Microsoft Surface Pro IPS Copilot+ incelemesi - Temel model bir IPS ekran ve Snapdragon X Plus ile birlikte geliyor

Name: Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+
Brand: Microsoft

Çok daha iyi bir fiyat/performans oranı. Yeni Surface Pro 11'in temel varyantı bir IPS ekran ve sözde daha yavaş Snapdragon X Plus işlemci ile gitti. Pratikte, daha düşük performansı fark etmiyorsunuz, ancak Windows'un ARM sürümü nedeniyle bazı kısıtlamalar devam ediyor.
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (Çeviren DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 08/14/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AI Convertible / 2-in-1 MS Surface Snapdragon X Series Wi-Fi 7 Touchscreen

OLED panelli yeni Surface Pro 11'i zaten kapsamlı bir şekilde inceledik ve şimdi daha yavaş Qualcomm ile temel varyanta bir göz atıyoruz Snapdragon X Plus işlemci ve bir IPS dokunmatik ekran. Microsoft, temel model için yaklaşık 1.000 dolar talep ediyor ve 16 GB RAM ile birlikte gelmesine rağmen, yalnızca küçük bir 256 GB SSD'ye sahip. SSD'yi 512 GB'a yükseltmek için Microsoft'a 250$ daha ödemek gerekiyor ancak alternatif olarak SSD'yi kendiniz de yükseltebilirsiniz.

Kasa, bağlantı noktaları, Wi-Fi performansı, web kamerası veya hoparlörler söz konusu olduğunda, daha önce incelenmiş olanlara kıyasla hiçbir fark yoktur üst düzey model snapdragon X Elite ve OLED panel ile, bu nedenle sizi şu adrese yönlendirmek istiyoruz bizim incelememiz bu konular hakkında kapsamlı bilgi için. Bu makalede, IPS ekranın yanı sıra daha zayıf olan Snapdragon X Plus ve emisyonları nasıl etkilediğine odaklanacağız.

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Surface Pro Copilot+ Best Performance (Surface Pro Seri)

İşlemci

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 10 x - 3.4 GHz, Oryon

Grafik kartı

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Bellek

16 GB

, LPDDR5x-8448, Dual-Channel, onboard

Görüntü

13.00 inç 3:2, 2880 x 1920 pixel 266 PPI, capacitive, LP129WT342166, IPS, parlak: evet, HDR, 120 Hz

Harddisk

Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ, 256 GB

, 185 GB Boş

Bağlantılar

4 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Portu, Brightness Sensor

Network

Qualcomm FastConnect 7800 (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 9.3 x 287 x 209

Batarya

47 Wh Lithium-Polymer

İşletim sistemi

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: Quad-HD+ 10M Wide Angle + IR
Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix
Secondary Camera: 9 MPix

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: Stereo, 12 Ay Garanti

Ağırlık

872 g, Güç kaynağı: 213 g

Fiyat

1199 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Karşılaştırmalı olarak olası rakipler

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
80.7 %	v8	08/2024	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	872 g	9.3 mm	13.00"	2880x1920
82.5 %	v8	07/2024	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	870 g	9.3 mm	13.00"	2880x1920
85.7 %	v7 ^(old)	04/2024	Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M	928 g	9.8 mm	14.00"	2560x1600
80.1 %	v8	06/2024	Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	1.7 kg	18.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1200
87 %	v7 ^(old)	04/2024	Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	1.4 kg	15.95 mm	13.30"	2880x1800
87.4 %	v7 ^(old)	05/2024	Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	1.6 kg	18.5 mm	14.00"	1920x1200

Not: Derecelendirme sistemimizi yakın zamanda güncelledik ve 8. sürümün sonuçları 7. sürümün sonuçları ile karşılaştırılamaz. Daha fazla bilgi için burada.

Kılıf ve özellikler

Daha önce de belirttiğimiz gibi, giriş seviyesi model ile yeni model arasında kasa veya özellik seti açısından temelde hiçbir fark yoktur OLED varyantı. Bununla birlikte, 47 Wh ile IPS modeli biraz daha küçük bir bataryaya sahiptir (OLED modelindeki 53 Wh ile karşılaştırıldığında). Sadece 2 gramlık bir ağırlık farkı ile bu, IPS panelin biraz daha ağır olması gerektiği anlamına geliyor.

Boyut ve ağırlık karşılaştırması

Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Minisforum V3 Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ DIN A4 ❌

Ekran - 600 cd/m² IPS dokunmatik ekran

Surface Pro modelleri arasındaki en büyük fark aslında ekran. Temel model OLED panel yerine IPS dokunmatik ekranla donatılmıştır. Çözünürlük (2.880 x 1.920 piksel), SDR parlaklık (600 nit) ve ayrıca yenileme hızı (120 Hz) aynıdır. Tabii ki, öznel görüntü kalitesi söz konusu olduğunda iki panel arasında farklılıklar var. Kuşkusuz OLED modeli daha canlı renklere ve derin siyahlara (ve sonuç olarak daha yüksek kontrast oranına) sahip ve ayrıca HDR içerik için daha büyük rezervlere sahip. Bununla birlikte, IPS panel kötü bir seçim değil ve öznel bir bakış açısıyla, iyi bir görüntü kalitesi de sunuyor ve sadece siyah seviyeleri biraz fazla yüksek. Ancak en büyük avantajı PWM titremesinin olmaması. Hem parlaklık hem de renk sıcaklığı Sensör aracılığıyla otomatik olarak ayarlanabiliyor.

Belirtilen 600 cd/m² parlaklığı doğrulayabiliriz, ancak bu sadece bir alanda. Ortalama 575 cd/m²'dir ve bunu 0,56 cd/m²'lik yüksek siyah seviyesi ile birleştirdiğinizde, bu sadece 1.000:1'in biraz üzerinde bir kontrast oranına yol açar. Bu günlük kullanım için hala yeterince iyi ancak kontrastın mükemmel olduğunu söylemek zor. Tam parlaklıkta hafif bir ışık sızması var ve tepki süreleri özellikle hızlı olmasa da, yüksek yenileme hızı hareketin çok akıcı olduğu anlamına geliyor, ayrıca zaten oyun oynamak için tasarlanmamış bir makineyle karşı karşıyayız.


615 cd/m²	555 cd/m²	550 cd/m²
595 cd/m²	585 cd/m²	551 cd/m²
580 cd/m²	585 cd/m²	553 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

LP129WT342166 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 615 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 574.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 89 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 585 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1045:1 (Siyah: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
79.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18

	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ LP129WT342166, IPS, 2880x1920, 13"	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ ATNA30DW01-1, OLED, 2880x1920, 13"	Minisforum V3 BOE, NE140QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14"	Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AU Optronics B14UAT, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"	Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 SDC ATNA33AA02-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3"	Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"
Display		11%	8%	-52%	14%	-7%
Display P3 Coverage	83.4	98.9 19%	97.7 17%	35.7 -57%	99.7 20%	71.6 -14%
sRGB Coverage	99.7	99.4 0%	99.8 0%	53.6 -46%	100 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	79.4	89.5 13%	85.4 8%	36.9 -54%	97 22%	73.4 -8%
Response Times		98%	66%	27%	92%	14%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	39.6 ?(18.1, 21.5)	0.32 ?(0.17, 0.15) 99%	10 ?(3, 7) 75%	23 ?(10.7, 12.3) 42%	1.88 ?(1, 0.88) 95%	28.8 ?(13.9, 14.9) 27%
Response Time Black / White *	18 ?(7, 11)	0.58 ?(0.29, 0.29) 97%	8 ?(3, 5) 56%	15.8 ?(9.1, 6.7) 12%	2.1 ?(0.9, 1.2) 88%	18 ?(8.9, 9.1) -0%
PWM Frequency		480 ?(69)			60 ?(100)
Screen		192%	-61%	-104%	-83%	-60%
Brightness middle	585	580 -1%	512 -12%	267.6 -54%	362.6 -38%	302.7 -48%
Brightness	574	581 1%	495 -14%	240 -58%	368 -36%	293 -49%
Brightness Distribution	89	99 11%	91 2%	84 -6%	97 9%	88 -1%
Black Level *	0.56	0.04 93%	0.48 14%	0.31 45%		0.35 37%
Contrast	1045	14500 1288%	1067 2%	863 -17%		865 -17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.3	0.7 46%	4.32 -232%	4.67 -259%	4.66 -258%	3.45 -165%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3	2.1 30%	7.04 -135%	17.52 -484%	7.25 -142%	6.04 -101%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	0.6 70%	4.22 -111%	2 -0%	2.6 -30%	4.7 -135%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.16 ^102%	2.31 ^95%	2.15 ^102%	2.2 ^100%	2.1 ^105%
CCT	6914 ^94%	6484 ^100%	6770 ^96%	6585 ^99%	6055 ^107%	5804 ^112%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *			4.17	2.49	0.56	0.47
Total Average (Program / Settings)		100% / 136%	4% / -25%	-43% / -72%	8% / -25%	-18% / -36%

* ... smaller is better

Ek bir fark da renk alanı kapsamıdır. Microsoft herhangi bir ayrıntı vermedi ve her iki ekran türü de aynı sRGB ve Vivid renk profillerine sahip olmasına rağmen, IPS paneli sRGB renk alanını yalnızca %83 oranında P3 ile tamamen kapsıyor. Buna göre, sRGB referansına kıyasla çok büyük renk sapmaları olduğu için Vivid profili ile fazla bir şey yapamazsınız. Ancak, profesyonel CalMAN yazılımı ile yaptığımız analizde, sRGB profili düşük renk sapmaları ile iyi bir izlenim bıraktı. Buna rağmen, renk sıcaklığı biraz soğuk tarafta. Yazılımımız (i1 Profiler) şu anda Windows'un ARM sürümünde çalışmadığı için paneli düzgün bir şekilde kalibre edemedik.

CalMAN gri ölçekleri (profil: sRGB, hedef renk uzayı: sRGB)

CalMAN doygunluğu (profil: sRGB, hedef renk uzayı: sRGB)

CalMAN ColorChecker (profil: sRGB, hedef renk uzayı: sRGB)

CalMAN gri ölçekleri (profil: Vivid, hedef renk uzayı: sRGB)

CalMAN doygunluğu (profil: Vivid, hedef renk uzayı: sRGB)

CalMAN ColorChecker (profil: Vivid, hedef renk uzayı: sRGB)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.1 ms rise
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17271 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Surface Pro'nun ekranı çok parlaktır ve iç mekanlarda bile hızlı bir şekilde rahatsız edici yansımalara eğilimli hale gelebilir. Yüksek parlaklık biraz yardımcı olur, ancak güneşli veya çok parlak günlerde dışarıda rahatça çalışmak hala zordur. IPS panel mükemmel görüş açısı stabilitesine sahiptir.

Performans - Snapdragon X Plus ve hızlı RAM

Surface Pro Copilot+'ın temel modeli, 16 GB RAM (LPDDR5x 8448) ile birleştirilmiş Snapdragon X Plus işlemci ile birlikte gelir, ancak RAM yükseltilemez.

Test koşulları

Microsoft herhangi bir ek enerji profili sunmuyor, bunun yerine yalnızca ayarlardan enerji durumunu değiştirebilirsiniz. Normalde Surface cihazlarında olduğu gibi, isimlendirme konusunda (diğer Windows dizüstü bilgisayarlara kıyasla) küçük sapmalar var, ancak bunlar aşağı yukarı aynı. Aşağıdaki kıyaslamaları ve ölçümleri En İyi Performans modunu kullanarak gerçekleştirdik, ancak Daha İyi Performans ve Önerilen modları da mevcut (bunlar diğer Windows dizüstü bilgisayarlardaki Dengeli ve En İyi Enerji Verimliliğine karşılık geliyor). Resmi TDP rakamları yok ancak tüketim değerleri 23-30 watt olduğunu varsaydığımız Snapdragon X Elite'li OLED modeline karşılık geliyor.

İşlemci - Snaprdragon X1P-64-100

Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 şu anda Qualcomm'un en yavaş Snapdragon X işlemcisidir. Elite çiplerin aksine, 3,4 GHz saat hızına ulaşan 12 CPU çekirdeği yerine yalnızca 10 çekirdek sunuyor. Aynı şekilde Snapdragon X Plus da çift çekirdekli turbo olmadan idare etmek zorunda. Bu da çipin özellikle tek çekirdekli testlerde X1E-80-100 ile OLED modelinin gerisinde kaldığı anlamına geliyor. Bununla birlikte, genel olarak performans çok iyi ve günlük durumlarda modeller arasında herhangi bir fark görmeyeceksiniz. Aşağıdaki tabloda, Surface Pro'da yalnızca ilk iki kıyaslama (CB 2024 ve Geekbench 6) yerel olarak çalıştırılmıştır. Diğer tüm kıyaslamalar emülasyon yoluyla çalıştırıldı ve bu da performansa zarar verdi.

Ancak, çok çekirdekli performans uzun süre korunamıyor. Cinebench R15 döngüsünde sonuçlar hızla düştü ve CB24 Multi çalıştırması sırasında CPU hızına baktığımızda, çipin maksimum 3,4 GHz'e yalnızca yaklaşık 20 saniye ulaştığını ve ardından 2,5-2,6 GHz'e yerleştiğini görebilirsiniz. Tam çok çekirdekli performans elde etmek için Snapdragon X Plus bile çok daha güçlü bir soğutma sistemi gerektirecektir. Pil modunda performans aynı kalmıştır. Ek CPU kıyaslamaları bulunabilir burada.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100: Ø1433 (1369.72-1988.86)

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100: Ø1696 (1626.02-2248.71)

Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U: Ø2038 (2014.3-2051.07)

Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø1718 (1669.1-1933.67)

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U: Ø1322 (1278.32-1504.72)

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U: Ø1366 (1325.21-1680.04)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 ^-2! AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	83.9 pt
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	82.5 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	73 pt
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 ^-2! Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	67.8 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML ^-2! Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	66.1 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	62.8 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	62.8 pt
Average of class Tablet	47.5 pt

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	893 Points +12%
Average of class Tablet (795 - 893, n=2, last 2 years)	844 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	795 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	795 Points 0%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	748 Points -6%

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	123 Points +13%
Average of class Tablet (109 - 123, n=2, last 2 years)	116 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	109 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	109 Points 0%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	98 Points -10%

Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	14458 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	13278 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	13278 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	11327 Points -15%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	11144 Points -16%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	9448 Points -29%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	8487 Points -36%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=62, last 2 years)	3334 Points -75%

Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	2845 Points +16%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2592 Points +6%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2537 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	2445 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	2445 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	2324 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	2163 Points -12%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=62, last 2 years)	1040 Points -57%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	12972 Points +50%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	12720 (10900.4^min - 12720.4^max) Points +47%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	9927 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	9574 (8804.18^min - 9574.36^max) Points +11%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	9385 (8670.97^min - 9384.63^max) Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	8644 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	8644 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (3066 - 9927, n=5, last 2 years)	6650 Points -23%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1737 Points +54%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1701 Points +51%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	1675 Points +48%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	1573 Points +39%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1321 Points +17%
Average of class Tablet (559 - 1559, n=5, last 2 years)	1141 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	1129 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	1129 Points 0%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	5067 Points +56%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	4854 Points +49%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	3760 Points +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	3640 Points +12%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	3613 Points +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	3252 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	3252 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (1175 - 3640, n=5, last 2 years)	2463 Points -24%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	681 Points +62%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	665 Points +58%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	646 Points +54%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	592 Points +41%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	490 Points +17%
Average of class Tablet (205 - 596, n=5, last 2 years)	430 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	420 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	420 Points 0%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	2249 (1626.02^min - 2248.71^max) Points +13%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2024 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	1989 (1369.72^min - 1988.86^max) Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	1989 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1934 (1669.1^min - 1933.67^max) Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	1680 (1325.21^min - 1680.04^max) Points -16%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	1505 (1278.32^min - 1504.72^max) Points -24%
Average of class Tablet (433 - 2249, n=5, last 2 years)	1327 Points -33%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	270 Points +29%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	263 Points +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	248 Points +19%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	230 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	228 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	209 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	209 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (119 - 248, n=5, last 2 years)	184.4 Points -12%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Tablet (351 - 1080, n=5, last 2 years)	649 Seconds * -61%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	402 Seconds *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	402 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	353 Seconds * +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	351 Seconds * +13%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	349 Seconds * +13%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	239 Seconds * +41%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	232 Seconds * +42%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	60670 MIPS +63%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	57795 MIPS +55%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	44404 MIPS +19%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	39025 MIPS +5%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	38645 MIPS +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	37289 MIPS
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	37289 MIPS 0%
Average of class Tablet (12470 - 44404, n=5, last 2 years)	29850 MIPS -20%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	6493 MIPS +40%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	5921 MIPS +27%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	5359 MIPS +15%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	4855 MIPS +4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	4659 MIPS 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	4652 MIPS
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	4652 MIPS 0%
Average of class Tablet (3915 - 5359, n=5, last 2 years)	4468 MIPS -4%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	16.5 fps +152%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	14.6 fps +123%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	10.7 fps +64%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	10.6 fps +62%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6.84 fps +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	6.54 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	6.54 fps 0%
Average of class Tablet (2.68 - 9.13, n=5, last 2 years)	5.76 fps -12%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Tablet (51.9 - 117.6, n=5, last 2 years)	68.5 s * -17%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	58.3 s *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	58.3 s * -0%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	52.5 s * +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	51.9 s * +11%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	47.1 s * +19%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	46.7 s * +20%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	44.3 s * +24%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	0.738 sec *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	0.738 sec * -0%
Average of class Tablet (0.532 - 1.012, n=5, last 2 years)	0.72 sec * +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	0.642 sec * +13%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	0.526 sec * +29%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	0.508 sec * +31%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	0.479 sec * +35%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	0.439 sec * +41%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

2661

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

17854

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

8454

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

21.25 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.18 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1989 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

24.8 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

209 Points

Yardım

... kıyaslama

Performance Rating
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	95.9 pt
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	95.2 pt
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	54.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	50.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	50.6 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	45.2 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	45.2 pt
Average of class Tablet	36.6 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	21489 KRay/s +181%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	20723 KRay/s +171%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	8380 KRay/s +10%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	8239 KRay/s +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	7637 KRay/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	7637 KRay/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (2184 - 7637, n=5, last 2 years)	4306 KRay/s -44%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2184 KRay/s -71%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	90007 Points +1593%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	87120 Points +1539%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	41991 Points +690%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	41650 Points +684%
Average of class Tablet (5315 - 35296, n=5, last 2 years)	14851 Points +179%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	5687 Points +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	5315 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	5315 Points 0%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	3999 MB/s +140%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	3896 MB/s +134%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2607 MB/s +56%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	2252 MB/s +35%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	2219 MB/s +33%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	1668 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	1668 MB/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (785 - 2607, n=5, last 2 years)	1593 MB/s -4%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	103719 Points +63%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	95165 Points +50%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	69762 Points +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	63513 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	63513 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (27210 - 69762, n=5, last 2 years)	48076 Points -24%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	47142 Points -26%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	44936 Points -29%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	13441 Points +583%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	13143 Points +567%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	5540 Points +181%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	5481 Points +178%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2357 Points +20%
Average of class Tablet (1161 - 3974, n=5, last 2 years)	2346 Points +19%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	1969 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	1969 Points 0%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	48197 Points +269%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	45793 Points +251%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	21082 Points +62%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	20640 Points +58%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15669 Points +20%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	13050 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	13050 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (6842 - 16614, n=5, last 2 years)	11852 Points -9%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	71089 MB/s +21%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	70017 MB/s +19%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	60328 MB/s +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	58675 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	58675 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	45243 MB/s -23%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	44193 MB/s -25%
Average of class Tablet (1275 - 71089, n=5, last 2 years)	39096 MB/s -33%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	892 MB/s +32%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	869 MB/s +28%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	802 MB/s +18%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	776 MB/s +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	678 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	678 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	657 MB/s -3%
Average of class Tablet (229 - 802, n=5, last 2 years)	531 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	11203 KRay/s +296%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	10812 KRay/s +283%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	4305 KRay/s +52%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	4195 KRay/s +48%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	3392 KRay/s +20%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2826 KRay/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	2826 KRay/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (1127 - 3718, n=5, last 2 years)	2498 KRay/s -12%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	44831 MPixel/s +22%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	38707 MPixel/s +6%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	37635 MPixel/s +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	36689 MPixel/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	36689 MPixel/s 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	33411 MPixel/s -9%
Average of class Tablet (14660 - 38707, n=5, last 2 years)	28957 MPixel/s -21%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	24082 MPixel/s -34%

Sistem performansı

Surface Pro'nun daha pahalı OLED modeli gibi, temel varyant da günlük görevleri yerine getirirken çok duyarlı bir arkadaştır. Sonuç olarak, sistem kararlılığıyla ilgili herhangi bir sorun yaşamadık ancak her uygulama çalışmıyor. Yalnızca günlük uygulamaları (ofis, tarayıcı, video akışı vb.) kullanmayı planlamıyorsanız, kötü sürprizlerden kaçınmak için önceden biraz araştırma yapmalısınız. Buna ek olarak, kendi sürücülerini gerektiren çevresel aygıtlar uyumluluk sorunları yaşayabilir.

