Notebookcheck Logo

Tam gaz AMD: Dell G5 15 Special Edition Radeon RX 5600M Laptop incelemesi

The AMD SmartShift edge.

Buradaki en sessiz veya en iyi görünümlü oyun dizüstü bilgisayarı değil, ancak GeForce RTX 2060 seviyeli grafikler ve Core i7 benzeri performans için 860 ABD doları tartışmak zor. Tüm AMD G5 15 Special Edition'ın değeri etkileyici.
AMD Gaming Renoir Ryzen (Zen) Laptop / Notebook Zen

Dell G5 15 Special Edition herhangi bir Intel CPU ve Nvidia GPU ile birlikte gönderilseydi, büyük olasılıkla çoğu okuyucu radarını geçecekti. Bunun yerine, sistem şimdiye kadar 7 nm Ryzen 7 4800H CPU'yu bir Radeon RX 5600M GPU ile eşleştiren tek dizüstü bilgisayar olarak benzersiz bir niş yarattı. Ayrıca, 2020 yılında AMD SmartShift'i entegre eden tek dizüstü bilgisayar olması bekleniyor - bu, Sony Playstation 5'de görünecek ancak XBox Series X'de görünmeyen aynı performans arttırıcı teknoloji. Bu ilginç özellikleri makul 850 $ ile birleştirin 1200 USD fiyat noktası ve Dell'in en son uygun fiyatlı oyun dizüstü bilgisayarının performansı hakkında neden bu kadar çok abartı olduğunu görebiliyoruz. İncelediğimiz SKU, Ryzen 7 4800H CPU, 1080p144 ekran, 16 GB RAM ile donatılmış üst düzey bir yapılandırmadır. ve yaklaşık 1250 $ karşılığında 512 GB NVMe SSD. Ryzen 5 4600H, 1080p60 ekran ve RAM ve depolama alanının yarısı ile daha az SKU mevcuttur. Radeon RX 5600M tüm seçeneklerde sabittir. Doğrudan rakipler, Asus TUF A15, HP Omen 15, Lenovo Legion Y740 veya MSI Bravo 15 gibi orta sınıf 15.6 inç oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarına diğer bütçeleri içerir. m15 R2Dell XPS 15 9500Dell G5 15 5590Dell Latitude 7400Dell Inspiron 15

Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F (G5 15 SE 5505 Seri)
İşlemci
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 8 x 2.9 - 4.2 GHz, Renoir-H (Zen 2)
Grafik kartı
AMD Radeon RX 5600M - 6 GB VRAM, Çekirdek: 1750 MHz, Bellek: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 27.20.1010.1
Bellek
16 GB 
, Sk Hynix DDR4-3200, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel
Görüntü
15.60 inç 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE NV156FH, WVA, BOE084A, Dell P/N: F5T P, parlak: hayır, 144 Hz
Anakart
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Harddisk
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU, 512 GB 
Bağlantılar
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm combo, Kart okuyucular: SD reader
Network
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 21.6 x 365.5 x 254
Batarya
51 Wh Lithium-Polymer
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: Stereo, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, Radeon Software, 12 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
2.428 kg, Güç kaynağı: 918 g
Fiyat
1200 USD
Bağlantılar
Dell anasayfa
Dell notebook kısmı
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
83.7 %
v7 (old)
06/2020
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M		2.4 kg21.6 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.7 %
v7 (old)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2.2 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.6 %
v7 (old)
12/2019
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.8 kg23.7 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.8 %
v7 (old)
10/2019
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.3 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.2 %
v7 (old)
05/2020
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.3 kg27.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.5 %
v7 (old)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		2.3 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080

Durum

Stilistik olarak, şasi çoğu kullanıcıyla vurulacak veya özlenecek. Potansiyel sahipleri, bunun bir Alienware veya MSI GS65 veya Razer Blade 15 gibi 2000 dolarlık minimalist tek kişilik bir oyun dizüstü bilgisayarı olmadığını hatırlamak zorunda. Bunun yerine, burada bir Inspiron 15'in genel estetiği ile çoğunlukla plastik olan şey var. Dış kapak hafif yanardöner ince bir görsel yetenek için gökkuşağı efekti, ancak bu eski G5 15 tasarımlarında olduğu gibi daha "sıradan" bir jet siyah rengini tercih eden oyuncular için karışık bir çanta olabilir. Dell'in şu anda "Supernova Silver" dışında başka renk seçenekleri sunmaması çok kötü. Bir yapı kalitesi perspektifinden, baz, klavye merkezine baskı uygularken veya köşeleri bükerken asgari çöküntüler veya çarpılma ile sağlamdır. -to tarafı. Bir Alienware m15 R2 kadar sağlam gelmiyor, ancak en azından Asus TUF A15 ile karşılaştırılabilir. Kapak daha sert olabilir ve ekran açılırken kasa gıcırdama eğilimi gösterir. Sistemin en ucuz olduğunu ve bütçe fiyat noktasını en iyi temsil ettiği yerdir.

Yeni kasa, eski G5 15 dizüstü bilgisayarlar hakkındaki en büyük şikayetlerimizden bazılarını ele alıyor: boyut ve ağırlık. G5 15 SE, fiyat aralığındaki diğer dizüstü bilgisayarlarla daha uyumlu olması için öncüllerinden belirgin şekilde daha küçük ve daha hafiftir. Aynı fiyat aralığındaki "nihai" ince ve hafif oyun dizüstü bilgisayarı, eski Asus Zephyrus GA502 serisi olmaya devam ediyor.

Chassis is plastic from top to bottom
Chassis is plastic from top to bottom
Matte gray surfaces hide fingerprints well in contrast to the black palm rests and keys
Matte gray surfaces hide fingerprints well in contrast to the black palm rests and keys
Bar hinge is satisfactory, but it teeters and creaks slightly when adjusting angles
Bar hinge is satisfactory, but it teeters and creaks slightly when adjusting angles
Lid opened to maximum angle (~150 degrees)
Lid opened to maximum angle (~150 degrees)
Base is designed with curves and other visual touches; opposite to the usual sleek and flat look
Base is designed with curves and other visual touches; opposite to the usual sleek and flat look
It can be difficult to see depending on lighting, but the outer lid has a unique iridescent rainbow effect
It can be difficult to see depending on lighting, but the outer lid has a unique iridescent rainbow effect
❌
364 mm 273 mm 23.7 mm 2.8 kg365.5 mm 254 mm 21.6 mm 2.4 kg362 mm 265 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 27.5 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 256 mm 24.9 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Bağlantı

Bağlantı noktası seçenekleri esasen G5 15 5590 ile aynıdır, ancak iki büyük fark vardır. Birincisi, USB Type-C bağlantı noktası artık Thunderbolt 3'ü desteklemiyor ve ikincisi, daha kolay erişilebilirlik için bağlantı noktası yerleşimi artık değişti. Bu seçenek giderek yaygınlaşmayacağından Dell'in özel mini DisplayPort'u koruduğunu görmek ilginç.

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD reader, 3.5 mm combo audio, 2x USB 2.0 Type-A, Noble Lock
Right: SD reader, 3.5 mm combo audio, 2x USB 2.0 Type-A, Noble Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, Mini-DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.2 Gen. 1 Type-A, Gigabit RJ-45, USB Type-C w/ DisplayPort
Left: AC adapter, Mini-DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.2 Gen. 1 Type-A, Gigabit RJ-45, USB Type-C w/ DisplayPort

SD Kart Okuyucu

Entegre SD kart okuyucu yavaş olmaya devam ediyor. UHS-II test kartımızdan masaüstüne 1 GB boyutundaki fotoğrafların çekilmesi, XPS 15'teki 8 saniyenin altına kıyasla yaklaşık 28 saniye sürer.

Fully inserted SD card. The reader is not spring-loaded
Fully inserted SD card. The reader is not spring-loaded
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.5 MB/s +120%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.6 MB/s
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.4 MB/s -25%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23 MB/s -37%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s +130%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.9 MB/s
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
31.92 MB/s -16%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s -29%

İletişim

Killer AX1650s, Wi-Fi 6 ve Bluetooth 5.1 bağlantısı için tüm SKU'larda standart olarak gelir. Netgear RAX200 yönlendiricimize bağlandığında herhangi bir sorunla karşılaşmadık.

