Kısa inceleme: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Top 10
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebook listesi
» Top 10 oyun notebooku
» Top 10 bütçeye uygun Ofis/İş Notebook Listesi
» Top 10 Premium Ofis/İş notebookları
» Top 10 Çalışma istasyonu laptopları
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» Top 10 Ultrabooklar
» En iyi 10 dönüştürülebilir modeli
» Seçimi en iyi 10 tablet
» Notebookcheck Top 10 Windows Tabletleri
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından incelenen en iyi Notebook ekranları
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından seçilen 300 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 akıllı telefon listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 hafif oyun notebookları
|
Aydınlatma: 85 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 342.4 cd/m²
Kontrast: 460:1 (Siyah: 0.744 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.36 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 12", 2160x1440 | Dell XPS 12 9250 4K 12.5", 3840x2160 | HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA 12", 1920x1080 | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 13.3", 3200x1800 | Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C 12.5", 1920x1080 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 12.3", 2736x1824 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 32% | -19% | -6% | -32% | 7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 62.4 | 83.9 34% | 52.9 -15% | 59.1 -5% | 42.63 -32% | 67.5 8% |
sRGB Coverage | 93 | 99.8 7% | 71.8 -23% | 85.5 -8% | 63.6 -32% | 96.6 4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.9 | 98.1 54% | 52.6 -18% | 61 -5% | 44.1 -31% | 69 8% |
Response Times | 75% | -57% | 152% | -72% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28.4 ? | 36 ? -27% | 47 ? -65% | 38 ? -34% | 46 ? -62% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 17.6 ? | 35 ? -99% | 26 ? -48% | 27 ? -53% | 31 ? -76% | |
PWM Frequency | 222.2 ? | 1000 ? 350% | 1429 ? 543% | 50 ? -77% | ||
Screen | 42% | 7% | 15% | -8% | 44% | |
Brightness middle | 342.4 | 437 28% | 353 3% | 390 14% | 342 0% | 389.2 14% |
Brightness | 315 | 399 27% | 347 10% | 352 12% | 301 -4% | 392 24% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 81 -5% | 91 7% | 81 -5% | 76 -11% | 92 8% |
Black Level * | 0.744 | 0.35 53% | 0.44 41% | 0.69 7% | 0.393 47% | 0.27 64% |
Contrast | 460 | 1249 172% | 802 74% | 565 23% | 870 89% | 1441 213% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.33 | 3.56 33% | 6.09 -14% | 3.04 43% | 9.69 -82% | 3.61 32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.25 | 9.3 -1% | 7.01 24% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.36 | 2.67 50% | 6.24 -16% | 2.88 46% | 9.27 -73% | 3.8 29% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.17 101% | 2.41 91% | 2.43 91% | 2.95 75% | 2.16 102% |
CCT | 7671 85% | 6681 97% | 7238 90% | 6848 95% | 6010 108% | 5969 109% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 86 51% | 46 -19% | 55 -4% | 40.4 -29% | 63 11% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 100 8% | 71 -24% | 85 -9% | 97 4% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 50% /
46% | -23% /
-8% | 54% /
37% | -20% /
-14% | -7% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.6 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.2 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 222.2 Hz | ≤ 49 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 222.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 49 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 222.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2976 puan | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3583 puan | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4058 puan | |
Yardım |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics (sort by value) | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 7515 puan | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1283 puan | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 46344 puan | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4474 puan | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 697 puan | |
Yardım |
BioShock Infinite | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
1366x768 High Preset (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell XPS 12 9250 4K |
düşük | orta | yüksek | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 44 | 25 | 20 | 6 |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.2 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 51.2 °C / 124.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-23.1 °C / -41.6 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | Dell XPS 12 9250 4K HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2 | Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -34% | -4% | -6% | 17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.87 | 5.4 8% | 4.5 23% | 4.2 28% | 2.4 59% |
Idle Average * | 6.05 | 10.2 -69% | 7.7 -27% | 8.4 -39% | 4.6 24% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.13 | 12.5 -104% | 8.3 -35% | 8.9 -45% | 5.6 9% |
Load Average * | 21.27 | 21.4 -1% | 19.8 7% | 15.9 25% | 15.6 27% |
Load Maximum * | 23.03 | 24.4 -6% | 20.6 11% | 22.5 2% | 30.7 -33% |
* ... smaller is better
Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.27 / 1.92 Watt |
Boşta | 5.87 / 6.05 / 6.13 Watt |
Çalışırken |
21.27 / 23.03 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | Dell XPS 12 9250 4K HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2 | Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -27% | 38% | 50% | 168% | 35% | |
Reader / Idle | 628 | 370 -41% | 954 52% | 1013 61% | 1616 157% | 791 26% |
WiFi v1.3 | 300 | 243 -19% | 361 20% | 402 34% | 760 153% | 488 63% |
Load | 118 | 93 -21% | 166 41% | 182 54% | 348 195% | 138 17% |
Artılar
Eksiler
Lenovo dönüştürülebilir modeller konusunda eskiden bir öncüydü, ancak X1 Tablet modeli firmanın Microsoft Surface stili modellere yönelik ilk denemesi. Cihazın amacı Surface Pro modeline alternatif olmak ve bazı yönlerden bunu başarıyor da. X1 Tablet sadece kullanılabilirliği değil aynı zamanda bir ThinkPadden beklenen arayüzleri de sunuyor. Pasif soğutulan bir cihaz için iyi bir performans da mevcut. Ayrı satılan modülleri de cihazın genişletilmesine olanak sağlıyor. Elden geçen sehpa tasarımı da takdir edilmesi gerekilen bir özellik.
Eksikliklerine karşın, X1 Tablet modeli Lenovo'nun iş dostu Surface Pro 4 alternatifi bir model.
Bu cihaza sahip olmadan önce eksikliklerinin de farkında olmanız gerekli. İlk olarak cihazın çıkarılabilir arka kapağı plastik bir bileşen ve magnezyum rakiplerine göre baskıya daha az dayanıklı. Cihaz aynı zamanda sıcak. En azından test ettiğimiz modeli. Bu da elde uzun süre kullanımı zorlaştırıyor. Biz en üst m7 modelini incelememize rağmen m3 model daha uygun olabilir diye düşünmüyor değiliz. Birçok sıcaklık kaynaklı kısıtlamadan ötürü m5 ve m3 modelleri neredeyse aynı performansı sunuyor. Bunun dışında batarya kullanımı da tüm rakiplerinin gerisinde.
Belki Core m3 veya m5 modelleri daha ilgi çekici olabilir. Ayrıca fiyatları daha makul.
İncelemenin tamamı için tıklayın.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
-
06/02/2016 v5.1 (old)
Steve Schardein