Lenovo IdeaPad S340-15 Laptop incelemesi: Ucuz Core i7 Ice Lake ve performans maliyeti

Name: Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL
Brand: Lenovo

Core i7 only in name.

Sıkı bir bütçeniz varsa ve düşük kaliteli spesifikasyonlara uymak istemiyorsanız, bu Core i7 destekli Lenovo sizin için olabilir. Sistem oyunları veya uzun süreler boyunca talep eden herhangi bir şeyi çalıştırırken tokalaşmaya başlar.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo, Published 03/28/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Ice Lake Laptop / Notebook Touchscreen

Bütçe IdeaPad S340-15, orta sınıf IdeaPad S540 veya daha üst düzey IdeaPad S740 veya IdeaPad S940'ın aksine Lenovo'nun en uygun fiyatlı 15,6 inç dizüstü bilgisayarlarından biridir. Buradaki test birimimiz, Intel'in en son Core i7-1065G7 Ice Lake CPU'su, 1080p IPS ekran, 512 GB SSD ve 8 GB DDR4 RAM ile donatılmış, yalnızca yaklaşık 700 ila 800 ABD Doları perakende satış için üst düzey bir yapılandırmadır. Eski Core i3-8145U CPU, 768p TN ekran, 128 GB SSD ve 400 doların altında sadece 4 GB RAM ile daha ucuz SKU'lar var. S15, HP Pavilion 15, Acer Aspire serisi ve Dell Inspiron 15. 15,6 inç IdeaPad S340-15, 14 inç IdeaPad S340-14 ve 15,6 inç IdeaPad S540-15 ile fiziksel özellikler paylaştığından, kontrol etmenizi öneririz 14 inç model hakkındaki yorumumuz, mevcut yorumlarımızın çoğu için de geçerli olacaktır.Daha fazla Lenovo yorumu: ThinkPad T490Yoga C940IdeaPad S540Legion Y740ThinkBook 15

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL (Ideapad S340 Seri)

İşlemci

Intel Core i7-1065G7 4 x 1.3 - 3.9 GHz, Ice Lake-U

Grafik kartı

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Çekirdek: 300 MHz, Bellek: 1000 MHz, DDR4, 26.20.100.7463

Bellek

8 GB

, 4 GB soldered, 1x SODIMM, 1866 MHz, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel

Görüntü

15.60 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, 10-point capacitive, BOE CQ NV156FHM-T03, IPS, BOE82F, parlak: hayır, 60 Hz

Anakart

Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)

Harddisk

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, 512 GB

Ses kartı

Intel Ice Lake-U/Y PCH-LP cAVS

Bağlantılar

3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm combo, Kart okuyucular: SD reader

Network

Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 17.9 x 358 x 245

Batarya

36 Wh, 3320 mAh Lithium-Polymer

İşletim sistemi

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: 2x 2 W, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, Lenovo Vantage, LenovoUtility, 12 Ay Garanti

Ağırlık

1.751 kg, Güç kaynağı: 158 g

Fiyat

700 USD

Bağlantılar

Lenovo anasayfa

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
79.4 % v7 ^(old)	03/2020	Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	1.8 kg	17.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	10/2019	Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630	1.9 kg	17 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83 % v6 ^(old)	05/2020	HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250	1.9 kg	18 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
80.7 % v6 ^(old)		Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T i5-8250U, GeForce MX130	2.3 kg	23 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84.1 % v6 ^(old)	09/2023	Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE R7 2700U, Vega 10	1.7 kg	17.6 mm	14.00"	1920x1080

Durum

Şasi, hafif bir kalınlık değişikliği için IdeaPad S540-15 ile görsel olarak aynıdır. Neredeyse tamamen alüminyum Yoga S900 serisinin aksine maliyetlerden tasarruf etmek için dış kapaktaki hafif kauçuklu plastik klavye desteğiyle alüminyumdur. Bununla birlikte, bütçeye uygun bir dizüstü bilgisayar için S340, Dell Inspiron 15 veya aşırı plastik Asus VivoBook S15 serisinden daha pürüzsüz ve şık bir his veriyor. Yüzeyler hala fiyat farkı göz önüne alındığında beklendiği gibi Yoga C940 veya XPS 15'ten daha fazla çözgü yapıyor.

Boyutlar ve ağırlık, HP Pavilion 15, Asus VivoBook S15, Dell Inspiron 15 ve Lenovo'nun kendi IdeaPad S540-15 modeline yakındır. Bu nedenle, bu bütçe dizüstü bilgisayarlar arasında seçim yapıyorsanız, boyut ve ağırlık yerine performans ve yapı kalitesindeki farklılıklar hakkında daha fazla endişelenmelisiniz. Eski bir dizüstü bilgisayardan yükseltme yapıyorsanız, daha yeni dizüstü bilgisayarların yeni dar çerçeve tasarımları taşınabilirliğe yardımcı olacaktır.

Rubberized matte surface will collect unsightly grease over time

Same physical features as the IdeaPad S540 even though they share very different internals

Bar hinge is rigid, but could have been more stiff. There is slight creaking when adjusting the angle

Small dimensions for a 15.6-inch laptop due to the narrow bezel design

Bottom panel is much easier to remove than on the HP Pavilion series

HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD DIN A4 ❌

Bağlantı

Beklenen bağlantı noktalarının çoğu burada USB C Tipi, USB A Tipi ve HDMI dahil. Bağlantı noktası konumlandırması, AC adaptör bağlantı noktası ile USB Type-C bağlantı noktası arasında sıkışmış sıkıca paketlenmiş HDMI bağlantı noktası için mükemmel bir tasarruf sağlar.

Right: SD reader, 2x USB 3.1 Type-A Gen. 1

Left: AC adapter, HDMI, USB Type-C 3.1 Gen. 1, 3.5 mm combo audio

SD Kart Okuyucu

Entegre SD kart okuyucusundan aktarım hızları, IdeaPad S540'ta kaydettiklerimizle neredeyse aynı. UHS-II test kartımızdan masaüstüne 1 GB görüntü taşımak, Dell XPS 15'teki görüntüye kıyasla yaklaşık 14 saniye sürüyor. Buna karşılık, ThinkPad T490 gibi diğer dizüstü bilgisayarlara takılan SD kartlar neredeyse kenara yaslanacak şekilde oturur.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	178 MB/s +133%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	77 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	76.4 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	37.7 MB/s -51%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	188 MB/s +122%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	84.5 MB/s
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	84 MB/s -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	37.6 MB/s -56%

İletişim

Kablosuz, Wi-Fi 5 veya 802.11ac hızları için Intel 9560 tarafından sağlanır. Wi-Fi 6 özellikli Netgear RAX200 yönlendiricimizden 1 metre uzakta durduğunuzda yaklaşık 1200 Mbps gerçek dünya ortalama aktarım hızlarını kaydedebiliyoruz. Test birimi ile geçirdiğimiz süre boyunca herhangi bir bağlantı sorunu yaşamadık.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1666 (841^min - 1700^max) MBit/s +39%
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1203 (1102^min - 1276^max) MBit/s +1%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1195 (922^min - 1315^max) MBit/s
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	496 (459^min - 531^max) MBit/s -58%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1378 (693^min - 1402^max) MBit/s +22%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1128 (1037^min - 1164^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1096 (1062^min - 1130^max) MBit/s -3%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	638 (625^min - 645^max) MBit/s -43%

Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1127 (1037-1164)

Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1195 (922-1315)

Web kamerası

ColorChecker Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL: 8.53 ∆E min: 4.61 - max: 13.99 ∆E

Bakım

Alt panel on adet T5 Torx vida ile sabitlenmiştir. Kullanıcılar çıkarıldıktan sonra, alüminyum plakanın altındaki iki depolama bölmesine ve bir SODIMM yuvasına erişebilir. Burada bakım, HP Pavilion serisine kıyasla çok daha kolay.

Aksesuarlar ve Garanti

Kutuda kağıt kılavuzları ve AC adaptörü dışında hiçbir ekstra yoktur. Doğrudan Lenovo'dan satın alınırsa standart bir yıllık sınırlı garanti, diğer seçeneklerle birlikte geçerlidir.

Giriş cihazları

Klavye ve Dokunmatik YüzeyLenovo, IdeaPad S340, S540 ve S740 serisinde aynı klavye ve dokunmatik yüzeyi kullanır. Dolayısıyla, S540 ve S740 hakkındaki mevcut yorumlarımız burada S340 için geçerlidir. Clickpad'in boyutu (10.5 x 7 cm) bile her üç model arasında aynıdır.Ne yazık ki, bu aynı zamanda klavye tuşlarının yumuşak geri bildirimlerinden daha az etkilendiğimiz anlamına gelir. Lenovo ThinkPads, dizüstü bilgisayarlar açısından en iyi klavye tuşlarından bazılarına sahipken, IdeaPad S340'ın tuşları daha spongier, sığ ve genel olarak daha ucuz hissediyor. Zaten ucuz Ultrabook'lara yazmaya alışkınsanız bu sürpriz olmayacaktır, ancak HP Spectre serisi veya ThinkPad serisi gibi daha sıkı tuşlara sahip Ultrabooks'tan geliyorsanız fark göze çarpar.

