Notebookcheck Logo

Kısa inceleme: Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Smartphone Review

Merhaba, Lumia! Yeni Windows amiral gemisi burada. Güçlü bileşenlerinin yanında, Windows Hello ve Continuum gibi özellikler karşımıza çıkıyor. En büyük dezavantajı ise yazılım, çünkü Windows 10 Mobile tam hazırmış gibi değil.
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (Lumia Seri)
İşlemci
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A57/-A53
Grafik kartı
Qualcomm Adreno 430
Bellek
3 GB 
Görüntü
5.70 inç 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, parlak: evet
Harddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25.2 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
1 USB 3.0, Ses çıkışları: combined stereo jack for headphones and microphone, Kart okuyucular: microSD up to 200 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), NFC, Alıcılar: gyroscope, barometer, position sensor, ambient light sensor, proximity sensor, magnetometer, SensoreCore, Wifi Direct, Miracast, OTG, MHL 3.1, NFC
Network
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8), LTE Cat. 6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40 and 41), LTE, GPS
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 8.3 x 151.9 x 78.4
Batarya
13 Wh, 3340 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 3.85 V, Konuşma süresi 3G (üreticiye göre): 19 h, Bekleme modu 3G (üreticiye göre): 300 h
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix (6 lenses, 2x digital zoom, OS, sensor size: 1/2.4-inch, f/1.9, focal length: 26 mm, Tri-LED flash, UHD video)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.4, Full-HD video)
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: mono speaker, Klavye: virtual, power adapter, USB cable, Microsoft Office Mobile, 24 Ay Garanti, SAR head: 0.56 W/kg, body SAR: 0.36 W/kg, wireless charging (Qi), quick charge, Windows Hello
Ağırlık
165 g, Güç kaynağı: 70 g
Fiyat
699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

The Lumia 950 XL (left) next to the Lumia 950 DS.
The Lumia 950 XL (left) next to the Lumia 950 DS.
159.3 mm 77.8 mm 7.5 mm 178 g158.2 mm 77.9 mm 7.3 mm 192 g153.9 mm 76.2 mm 10.6 mm 177 g154.4 mm 75.8 mm 6.9 mm 153 g151.9 mm 78.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g148.9 mm 76.1 mm 9.8 mm 155 g149.89 mm 75.35 mm 7.2 mm 156 g146 mm 72 mm 7.3 mm 154 g142.1 mm 70.1 mm 7 mm 132 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
289
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 308 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 296.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.19 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 93 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 297 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Siyah: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.81 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.79% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.31% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
16%
-13%
13%
29%
23%
-37%
Brightness middle
297
343
15%
566
91%
583
96%
538
81%
363
22%
352
19%
Brightness
297
338
14%
536
80%
560
89%
528
78%
365
23%
350
18%
Brightness Distribution
93
94
1%
90
-3%
91
-2%
92
-1%
90
-3%
87
-6%
Black Level *
0.47
0.46
0.66
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.67
2.2
18%
6.17
-131%
3.55
-33%
2.63
1%
2.34
12%
4.95
-85%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.98
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.81
2.37
16%
6.26
-123%
3.88
-38%
3.24
-15%
1.03
63%
6.54
-133%
Gamma
2.08 106%
2.41 91%
2.48 89%
2.2 100%
2.17 101%
2.23 99%
2.27 97%
CCT
6379 102%
6425 101%
8171 80%
7280 89%
6906 94%
6429 101%
6943 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
66.31
87.77
32%
65.48
-1%
59.05
-11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.79
98.63
-1%
92.8
-7%
Contrast
1204
1267
815

* ... smaller is better

Grayscale (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: standard, target color space: Adobe RGB)
ColorChecker (profile: standard, target color space: Adobe RGB)
ColorChecker (profile: vivid, target color space: Adobe RGB)
ColorChecker (profile: vivid, target color space: Adobe RGB)
ColorChecker (profile: cool, target color space: Adobe RGB)
ColorChecker (profile: cool, target color space: Adobe RGB)
Saturation (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)
Color-space coverage sRGB: 99.79%
Color-space coverage sRGB: 99.79%
Color-space coverage Adobe RGB: 66.31%
Color-space coverage Adobe RGB: 66.31%

