Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarKısa inceleme: Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 Tablet
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aydınlatma: 82 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 452 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Siyah: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.06% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
82.32% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.7" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Apple iPad Pro 9.7 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Google Pixel C LTPS, 2560x1800, 10.2" | Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Apple iPad (2017) IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -11% | -94% | 11% | -145% | -141% | -0% | |
| Brightness middle | 452 | 358 -21% | 392 -13% | 523 16% | 487 8% | 489 8% | 514 14% |
| Brightness | 468 | 357 -24% | 385 -18% | 500 7% | 510 9% | 443 -5% | 485 4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 86 5% | 91 11% | 93 13% | 91 11% | 86 5% | 88 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.46 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.78 1% | 4.5 -150% | 1.1 39% | 5.24 -191% | 5.5 -206% | 1.4 22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4 | 7.8 -95% | 1.9 52% | 11.6 -190% | 2.9 27% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.38 -15% | 4.8 -300% | 1.4 -17% | 7.95 -563% | 6.7 -458% | 2.1 -75% |
| Gamma | 2.11 104% | 2.24 98% | 2.47 89% | 2.11 104% | 2.16 102% | 2.06 107% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6500 100% | 6366 102% | 7426 88% | 6662 98% | 6565 99% | 7457 87% | 6647 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 82.32 | 62.97 -24% | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.06 | 99.55 0% | |||||
| Contrast | 664 | 1006 | 1249 | 1137 | 1117 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 221.2 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 221.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 221.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Storage score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| ANDEBench PRO | |
| Device Score | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| CoreMark-PRO/HPC (Base) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Memory Bandwidth | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Memory Latency | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Storage | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Platform | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| 3D | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | Google Pixel C | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -32% | -52% | -25% | 9% | -27% | -34% | 80% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 288.6 | 248.2 -14% | 131 -55% | 154.3 -47% | 249.7 -13% | 209.3 -27% | 143.4 -50% | 788 173% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 87.6 | 49.37 -44% | 78.2 -11% | 109.4 25% | 117.2 34% | 136.5 56% | 80.6 -8% | 194.2 122% |
| Random Read 4KB | 45.82 | 25.56 -44% | 14.59 -68% | 19.96 -56% | 32.04 -30% | 24.85 -46% | 23.5 -49% | 127.2 178% |
| Random Write 4KB | 13.13 | 9.82 -25% | 9.86 -25% | 10.08 -23% | 31.35 139% | 6.8 -48% | 11.7 -11% | 15.27 16% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 76.4 | 17.57 -77% | 61.7 -19% | 45.15 -41% | 48.9 -36% | 71.1 -7% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 58.6 | 13.98 -76% | 23.52 -60% | 26.9 -54% | 30.6 -48% | 57.2 -2% |
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Ayarlar | Değer | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Ayarlar | Değer | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel C audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Kapalı / Bekleme modu |   0.03 / 0.29 Watt |
| Boşta |  2.08 / 3.5 / 3.58 Watt |
| Çalışırken |
6.97 / 7.4 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE 5870 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 9.7 7306 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro 6600 mAh | Google Pixel C mAh | Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M 5900 mAh | Apple iPad (2017) 8.827 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -31% | -59% | -5% | -32% | -25% | -64% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.08 | 2.3 -11% | 1.71 18% | 1.58 24% | 1.82 12% | 1.59 24% | 2.06 1% |
| Idle Average * | 3.5 | 4.5 -29% | 7.55 -116% | 4.12 -18% | 4.26 -22% | 4.14 -18% | 7.42 -112% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.58 | 5 -40% | 7.62 -113% | 4.15 -16% | 4.33 -21% | 4.23 -18% | 7.47 -109% |
| Load Average * | 6.97 | 9.4 -35% | 8.39 -20% | 6.2 11% | 9.82 -41% | 10.89 -56% | 9.45 -36% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.4 | 10.4 -41% | 12.08 -63% | 9.27 -25% | 13.99 -89% | 11.58 -56% | 12.31 -66% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE 5870 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro 6600 mAh | Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M 5900 mAh | Apple iPad (2017) 8.827 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 9.7 7306 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -26% | -27% | -22% | -2% | -6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1903 | 918 -52% | 1230 -35% | 1453 -24% | 1496 -21% | 1850 -3% |
| H.264 | 551 | 651 18% | 593 8% | 600 9% | 845 53% | 708 28% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 760 | 393 -48% | 416 -45% | 518 -32% | 764 1% | 779 3% |
| Load | 375 | 291 -22% | 248 -34% | 225 -40% | 225 -40% | 186 -50% |
Artılar
Eksiler
Samsung’s Galaxy Tab S3 LTE is a very good tablet, which does not rely on modern high-end hardware across the board (as with the Apple iPad 2017), but the overall package is very compelling.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 might not offer many superlatives, but it is currently the best Android tablet.
Besides a great display with HDR support, good speakers, improved battery runtimes and S Pen support, the Wi-Fi module in particular is very fast. The integrated Snapdragon 820 is certainly not the latest SoC from Qualcomm, but the performance is still very good. Only the small and slow eMMC storage is not a good fit for a premium multimedia tablet. Samsung has not included very good cameras either, so there is no real premium feeling.
We really like the S Pen support though. It is shipped with every Tab S3 and leaves an excellent impression. 770 Euros (~$839) is still a lot of money for a tablet, and there are not many reasons to switch if you already own a Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 and can do without the pen.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
- 04/26/2017 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
