Kısa inceleme: Samsung Galaxy J1 akıllı telefon

Name: Samsung Galaxy J1
Brand: Samsung

Giriş seviyesi Galaxy. Küçük Galaxy, 4.3 ekrana sahip ve günümüz büyük ekran trendini takip etmiyor. Ancak Samsung geri kalan bileşenler konusunda cömert davranmış.

Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Tanja Hinum, Published 07/10/2015 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy J1 (Galaxy Seri)

İşlemci

Spreadtrum SC8830 4 x 1.2 GHz, Cortex-A7, Cortex A7

Grafik kartı

ARM Mali-400 MP2

Bellek

512 MB

Görüntü

4.30 inç 5:3, 800 x 480 pixel, capacitive touchscreen, TFT, parlak: evet

Harddisk

4 GB Flash, 4 GB

, 1.1 GB Boş

Bağlantılar

1 USB 2.0, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm Combo, Kart okuyucular: microSD up to 128 GB, Alıcılar: Accelerometer, Proximity sensor, Position sensor, GPS, Glonass

Network

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, Quad-band gSM (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), Dual-band UMTS (900 and 2100 MHz), Head-SAR: 0.582 W/kg, SAR Body: 0.496 W/kg

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 8.9 x 129 x 68.2

Batarya

7 Wh Lithium-Ion, 1850 mAh, replaceable, Konuşma süresi 3G (üreticiye göre): 9 h

İşletim sistemi

Android 4.4 KitKat

Camera

Webcam: 2 MP, Videos with 960x540; Main camera: 5 MP (2592x1944) with autofocus and flash, videos in HD resolution (1280x720 @30fps)

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: Mono, Klavye: virtual, Power adaptor, USB data cable, headset, manual, Galaxy Apps, radio, 24 Ay Garanti, FM-Radio (in combination with headphones), WiFi-Direct

Ağırlık

122 g, Güç kaynağı: 50 g

Fiyat

109 Euro

Bağlantılar

Samsung anasayfa
Samsung notebook kısmı

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


355 cd/m²	367 cd/m²	364 cd/m²
365 cd/m²	370 cd/m²	360 cd/m²
364 cd/m²	374 cd/m²	361 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 374 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 364.4 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 95 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 370 cd/m²
Kontrast: 587:1 (Siyah: 0.63 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.28 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.59

	Samsung Galaxy J1 Mali-400 MP2, SC8830, 4 GB Flash	Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Microsoft Lumia 535 Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Honor Holly Mali-400 MP2, MT6582, 16 GB eMMC Flash	LG L Fino Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 4 GB Flash	Huawei Y540 Mali-400 MP, MT6572, 4 GB Flash
Screen		23%	18%	-4%	3%	-16%
Brightness middle	370	217 -41%	431 16%	472 28%	299 -19%	484 31%
Brightness	364	204 -44%	424 16%	455 25%	303 -17%	464 27%
Brightness Distribution	95	55 -42%	90 -5%	87 -8%	93 -2%	83 -13%
Black Level *	0.63	0.15 76%	0.64 -2%	0.77 -22%	0.5 21%	0.76 -21%
Contrast	587	1447 147%	673 15%	613 4%	598 2%	637 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.99	4.12 31%	3.6 40%	8.23 -37%	5.41 10%	11.06 -85%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.28	4.87 33%	3.71 49%	8.84 -21%	5.44 25%	11.88 -63%
Gamma	2.59 ^85%	2.38 ^92%	2.4 ^92%	2.12 ^104%	2.23 ^99%	2.33 ^94%
CCT	7949 ^82%	6019 ^108%	6878 ^95%	6819 ^95%	7400 ^88%	12908 ^50%

* ... smaller is better

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	567 Points
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015	1464 Points +158%
Honor Holly	1174 Points +107%
LG L Fino	1113 Points +96%
Huawei Y540	581 Points +2%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	312 Points
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015	481 Points +54%
Honor Holly	352 Points +13%
LG L Fino	329 Points +5%
Huawei Y540	325 Points +4%