Removable M.2 2230 WLAN module
Removable M.2 2230 WLAN module
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1385 (1268min - 1486max) MBit/s
HP Envy x360 15-dr1679cl
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1133 (892min - 1299max) MBit/s -18%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1049 (862min - 1225max) MBit/s -24%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
662 (553min - 769max) MBit/s -52%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1470 (1297min - 1511max) MBit/s
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1446 (653min - 1555max) MBit/s -2%
HP Envy x360 15-dr1679cl
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1354 (746min - 1510max) MBit/s -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
630 (571min - 641max) MBit/s -57%
080160240320400480560640720800880960104011201200128013601440Tooltip
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1469 (1297-1511)
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1385 (1268-1486)

Web kamerası

ColorChecker
7.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
15 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F: 11.55 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 19.22 ∆E

Bakım

Philips tornavida ve arka kısım için keskin kenar ile alt panelin çıkarılması nispeten kolaydır. Dahili son nesil G5 15 5590 ile karşılaştırıldığında tamamen yeniden tasarlandı.

Aksesuarlar ve Garanti

Kutuda AC adaptörü ve normal evrak işleri dışında hiçbir ekstra yoktur. Doğrudan Dell'den satın alınırsa, standart bir yıllık sınırlı garanti birçok eklenti seçeneği için geçerlidir.

Giriş cihazları

Klavye klavye düzeni ve geri bildirimleri G5 15 5590 ile aynı kalır. Dell, Alienware Command Center Yüksek Performans modunu değiştirmek için F7 tuşuna yeni bir "G" fn kısayol tuşu ekledi. Bu mod sistemden en iyi performansı almak için gereklidir, ancak fan gürültüsü hemen maksimum seviyesine atlar. Dört bölgeli RGB arka ışığı dahildir ve tüm tuşlar ve semboller yanar. Allienware Command Center çalışıyor olmalıdır, aksi takdirde arka ışık etkinleştirilemez.

Dokunmatik

Clickpad (10,5 x 8 cm), hem yavaş hem de yüksek hızlarda imleç kontrolü için iyi çalışır ve 144 Hz ekran yenileme hızı nedeniyle de çok duyarlı hisseder. Ancak, tıklama çok sığ ve süngerimsi.

No changes to the keyboard layout aside from the new "G" fn hotkey
No changes to the keyboard layout aside from the new "G" fn hotkey
The integrated mouse keys could have been firmer and deeper
The integrated mouse keys could have been firmer and deeper
QWERTY Keys have quiet clatter with satisfactory feeedback
QWERTY Keys have quiet clatter with satisfactory feeedback
Small arrow keys and narrow NumPad keys feel cramped
Small arrow keys and narrow NumPad keys feel cramped

Görüntüle

Dell, tüm SKU'larda 60 Hz veya 144 Hz seçenekleriyle yalnızca bir 1080p WVA paneli sunar. Ne yazık ki, uyarlanabilir senkronizasyon mevcut değil. Ekran kalitesi harika ve orta sınıf bir oyun dizüstü bilgisayarını temsil ediyor. Hızlı tepki süreleri, iyi kontrast oranı ve iyi renkler, biraz daha iyi olmasalar bile, diğer ~ 1000 $ alternatiflerine göre görmeyi beklediğimiz yerdir. Örneğin, Asus TUF A15 FA506IV daha zayıf renklere ve daha yavaş tepki sürelerine sahiptir, ancak uyarlanabilir senkronizasyon uyumluluğunun ek faydası vardır. Akılda tutulması gereken bazı reklamsız dezavantajları vardır. Darbe genişliği modülasyonu, yüzde 99'a kadar tüm parlaklık seviyelerinde mevcuttur, yani ekranda titremeye duyarlı kullanıcıların Dell G5 15 SE'den kaçınmak isteyebileceği anlamına gelir. Ayrıca, ünitemiz, oyun oynarken veya siyah kenarlıklarla video oynatılırken fark edilir hale gelen alt kenar boyunca orta derecede düzensiz arka ışık kanamasından muzdariptir.

