Kısa inceleme: Samsung Galaxy Note 7
Top 10
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebook listesi
» Top 10 oyun notebooku
» Top 10 bütçeye uygun Ofis/İş Notebook Listesi
» Top 10 Premium Ofis/İş notebookları
» Top 10 Çalışma istasyonu laptopları
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» Top 10 Ultrabooklar
» En iyi 10 dönüştürülebilir modeli
» Seçimi en iyi 10 tablet
» Notebookcheck Top 10 Windows Tabletleri
» Top 10 Subnotebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından incelenen en iyi Notebook ekranları
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» NotebookCheck tarafından seçilen 300 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook
» Notebookcheck'in 500 Euro altındaki en iyi 10 Notebook listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 akıllı telefon listesi
» Notebookcheck'in Top 10 hafif oyun notebookları
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Acer Liquid Jade Primo | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Acer Liquid Jade Primo | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 |
|
Aydınlatma: 84 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 544 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Siyah: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
83.92% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
96.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Dual Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Samsung Galaxy Note Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 5.6" | Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Huawei P9 Plus AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Apple iPhone 6S Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | LG Stylus 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.7" | LG V10 Quantum-IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -30% | -6% | -95% | -24% | -31% | -142% | -105% | |
Brightness middle | 544 | 481 -12% | 394.8 -27% | 361 -34% | 297 -45% | 583 7% | 370 -32% | 450 -17% |
Brightness | 523 | 474 -9% | 397 -24% | 366 -30% | 297 -43% | 560 7% | 374 -28% | 431 -18% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 94 12% | 91 8% | 87 4% | 93 11% | 91 8% | 92 10% | 93 11% |
Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.25 | 0.22 | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 2.24 -18% | 1.49 22% | 5.1 -168% | 2.67 -41% | 3.55 -87% | 6.1 -221% | 5.18 -173% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.2 | 10 -138% | 3.98 5% | 16.5 -293% | 10.39 -147% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 4.02 -123% | 1.98 -10% | 5.5 -206% | 2.81 -56% | 3.88 -116% | 7 -289% | 6.94 -286% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 3.07 72% | 2.19 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.08 106% | 2.2 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 6449 101% | 6476 100% | 6382 102% | 7388 88% | 6379 102% | 7280 89% | 8350 78% | 8091 80% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 83.92 | 66.31 -21% | 59.05 -30% | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99.79 0% | 92.8 -7% | |||||
Contrast | 1267 | 1480 | 2045 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 2.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise | |
↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 59.5 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 59.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 59.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
LG Stylus 2 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
LG Stylus 2 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
LG Stylus 2 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
LG Stylus 2 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
LG Stylus 2 |
GFXBench | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
LG Stylus 2 | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
LG Stylus 2 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
LG Stylus 2 |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 |
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
LG Stylus 2 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
LG Stylus 2 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
LG Stylus 2 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
LG Stylus 2 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
LG Stylus 2 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL |
* ... smaller is better
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
LG Stylus 2 | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Ayarlar | Değer | ||
high | 30 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Ayarlar | Değer | ||
high | 55 fps |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HTC 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P9 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.02 / 0.2 Watt |
Boşta | 0.72 / 1.37 / 1.44 Watt |
Çalışırken |
5.56 / 6.78 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 3500 mAh | Huawei Mate 8 4000 mAh | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Apple iPhone 6S Plus 2750 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note Edge mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -13% | -127% | 4% | -3% | 7% | -26% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.72 | 0.85 -18% | 2.85 -296% | 0.63 12% | 0.5 31% | 0.87 -21% | 0.4 44% |
Idle Average * | 1.37 | 2.07 -51% | 2.95 -115% | 1.1 20% | 1.9 -39% | 1.2 12% | 1.5 -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.44 | 2.28 -58% | 3.26 -126% | 1.56 -8% | 2.2 -53% | 1.27 12% | 2.4 -67% |
Load Average * | 5.56 | 3.91 30% | 8.92 -60% | 5.95 -7% | 3.2 42% | 4.69 16% | 6.9 -24% |
Load Maximum * | 6.78 | 4.69 31% | 9.39 -38% | 6.7 1% | 6.4 6% | 5.63 17% | 11.8 -74% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A mAh | Huawei Mate 8 4000 mAh | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Apple iPhone 6S Plus 2750 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | LG Stylus 2 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -5% | 11% | -38% | 10% | -18% | -15% | -15% | |
Reader / Idle | 1429 | 1775 24% | 1872 31% | 1078 -25% | 1663 16% | 1655 16% | 1446 1% | 1225 -14% |
H.264 | 960 | 963 0% | 611 -36% | 914 -5% | 714 -26% | 776 -19% | 697 -27% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 607 | 431 -29% | 865 43% | 369 -39% | 732 21% | 513 -15% | 530 -13% | 663 9% |
Load | 361 | 322 -11% | 256 -29% | 179 -50% | 392 9% | 197 -45% | 263 -27% | 258 -29% |
Artılar
Eksiler
Samsung, Galaxy Note 7 modeli ile yine harika bir akıllı telefon sunuyor ve bu cihazın gerçek bir rakibi yok. Bu kadar kullanışlı bir S-Pen hiçbir diğer cihazda bulunmuyor ve bir stylustan daha fazlası.
Ayrıca sunulan donanım da harika. Ekran ile başlayıp ekran ile son bulan bir liste bu. İşlemci, cömert ve hızlı bellek, su ve toza karşı dayanıklılık. Kamera harika resimler çekiyor ve batarya kullanımı oldukça uzun. Nihayet Samsung da USB C portu kullananlar arasına katılıyor.
Elbette bazı detaylar eleştirilebilir. WLAN çekim yönünden düşük bir performans sunuyor ve USB 3.1 daha iyi kullanılabilirmiş. Cihaz sadece USB 2.0 kablosu ile geliyor ve bunu anlamakta güçlük çekiyoruz. Hoparlörler de iyi olabilirmiş. Cihaz, Fiyatıyla da cebinizde delik açabilir.
Note serisinin fanları heyecanlanmakta haklı ve kullanışlı bir dijital cihaz arıyorsanız, daha iyisi yok.
Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
- 09/16/2016 v5.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt