Kısa inceleme: Sony Vaio Fit 13A SV-F13N1L2E/S Convertible
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aydınlatma: 88 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 368 cd/m²
Kontrast: 584:1 (Siyah: 0.63 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.36 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
| PCMark 7 Score | 4277 puan | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated | 2592 puan | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated | 2624 puan | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated | 3538 puan | |
Yardım | ||
| Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Sony Vaio Fit multi-flip SV-F13N1L2E/S | |
| HP Spectre 13-h205eg x2 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z10t | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Helix | |
| Asus Taichi 31-CX003H | |
| Sony Vaio Duo 13 SVD1321M2E | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 2 | |
| HP EliteBook Revolve 810 | |
| 3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Sony Vaio Fit multi-flip SV-F13N1L2E/S | |
| HP Spectre 13-h205eg x2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Helix | |
| Asus Taichi 31-CX003H | |
| Sony Vaio Duo 13 SVD1321M2E | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 2 | |
| HP EliteBook Revolve 810 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 4607 puan | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 28829 puan | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3236 puan | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 498 puan | |
Yardım | ||
| Battlefield 4 | |
| 1024x768 Low Preset (sort by value) | |
| Sony Vaio Fit multi-flip SV-F13N1L2E/S | |
| HP Spectre 13-h205eg x2 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
| Sony Vaio Fit multi-flip SV-F13N1L2E/S | |
| HP Spectre 13-h205eg x2 | |
| Fifa 14 - 1366x768 High Preset AA:2x MS (sort by value) | |
| Sony Vaio Fit multi-flip SV-F13N1L2E/S | |
| HP Spectre 13-h205eg x2 | |
| düşük | orta | yüksek | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 (2013) | 51 | 32 | ||
| Fifa 14 (2013) | 145 | 84 | 59 | 33 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 21 | 15 |
Ses yüksekliği
| Boşta |
| 29.6 / 35.8 / 35.8 dB |
| Çalışırken |
| 42.7 / 42.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm uzaklık) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-0.4 °C / -0.7 F).
| Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.01 / 0.5 Watt |
| Boşta | 4.1 / 7.6 / 8.8 Watt |
| Çalışırken |
22 / 22.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 960 | |
With the Vaio Fit 13A (multi-flip SV-F13N1L2E/S), Sony presents a convertible that offers a well-rounded performance in many disciplines. The display's foldaway principle completely convinced us. Still, the chassis' lightweight and the folding mechanism have their disadvantages in terms of stability. This would be bearable, but we were displeased by the keyboard's significant give.
The IPS panel is of good quality (low DeltaE deviation), although the contrast is only average. Thanks to the fast Samsung SSD, the application performance is at the level of much more expensive competitors. The heat discharge is relatively low, but under load or in performance mode, the fan still makes more noise than seems necessary. The battery life of about five hours in our practical tests is definitely satisfying.
The test shows once again how the manufacturers still juggle the numbers in terms of performance and temperature, in order to achieve particular run times or to remain within certain temperature thresholds. However, in the case of the Vaio Fit multi-flip SV-F13N1L2E/S, Sony seems to have been somewhat overzealous. The Turbo is deactivated, although the sensors consistently register harmless temperatures (even in self-test). If the users are paying for a Core i5, naturally they expect its full processing power. This belies the flowery promise of a "computer experience without compromises" - at least for users sensitive to performance. All other users probably will not notice anything and will only have the pros and cons of outward appearance to consider.