No edge-to-edge glass, touchscreen, or 4K options. Bottom and top bezels are quite thick
No edge-to-edge glass, touchscreen, or 4K options. Bottom and top bezels are quite thick
Relatively narrow side bezels
Relatively narrow side bezels
Matte overlay with only a slight hint of graininess
Matte overlay with only a slight hint of graininess
Moderate uneven backlight bleeding along the bottom edge
Moderate uneven backlight bleeding along the bottom edge
323.2
cd/m²		305.2
cd/m²		302.5
cd/m²
307.8
cd/m²		292
cd/m²		281.4
cd/m²
284.6
cd/m²		249.4
cd/m²		263.1
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
BOE NV156FH tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 323.2 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 289.9 cd/m² Minimum: 5.41 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 77 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 292 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1081:1 (Siyah: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.02
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
BOE NV156FH, WVA, 15.6", 1920x1080		Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
BOE NV156FHM-N4J, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
LGD05CE, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display
-37%
3%
5%
-38%
3%
Display P3 Coverage
63
38.92
-38%
65.7
4%
67.7
7%
38.37
-39%
66.4
5%
sRGB Coverage
90.1
58.5
-35%
91.2
1%
91.6
2%
57.6
-36%
91
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64.1
40.22
-37%
66.7
4%
67.1
5%
39.69
-38%
66.6
4%
Response Times
-95%
1%
7%
-135%
35%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
20.4 ?(10.8, 9.6)
34 ?(16, 18)
-67%
16.4 ?(8.4, 8)
20%
19 ?(9, 10)
7%
40 ?(21.2, 18.8)
-96%
7 ?(3.4, 3.6)
66%
Response Time Black / White *
10.8 ?(6.4, 4.4)
24 ?(13, 11)
-122%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-19%
10 ?(6, 4)
7%
29.6 ?(17.2, 12.4)
-174%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
4%
PWM Frequency
198.4 ?(99)
Screen
-27%
4%
28%
-34%
-5%
Brightness middle
292
280
-4%
291
0%
477
63%
251
-14%
310
6%
Brightness
290
254
-12%
295
2%
431
49%
232
-20%
310
7%
Brightness Distribution
77
88
14%
83
8%
84
9%
76
-1%
86
12%
Black Level *
0.27
0.15
44%
0.22
19%
0.175
35%
0.17
37%
0.29
-7%
Contrast
1081
1867
73%
1323
22%
2726
152%
1476
37%
1069
-1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.99
5.89
-48%
3.95
1%
4.17
-5%
6.2
-55%
4.78
-20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.11
19
-211%
7.46
-22%
6.97
-14%
18.6
-204%
8.1
-33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.02
4.79
-59%
2.05
32%
2.51
17%
4.8
-59%
2.36
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
4.08
-24%
3.82
-16%
3.49
-6%
4.2
-27%
4.78
-45%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.33 94%
2.49 88%
2.5 88%
2.32 95%
2.43 91%
CCT
7047 92%
7303 89%
7317 89%
7076 92%
7454 87%
7739 84%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58.1
37
-36%
59
2%
60
3%
36.5
-37%
59
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89.7
58
-35%
91
1%
91
1%
57.4
-36%
91
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-53% / -37%
3% / 4%
13% / 21%
-69% / -48%
11% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Renk alanı, sRGB ve AdobeRGB standartlarının sırasıyla yaklaşık yüzde 90'ı ve yüzde 58'i oranında orta sınıftan yüksek teknolojiye sahip bir oyun dizüstü bilgisayarı için tipiktir. Daha geniş bir gam talep etmek genellikle oyun oynarken tartışmasız daha önemli olan yenileme hızından veya yanıt sürelerinden ödün verilmesine neden olur.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

X-Rite kolorimetre ölçümleri kutudan çıkmış, iyi kalibre edilmiş bir ekran gösteriyor. Renk sıcaklığı biraz fazla soğuk, ancak kalibrasyonumuz bunu herhangi bir sorun olmadan giderir.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 9.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 198.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Görüş açıları aynı değilse IPS'ye benzer. Anormal derecede aşırı açılardan bakılmadığı sürece renkler ve kontrast bozulmaz. Arka ışık çoğunlukla iç mekan izleme için tasarlandığından, dış mekan görünürlüğü ortalama olarak en iyi düzeydedir. AMD Vari-Bright'ı devre dışı bırakmayı unutmayın, aksi takdirde pil gücüyle çalışırken maksimum parlaklık düşer.

Verim

Şu anda tüm SKU'lar Zen 2 hexa çekirdekli Ryzen 5 4600H veya okta çekirdekli Ryzen 7 4800H ile birlikte gelir. Her ikisi de en son 10. nesil Intel Core i7 CPU'larla doğrudan rekabet ediyor ve son nesil AMD oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarında bulunan Zen dört çekirdekli Ryzen 5 3550H veya Ryzen 7 3750H'ye göre muazzam bir gelişme. AMD SmartShift her zaman aktiftir ve değiştirilemez veya kapalı. Radeon Anti-Lag, Chill, Boost, Vari-Bright, vsync ve diğerleri de dahil olmak üzere önemli özellikler arasında geçiş yapılabileceğinden, sahiplerin yenilenen Radeon yazılımına aşina olmalarını öneririz.