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total

CrossMark / Overall
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1681 Points +38%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1566 Points +29%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	1467 Points +21%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1443 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1363 Points +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1216 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ()	1216 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=65, last 2 years)	757 Points -38%

CrossMark / Productivity
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1638 Points +46%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1520 Points +35%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	1443 Points +28%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1375 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1354 Points +20%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1124 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ()	1124 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 1797, n=65, last 2 years)	778 Points -31%

CrossMark / Creativity
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1863 Points +35%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1726 Points +25%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	1566 Points +13%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1529 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1433 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1381 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ()	1381 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (151 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years)	750 Points -46%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1401 Points +33%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1334 Points +27%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1280 Points +22%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	1266 Points +20%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1199 Points +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1052 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ()	1052 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (205 - 1401, n=65, last 2 years)	760 Points -28%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	435 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	399 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ()	399 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	308 Points -23%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	302 Points -24%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	272 Points -32%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	251 Points -37%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=51, last 2 years)	151 Points -62%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	295 Points +15%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	257 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	256 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ()	256 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	250 Points -2%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	248 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	231 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=71, last 2 years)	101.1 Points -61%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=77, last 2 years)	3599 ms * -681%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	581 ms * -26%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	548 ms * -19%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	528 ms * -15%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	515 ms * -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ()	461 ms * -0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	460.8 ms *
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	400.3 ms * +13%

* ... smaller is better

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	77717 MB/s +22%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	65911 MB/s +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	63769 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	63769 MB/s 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	63403 MB/s -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	63007 MB/s -1%
Average of class Tablet (32539 - 68769, n=5, last 2 years)	54159 MB/s -15%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	36019 MB/s -44%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	124555 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	124555 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	119818 MB/s -4%
Average of class Tablet (31342 - 124555, n=5, last 2 years)	73622 MB/s -41%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	62523 MB/s -50%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	61739 MB/s -50%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	49784 MB/s -60%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	38849 MB/s -69%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	91878 MB/s +104%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	78347 MB/s +74%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	60520 MB/s +34%
Average of class Tablet (33224 - 62397, n=5, last 2 years)	47049 MB/s +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	45097 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	45097 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	44742 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	37153 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	143.3 ns * -1811%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	125.5 ns * -1573%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	121.4 ns * -1519%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	92.2 ns * -1129%
Average of class Tablet (7.4 - 110, n=5, last 2 years)	48.1 ns * -541%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	7.5 ns *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	7.5 ns * -0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	7.4 ns * +1%

* ... smaller is better

DPC gecikme süreleri

LatencyMon uygulaması ARM sistemlerde önyükleme yapmadığı için standart gecikme testimizi gerçekleştiremedik. En azından 4K YouTube videosunun oynatılması sırasında atlanan karelerle ilgili herhangi bir sorun yaşanmadı.

Yığın depolama

Temel varyant inceleme cihazımız yalnızca Samsung'un 256 GB SSD'si (PM981) ile birlikte gelmektedir. Bu kompakt M.2 2230 SSD'ye cihazın arkasındaki manyetik kapak aracılığıyla kolayca erişilebilmektedir. Bu da SSD'yi daha büyük kapasiteli bir depolama sürücüsüyle değiştirmenin ve böylece Microsoft'un yüksek ek ücretini (256'dan 512 GB'a yükseltme için 250 dolar) ödemek zorunda kalmamanın zahmetsizce kolay olduğu anlamına geliyor. Çeşitli çevrimiçi mağazalarda, 1 TB-SSD size yaklaşık 80-100 $'a mal olacaktır.

Samsung SSD, PCIe 4.0 üzerinden bağlanır ve performansı oldukça iyidir, sürekli yük altında sabit kalır. İlk kurulumdan sonra kullanıcının kullanımına 185 GB sunulmaktadır. Diğer SSD kıyaslamalarını aşağıda bulabilirsiniz burada.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3659 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2509 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 315 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 426 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 64 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 116.3 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 613 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1078 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	90 pt
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	80.5 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	72.7 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	72.1 pt
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	72.1 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	69.6 pt
Average of class Tablet	57.4 pt
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	54.7 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	3321 (3281.98^min - 3320.91^max) MB/s +35%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	2961 (2945.85^min - 2960.71^max) MB/s +21%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2592 (2555.51^min - 2591.66^max) MB/s +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2526 (2409.21^min - 2526.44^max) MB/s +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	2451 (2391.59^min - 2451.07^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	2451 MB/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (1127 - 2629, n=5, last 2 years)	2070 MB/s -16%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	2044 (2024.17^min - 2044.09^max) MB/s -17%
seq write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3439 (3052.4^min - 3438.7^max) MB/s +79%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	2964 (2739.3^min - 2964.06^max) MB/s +54%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	2631 (2464.99^min - 2630.67^max) MB/s +37%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	2610 (2491.47^min - 2609.51^max) MB/s +36%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2249 (2116.03^min - 2249.31^max) MB/s +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1920 (1853.32^min - 1920.15^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	1920 MB/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (238 - 2725, n=5, last 2 years)	1699 MB/s -12%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	5234 (4365.43^min - 5234.3^max) MB/s +44%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	4977 (4200.4^min - 4976.86^max) MB/s +37%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	4852 (4230.58^min - 4852.03^max) MB/s +34%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4789 (4345.83^min - 4788.71^max) MB/s +32%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	3660 (3274.24^min - 3659.74^max) MB/s +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	3634 (3212.91^min - 3633.94^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	3634 MB/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (1075 - 4955, n=5, last 2 years)	3108 MB/s -14%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	4403 (4331.88^min - 4402.97^max) MB/s +81%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	4309 (2943.13^min - 4308.56^max) MB/s +77%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3678 (3661^min - 3677.55^max) MB/s +51%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	3439 (2844.97^min - 3438.66^max) MB/s +41%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2986 (2958.24^min - 2986.34^max) MB/s +23%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	2435 (2059.61^min - 2434.58^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	2435 MB/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (238 - 3623, n=5, last 2 years)	2389 MB/s -2%
4k q1 t1 read
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	65.4 (64.45^min - 65.38^max) MB/s +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	63.3 (61.13^min - 63.27^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	63.3 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	60.4 (57.59^min - 60.39^max) MB/s -5%
Average of class Tablet (40.3 - 65.4, n=5, last 2 years)	55.7 MB/s -12%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	54.6 (52.91^min - 54.56^max) MB/s -14%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	49.9 (49.37^min - 49.91^max) MB/s -21%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	31.1 (30.82^min - 31.09^max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	161.1 (150.7^min - 161.06^max) MB/s +41%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	127.7 (123.8^min - 127.74^max) MB/s +11%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	123.9 (113.54^min - 123.93^max) MB/s +8%
Average of class Tablet (49.4 - 187.5, n=5, last 2 years)	122.3 MB/s +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	122 (120.81^min - 121.95^max) MB/s +6%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	120.5 (119.19^min - 120.53^max) MB/s +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	114.6 (108.47^min - 114.63^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	114.6 MB/s 0%
4k q32 t16 read
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1069 (1020.98^min - 1069.39^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	1069 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1003 (972.92^min - 1003.23^max) MB/s -6%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	978 (957.59^min - 977.78^max) MB/s -9%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	781 (742.63^min - 781.21^max) MB/s -27%
Average of class Tablet (174 - 1069, n=5, last 2 years)	726 MB/s -32%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	705 (687.5^min - 705.08^max) MB/s -34%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	632 (620.15^min - 631.53^max) MB/s -41%
4k q32 t16 write
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	642 (635.59^min - 642.04^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	642 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	631 (619.64^min - 630.94^max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Tablet (212 - 642, n=5, last 2 years)	439 MB/s -32%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	413 (402.24^min - 412.89^max) MB/s -36%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	358 (344.36^min - 358.28^max) MB/s -44%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	335 (320.67^min - 334.9^max) MB/s -48%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	314 (299.4^min - 314.29^max) MB/s -51%

AS SSD
Score Total
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4762 Points +72%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	3586 Points +30%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	3370 Points +22%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	2764 Points
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	2764 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	2248 Points -19%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2242 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet (637 - 2961, n=5, last 2 years)	1997 Points -28%
Score Read
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1315 Points +72%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	1171 Points +53%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1057 Points +38%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	889 Points +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	820 Points +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	764 Points
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	764 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (288 - 1019, n=5, last 2 years)	684 Points -10%
Score Write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2829 Points +73%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	1885 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1841 Points +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1638 Points
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	1638 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1015 Points -38%
Average of class Tablet (226 - 1638, n=5, last 2 years)	999 Points -39%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	971 Points -41%
Seq Read
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	4133 MB/s +50%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3771 MB/s +36%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	3642.65 MB/s +32%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	2968.79 MB/s +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2885 MB/s +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	2763 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	2763 MB/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (1072 - 4037, n=5, last 2 years)	2605 MB/s -6%
Seq Write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2439 MB/s +36%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	2415.77 MB/s +35%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2127 MB/s +19%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1991.66 MB/s +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1791 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	1791 MB/s 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1562.89 MB/s -13%
Average of class Tablet (227 - 2127, n=5, last 2 years)	1501 MB/s -16%
4K Read
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	69.2 MB/s +21%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	58.39 MB/s +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	57.4 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	57.4 MB/s 0%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	54.3 MB/s -5%
Average of class Tablet (28.7 - 69.2, n=5, last 2 years)	52.8 MB/s -8%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	50.09 MB/s -13%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	28.07 MB/s -51%
4K Write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	201 MB/s +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	184 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	183.5 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	183.5 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	167.15 MB/s -9%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	159.18 MB/s -13%
Average of class Tablet (65.2 - 199.4, n=5, last 2 years)	157.3 MB/s -14%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	114.15 MB/s -38%
4K-64 Read
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	884 MB/s +106%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	699.78 MB/s +63%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	654.43 MB/s +52%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	643.12 MB/s +50%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	463 MB/s +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	430 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	430 MB/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (137.9 - 549, n=5, last 2 years)	371 MB/s -14%
4K-64 Write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2384 MB/s +87%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1482.86 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	1476.23 MB/s +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1275 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	1275 MB/s 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	700.07 MB/s -45%
Average of class Tablet (48.7 - 1275, n=5, last 2 years)	692 MB/s -46%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	618 MB/s -52%
Access Time Read
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	0.122 ms * -198%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	0.098 ms * -139%
Average of class Tablet (0.035 - 0.163, n=5, last 2 years)	0.0892 ms * -118%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	0.084 ms * -105%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.055 ms * -34%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	0.041 ms *
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	0.041 ms * -0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	0.035 ms * +15%
Access Time Write
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	0.333 ms * -1010%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	0.307 ms * -923%
Average of class Tablet (0.03 - 0.344, n=5, last 2 years)	0.131 ms * -337%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	0.066 ms * -120%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	0.031 ms * -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	0.03 ms *
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	0.03 ms * -0%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.022 ms * +27%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3641 (3273.65-3660.18)

Grafik kartı - Adreno X1-85

Entegre sistem söz konusu olduğunda Adreno X1-85 grafik kartı, Snapdragon X Elite ile Surface Pro ile karşılaştırıldığında hiçbir fark yoktur, çünkü her ikisi de maksimum 1,2 GHz saat hızına sahip daha zayıf 3,8 TFLOP varyantını kullanır. Günlük kullanımda Adreno GPU iyi bir performans sergiliyor ve yüksek çözünürlüklü videoları oynatırken bile sorunsuz çalışıyor. Bunun da ötesinde, sürekli yük altında ve pil modunda da grafik performansı sabit kalıyor.

OLED Surface Pro ile karşılaştırıldığında, kıyaslama sonuçları biraz daha iyi, bu da muhtemelen Qualcomm'un biz incelemecilere bir beta sürümünde dağıttığı güncellenmiş GPU sürücülerinden kaynaklanıyor. Bu, örneğin oyun uyumluluğunu geliştirdi (örneğin Far Cry 5 desteği, Cyberpunk 2077'de artık çökme yok). Qualcomm'un kendisi bu indirilebilir sürücüyü halka sunmuyor, bunun yerine normal Windows ve üretici güncellemeleri yoluyla bir noktada dağıtılacak. Ancak, bu şimdiye kadar gerçekleşmemiş bir şey.

Esasen, oyun performansı AMD ve Intel iGPU'larda bulunandan önemli ölçüde daha kötüdür ve birçok oyun da düzgün çalışmayı reddeder (örneğin Total War Pharaoh'da grafik hataları) veya hiç açılmaz(F1 23/F124). Ek GPU kıyaslamaları bulunabilir burada.

3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 6.2

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	12345 Points +92%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	11659 Points +81%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	6741 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	6429 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6311 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (4823 - 6515, n=9)	6200 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	6007 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (2912 - 6429, n=5, last 2 years)	4636 Points -28%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	7818 Points +22%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	6722 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	6410 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6294 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (5569 - 6454, n=10)	6231 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	5390 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet (1781 - 6410, n=4, last 2 years)	4489 Points -30%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	4284 Points -33%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2780 Points +62%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2252 Points +31%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	1715 Points
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	1712 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1617 - 1739, n=10)	1705 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1700 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	1668 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (561 - 1715, n=4, last 2 years)	1245 Points -27%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	6430 Points
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (6248 - 6430, n=5)	6322 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6248 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (72 - 8889, n=76, last 2 years)	1424 Points -78%
Steel Nomad Light Score
Average of class Tablet (237 - 3592, n=8, last 2 years)	2202 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	2187 Points
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (2000 - 2194, n=8)	2103 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	2012 Points -8%
Steel Nomad Score
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	524 Points
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (476 - 538, n=7)	510 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (477 - 524, n=2, last 2 years)	501 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	477 Points -9%

Geekbench 6.2
GPU OpenCL
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	27982 Points +39%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	27978 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (19879 - 20906, n=9)	20412 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	20185 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	19879 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	17437 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	15823 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (343 - 20185, n=30, last 2 years)	3684 Points -82%
GPU Vulkan 6.2
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	28404 Points +19%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	27393 Points +15%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	23831 Points
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (23174 - 24430, n=9)	23719 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	23348 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	19667 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	15598 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet (433 - 23831, n=29, last 2 years)	4202 Points -82%

3DMark 11 Performance		6886 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score		6130 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score		1894 puan
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		524 puan
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		2187 puan
Yardım

... kıyaslama

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Tablet (637 - 2098, n=5, last 2 years)	1225 Seconds * -63%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	751 Seconds *
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	649 Seconds * +14%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	638 Seconds * +15%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (545 - 751, n=8)	638 Seconds * +15%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	637 Seconds * +15%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	404 Seconds * +46%
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	383 Seconds * +49%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	100 pt
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 ^-1! AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	86.3 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	69 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ ^-1! Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	67.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	64.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	53.9 pt
Average of class Tablet	53.7 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	30.4 (15.4^min, 16.7^P0.1, 18.9^P1) fps +52%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	24.1 (21^min) fps +21%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	20 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	18.8 fps -6%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	17.9 (15^min) fps -10%
Average of class Tablet (8.5 - 20, n=4, last 2 years)	14.5 fps -27%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	11.9 (10^min) fps -40%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	26.5 (2.34^min, 18.5^P1) fps +27%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	20.8 (2.32^min, 12.3^P1) fps
Average of class Tablet (7.79 - 20.8, n=2, last 2 years)	14.3 fps -31%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 fps +73%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	23.7 fps +51%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	16.3 fps +4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	15.7 fps 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15.7 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15.4 fps -2%
Average of class Tablet (7.29 - 15.7, n=4, last 2 years)	12.5 fps -20%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	45.6 (5^min, 16.5^P1) fps +23%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	39.9 (6.9^min, 8.65^P1) fps +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	37 fps 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	37 fps
Average of class Tablet (17.9 - 37, n=3, last 2 years)	30.6 fps -17%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	30.3 (7.5^min, 11.1^P1) fps -18%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	22.9 (7.3^min, 9.15^P1) fps -38%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	73.2 (64.1^min) fps +63%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	66.7 (56.4^min) fps +48%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	54.2 (41.9^min) fps +20%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	51.6 (40.6^min) fps +15%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	50 (40.1^min) fps +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	45 (33.5^min) fps
Average of class Tablet (13.2 - 51.6, n=5, last 2 years)	39.1 fps -13%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 22 | Far Cry 5

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	38.7 (32.8^min) fps +68%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	34.3 (29^min) fps +49%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (21 - 24.6, n=10)	23.2 fps +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	23 (17.3^min) fps
Average of class Tablet (21 - 23, n=2, last 2 years)	22 fps -4%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	21.6 (16.7^min) fps -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	21 (15.9^min) fps -9%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	18.5 (6.99^min) fps -20%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Low Preset
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	31 fps +31%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	23.6 fps
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (19.4 - 25.1, n=9)	23.5 fps 0%
Average of class Tablet (23.2 - 23.6, n=2, last 2 years)	23.4 fps -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	23.2 fps -2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	17.7 fps -25%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	16.2 fps -31%

F1 22 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	74.3 (65^min, 50^P1) fps +35%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	58.4 (25^min, 37^P1) fps +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	55 (38^min, 37^P1) fps
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (49.6 - 56.6, n=8)	52.8 fps -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	49.6 (32^min, 28^P1) fps -10%
Average of class Tablet (22.5 - 55, n=3, last 2 years)	42.4 fps -23%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	40.5 (32^min, 33^P1) fps -26%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	35.9 (30^min, 30^P1) fps -35%

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	48 (43^min) fps +92%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	36 (7^min) fps +44%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (25 - 34, n=5)	29.6 fps +18%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	25 (7^min) fps 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	25 fps
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years)	25 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	20 (12^min) fps -20%

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS diagram

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS: Ø10.8 (8.97-12)

	düşük	orta	yüksek	ultra
GTA V (2015)	104.2	97.7	49.2	20.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	107	70	40	20
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	61.4	46.3	46.1	45
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	54.9	25.4	15.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	39
Far Cry 5 (2018)	32	25	23	22
Strange Brigade (2018)	140	52	43	37
F1 22 (2022)	61.7	55	37	28.1
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	23.6	19.5	16.9	16.6
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	23	18.2	16.4	14.3

Emisyonlar ve enerji

Gürültü emisyonları

Günlük kullanımda, Snapdragon X Plus'lı Surface Pro genellikle tamamen sessiz çalışır ve yüksek yük altında bile fanlar her zaman devreye girmez. Bununla birlikte, işlemci zorlandığında veya oyun oynarken, 44,7 dB(A)'ya kadar tam olarak aynı seviyeye ulaşır OLED model. İlginç bir şekilde, oyun oynarken, temel model OLED versiyonundan daha yüksekti.Daha zayıf enerji profillerinden birini kullanırsanız, maksimum ses seviyesi 40,1 dB(A)(Daha İyi Performans) ve 37,7 dB(A)(Önerilen) değerlerine düşer. İnceleme cihazı başka hiçbir elektrik sesi çıkarmadı

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta		23.8 / 23.8 / 23.8 dB
Çalışırken		23.8 / 44.7 dB

	30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A)

	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N
Noise		-8%	-17%	-8%	5%	-4%
off / environment *	23.8	23.6 1%	25.4 -7%	23.6 1%	23.3 2%	23 3%
Idle Minimum *	23.8	23.6 1%	26.7 -12%	24.3 -2%	23.3 2%	23.5 1%
Idle Average *	23.8	23.6 1%	31.6 -33%	24.3 -2%	23.3 2%	24.2 -2%
Idle Maximum *	23.8	25.2 -6%	32.5 -37%	24.8 -4%	24.6 -3%	24.2 -2%
Load Average *	23.8	39 -64%	32.7 -37%	33.5 -41%	26.2 -10%	29.6 -24%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	44.7	39 13%
Load Maximum *	44.7	44.8 -0%	34 24%	43.8 2%	27.3 39%	44.9 -0%
Witcher 3 ultra *			33.2	43.8	27.3	44.9

* ... smaller is better

Sıcaklık

Sıcaklık durumu daha pahalı olan Surface Pro OLED ile karşılaştırılabilir. Boşta kullanımda ve günlük görevleri yerine getirirken kasa hoş bir şekilde serin kalıyor, ancak yük artar artmaz metal kasa hızla ısınıyor. Metal yüzeyler nedeniyle, dizüstü bilgisayarın herhangi bir alanında 45 °C'den fazla sıcaklık kaydetmememize rağmen, cihazı kullanmak rahatsız edici. 2'si 1 arada, sıcak yüzeylerle doğrudan temas edilmemesini sağlayan destek ayağı sayesinde cihaz kullanıcının kucağına yerleştirilerek de kullanılabiliyor. Kombine CPU/GPU yükü ile yapılan stres testinde, CPU saat hızı hızla ~2,2 GHz'e ve GPU ~800 MHz'e yerleşti.