Identical keyboard layout as the IdeaPad S540 and S740

Clickpad offers smooth gliding with no cursor jumping even if moving slowly. Clicking produces an audible click with soft feedback

Two-level white backlight illuminates all keys and symbols

NumPad and Arrow keys are cramped and spongier than the main QWERTY keys

Görüntüle

Ünitemizdeki BOE NV156FHM-T03 paneli, bu yazı itibariyle veritabanımızda başka hiçbir dizüstü bilgisayarda bulunamaz. Bununla birlikte, Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro ve Lenovo Legion Y740 dahil olmak üzere BOE NV156FHM ailesinden panelli birkaç dizüstü bilgisayar var. Sürprizimize göre, grenlilik minimumdur ve ucuz bir dizüstü bilgisayardaki mat bir panelden kontrast beklenenden daha iyidir. Öte yandan, sınırlı renk alanı ve yanlış renkler, panelin Surface laptop 3 15 veya IdeaPad S940 gibi daha pahalı dizüstü bilgisayarlarda bulunan paneller kadar renkli olmasını önler. kenarlar ve köşeler boyunca hafif-orta düzensiz arka ışık kanaması çekiyor.

768p TN and 1080p IPS options. We recommend avoiding the 768p panel

The display is also a touchscreen which is quite uncommon for a matte panel

Physical webcam shutter along the top edge

Slight-moderate uneven backlight bleeding


326.7 cd/m²	317.5 cd/m²	310.8 cd/m²
313.1 cd/m²	320.8 cd/m²	306.6 cd/m²
283.4 cd/m²	310.5 cd/m²	290.1 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

BOE CQ NV156FHM-T03 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 326.7 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 308.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.3 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 87 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 320.8 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1188:1 (Siyah: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.65
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.77% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.43% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12

Download ICC Dosyası (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL BOE CQ NV156FHM-T03, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 LG Philips 156WFC, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE06FB), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng BOE080D, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T BOE CQ NT156FHM-N41, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		65%	-7%	54%	57%	-6%
Display P3 Coverage	40.43	66.5 64%	37.31 -8%	66.8 65%	67.2 66%	37.47 -7%
sRGB Coverage	58.8	98 67%	56.2 -4%	86.5 47%	88.1 50%	56.4 -4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	41.77	68.4 64%	38.55 -8%	63.2 51%	64.4 54%	38.71 -7%
Response Times		-3%	31%	-3%	13%	29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	46.4 ?(26, 20.4)	52.8 ?(25.6, 27.2) -14%	28.4 ?(10.4, 18) 39%	49.6 ?(22.4, 27.2) -7%	43 ?(22, 21) 7%	41 ?(22, 19) 12%
Response Time Black / White *	35.2 ?(20.4, 14.8)	32 ?(16.4, 15.6) 9%	27.2 ?(16.4, 10.8) 23%	34.8 ?(18.8, 16) 1%	29 ?(16, 13) 18%	19 ?(14, 5) 46%
PWM Frequency		1020 ?(25)		202 ?(99)	208 ?(90)	7000 ?(90)
Screen		49%	2%	25%	24%	0%
Brightness middle	320.8	588 83%	253.6 -21%	299 -7%	320 0%	230 -28%
Brightness	309	555 80%	227 -27%	278 -10%	293 -5%	221 -28%
Brightness Distribution	87	89 2%	84 -3%	87 0%	86 -1%	91 5%
Black Level *	0.27	0.4 -48%	0.27 -0%	0.25 7%	0.26 4%	0.45 -67%
Contrast	1188	1470 24%	939 -21%	1196 1%	1231 4%	511 -57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.68	2.5 67%	6.05 21%	4.32 44%	4.5 41%	3.6 53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	21.97	6.3 71%	14.03 36%	9.3 58%	8.81 60%	5.59 75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.65	0.6 87%	4.97 -7%	2.58 45%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.3	4.5 38%	3.2 56%	4.21 42%	4.71 35%	3.13 57%
Gamma	2.12 ^104%	2.2 ^100%	2 ^110%	2.39 ^92%	2.45 ^90%	2.45 ^90%
CCT	6213 ^105%	6836 ^95%	6820 ^95%	6799 ^96%	7085 ^92%	7244 ^90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	37.8	63.2 67%	35.5 -6%	57 51%	58 53%	36 -5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	58.3	98 68%	55.6 -5%	86 48%	88 51%	56 -4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		37% / 46%	9% / 4%	25% / 27%	31% / 29%	8% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Renk alanı, bir bütçe panelini göstermek için sırasıyla AdobeRGB ve sRGB standartlarının sadece yüzde 38'i ve yüzde 58'i ile sınırlıdır. IdeaPad S340-15'ten bir adım ötedeki IdeaPad S540-15, sRGB'nin yaklaşık yüzde 86'sında daha derin ve potansiyel olarak daha doğru renkler sunar. Dizüstü bilgisayardan en iyi şekilde yararlanmak için ekranı kendiniz kalibre etmenizi veya yukarıdaki ICM profilimizi uygulamanızı öneririz.

Bir X-Rite kolorimetresi ile yapılan diğer ölçümler normalden daha sıcak bir renk sıcaklığı gösterirken, diğer çoğu bütçe dizüstü bilgisayardaki gri tonlama genellikle daha soğuktur. Ekranı kendimiz kalibre etmek bu dezavantajı doğrudan giderir, ancak yukarıda belirtilen dar gamut nedeniyle renkler daha yüksek doygunluk seviyelerinde giderek daha yanlış hale gelir.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.4 ms rise
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 26 ms rise
46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Dış mekan görünürlüğü, HP Pavilion veya Asus VivoBook gibi doğrudan rakiplerle uyumludur, yani en iyi ihtimalle ortalamadır. Güneş ışığı ekranı yıkayacaktır, dış mekan kullanımı gerekiyorsa gölge en iyi seçeneğiniz olacaktır. XPS 15 veya MacBook Pro gibi daha pahalı dizüstü bilgisayarlar neredeyse iki kat daha parlaktır.

Wide IPS viewing angles. Slight changes in contrast if viewing from extreme angles

Verim

Intel Core U serisi, güç kullanıcılarını, video editörlerini ve oyuncuları hedefleyen Intel Core H serisinin aksine öncelikle göz atan, akış yapan ve e-posta gönderen sıradan kullanıcıları hedefliyor. Yeni Intel 10. nesil Core i7 Buz Gölü CPU, fotoğraf düzenleme ve Roket Ligi veya DOTA 2 oyunlarını artırmak için çok gelişmiş grafik potansiyeline sahip olsa da, geçen yılki Whiskey Lake-U serisiyle neredeyse aynı işlemci performansını sunuyor. IdeaPad S340-15 serisi, özel grafik seçenekleri sunmuyor. genişletme için bir boş DDR4 SODIMM yuvası ile 4 GB lehimli RAM var. LatencyMon, kablosuz özelliği etkinleştirilmiş olsa bile yinelenen DPC gecikme sorunu göstermez.

İşlemci

CineBench R15 ve R20'ye göre, CPU performansı, veritabanımızdaki ortalama Core i7-1065G7'nin yüzde 5'inde olmasını beklediğimiz yerdir. Sorun, dizüstü bilgisayarın performans sürdürülebilirliğini test etmek için bu aynı ölçütleri sonsuz bir döngüde çalıştırırken ortaya çıkar. Örneğin, bir döngüde CineBench R15 Multi-Thread çalıştırıldığında, 738 puanlık başlangıç puanı, dört tam döngüden sonra zaman içinde işlemci performansında yüzde 38'lik büyük bir düşüşü temsil etmek için 460 puana kadar düşecektir. Buna karşılık, aynı Core i7-1065G7 CPU ile donatılmış Surface Laptop 3 15, aşağıdaki grafiğimizde gösterildiği gibi, tekrar geri daldırılmadan önce CPU performansı zaman zaman normale dönecektir. Bu geniş performans deltası ve çevrim davranışı, aşırı işleme yükleri çalıştırırken tutarlı CPU performansı isteyen kullanıcılar için olumsuz özelliklerdir. Daha fazla teknik bilgi ve karşılaştırma karşılaştırmaları için Core i7-1065G7'deki özel sayfamıza bakın.

Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø517 (460.32-737.44)

Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø672 (632.81-836.68)

Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Quadro P520, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW256G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø624 (521.26-694.16)

Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB RKT30Q.1; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø650 (621.2-684.29)

Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Core i7-10710U	460 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US Intel Core i7-10510U	454 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	444 Points 0%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Core i7-1065G7	444 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7	439 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (358 - 474, n=31)	438 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML Intel Core i5-10210U	421 Points -5%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	418 Points -6%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	383 Points -14%
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	356 Points -20%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	334 Points -25%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Core i7-10710U	2598 Points +60%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	1737 Points +7%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	1645 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7	1630 Points 0%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Core i7-1065G7	1624 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US Intel Core i7-10510U	1565 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1081 - 2024, n=31)	1510 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	1504 Points -7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	1499 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML Intel Core i5-10210U	1292 Points -20%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	1138 Points -30%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Core i7-10710U	191 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US Intel Core i7-10510U	186 Points +2%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Core i7-1065G7	182 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	181 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (141 - 190, n=35)	174.2 Points -4%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	173 Points -5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7	172 Points -5%
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML Intel Core i5-10210U	169 Points -7%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	156 Points -14%
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	136 Points -25%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	135 Points -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Core i7-10710U	1103 Points +50%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	797 Points +8%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Core i7-1065G7	737 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7	736 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	683 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML Intel Core i5-10210U	677 Points -8%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	672 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US Intel Core i7-10510U	657 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	654 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (288 - 836, n=36)	648 Points -12%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	494 Points -33%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2.09 - 2.17, n=4)	2.12 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7	2.05 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	1.52 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7	7.94 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	7.56 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (5.69 - 9.37, n=4)	7.37 Points

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7	23829 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (16551 - 26481, n=4)	21959 Points
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	17043 Points
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	15324 Points
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (7083 - 7390, n=4)	7254 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7	6855 Points
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	6212 Points
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	4527 Points

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (233 - 354, n=3)	281 s *
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7	265 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