İşlemci

SmartShift'in etkin olması, Dell'in aniden alabileceğiniz en hızlı Ryzen 7 4800H ile donatıldığı anlamına gelmez. Örneğin Eluktronics RP-15, azaltmayı hesapladıktan sonra aynı CPU ile yaklaşık yüzde 7 daha hızlı çalışabilir. Zaman içindeki performans, aşağıdaki CineBench R15 Multi-Thread döngü testimizde gösterildiği gibi Asus TUF A15'te gözlemlediğimizden daha istikrarlı ve daha tutarlıdır. Ryzen 5 4600H seçeneğinden yükseltme, kullanıcılara yaklaşık yüzde 36 daha hızlı çok iş parçacığı performansı sağlayacaktır. Ham işlemci performansı, çok iş parçacıklı 10'uncu çekirdek i9-10980HK'yı bile çok az iş parçacığında biraz daha geride bırakarak inanılmaz derecede hızlı olmaya devam ediyor iş parçacıklı görevler. Bu özel Intel CPU genellikle yüzlerce dolara mal olan daha pahalı dizüstü bilgisayarlarda bulunur. İlginç bir şekilde, CineBench R15 döngü testimizdeki performans, 1800 nokta aralığına gelmeden önce yaklaşık 1560 noktaya düşecektir. Başlangıçta bir fluke olduğundan şüphelendik ve bu yüzden testi sadece ikinci kez benzer bir burun bulması için yeniden düzenliyoruz. İşlemci aşırı seviyelere gerildiğinde hafif bir performans hatası olabilir. Daha fazla teknik bilgi ve karşılaştırma karşılaştırmaları için Ryzen 7 4800H'deki özel sayfamıza bakın.

CineBench R15
CineBench R15
CineBench R20
CineBench R20
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1845 (1564.03-1971.71)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1655 (1591.98-1850.91)
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1835 (1810.86-1981.87)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1610 (1581.15-1708.45)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1573 (1544.4-1818.6)
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1496 (1486.55-1622.78)
Eluktronics RP-15 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PM81000GPMQCN28BTF-E12S4 M.2 NVM SSD; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1970 (1946.66-1995.21)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1753 (1601.6-1850.14)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
4782 Points +9%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
4463 Points +2%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4396 Points
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4288 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (3692 - 4663, n=18)
4275 Points -3%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3843 Points -13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
3801 Points -14%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
3505 Points -20%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
3250 Points -26%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3224 Points -27%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
2760 Points -37%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
Intel Core i7-8750H
2142 Points -51%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1633 Points -63%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
511 Points +6%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
509 Points +6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
506 Points +5%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
495 Points +3%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
493 Points +2%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
482 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (462 - 491, n=17)
482 Points 0%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
476 Points -1%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
474 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
448 Points -7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
428 Points -11%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
Intel Core i7-8750H
409 Points -15%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
352 Points -27%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
2092 Points +6%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1972 (1142.92min - 1972max) Points
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
1962 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1863 Points -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (1652 - 1995, n=21)
1859 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
1818 (1544.4min - 1818.6max) Points -8%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1708 (1581.15min - 1708.45max) Points -13%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
1623 Points -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1398 (1313.46min - 1397.77max) Points -29%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
1391 (1148.9min - 1390.72max) Points -29%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1294 Points -34%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
Intel Core i7-8750H
1016 Points -48%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
734 Points -63%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
215 Points +14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
213 Points +13%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
206 Points +10%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
204 Points +9%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
204 Points +9%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
198 Points +5%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
193 Points +3%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
188 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (186 - 191, n=15)
188 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
187 Points -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
178 Points -5%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG
Intel Core i7-8750H
167 Points -11%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
143 Points -24%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
373.8 Seconds * -35%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
353 Seconds * -28%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
345 Seconds * -25%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
297 Seconds * -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
285 Seconds * -3%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
278 Seconds * -1%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
276 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (248 - 299, n=15)
266 Seconds * +4%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
244 Seconds * +12%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
181.4 Seconds * +34%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
5674 MIPS +22%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5463 MIPS +17%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
5457 MIPS +17%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
5335 MIPS +14%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
5333 MIPS +14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
5083 MIPS +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (4575 - 4743, n=15)
4678 MIPS 0%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4666 MIPS
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4634 MIPS -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4471 MIPS -4%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
57307 MIPS +15%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
55064 MIPS +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (44827 - 53883, n=15)
49860 MIPS 0%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
49685 MIPS
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
48577 MIPS -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
47170 MIPS -5%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
46976 MIPS -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
36693 MIPS -26%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
36383 MIPS -27%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
35067 MIPS -29%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
1372 Points +18%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1352 Points +17%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
1347 Points +16%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
1318 Points +14%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
1304 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1237 Points +7%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1218 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (1154 - 1207, n=17)
1188 Points +3%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1158 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1108 Points -4%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
874 Points -25%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
9100 Points +17%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
8960 Points +15%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8104 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
8087 Points +4%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
7799 Points 0%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7775 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (5920 - 8672, n=17)
7725 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
7675 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
6103 Points -22%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5260 Points -32%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
3537 Points -55%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
15.4 fps +22%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
15.31 fps +22%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
13 fps +3%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps +3%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.6 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (10.8 - 14.1, n=16)
12.6 fps 0%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
12.19 fps -3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
10.2 fps -19%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
10.2 fps -19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.27 fps -26%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
69.1 s *
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
64.1 s * +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (28.6 - 95.8, n=14)
63.8 s * +8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
63 s * +9%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
53.4 s * +23%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
52.6 s * +24%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
52.4 s * +24%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.626 sec * -10%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.613 sec * -8%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.584 sec * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (0.562 - 0.603, n=15)
0.579 sec * -2%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.569 sec *
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.564 sec * +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.547 sec * +4%
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
12922
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
67.9 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1972 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
120.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
188 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4396 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
482 Points
Yardım