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Cyberpunk


40.2 °C	42.8 °C	43.1 °C
40.4 °C	41.5 °C	41.1 °C
43.9 °C	43.6 °C	42.1 °C

Maksimum: 43.9 °C
Ortalama: 42.1 °C


44.6 °C	44.9 °C	43.1 °C
43.5 °C	44.9 °C	43.5 °C
41.3 °C	42.3 °C	42.4 °C

Maksimum: 44.9 °C
Ortalama: 43.4 °C

Güç kaynağı 39.6 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 22.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Cyberpunk


24.9 °C	25.1 °C	25.3 °C
25.4 °C	25.4 °C	25.7 °C
26.2 °C	26.2 °C	26 °C

Maksimum: 26.2 °C
Ortalama: 25.6 °C


24.1 °C	24.6 °C	24.6 °C
24.2 °C	24.5 °C	24.5 °C
24.1 °C	24.4 °C	24.3 °C

Maksimum: 24.6 °C
Ortalama: 24.4 °C

Güç kaynağı 24.9 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Cyberpunk


39.8 °C	42.7 °C	43 °C
40.7 °C	41.5 °C	41.2 °C
43.4 °C	44 °C	42.8 °C

Maksimum: 44 °C
Ortalama: 42.1 °C


43.7 °C	44 °C	44.1 °C
41.4 °C	45.1 °C	44.4 °C
41.5 °C	42.2 °C	42.3 °C

Maksimum: 45.1 °C
Ortalama: 43.2 °C

Güç kaynağı 39 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 22.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the class Tablet.

	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Heat		-4%	-30%	-14%	-8%	-1%
Maximum Upper Side *	43.9	43.1 2%	50.5 -15%	41.2 6%	39.2 11%	37.4 15%
Maximum Bottom *	44.9	46.3 -3%	54.8 -22%	48.4 -8%	41 9%	39 13%
Idle Upper Side *	26.2	27.5 -5%	34.9 -33%	29.4 -12%	32.2 -23%	28.6 -9%
Idle Bottom *	24.6	26.8 -9%	36.3 -48%	35.2 -43%	31.6 -28%	30.6 -24%

* ... smaller is better

Konuşmacılar

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Minisforum V3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Güç tüketimi

Minimum tüketim söz konusu olduğunda, IPS modeli biraz daha ekonomiktir, ancak buna karşılık, tam parlaklıkta (maksimum 9,5 watt) IPS modelinden daha fazla güç tüketir OLED varyantı. Bununla birlikte, OLED varyantının daha açık bir duvar kağıdı kullanıldığında güç tüketimi artarken koyu renkli standart bir duvar kağıdına sahip olmaktan yararlandığını belirtmek gerekir. Yük altında, cihaz başlangıçta 39 watt'lık güç adaptörünün sınırları içinde çalışıyor ve daha sonra ~40 watt'a yerleşiyor. Bu, aşağıdaki modelle aynı seviyeyi temsil ediyor OLED model.

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.25 / 0.37 Watt
Boşta	1.9 / 9.2 / 9.5 Watt
Çalışırken	29.6 / 40.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N
Power Consumption		8%	-152%	-49%	-100%	-9%
Idle Minimum *	1.9	2.8 -47%	10.1 -432%	4.5 -137%	7.1 -274%	2.3 -21%
Idle Average *	9.2	3.9 58%	16.9 -84%	8.4 9%	9.1 1%	6.7 27%
Idle Maximum *	9.5	4.9 48%	20.6 -117%	8.9 6%	18.4 -94%	6.8 28%
Load Average *	29.6	34.3 -16%	51.7 -75%	50.7 -71%	51.3 -73%	34.1 -15%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	39.5	35.8 9%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	37.4	36 4%
Load Maximum *	40.7	41.2 -1%	61.2 -50%	62.4 -53%	65.5 -61%	67 -65%
Witcher 3 ultra *			55.4	50.8	41.5	27.4

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / stress test

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø38.5 (34.8-40.7)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.02 (3.77-4.82)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø39.5 (32.8-40.8)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø40.6 (40.5-40.7)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø14.4 (13-32.6)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø39.2 (36.6-40.8)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø18.5 (17.3-36.8)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.34 (4.97-6.54)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø37.4 (34.1-40.1)

Pil ömrü

Genel olarak, temel modelin pil ömrü biraz daha zayıftır, ancak kapasitesi yaklaşık %10 daha az olan (47'ye karşı 53 Wh) daha küçük pili de dikkate almak gerekir. Ağırlığın belirleyici faktör olup olmadığından ya da OLED modelinin daha kötü performans göstermesinin amaçlanıp amaçlanmadığından emin değiliz. Wi-fi testinde 150 cd/m²'de (inceleme cihazının maksimum SDR parlaklığının %56'sını temsil ediyor) her iki model de 11 saatin biraz altında bir çalışma süresiyle birbiriyle aynı seviyede. Wi-Fi testinde tam SDR parlaklığında, OLED modeline kıyasla yaklaşık bir saat kaybedersiniz. 120 Hz'de çalışırken, çalışma süresi 150 cd/m²'de yaklaşık 80 dakika azalıyor ve tam parlaklıkta fark sadece birkaç dakika. Video testinde 14 saat ile temel varyant da OLED modeline (neredeyse 16 saat) yenildiğini kabul etmek zorunda.

Daha küçük pil kapasitesi nedeniyle, tam şarj döngüsü 10 dakika daha az sürüyor, ancak cihaz açıkken 133 dakika hala oldukça yavaş (78 dakika sonra %80).

Batarya ömrü

WiFi Websurfing		11h 02min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		5h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 01min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)		1h 29min

	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 47 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 53 Wh	Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 50.82 Wh	Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh	Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core, 80 Wh	Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 60 Wh	Average of class Tablet
Battery Runtime		10%	-7%	35%	-8%	-28%	81%
H.264	841	953 13%					935 ?(463 - 1952, n=55, last 2 years) 11%
WiFi v1.3	662	665 0%	352 -47%	787 19%	608 -8%	651 -2%	830 ?(319 - 1764, n=82, last 2 years) 25%
Load	89	104 17%	119 34%	134 51%		42 -53%	274 ?(89 - 722, n=59, last 2 years) 208%

Artılar

+ doğru renklere sahip parlak IPS panel (sRGB)

+ premium çanta

+ iyi sistem performansı

+ çok iyi kameralar

+ iyi pil ömrü

+ USB 4 ve Wi-Fi 7

+ değiştirilebilir SSD (M.2 2230)

+ isteğe bağlı klavye kapağı ve entegre kalem

Eksiler

- yük altında/oyun oynarken yüksek kasa sıcaklıkları

- IPS panel P3 renk alanını kapsamıyor

- IPS modeli daha küçük bir bataryaya sahiptir

- 3,5 mm ses girişi yok

- sD kart okuyucu yok

Karar - Günlük kullanımda daha ucuz ama daha yavaş olmayan Surface Pro

İnceleme: Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+. İnceleme cihazı tarafından sağlanmıştır:

Başlangıç fiyatı yaklaşık 1.000 dolar olan yeni Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ temel varyantı ilginç bir cihaz. Daha yavaş olduğu varsayılan Snapdragon X Plus biraz daha az CPU performansı sunsa da, GPU performansı aynı ve performans günlük işler için kolayca yeterli. Genel olarak Windows ve özellikle de yerel uygulamalar çok iyi çalışıyor. Bununla birlikte, potansiyel müşterilerin yeni Windows sürümünün Intel veya AMD çipleriyle kullanılanlar kadar esnek olmadığının farkında olmaları gerekecek çünkü özel ARM sürümleri gerekiyor. Bu da kendi sürücüleri olan uygulamalar, oyunlar ya da çevre birimleri ile uyumluluk sorunlarına yol açabilir. İstenen uygulamaların/oyunların uyumlu olup olmadığını önceden araştırmak daha iyi olacaktır.

Daha pahalı OLED modellerinin neredeyse tamamında olduğu gibi, temel model 16 GB RAM ancak yalnızca bir adet 256 GB SSD sunuyor. Microsoft ayrıca 512 GB'a yükseltme imkanı da sunuyor, ancak bu size 250 dolar gibi yüksek bir ek maliyet getirecektir. M.2 2230 SSD'yi değiştirmek kolay olduğundan, sürücüyü kendiniz değiştirmeniz daha iyi olabilir. Bunun dışında başka bir bakım seçeneği mevcut değildir ve iç kısımlara (fan dahil) erişim de mümkün değildir. Günlük durumlarda, Surface Pro Copilot + çoğunlukla sessizdir ve yalnızca sürekli yük altındayken (örneğin, oyun oynarken) fark edilir derecede gürültülü olur. Bu gibi durumlarda, örneğin cihaz kullanıldığında alüminyum kasa rahatsız edici bir şekilde ısınır.

Yeni Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+'ın temel modeli çok daha iyi bir fiyat-performans oranı sunuyor. Günlük kullanımda Snapdragon X Plus işlemci yeterli güce sahiptir ve parlak IPS dokunmatik ekran PWM'den muzdarip olmasa da, P3 renk alanını kapsayamaması, ortaya çıkan görüntü kalitesinin OLED ekranın gerisinde kaldığı anlamına gelir. Küçük 256 GB SSD'nin değiştirilmesi kolay, ucuz ve kullanıcı tarafından yapılabilir.

En büyük fark (işlemci dışında) ekran seçimidir çünkü temel model OLED panel yerine IPS dokunmatik ekranla gelmektedir. OLED ile elde ettiğiniz öznel görüntü kalitesini (canlı renkler ve derin siyahlar) sunmayabilir, ancak 600 cd/m² parlaklık, yüksek çözünürlük ve 120 Hz yenileme hızı ile PWM ile ilgili sorunları olmayan iyi bir ekrandır. Buna rağmen Microsoft, IPS ekranın P3 renk alanını tamamen kapsamadığını belirtmeyi ihmal etmedi. Bununla birlikte, doğru bir sRGB profilinin bulunması, bunun çoğu kullanıcı için bir sorun olmayacağı anlamına gelir.

Ek bir fark da pil kapasitesidir. Temel modelin kapasitesi 47 Wh ile OLED modelden yaklaşık %10 daha az. Her iki model de neredeyse aynı ağırlıkta olduğu için Microsoft'un IPS ekranın ek ağırlığını telafi ettiğini düşünüyoruz. Bununla birlikte, sonuç bazı senaryolarda biraz daha düşük pil ömrüdür.

Windows tablet/2'si 1 arada segmenti bugünlerde üreticiler tarafından büyük ölçüde ihmal ediliyor. Her ne kadar hala birkaç iş cihazı olsa da, örneğin ThinkPad X12 veya oyun modelleri gibi Asus ROG Flow Z13surface Pro Copilot+'ın tek doğrudan rakibi olan Minisforum V3daha pahalıdır ve ayrıca daha kısa pil ömrünün yanı sıra çok daha aktif fanlarla mücadele etmek zorundadır.

Fiyat ve bulunabilirlik

IPS ekranlı Surface Pro 11 Copilot+'ın temel modeli Amazon'da yaklaşık 1.069 dolara satılıyor.

Not: Derecelendirme sistemimizi yakın zamanda güncelledik ve 8. sürümün sonuçları 7. sürümün sonuçları ile karşılaştırılamaz. Daha fazla bilgi için burada.

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ - 2024-08-10 08/10/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

İşcilik

91 / 98 → 92%

Mouse

94%

Bağlanılabilirlik

64 / 69 → 92%

Ağırlık

77 / 40-88 → 77%

Batarya

89%

Görüntü

81%

Oyun performansı

39 / 65 → 59%

Uygulama performansı

75 / 92 → 81%

Isınma

83%

Ses

84%

Audio

85 / 91 → 93%

Camera

70 / 90 → 78%

Ortalama

68%

81%

Tablet - Ortalama Ağırlık

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
89.2%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 51.9%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 104 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 433347 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Microsoft Surface Pro IPS Copilot+ incelemesi - Temel model bir IPS ekran ve Snapdragon X Plus ile birlikte geliyor

Andreas Osthoff, 2024-08-14 (Update: 2024-08-14)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit kıyaslama
Toshiba Satellite W30Dt-A-100 (min) A4-1200, Radeon HD 8180	33
...
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M	1985
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R1JH R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	1986
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M	1986
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	1989
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES R7 7840U, Radeon 780M	1994
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2000
Gigabyte G5 KF i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2001
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	15842

Microsoft Surface Pro IPS Copilot+ incelemesi - Temel model bir IPS ekran ve Snapdragon X Plus ile birlikte geliyor

Karşılaştırmalı olarak olası rakipler

Kılıf ve özellikler

Boyut ve ağırlık karşılaştırması

Ekran - 600 cd/m² IPS dokunmatik ekran

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Performans - Snapdragon X Plus ve hızlı RAM

Test koşulları

İşlemci - Snaprdragon X1P-64-100

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Sistem performansı

DPC gecikme süreleri

Yığın depolama

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Grafik kartı - Adreno X1-85

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS diagram

Emisyonlar ve enerji

Gürültü emisyonları

Sıcaklık

Konuşmacılar

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ audio analysis

Minisforum V3 audio analysis

Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 audio analysis

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 audio analysis

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML audio analysis

Güç tüketimi

Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

Pil ömrü

Artılar

Eksiler

Karar - Günlük kullanımda daha ucuz ama daha yavaş olmayan Surface Pro

Fiyat ve bulunabilirlik

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison

3DMark 11 kıyaslama
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	6870
Acer Aspire Vero AV15-53P i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6873
Dell XPS 13 9345 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	6884
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	6886
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450	6890
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6896
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9403CVA-KM0153X i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6903
...
(max) i5-14600K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	66828