63 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

737 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

182 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

1624 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

444 Points

Yardım

... kıyaslama

Sistem performansı

PCMark sonuçları, sistem yukarıdaki kriterlerimizde örneklendiği gibi yüksek stres altında tokalaşsa da, aynı Core i7-1065G7 CPU ile donatılmış diğer dizüstü bilgisayarlarla ilgili olmasını beklediğimiz yerdir. Bu, sistemin günlük tarama veya akış yükleri sırasında normal şekilde çalışacağını gösterir. Bununla birlikte, Buz Gölü CPU'sundan en iyi şekilde yararlanmak isteyen güçlü kullanıcılar, bunun yerine Yoga C940'a bakmak isteyebilir.Test birimimizle zamanımız boyunca kayda değer bir yazılım veya donanım hıçkırığı yaşamadık.

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4679 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3878 - 4679, n=20)	4356 Points -7%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	4292 Points -8%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	4105 Points -12%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	3903 Points -17%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	3759 Points -20%
HP Pavilion 15-cw1212ng Vega 6, R3 3300U	3602 Points -23%
Essentials
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	9511 Points
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	9236 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (8302 - 9902, n=20)	9123 Points -4%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	9000 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	7692 Points -19%
HP Pavilion 15-cw1212ng Vega 6, R3 3300U	7664 Points -19%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	7204 Points -24%
Productivity
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	7379 Points
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	7217 Points -2%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	6771 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (5462 - 7379, n=20)	6555 Points -11%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	6302 Points -15%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5859 Points -21%
HP Pavilion 15-cw1212ng Vega 6, R3 3300U	5667 Points -23%
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	3961 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3260 - 4424, n=20)	3773 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	3581 Points -10%
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	3220 Points -19%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	3175 Points -20%
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	3096 Points -22%
HP Pavilion 15-cw1212ng Vega 6, R3 3300U	2923 Points -26%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	4175 Points +10%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	3807 Points 0%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	3791 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3305 - 4275, n=17)	3734 Points -2%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	3504 Points -8%
HP Pavilion 15-cw1212ng Vega 6, R3 3300U	3405 Points -10%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5291 Points
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	5070 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4968 Points -6%
HP Pavilion 15-cw1212ng Vega 6, R3 3300U	4479 Points -15%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4429 Points -16%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2460 - 5291, n=17)	4309 Points -19%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3791 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5291 puan
PCMark 10 Score		4679 puan
Yardım

Depolama aygıtları

Bir M.2 2280 PCIe yuvası ve 2,5 inç SATA III yuvası mevcuttur. Test birimimiz, daha pahalı Samsung PM981 serisinin veya Intel'in daha yeni 760p serisinin aksine bütçe NVMe SSD olan 512 GB Intel 660p ile birlikte geliyor. Yine de, sıradan okuma ve yazma oranları, herhangi bir SATA III SSD'den en az iki kat daha hızlıdır, bu da gündelik ev, okul veya ofis kullanıcısı için yeterlidir.

M.2 slot and 2.5-inch bay protected by foil. Note the Lenovo anti-tamper sticker securing the M.2 drive

	Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
AS SSD		71%	9%	-31%	128%
Seq Read	1447	2357 63%	398.9 -72%	1348 -7%	2642 83%
Seq Write	926	1235 33%	884 -5%	685 -26%	2433 163%
4K Read	40.06	43.29 8%	34.54 -14%	29.15 -27%	58 45%
4K Write	97.9	99.7 2%	82.1 -16%	90.3 -8%	145.3 48%
4K-64 Read	323.7	1020 215%	647 100%	650 101%	1431 342%
4K-64 Write	791	1502 90%	985 25%	514 -35%	1753 122%
Access Time Read *	0.06	0.07 -17%	0.072 -20%	0.31 -417%	0.072 -20%
Access Time Write *	0.144	0.039 73%	0.047 67%	0.044 69%	0.027 81%
Score Read	508	1299 156%	721 42%	814 60%	1753 245%
Score Write	982	1726 76%	1155 18%	673 -31%	2142 118%
Score Total	1738	3640 109%	2279 31%	1876 8%	4790 176%
Copy ISO MB/s	943	2145 127%	862 -9%	763 -19%
Copy Program MB/s	612	565 -8%	457 -25%	350.3 -43%
Copy Game MB/s	826	1320 60%	902 9%	310 -62%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		35%	-24%	-34%	44%
Write 4K	130.8	93.6 -28%	105.9 -19%	63.6 -51%	170.7 31%
Read 4K	54.8	41.87 -24%	36.56 -33%	28.58 -48%	49.51 -10%
Write Seq	978	1698 74%	1165 19%	688 -30%	1156 18%
Read Seq	1627	1978 22%	423.2 -74%	1032 -37%	1136 -30%
Write 4K Q32T1	450.1	383.1 -15%	332.1 -26%	266.7 -41%	420.5 -7%
Read 4K Q32T1	345.9	326.9 -5%	229.3 -34%	321.5 -7%	527 52%
Write Seq Q32T1	982	2778 183%	1460 49%	606 -38%	2984 204%
Read Seq Q32T1	1842	3119 69%	472.5 -74%	1508 -18%	3550 93%
Write 4K Q8T8				410.8
Read 4K Q8T8				331.4
Total Average (Program / Settings)		53% / 57%	-8% / -3%	-33% / -32%	86% / 92%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1842 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 982 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 345.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 450.1 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1627 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 978 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 54.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 130.8 MB/s

