. P8 modelinin yeni versiyonunda Huawei tamamen kamerasıa güveniyor ve yine genel olarak etkileyici bir ürün sunuyor. Yeni model daha yüksek kalite ve daha geniş bir bataryaya sahip olsa da, geliştirme için halen alanlar mevcut.

Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Tanja Hinum, Published 05/11/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Huawei

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei P9 (P9 Seri)

İşlemci

HiSilicon Kirin 955 8 x 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53

Grafik kartı

ARM Mali-T880 MP4

Bellek

3 GB

, LPDDR4

Görüntü

5.20 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, 10 multi-touch points, IPS-NEO, JDI, parlak: evet

Harddisk

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 23.22 GB Boş

Bağlantılar

1 USB 2.0, Ses çıkışları: combo headphone and microphone jack (3.5 mm), Kart okuyucular: Micro-SD max. 128 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: proximity sensor, rotation sensor, accelerometer and G sensor, digital compass, Wifi Direct, OTG, Miracast

Network

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 19), LTE Cat. 6 (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39 and 40), LTE, GPS

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 6.95 x 145 x 70.9

Batarya

11.46 Wh, 3000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.82 volts, Konuşma süresi 2G (üreticiye göre): 33 h, Konuşma süresi 3G (üreticiye göre): 18 h, Bekleme modu 2G (üreticiye göre): 526 h, Bekleme modu 3G (üreticiye göre): 566 h

İşletim sistemi

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Leica dual camera, Summarit-H 27 mm f/2.2 ASPH, BSI CMOS, 2-color LED flash, Full HD video)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.4)

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: mono speaker, Klavye: virtual, modular power supply, USB cable, SIM tool, headset, EMUI 4.1, phone manager, HiCare, health, designs, mirror, compass, recorder, memo, 36 Ay Garanti, USB Type-C, fanless

Ağırlık

144 g, Güç kaynağı: 64 g

Fiyat

569 Euro

Bağlantılar

Huawei anasayfa

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


531 cd/m²	548 cd/m²	572 cd/m²
553 cd/m²	582 cd/m²	578 cd/m²
556 cd/m²	573 cd/m²	570 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 582 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 562.6 cd/m² Minimum: 7.89 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 91 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 582 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1532:1 (Siyah: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.44% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
77.78% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download ICC Dosyası (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Huawei P8 IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Apple iPhone 6S IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"	Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"	Microsoft Lumia 950 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.2"	OnePlus 2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Sony Xperia Z5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen		-4%	-1%	15%	1%	-3%	-44%
Brightness middle	582	453 -22%	552 -5%	350 -40%	292 -50%	451 -23%	669 15%
Brightness	563	439 -22%	549 -2%	351 -38%	298 -47%	446 -21%	624 11%
Brightness Distribution	91	91 0%	87 -4%	98 8%	92 1%	90 -1%	85 -7%
Black Level *	0.38	0.28 26%	0.39 -3%			0.3 21%	0.68 -79%
Contrast	1532	1618 6%	1415 -8%			1503 -2%	984 -36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.4	4.7 -7%	3.4 23%	2.04 54%	2.48 44%	3.84 13%	7.96 -81%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.4			3.25 56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.8	5.03 -5%	4.16 13%	1.63 66%	1.97 59%	3.97 17%	10.95 -128%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.27 ^97%	2.21 ^100%	2.07 ^106%	2.06 ^107%	2.46 ^89%	2.61 ^84%
CCT	6175 ^105%	7439 ^87%	7288 ^89%	6391 ^102%	6640 ^98%	7283 ^89%	7402 ^88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	77.78	72.04 -7%	62.18 -20%	86.86 12%		58.07 -25%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	99.44		95.93 -4%	99.35 0%		90.14 -9%

* ... smaller is better

ProPhoto RGB color space coverage: 40.62%

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 30 ms rise
49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P9	7058 Points
Huawei P8	4479 Points -37%
Huawei Mate 8	7344 Points +4%
Google Nexus 5X	4324 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7	4826 Points -32%
Motorola Moto X Force	5365 Points -24%
Sony Xperia Z5	5184 Points -27%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9	95743 Points
Huawei Mate 8	93767 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7	127902 Points +34%
Motorola Moto X Force	89911 Points -6%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9	1767 Points
Huawei P8	864 Points -51%
Huawei Mate 8	1721 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X	1246 Points -29%
Apple iPhone 6S	2539 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2199 Points +24%
Motorola Moto X Force	1262 Points -29%
Sony Xperia Z5	1325 Points -25%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9	6522 Points
Huawei P8	3458 Points -47%
Huawei Mate 8	6265 Points -4%
Google Nexus 5X	3530 Points -46%
Apple iPhone 6S	4422 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S7	6401 Points -2%
Motorola Moto X Force	4791 Points -27%
Sony Xperia Z5	4414 Points -32%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9	19854 Points
Huawei P8	9080 Points -54%
Huawei Mate 8	19179 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X	18898 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 6S	28419 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S7	29015 Points +46%
Motorola Moto X Force	25751 Points +30%
Sony Xperia Z5	24980 Points +26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9	21577 Points
Huawei P8	8743 Points -59%
Huawei Mate 8	20537 Points -5%
Google Nexus 5X	22180 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 6S	42686 Points +98%
Samsung Galaxy S7	33348 Points +55%
Motorola Moto X Force	38394 Points +78%
Sony Xperia Z5	37738 Points +75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P9	15517 Points
Huawei P8	10494 Points -32%
Huawei Mate 8	15575 Points 0%
Google Nexus 5X	12451 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 6S	13097 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S7	19944 Points +29%
Motorola Moto X Force	11963 Points -23%
Sony Xperia Z5	11442 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P9	1237 Points
Huawei Mate 8	1244 Points +1%
Google Nexus 5X	1497 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2715 Points +119%
Motorola Moto X Force	2413 Points +95%
Sony Xperia Z5	1613 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P9	1080 Points
Huawei Mate 8	1092 Points +1%
Google Nexus 5X	1942 Points +80%
Samsung Galaxy S7	3018 Points +179%
Motorola Moto X Force	3226 Points +199%
Sony Xperia Z5	2246 Points +108%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P9	2510 Points
Huawei Mate 8	2432 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X	831 Points -67%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2010 Points -20%
Motorola Moto X Force	1282 Points -49%
Sony Xperia Z5	812 Points -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P9	974 Points
Huawei Mate 8	945 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X	1096 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2170 Points +123%
Motorola Moto X Force	1849 Points +90%
Sony Xperia Z5	1084 Points +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P9	829 Points
Huawei Mate 8	801 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X	1127 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2216 Points +167%
Motorola Moto X Force	2067 Points +149%
Sony Xperia Z5	1103 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P9	2503 Points
Huawei Mate 8	2552 Points +2%
Google Nexus 5X	1002 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2022 Points -19%
Motorola Moto X Force	1351 Points -46%
Sony Xperia Z5	1024 Points -59%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9	43 fps
Huawei P8	11 fps -74%
Huawei Mate 8	44 fps +2%
Google Nexus 5X	38 fps -12%
Microsoft Lumia 950	13.73 fps -68%
Apple iPhone 6S	59.1 fps +37%
Samsung Galaxy S7	53 fps +23%
Motorola Moto X Force	42 fps -2%
Sony Xperia Z5	49 fps +14%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9	40 fps
Huawei P8	10 fps -75%
Huawei Mate 8	41 fps +3%
Google Nexus 5X	37 fps -7%
Microsoft Lumia 950	21.82 fps -45%
Apple iPhone 6S	79.6 fps +99%
Samsung Galaxy S7	84 fps +110%
Motorola Moto X Force	58 fps +45%
Sony Xperia Z5	49 fps +23%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P9	19 fps
Huawei P8	5.8 fps -69%
Huawei Mate 8	19 fps 0%
Google Nexus 5X	17 fps -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950	6.76 fps -64%
Apple iPhone 6S	56 fps +195%
Samsung Galaxy S7	27 fps +42%
Motorola Moto X Force	17 fps -11%
Sony Xperia Z5	26 fps +37%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9	18 fps
Huawei P8	5.5 fps -69%
Huawei Mate 8	18 fps 0%
Google Nexus 5X	16 fps -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950	12.3 fps -32%
Apple iPhone 6S	39.5 fps +119%
Samsung Galaxy S7	40 fps +122%
Motorola Moto X Force	27 fps +50%
Sony Xperia Z5	24 fps +33%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9	11 fps
Huawei Mate 8	11 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7	15 fps +36%
Motorola Moto X Force	12 fps +9%
Sony Xperia Z5	18 fps +64%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9	10 fps
Huawei Mate 8	10 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7	28 fps +180%
Motorola Moto X Force	20 fps +100%
Sony Xperia Z5	16 fps +60%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P9	2025 Points
Huawei P8	1085 Points -46%
Huawei Mate 8	2046 Points +1%
Google Nexus 5X	1318 Points -35%
Microsoft Lumia 950	1140 Points -44%
Apple iPhone 6S	2194 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7	1987 Points -2%
Motorola Moto X Force	1774 Points -12%
Sony Xperia Z5	1437 Points -29%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P9	3930 Points
Huawei P8	1860 Points -53%
Huawei Mate 8	4064 Points +3%
Google Nexus 5X	1730 Points -56%
Microsoft Lumia 950	1096 Points -72%
Apple iPhone 6S	3466 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7	4217 Points +7%
Motorola Moto X Force	2878 Points -27%
Sony Xperia Z5	2360 Points -40%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P9	2627 Points
Huawei P8	1216 Points -54%
Huawei Mate 8	2339 Points -11%
Google Nexus 5X	1115 Points -58%
Microsoft Lumia 950	1640 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 6S	1281 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2244 Points -15%
Motorola Moto X Force	1085 Points -59%
Sony Xperia Z5	865 Points -67%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P9	1583 Points
Huawei P8	882 Points -44%
Huawei Mate 8	1636 Points +3%
Google Nexus 5X	2038 Points +29%
Microsoft Lumia 950	1437 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 6S	4323 Points +173%
Samsung Galaxy S7	1723 Points +9%
Motorola Moto X Force	3376 Points +113%
Sony Xperia Z5	3095 Points +96%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P9	1029 Points
Huawei P8	694 Points -33%
Huawei Mate 8	1127 Points +10%
Google Nexus 5X	769 Points -25%
Microsoft Lumia 950	655 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 6S	1207 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S7	957 Points -7%
Motorola Moto X Force	939 Points -9%
Sony Xperia Z5	675 Points -34%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei P9	7.9 fps
Huawei Mate 8	7.9 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7	13.86 fps +75%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9	328 Points
Huawei Mate 8	347 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 6S	887 Points +170%
Samsung Galaxy S7	732 Points +123%