3DMark
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	2213 Points
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015	5378 Points +143%
Honor Holly	3136 Points +42%
LG L Fino	4659 Points +111%
Huawei Y540	2304 Points +4%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	1957 Points
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015	4847 Points +148%
Honor Holly	2680 Points +37%
LG L Fino	4234 Points +116%
Huawei Y540	2045 Points +4%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	3859 Points
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015	8718 Points +126%
Honor Holly	7766 Points +101%
LG L Fino	7183 Points +86%
Huawei Y540	4134 Points +7%

Smartbench 2012
Productivity Index (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	2126 points
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015	4147 points +95%
Honor Holly	4435 points +109%
Huawei Y540	2401 points +13%
Gaming Index (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	2263 points
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015	4011 points +77%
Honor Holly	2230 points -1%
Huawei Y540	2106 points -7%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	245 Points
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015	515 Points +110%
Microsoft Lumia 535	391 Points +60%
Honor Holly	355 Points +45%
LG L Fino	380 Points +55%
Huawei Y540	86 Points -65%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	551 Points
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015	1053 Points +91%
Microsoft Lumia 535	572 Points +4%
Honor Holly	983 Points +78%
LG L Fino	711 Points +29%
Huawei Y540	564 Points +2%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	65 Points
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015	312 Points +380%
Microsoft Lumia 535	189 Points +191%
Honor Holly	137 Points +111%
LG L Fino	318 Points +389%
Huawei Y540	69 Points +6%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	541 Points
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015	580 Points +7%
Microsoft Lumia 535	367 Points -32%
Honor Holly	507 Points -6%
LG L Fino	562 Points +4%
Huawei Y540	9 Points -98%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	1998 Points
Huawei Y540	1077 Points -46%

Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	1772 ms *
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015	1305 ms * +26%
Microsoft Lumia 535	1254 ms * +29%
Honor Holly	1361 ms * +23%
LG L Fino	1526 ms * +14%
Huawei Y540	1704 ms * +4%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	19284 ms *
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015	14002 ms * +27%
Microsoft Lumia 535	27175 ms * -41%
Honor Holly	15355 ms * +20%
LG L Fino	15616 ms * +19%
Huawei Y540	18280 ms * +5%

Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	1769 Points
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015	2580 Points +46%
Microsoft Lumia 535	1141 Points -36%
Honor Holly	1820 Points +3%
Huawei Y540	1780 Points +1%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1	28 Points
Huawei Y540	27 Points -4%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy J1 Spreadtrum SC8830, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 4 GB Flash

Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Microsoft Lumia 535 Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212, Qualcomm Adreno 302, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Honor Holly Mediatek MT6582, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

LG L Fino Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212, Qualcomm Adreno 302, 4 GB Flash

Huawei Y540 MediaTek MT6572, ARM Mali-400 MP, 4 GB Flash

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5 | BaseMark OS II

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1 Mali-400 MP2, SC8830, 4 GB Flash	59.7 MB/s
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	100 MB/s +68%
Honor Holly Mali-400 MP2, MT6582, 16 GB eMMC Flash	143.8 MB/s +141%
LG L Fino Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 4 GB Flash	55.7 MB/s -7%
Huawei Y540 Mali-400 MP, MT6572, 4 GB Flash	79.3 MB/s +33%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1 Mali-400 MP2, SC8830, 4 GB Flash	11.3 MB/s
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	20.03 MB/s +77%
Honor Holly Mali-400 MP2, MT6582, 16 GB eMMC Flash	48.29 MB/s +327%
LG L Fino Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 4 GB Flash	10.79 MB/s -5%
Huawei Y540 Mali-400 MP, MT6572, 4 GB Flash	11.1 MB/s -2%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1 Mali-400 MP2, SC8830, 4 GB Flash	13.76 MB/s
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	12.08 MB/s -12%
Honor Holly Mali-400 MP2, MT6582, 16 GB eMMC Flash	17.73 MB/s +29%
LG L Fino Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 4 GB Flash	9.5 MB/s -31%
Huawei Y540 Mali-400 MP, MT6572, 4 GB Flash	12.66 MB/s -8%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1 Mali-400 MP2, SC8830, 4 GB Flash	1.5 MB/s
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	1.67 MB/s +11%
Honor Holly Mali-400 MP2, MT6582, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4.76 MB/s +217%
LG L Fino Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 4 GB Flash	0.6 MB/s -60%
Huawei Y540 Mali-400 MP, MT6572, 4 GB Flash	0.43 MB/s -71%

BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J1 Mali-400 MP2, SC8830, 4 GB Flash	185 Points
Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	369 Points +99%
Microsoft Lumia 535 Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 8 GB eMMC Flash	593 Points +221%
Honor Holly Mali-400 MP2, MT6582, 16 GB eMMC Flash	232 Points +25%
LG L Fino Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 4 GB Flash	164 Points -11%
Huawei Y540 Mali-400 MP, MT6572, 4 GB Flash	154 Points -17%

Maksimum yük

Bekleme


36.7 °C	34.4 °C	31.9 °C
37.8 °C	33.7 °C	32.3 °C
38 °C	33.7 °C	31.6 °C

Maksimum: 38 °C
Ortalama: 34.5 °C


32.9 °C	35.9 °C	35.9 °C
32.4 °C	36.4 °C	36.8 °C
31.8 °C	33.2 °C	35 °C

Maksimum: 36.8 °C
Ortalama: 34.5 °C

Güç kaynağı 33.2 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 23.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

	Samsung Galaxy J1 Mali-400 MP2, SC8830, 4 GB Flash	Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Microsoft Lumia 535 Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Honor Holly Mali-400 MP2, MT6582, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption		2%	-39%	-18%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.7 12%	1.3 -63%	0.8 -0%
Idle Average *	1.5	1.1 27%	1.6 -7%	1.5 -0%
Idle Maximum *	1.7	1.4 18%	2.4 -41%	1.7 -0%
Load Average *	2.2	2.7 -23%	3.3 -50%	2.9 -32%
Load Maximum *	3.4	4.3 -26%	4.6 -35%	5.3 -56%

* ... smaller is better

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0 / 0.7 Watt
Boşta	0.8 / 1.5 / 1.7 Watt
Çalışırken	2.2 / 3.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC 870

	Samsung Galaxy J1 Mali-400 MP2, SC8830, 4 GB Flash	Motorola Moto E 2. Gen 2015 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Microsoft Lumia 535 Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Honor Holly Mali-400 MP2, MT6582, 16 GB eMMC Flash	LG L Fino Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 4 GB Flash	Huawei Y540 Mali-400 MP, MT6572, 4 GB Flash
Battery Runtime		-24%	-49%	-34%	-29%	-43%
H.264	512	360 -30%	322 -37%			272 -47%
WiFi v1.3	648	506 -22%				397 -39%
Load	321	260 -19%	127 -60%	211 -34%	228 -29%	184 -43%
WiFi			376	363	407

Batarya ömrü

Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)		21h 02min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 32min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)		5h 21min

Artılar

+ Sağlam kasa

+ Kompakt boyutlar

+ Değiştirilebilir batarya

+ SD slotu

+ Uzun batarya süreleri

+ Parlak ekran

Eksiler

- Sadece 4 GB depolama alanı

- Sadece 512 MB RAM

- Yavaş işlemci

- Uzun yükleme süreleri

- Ortam ışık sensörü yok

In Review: Samsung Galaxy J1. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

Samsung Galaxy J1, 109 Euroluk fiyat etiketi için makul bir cihaz ve birçok alanda iyi bir izlenim bırakıyor. Kasa oldukça sağlam ve pahalı Galaxy modellerinden çok farklı değil. Batarya değiştirilebiliyor. Düşük emisyon değerli ve harika batarya süreleri mevcut. Rakip cihazların hiçbiri Galaxy J1 ile yarışamıyor.

Bunun dışında performans ortalama. Daha akıcı bir kullanım sunulabilirdi. Ses kalitesi yönünden iyileştirmeler yapılabilir. Ana kamera iyi ışık koşullarında güzel fotoğraflar çekebiliyor, ekran için de eleştirilebilecek pek bir şey yok. Samsung Galaxy J1 iyi bir giriş seviyesi cihaz, ancak rakipler performan konusunda daha iyi olabilir.

Bu fiyat aralığında rakipler daha iyi bir performans sunabilir. Ama Galaxy J1 iyi bir giriş seviyesi cihaz ve kötü bir seçim değil.

Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.

Samsung Galaxy J1 - 07/02/2015 v4 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

İşcilik

77%

Klavye

61 / 75 → 81%

Mouse

79%

Bağlanılabilirlik

44 / 60 → 73%

Ağırlık

95%

Batarya