GPU Performance

Graphics performance is consistently below the average Iris Plus Graphics G7 in our database in almost every 3DMark benchmark by 15 to 20 percent. Users can expect a performance level between the older UHD Graphics 620 and the GeForce MX150 which is just barely enough to play popular undemanding titles like Rocket League or DOTA 2 at low settings.

Frame rates are some of the lowest we've recorded yet for a Core i7-1065G7 laptop. Running Rocket League on the lowest 720p settings, for example, returns an average of 45 FPS compared to ~114 FPS on the XPS 13 2-in-1. Furthermore, the system is unable to maintain Boost clock rates for very long as exemplified by our Witcher 3 graph below. Standing still in the game starts out at ~45 FPS only to fall and stabilize at ~33 FPS over the course of an hour.

See our dedicated page on the Iris Plus Graphics G7 for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G	38812 Points +182%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U	23806 Points +73%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	20784 Points +51%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, R5 3580U	19255 Points +40%
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	18423 Points +34%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7	16695 Points +21%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (7024 - 18881, n=24)	15496 Points +13%
Walmart Motile M142 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U	13919 Points +1%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	13766 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U	10450 Points -24%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G	7181 Points +207%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U	3868 Points +65%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	2999 Points +28%
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	2851 Points +22%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, R5 3580U	2789 Points +19%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7	2692 Points +15%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (1418 - 3156, n=27)	2594 Points +11%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	2339 Points
Walmart Motile M142 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U	2020 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U	1353 Points -42%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
MSI Modern 15 A10RB NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U	79135 Points +44%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	78094 Points +42%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, R5 3580U	70492 Points +28%
Walmart Motile M142 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U	65039 Points +18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7	57777 Points +5%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (13522 - 68277, n=15)	55230 Points 0%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	55073 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U	48252 Points -12%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G	2031 Points +230%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U	1160 Points +89%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, R5 3580U	872 Points +42%
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	858 Points +40%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	852 Points +39%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7	794 Points +29%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (526 - 851, n=23)	744 Points +21%
Walmart Motile M142 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U	618 Points 0%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	615 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U	428 Points -30%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G	9825 Points +159%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U	4905 Points +29%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, R5 3580U	4380 Points +15%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7	4279 Points +13%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	4165 Points +10%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2112 - 4630, n=28)	3996 Points +5%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	3796 Points
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3540 Points -7%
Walmart Motile M142 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U	3332 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U	1942 Points -49%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G	7006 Points +197%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U	4532 Points +92%
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3556 Points +51%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7	3409 Points +45%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	3247 Points +38%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (1319 - 4163, n=28)	3189 Points +35%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, R5 3580U	3041 Points +29%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	2356 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U	2088 Points -11%
Walmart Motile M142 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U	2003 Points -15%

3DMark 11 Performance		3762 puan
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		65852 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		9962 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score		2171 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score		701 puan
Yardım

... kıyaslama

Rocket League | The Witcher 3

Rocket League
1280x720 Performance
MSI Modern 15 A10RB Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	182.9 fps +302%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7 Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	156 fps +243%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	119.7 fps +163%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (22.1 - 123, n=16)	90.6 fps +99%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	79 fps +74%
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	70.4 fps +55%
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	58.5 fps +29%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	45.5 fps
1920x1080 Performance
MSI Modern 15 A10RB Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	139.3 fps +223%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	94.3 fps +119%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (43.1 - 112.6, n=11)	69.3 fps +61%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	52.4 fps +22%
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	49 fps +14%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	43.1 fps
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX
MSI Modern 15 A10RB Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	91.2 fps +204%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7 Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	76.1 fps +154%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	59.9 fps +100%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (24.9 - 71.3, n=16)	54.1 fps +80%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	45.6 fps +52%
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	33.6 fps +12%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	30 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	17.7 fps -41%

The Witcher 3 - 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Huawei MateBook 13 i7 Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	70.5 fps +136%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	70 fps +134%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	53.8 fps +80%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	49 fps +64%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (28.2 - 58, n=20)	47.8 fps +60%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	29.9 fps

Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø36.7 (25-47)

	düşük	orta	yüksek	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	81.9	48.9	39.9	13.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)	29.9	20.8	10.9	5.9
Rocket League (2017)	45.5	30	21.1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	19

Emissions

System Noise

Modern 15-inch laptops running on only ULV U-series CPUs tend to be very quiet and the IdeaPad S340-15 is no exception. Expect no fan noise during low loads like browsing or streaming and only a small increase to ~30 dB(A) when under moderate loads. If gaming, fan noise maxes out at 35.5 dB(A) to be quieter than any Ultrabook with dedicated GeForce MX250 graphics when under similar conditions. In short, fan noise never becomes bothersome no matter the onscreen load.