Legend

Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P8 HiSilicon Kirin 930, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Mate 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Google Nexus 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Microsoft Lumia 950 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPhone 6S Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Motorola Moto X Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia Z5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11783 Points
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4084 Points -65%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11329 Points -4%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8202 Points -30%
Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6990 Points -41%
Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	16200 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	13161 Points +12%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8699 Points -26%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8627 Points -27%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	68.4 Points
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	65 Points -5%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	45 Points -34%
Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24.52 Points -64%
Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	118.6 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	74 Points +8%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	49.37 Points -28%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	37 Points -46%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2923 ms *
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11808 ms * -304%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3643 ms * -25%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4734 ms * -62%
Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6914 ms * -137%
Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	1715 ms * +41%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2562 ms * +12%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4080 ms * -40%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5693 ms * -95%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	128 Points
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	70 Points -45%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	139 Points +9%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	107 Points -16%
Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	64 Points -50%
Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	187 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	166 Points +30%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	103 Points -20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	73 Points -43%

Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6580 (6523^min) Points
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	2756 (2248^min) Points -58%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7008 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	7570 Points +15%

BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1029 Points
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	694 Points -33%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1127 Points +10%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	769 Points -25%
Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	655 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	1207 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	957 Points -7%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	939 Points -9%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	675 Points -34%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	281.3 MB/s
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	139.9 MB/s -50%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	238.3 MB/s -15%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	245.2 MB/s -13%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	483.8 MB/s +72%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	252 MB/s -10%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	219.8 MB/s -22%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	72.2 MB/s
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	39.58 MB/s -45%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	124.8 MB/s +73%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	98.6 MB/s +37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	145.7 MB/s +102%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.99 MB/s -34%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	115.5 MB/s +60%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39 MB/s
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	22.46 MB/s -42%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24.98 MB/s -36%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24.8 MB/s -36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	85.9 MB/s +120%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	22.55 MB/s -42%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.59 MB/s -91%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.45 MB/s
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	10.04 MB/s -79%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15.74 MB/s -67%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	12.21 MB/s -74%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	16.01 MB/s -66%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	19.78 MB/s -58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11.46 MB/s -76%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	72.3 MB/s +31%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	79 MB/s +44%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24.83 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	53.6 MB/s +116%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46.96 MB/s +89%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Ayarlar	Değer
	high	30 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Ayarlar	Değer
	high	60 fps