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.42 ms rise
↘ 0.52 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.72 ms rise
↘ 4.68 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps
Nokia Lumia 930
20 fps +7%
Google Nexus 6P
33 fps +76%
Motorola Moto X Style
24 fps +28%
HTC One M9
50 fps +167%
Sony Xperia Z5
49 fps +161%
Huawei Mate S
11 fps -41%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
59 fps +215%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps
Nokia Lumia 930
15 fps -45%
Google Nexus 6P
44 fps +62%
Motorola Moto X Style
34 fps +25%
HTC One M9
49 fps +81%
Sony Xperia Z5
49 fps +81%
Huawei Mate S
10 fps -63%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
78.9 fps +191%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps
Google Nexus 6P
17 fps +44%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
14 fps +19%
Motorola Moto X Style
9.3 fps -21%
HTC One M9
24 fps +103%
Sony Xperia Z5
26 fps +120%
Huawei Mate S
6.3 fps -47%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps +225%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps
Google Nexus 6P
25 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
18 fps +3%
Motorola Moto X Style
15 fps -14%
HTC One M9
23 fps +31%
Sony Xperia Z5
24 fps +37%
Huawei Mate S
5.8 fps -67%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps +119%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points
Nokia Lumia 930
1085 Points -26%
Google Nexus 6P
1405 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1801 Points +23%
Motorola Moto X Style
1743 Points +19%
HTC One M9
1410 Points -4%
Sony Xperia Z5
1437 Points -2%
Huawei Mate S
1222 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2206 Points +51%
System (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points
Nokia Lumia 930
1296 Points -6%
Google Nexus 6P
1798 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
3321 Points +140%
Motorola Moto X Style
2783 Points +101%
HTC One M9
1672 Points +21%
Sony Xperia Z5
2360 Points +70%
Huawei Mate S
2129 Points +54%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3925 Points +183%
Memory (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points
Nokia Lumia 930
1500 Points -23%
Google Nexus 6P
1136 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1298 Points -33%
Motorola Moto X Style
1776 Points -9%
HTC One M9
933 Points -52%
Sony Xperia Z5
865 Points -56%
Huawei Mate S
1304 Points -33%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1124 Points -42%
Graphics (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points
Nokia Lumia 930
1233 Points -40%
Google Nexus 6P
2424 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
2457 Points +20%
Motorola Moto X Style
1918 Points -6%
HTC One M9
3210 Points +57%
Sony Xperia Z5
3095 Points +52%
Huawei Mate S
962 Points -53%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4299 Points +111%
Web (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points
Nokia Lumia 930
579 Points -31%
Google Nexus 6P
791 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
993 Points +19%
Motorola Moto X Style
974 Points +16%
HTC One M9
789 Points -6%
Sony Xperia Z5
675 Points -19%
Huawei Mate S
834 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1199 Points +43%
Linpack Android / IOS
Single Thread (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
369.6 MFLOPS
Nokia Lumia 930
232.5 MFLOPS -37%
Google Nexus 6P
87.1 MFLOPS -76%
Motorola Moto X Style
415 MFLOPS +12%
HTC One M9
578 MFLOPS +56%
Sony Xperia Z5
251.8 MFLOPS -32%
Huawei Mate S
129.6 MFLOPS -65%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
669 MFLOPS +81%
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2957 MFLOPS
Nokia Lumia 930
930 MFLOPS -69%
Google Nexus 6P
262 MFLOPS -91%
Motorola Moto X Style
590 MFLOPS -80%
HTC One M9
685 MFLOPS -77%
Sony Xperia Z5
499 MFLOPS -83%
Huawei Mate S
282.5 MFLOPS -90%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1295 MFLOPS -56%
Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
33082 Points
Nokia Lumia 930
19987 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
31743 Points -4%
HTC One M9
27968 Points -15%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
46 Points
Google Nexus 6P
47.4 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
48.14 Points +5%
Motorola Moto X Style
45 Points -2%
HTC One M9
26.85 Points -42%
Sony Xperia Z5
37 Points -20%
Huawei Mate S
25.41 Points -45%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
118.7 Points +158%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
8059 Points
Nokia Lumia 930
2737 Points -66%
Google Nexus 6P
8804 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
7724 Points -4%
Motorola Moto X Style
8065 Points 0%
HTC One M9
6493 Points -19%
Sony Xperia Z5
8627 Points +7%
Huawei Mate S
4106 Points -49%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
15967 Points +98%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
5553 ms *
Nokia Lumia 930
11108 ms * -100%
Google Nexus 6P
4193 ms * +24%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
5067 ms * +9%
Motorola Moto X Style
7325 ms * -32%
HTC One M9
6508 ms * -17%
Sony Xperia Z5
5693 ms * -3%
Huawei Mate S
11029 ms * -99%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1743 ms * +69%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
113 Points
Google Nexus 6P
116 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
95 Points -16%
Motorola Moto X Style
110 Points -3%
HTC One M9
72 Points -36%
Sony Xperia Z5
73 Points -35%
Huawei Mate S
73 Points -35%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
190 Points +68%

Legend

 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia Lumia 930 Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Motorola Moto X Style Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC One M9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate S HiSilicon Kirin 935, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

* ... smaller is better

Maksimum yük
 38.2 °C39.9 °C45.7 °C 
 38.7 °C42.4 °C48.3 °C 
 40.1 °C40.5 °C45.4 °C 
Maksimum: 48.3 °C
Ortalama: 42.1 °C
45.8 °C43.4 °C39.2 °C
45.8 °C45 °C39.6 °C
44.2 °C43.4 °C39.3 °C
Maksimum: 45.8 °C
Ortalama: 42.9 °C
Güç kaynağı  31.6 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Speaker measurement: Pink Noise
Speaker measurement: Pink Noise
Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0 / 0.14 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 2.85 / 2.95 / 3.26 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 8.92 / 9.39 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption
49%
43%
43%
41%
53%
Idle Minimum *
2.85
0.5
82%
0.83
71%
0.7
75%
0.7
75%
0.6
79%
Idle Average *
2.95
1.9
36%
1.09
63%
2.2
25%
1.7
42%
1.2
59%
Idle Maximum *
3.26
2.2
33%
1.17
64%
2.3
29%
1.8
45%
1.6
51%
Load Average *
8.92
3.2
64%
7.49
16%
3.9
56%
5.6
37%
4.1
54%
Load Maximum *
9.39
6.4
32%
9.51
-1%
6.8
28%
8.7
7%
7.4
21%

* ... smaller is better

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
17h 58min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 11min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
2h 59min
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Battery Runtime
32%
-0%
20%
28%
30%
Reader / Idle
1078
1459
35%
1141
6%
1447
34%
1124
4%
1655
54%
H.264
611
383
-37%
533
-13%
569
-7%
714
17%
WiFi v1.3
369
501
36%
400
8%
375
2%
575
56%
513
39%
Load
179
223
25%
219
22%
280
56%
282
58%
197
10%

Artılar

+ Hızlı sistem çipi
+ Genişletilebilir depolama alanı
+ USB 3.1
+ Yüksek WiFi kapsama alanı
+ Continuum
+ Windows Hello
+ İyi GPS performansı
+ Harika kameralar
+ İyi bağlantı olanakları
+ Hızlı tepki sürelerine ve tutarlı renklere sahip harika ekran

Eksiler

- ve PWM
- Ses kalitesinde bazı aksaklıklar
- Biraz fazla basit görünüyor
- Batarya süreleri biraz daha iyi olabilir
- Uygulama mağazasında kayıp uygulamalar
- Windows 10 Mobile ile ilgili küçük sorunlar
In review: Microsoft Lumia 950 XL. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In review: Microsoft Lumia 950 XL. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

Microsoft'un yeni cihazı için bekleyiş sona eriyor. Lumia 950 XL harika bir üst sınıf cihaz ve teknoloji yönünden hiçbir hatası yok. Hızlı çipin yanı sıra, yeterli ve genişletilebilir depolama alanına sahip oluyorsunuz. Kamera tatmin edici fotoğraf ve videolar çekiyor. USB 3.1 desteli Type C bağlantısı bile mevcut.

Continuum karşımıza çıkan yeni bir özellik. Ayrıca 1 yıllık Office 365 kullanımı ve bağlantı noktası cihazla beraber geliyor. Windows Hello sisteme iyi dahil edilmiş basit ve güvenilir bir güvenlik önlemi.

Lumia 950 XL iyi özellik ve bileşenlere sahip Continuum ile PC yerine de kullanılabilecek bir akıllı telefon.

Cihazın en büyük sorunu ise yazılım gibi duruyor. Windows 10 Mobile arayüzleri harika ancak işletim sistemi tam hazırmış izlenimi vermiyor. Çok fazla uygulama eksik ve bu büyük bir sorun. Ayrıca ses kalitesi bu fiyata sahip bir ürün için daha iyi olmalıydı.

Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL - 04/13/2016 v5 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

İşcilik
87%
Klavye
77 / 75 → 100%
Mouse
97%
Bağlanılabilirlik
60 / 60 → 100%
Ağırlık
91%
Batarya
90%
Görüntü
89%
Oyun performansı
60 / 63 → 95%
Uygulama performansı
54 / 70 → 77%
Isınma
83%
Ses
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 74%
Camera
87%
Ortalama
80%
89%
Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Smartphone Review
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-02- 9 (Update: 2024-11- 4)