We're not able to notice any electronic noise or coil whine from our test unit.

Cooling solution consists of a single ~55 mm fan and a short heat pipe over the CPU

Lots of empty space inside the laptop - a common occurrence on budget laptops

The motherboard design allows for no dedicated graphics options in the near future

1x SODIMM slot underneath the protective plate

	Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng GeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Noise		-4%	-3%	-18%	-17%	-11%
off / environment *	28.5	29.3 -3%	28.3 1%	30 -5%	30.5 -7%	30 -5%
Idle Minimum *	28.5	29.3 -3%	28.3 1%	30 -5%	31.5 -11%	30.9 -8%
Idle Average *	28.5	29.3 -3%	28.3 1%	32 -12%	31.5 -11%	30.9 -8%
Idle Maximum *	28.5	29.8 -5%	28.3 1%	37 -30%	31.5 -11%	30.9 -8%
Load Average *	30.3	32.4 -7%	31.4 -4%	41 -35%	42.5 -40%	39 -29%
Load Maximum *	35.5	37.2 -5%	41.4 -17%	42 -18%	42.5 -20%	38 -7%
Witcher 3 ultra *			41.4	39

* ... smaller is better

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta		28.5 / 28.5 / 28.5 dB
Çalışırken		30.3 / 35.5 dB

	30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 28.5 dB(A)

Temperature

Surface temperatures will always be warmer on the left half of the laptop than the right half due to the positioning of the processor and motherboard within. When under heavy loads, hot spots can range from 34 C on the keyboard to as high as 44 C on the bottom as shown by our temperature maps below. Results are cooler than what we recorded on the Surface Laptop 3 15 or XPS 13 even though they all carry the same Core i7-1065G7 CPU likely because these pricier alternatives have thinner and sleeker designs.

AC adapter after running Prime95+FurMark for over an hour

Maksimum yük

Bekleme


35 °C	34.2 °C	26.4 °C
30.8 °C	32 °C	23.8 °C
25 °C	23.6 °C	22.2 °C

Maksimum: 35 °C
Ortalama: 28.1 °C


26 °C	44 °C	38.2 °C
24.2 °C	35 °C	30 °C
23.6 °C	24 °C	26 °C

Maksimum: 44 °C
Ortalama: 30.1 °C

Güç kaynağı 48 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 20.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25 °C / 77 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.8 °C / 6.8 F).

Stress Test

The poor performance sustainability mentioned in our CPU section above can be explained with HWiNFO. When running Prime95, clock rates would boost up to 3.5 GHz for only the first 5 seconds or so until hitting a core temperature of 93 C. Thereafter, clock rates would drop steadily over time to 2.9 GHz before finally stabilizing at just 1.7 GHz and at a core temperature of ~54 C. When considering that the base clock rate of the Core i7-1065G7 is 1.3 GHz, the 400 MHz boost is disappointing. The XPS 13 2-in-1 with the same CPU stabilizes at 3.0 GHz when under the same conditions.

Running on battery power will not limit performance. A 3DMark 11 run on batteries returns Physics and Graphics scores of 6743 and4083 points, respectively, compared to 5819 and 3796 points when on mains.

	CPU Clock (GHz)	GPU Clock (MHz)	Average CPU Temperature (°C)
System Idle	--	--	45
Prime95 Stress	1.7	--	56
Prime95 + FurMark Stress	1.3	400	54

Speakers

The stereo speakers offer nothing out of the ordinary for an inexpensive 15.6-inch laptop. Audio is loud with weak bass meaning that the speakers are better for video conferencing rather than music or multimedia playback. Higher volume settings will not vibrate the palm rests or introduce any static.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Idling on desktop consumes between 3 W and 7 W depending on the brightness level and power profile. When gaming, the system will consume between 40 W and 44 W compared to 44 W and 64 W on the IdeaPad S540 with the more powerful dedicated GeForce MX250 GPU.

We're able to record a maximum of 47.5 W from the small (~6.3 x 6.3 x 2.8 cm) 45 W AC adapter when running Prime95 or both Prime95 and FurMark simultaneously. This high of a consumption is only temporary as shown by our graphs below due to the limited Turbo Boost potential of the system. The power consumption behavior mirrors what we observed in the Stress Test section above.