... kıyaslama

Maksimum yük

Bekleme


41.9 °C	38.8 °C	40.2 °C
42.1 °C	39.6 °C	39.4 °C
41.1 °C	38 °C	38.6 °C

Maksimum: 42.1 °C
Ortalama: 40 °C


36.2 °C	38.5 °C	38.8 °C
35.6 °C	38.6 °C	38.1 °C
35.9 °C	38.1 °C	38.2 °C

Maksimum: 38.8 °C
Ortalama: 37.6 °C

Güç kaynağı 33.5 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.02 / 0.38 Watt
Boşta	0.77 / 2.36 / 2.37 Watt
Çalışırken	3.09 / 5.35 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption		-12%	-1%	-17%	-4%	23%	7%	-64%
Idle Minimum *	0.77	0.7 9%	0.55 29%	0.7 9%	0.6 22%	0.5 35%	0.68 12%	1.97 -156%
Idle Average *	2.36	2 15%	1.44 39%	1.7 28%	1.7 28%	1.6 32%	1.02 57%	2.42 -3%
Idle Maximum *	2.37	2.1 11%	1.9 20%	1.8 24%	1.8 24%	1.9 20%	1.14 52%	2.96 -25%
Load Average *	3.09	4.9 -59%	3.36 -9%	5.6 -81%	5.7 -84%	2.5 19%	4.73 -53%	5.94 -92%
Load Maximum *	5.35	7.4 -38%	9.76 -82%	8.7 -63%	6 -12%	4.8 10%	7.16 -34%	7.79 -46%

* ... smaller is better

Batarya ömrü

Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)		25h 14min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 28min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)		3h 26min

	Huawei P9 11.46 Wh	Huawei P8 Wh	Apple iPhone 6S 7 Wh	Samsung Galaxy S7 11.55 Wh	Motorola Moto X Force Wh	Google Nexus 5X 10 Wh	Microsoft Lumia 950 12 Wh	Huawei Mate 8 Wh
Battery Runtime		-16%	-6%	19%	17%	2%	-17%	43%
Reader / Idle	1514	826 -45%	1510 0%	1810 20%	1610 6%	1775 17%	1500 -1%	1872 24%
H.264	568	581 2%	699 23%	892 57%	710 25%	555 -2%	570 0%	963 70%
WiFi v1.3	569	434 -24%	492 -14%	456 -20%	426 -25%	412 -28%	250 -56%	865 52%
Load	206	215 4%	137 -33%	242 17%	330 60%	245 19%	187 -9%	256 24%

Artılar

+ Hızlı sistem çipi

+ Genişletilebilir depolama alanı

+ Geniş frekans aralığı

+ İyi kameralar

+ Arama kalitesi

+ Kulaklık dahil

+ Hızlı şarj

+ USB Type-C

+ Makul batarya ömrü

Eksiler

- App2SD yok

- LTE Cat. 6

- Radyo alıcı yok

- Kızıl ötesi yok

- MHL veya SlimPort yok

- Sadece USB 2.0

- DNG dosyaları micro-SD üzerinde depolanamıyor

- Yoğun kullanımda sistem çipi takılabiliyor

In review: Huawei P9. Review sample courtesy of Huawei.

Çinli firma P serisinin başarısını sürdürmeye devam ediyor ve bu modelleri sürekli güncelliyor. Yine harika IPS ekran, iyi performans, resim kalitesi Leica çift kamera ve güçlü batarya ömrü ile bizi etkiliyor.

Huawei'nin kullandığı bileşenler genel olarak iyi çalışsa da sınıfının en iyisi denemez. LTE Cat. 9 yerine eski Cat. 6 versiyonu mevcut. Ama yine de geniş bir frekans aralığı sunuluyor. Ayrıca telefon kalitesi göz ardı edilmemiş ve iyi bir kalite sunuluyor.

Huawei'nin P9 modeli güçlü bir premium cihaz ve genel olarak etkileyici.

Hızlı sistem çipi harika bir performans sunmakla yoğun kullanım altında farkedilir takılmalar yaşıyor. Çift kamera reklamlarda söylendiği gibi mobil fotoğrafçılığı baştan icat etmese de kaliteli resimler sunuyor. Kameranın video özellikleri ise biraz zayıf.

Huawei, P9 modelinin fiyatını arttırmış olsa bile iyi bir fiyat/performans oranı sunuyor.

Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.

Huawei P9 - 2016-04-28 04/28/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

İşcilik

93%

Klavye

70 / 75 → 93%

Mouse

96%

Bağlanılabilirlik

55 / 60 → 92%

Ağırlık

93%

Batarya

91%

Görüntü

88%

Oyun performansı

50 / 63 → 80%

Uygulama performansı

59 / 70 → 84%

Isınma

87%

Ses

100%

Audio

69 / 91 → 76%

Camera

81%

Ortalama

79%

90%

Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: Huawei P9

Daniel Schmidt, 2016-05-11 (Update: 2016-05-11)