Kısa inceleme: Lenovo ThinkPad T480s (i7-8550U, MX150 Max-Q) Laptop
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 (Toshiba (Exceria Pro SDXC UHS-II 64 GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 (Toshiba (Exceria Pro SDXC UHS-II 64 GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aydınlatma: 91 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 313 cd/m²
Kontrast: 864:1 (Siyah: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.7
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 LP140QH2-SPB1, , 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 LP140QH2-SPB1, , 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 B140QAN01.5, , 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 B140QAN02.0, , 2560x1440, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V22ES ABD AUO133D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 7480 LG Philips LGD0557, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | -3% | 22% | -5% | -7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 71.4 | 72.8 2% | 69 -3% | 87.7 23% | 67.5 -5% | 65.4 -8% |
| sRGB Coverage | 96.6 | 97.9 1% | 95.1 -2% | 100 4% | 92.5 -4% | 92.3 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.1 | 74.1 3% | 69.6 -3% | 99.9 39% | 67.7 -6% | 65.8 -9% |
| Response Times | -4% | -16% | -44% | 12% | -12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 38.4 ? -7% | 46.4 ? -29% | 59.2 ? -64% | 33.6 ? 7% | 40.8 ? -13% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 28.4 ? -1% | 28.8 ? -3% | 34.4 ? -23% | 23.2 ? 17% | 31.2 ? -11% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -7% | -25% | 38% | -5% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 311 | 352 13% | 327 5% | 578 86% | 289 -7% | 344 11% |
| Brightness | 302 | 343 14% | 311 3% | 533 76% | 274 -9% | 321 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 91 0% | 88 -3% | 84 -8% | 82 -10% | 85 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.46 -28% | 0.25 31% | 0.38 -6% | 0.17 53% | 0.32 11% |
| Contrast | 864 | 765 -11% | 1308 51% | 1521 76% | 1700 97% | 1075 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3 | 3.3 -10% | 6.1 -103% | 1.9 37% | 4.7 -57% | 2.6 13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.1 | 7.3 -20% | 12.2 -100% | 3.8 38% | 8.6 -41% | 7.8 -28% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.7 | 0.8 53% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 5.3 -33% | 8.8 -120% | 3 25% | 6.4 -60% | 2.6 35% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.18 101% | 2.14 103% | 2.22 99% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6961 93% | 6452 101% | 6172 105% | 6377 102% | 6454 101% | 7050 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66.7 | 68.4 3% | 61.56 -8% | 88.8 33% | 60.3 -10% | 65.82 -1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96.7 | 98 1% | 94.88 -2% | 100 3% | 92.3 -5% | 92.27 -5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-5% | -15% /
-19% | 5% /
25% | 1% /
-3% | -4% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3540 puan | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4909 puan | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3960 puan | |
Yardım | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 7480 Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -16% | -25% | -64% | -18% | |
| Read Seq | 2588 | 1760 -32% | 2327 -10% | 486.5 -81% | 2002 ? -23% |
| Write Seq | 1858 | 1666 -10% | 1808 -3% | 418.6 -77% | 1656 ? -11% |
| Read 512 | 1799 | 832 -54% | 419.3 -77% | 354.3 -80% | 1213 ? -33% |
| Write 512 | 1863 | 1064 -43% | 1272 -32% | 306.8 -84% | 1641 ? -12% |
| Read 4k | 62.7 | 53.2 -15% | 60.6 -3% | 29.25 -53% | 61.4 ? -2% |
| Write 4k | 146.8 | 167.4 14% | 132.9 -9% | 90.5 -38% | 131.3 ? -11% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 446.6 | 630 41% | 340.7 -24% | 280.2 -37% | 407 ? -9% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 706 | 533 -25% | 439.7 -38% | 252.8 -64% | 402 ? -43% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 12796 puan | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 7839 puan | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3922 puan | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 65886 puan | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12049 puan | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2584 puan | |
Yardım | ||
| düşük | orta | yüksek | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 158.3 | 87 | 77 | 28.89 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 53 | 31.47 | 17.06 | |
| Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 78.4 | 53.8 | 24.5 | 21.4 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 54.6 | 32.6 | 16.5 | |
| Doom (2016) | 60.5 | 49.6 | 17.1 | |
| Civilization VI (2016) | 75.5 | 42.87 | 19.47 | |
| Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) | 62.5 | 23.7 | ||
| FIFA 18 (2017) | 133.9 | 83.6 | 78.1 | 73 |
| Call of Duty WWII (2017) | 87.9 | 54.6 | 24.5 | |
| Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 59.3 | 26.4 | 22.5 | 14.6 |
Ses yüksekliği
| Boşta |
| 29 / 29 / 29 dB |
| Çalışırken |
| 36.5 / 38.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.2 °C / 95.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-7.6 °C / -13.7 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 7480 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.34 / 0.69 Watt |
| Boşta | 3.4 / 7.5 / 10.8 Watt |
| Çalışırken |
55.4 / 70.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Latitude 7480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 8% | 4% | -0% | 26% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 3.1 9% | 4.64 -36% | 3.8 -12% | 4.32 -27% |
| Idle Average * | 7.5 | 6.8 9% | 8.93 -19% | 8.9 -19% | 6.27 16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.8 | 10.1 6% | 9.12 16% | 11.9 -10% | 6.35 41% |
| Load Average * | 55.4 | 48.4 13% | 42.2 24% | 47.5 14% | 29.82 46% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 34 | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 70.3 | 67.1 5% | 47.3 33% | 52.5 25% | 30.64 56% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V22ES ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Dell Latitude 7480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 32% | -15% | 9% | 9% | 61% | 22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1366 | 787 -42% | 1328 -3% | 1662 22% | 1234 ? -10% | ||
| H.264 | 550 | 721 31% | 454 -17% | 566 3% | 716 ? 30% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 530 | 537 1% | 417 -21% | 519 -2% | 578 9% | 719 36% | 608 ? 15% |
| Load | 76 | 124 63% | 93 22% | 106 39% | 171 125% | 117.4 ? 54% |
Artılar
Eksiler
T480s oldukça dengeli ve üst sınıf bir iş cihazı. Harici Nvidia GeForce MX150 ekran kartı ile daha fazla kullanım alanı bulduğu söylenebilir.
İşlemci performansı i7 ile oldukça iyi ancak testlerimiz gösteriyorki soğutma sisteminin sınırlarına ulaşıldığında performans da sınırlarına ulaşıyor. Bu da aslında i7 mi i5 mi sorusunu gündeme getiriyor. ThinkPad X280 daha küçük bir model olmasına karşın benzer şekilde işlemci performans yönetiminde sorun yaşıyor, en azından BIOS güncellemesi ile bu sorunun düzeldiğini söyleyebiliriz. Yüzey sıcaklığı yüksek, hoparlörler zayıf.
Lenovo, T480s ile tüm kutucukları işaretlemeye çok yakın. Pozitifleri negatiflerinin fazlasıyla önünde. Bu yüzden MX150 ile T480s modelini öneriyoruz.
Asıl rakipler Dell Latitude 7490, HP 840 G5 ve daha pahalı ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018. Bunu söylemekle beraber T480s modelinin rekabetten kaçmaya ihtiyacı yok. Lenovo bu modeli ile harika bir bileşimi ortaya çıkarmayı başarmış.
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
- 03/19/2018 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