Consumption when running the first scene of 3DMark 06

Consumption when running Witcher 3 for the first 90 seconds

Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Consumption spikes to 47.5 W for about 30 seconds before steadily falling to as low as 29 W

Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Behavior is similar to the Prime95 only stress test

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.14 / 0.76 Watt
Boşta	3.8 / 6.9 / 7.7 Watt
Çalışırken	43.3 / 47.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		-38%	5%	-27%	-19%	-15%
Idle Minimum *	3.8	3.79 -0%	4.2 -11%	5 -32%	4.9 -29%	4.75 -25%
Idle Average *	6.9	6.9 -0%	6.8 1%	7 -1%	7.9 -14%	6.9 -0%
Idle Maximum *	7.7	9.2 -19%	7 9%	10 -30%	10.1 -31%	7 9%
Load Average *	43.3	62 -43%	36.5 16%	64 -48%	60 -39%	53 -22%
Witcher 3 ultra *	40.4		37.9 6%	44 -9%
Load Maximum *	47.5	108 -127%	44 7%	67 -41%	38 20%	65.3 -37%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Depending on region and SKU, configurations may come with either a 36 Wh or 52.5 Wh internal battery. Our specific unit has the smaller 36 Wh version. In comparison, the IdeaPad S540-15 comes with a much larger 70 Wh battery. Runtimes are short on our IdeaPad S340-15 at just over 4 hours of real-world WLAN use.

Recharging the system from empty to full capacity is slow. The process takes about 2.5 to 3 hours compared to just 1.5 to 2 hours of most other Ultrabooks. When considering the already small battery capacity of the IdeaPad S340-15, this is a bit disappointing. Recharging via USB Type-C will not work, either.

Batarya ömrü

Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)		9h 59min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 18min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)		1h 06min

	Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 36 Wh	Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, 97 Wh	Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10, 42 Wh	Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 70 Wh	HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh	Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 38 Wh
Battery Runtime		140%	43%	135%	5%	58%
Reader / Idle	599		856 43%	1810 202%	480 -20%
WiFi v1.3	258	844 227%	421 63%	724 181%	297 15%	407 58%
Load	66	100 52%	81 23%	81 23%	79 20%

Artılar

+ 2x depolama yuvası ve yükseltilebilir RAM

+ saygın yüzey sıcaklıkları

+ ince dar çerçeve tasarımı

+ yüksek kontrast oranı

+ kolay servis kolaylığı

+ web kamerası deklanşörü

Eksiler

- oyun oynarken veya aşırı yük altında tutarsız CPU performansı

- kısa pil ömrü; küçük pil kapasitesi

- USB Type-C ile şarj edilemiyor

- zayıf anahtar geribildirimi

- dar renk alanı

- süngerimsi tıklama yüzeyi

Verdict

A few weeks ago, we posted about the Lenovo IdeaPad S340-15 as being one of the cheapest laptops you can find with Intel's latest 10th gen Core i7-1065G7 CPU. This is the same processor found on much more expensive alternatives like the Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 or the Razer Blade Stealth that can easily cost two times more than our Lenovo. While this looks good for Lenovo on paper, the reality is that the IdeaPad S340-15 exhibits below-average CPU performance than the aforementioned alternatives especially when gaming or running other demanding loads. If you want the best that Ice Lake has to offer, you're going to have to look beyond the IdeaPad series.

As for the laptop itself, it's more modern and visually attractive than the competing Dell Inspiron, Asus VivoBook, or HP Pavilion series. The matte touchscreen and accessible dual storage bays are also a nice surprises as these features are uncommon on budget laptops. Otherwise, almost everything else about the system is adequate if not middling. The narrow color space, light keys, and mediocre battery life are all commonplace for its price range. We recommend opting for the less expensive Core i5 or Core i7 Whiskey Lake-U SKUs as Ice Lake brings very little extra to the table for the IdeaPad S340.

The Lenovo IdeaPad S340-15 is at its best for home multimedia use and the occasional travel because of its light weight. Don't expect good Core i7 Ice Lake performance when running higher loads like gaming.

Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL - 03/14/2020 v7 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

İşcilik

78 / 98 → 79%

Klavye

85%

Mouse

86%

Bağlanılabilirlik

45 / 80 → 56%

Ağırlık

66 / 20-72 → 88%

Batarya

59 / 95 → 63%

Görüntü

80%

Oyun performansı

55 / 90 → 62%

Uygulama performansı

88 / 90 → 98%

Isınma

93%

Ses

97 / 95 → 100%

Audio

79%

Camera

44 / 85 → 51%

Ortalama

74%

79%

Multimedia - Ortalama Ağırlık

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5250 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Lenovo IdeaPad S340-15 Laptop incelemesi: Ucuz Core i7 Ice Lake ve performans maliyeti

Allen Ngo, 2020-03-28 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Durum

Bağlantı

SD Kart Okuyucu

İletişim

Web kamerası

Bakım

Aksesuarlar ve Garanti

Giriş cihazları

Görüntüle

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Verim

İşlemci

Sistem performansı

Depolama aygıtları

GPU Performance

Emissions

System Noise

Temperature

Stress Test

Speakers

Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Battery Life

Artılar

Eksiler

Verdict

More articles related to this device

Price comparison