System Performance

PCMark results are neck-to-neck with other high-performance gaming laptops powered by Intel H-series CPUs and Turing GPUs. Most notably, scores are consistently ahead of last year's MSI Alpha 15 series which ran on last generation AMD hardware. We didn't experience any hardware or software issues during our time with the unit.

PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6254 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
5938 Points 0%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
5936 Points
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
5462 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
5095 Points -14%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
4873 Points -18%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4605 Points -22%
Essentials
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
10017 Points +6%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
9461 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
9364 Points -1%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
9140 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8806 Points -7%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
8575 Points -9%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
8174 Points -14%
Productivity
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8193 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
7381 Points +1%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
7319 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
7261 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
7156 Points -2%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
7154 Points -2%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
6067 Points -17%
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
8220 Points 0%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
8197 Points
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8088 Points -1%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
6765 Points -17%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
5695 Points -31%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5344 Points -35%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5044 Points -38%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
5661 Points +16%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
4894 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
4698 Points -4%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4516 Points -8%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4121 Points -16%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
3691 Points -25%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5894 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
5870 Points +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
5773 Points +8%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
5352 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5107 Points -5%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5045 Points -6%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4894 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5352 puan
PCMark 10 Score
5936 puan
Yardım

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows DPC latency issues when opening multiple tabs on our homepage. 4K video playback on YouTube is otherwise smooth with no dropped frames.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC611 512GB
9856 μs * -345%
HP Envy x360 15-dr1679cl
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
4778 μs * -116%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
2216 μs *
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
1877 μs * +15%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1172 μs * +47%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI
1000 μs * +55%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
935 μs * +58%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
797 μs * +64%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

Up to two M.2 2280 NVMe drives are supported. Curiously, our unit comes with an uncommon M.2 2230 NVMe SSD, but the more popular 2280 form factor will work as well. Transfer rates from our miniature Samsing PM991 SSD are faster than the cheaper SK Hynix BC501 but still slower than the full-size Samsing PM981 series.

See our table of SSDs and HDDs for more benchmark comparisons.

CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
AS SSD
AS SSD
Two M.2 PCIe slots. One is able to support either 2230 or 2280 drives. Dell includes a copper heat spreader for our 2230 drive
Two M.2 PCIe slots. One is able to support either 2230 or 2280 drives. Dell includes a copper heat spreader for our 2230 drive
Empty space for a potential 2.5-inch SATA III drive. Curiously, however, there are no ports or SATA cables to support any
Empty space for a potential 2.5-inch SATA III drive. Curiously, however, there are no ports or SATA cables to support any
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU		Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG		Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB		HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G		MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
AS SSD
-10%
-3%
48%
-12%
Seq Read
1386
1221
-12%
1682
21%
2955
113%
1423
3%
Seq Write
1234
731
-41%
904
-27%
2440
98%
958
-22%
4K Read
41.32
37.93
-8%
60.2
46%
40.56
-2%
33.2
-20%
4K Write
128
88.1
-31%
164.8
29%
118.6
-7%
80.7
-37%
4K-64 Read
854
778
-9%
472.5
-45%
1283
50%
816
-4%
4K-64 Write
721
552
-23%
845
17%
1538
113%
708
-2%
Access Time Read *
0.098
0.091
7%
0.087
11%
0.084
14%
0.1
-2%
Access Time Write *
0.095
0.043
55%
0.02
79%
0.032
66%
0.047
51%
Score Read
1034
938
-9%
701
-32%
1619
57%
991
-4%
Score Write
973
713
-27%
1101
13%
1901
95%
885
-9%
Score Total
2536
2114
-17%
2143
-15%
4323
70%
2365
-7%
Copy ISO MB/s
1284
675
-47%
1418
10%
1043
-19%
Copy Program MB/s
401.9
248.4
-38%
392.5
-2%
252.7
-37%
Copy Game MB/s
1013
535
-47%
907
-10%
483.6
-52%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-32%
1%
22%
-25%
Write 4K
142.1
64.6
-55%
219.8
55%
112.1
-21%
105.4
-26%
Read 4K
46.43
35.64
-23%
50.2
8%
42.01
-10%
33.24
-28%
Write Seq
1108
748
-32%
979
-12%
1964
77%
1029
-7%
Read Seq
1622
1039
-36%
1990
23%
2065
27%
1098
-32%
Write 4K Q32T1
467
435.7
-7%
516
10%
318.2
-32%
322.1
-31%
Read 4K Q32T1
525
292.4
-44%
298.3
-43%
406.7
-23%
352
-33%
Write Seq Q32T1
1203
870
-28%
982
-18%
2534
111%
1036
-14%
Read Seq Q32T1
2288
1557
-32%
1907
-17%
3438
50%
1606
-30%
Write 4K Q8T8
981
Read 4K Q8T8
300.9
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-21% / -20%
-1% / -1%
35% / 38%
-19% / -16%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2288 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1203 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 525 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 467 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1622 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1108 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.43 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 142.1 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU Performance

3DMark scores are approximately 45 percent faster than the Radeon RX 5500M to edge out the all-popular mobile GeForce RTX 2060. It's almost on par with the much more expensive RTX 2070 Max-Q. Laptops in this price range typically come with the GTX 1660 Ti instead which will be about 10 to 20 percent slower than our Navi 10 chip. 

The main catch is that the AMD GPU offers no hardware-accelerated ray-tracing unlike on the RTX 2060. If such features are important to you, then GeForce RTX-based laptops will still offer more value.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Ice Storm Extreme
Ice Storm Extreme
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Time Spy
Time Spy
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
25497 Points +36%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
22836 Points +21%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
19338 Points +3%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
18807 Points
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
18166 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (14768 - 18358, n=43)
16301 Points -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
15967 Points -15%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
14724 Points -22%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
14718 Points -22%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 4800H
12753 Points -32%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11332 Points -40%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H
10209 Points -46%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
9854 Points +56%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
8328 Points +32%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7732 Points +22%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
6722 Points +6%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
6312 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5660 - 6910, n=41)
6206 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
6043 Points -4%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5534 Points -12%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4708 Points -25%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 4800H
4331 Points -31%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H
3773 Points -40%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3626 Points -43%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
10012 Points +51%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
8419 Points +27%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7878 Points +19%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
6610 Points
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
6527 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
6256 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5679 - 6926, n=41)
6254 Points -5%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5697 Points -14%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4856 Points -27%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 4800H
4712 Points -29%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H
4011 Points -39%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3795 Points -43%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
11017 Points +22%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 4800H
9396 Points +4%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
9034 Points
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
8975 Points -1%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
8825 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
7826 Points -13%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
6845 Points -24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (4463 - 9287, n=41)
6766 Points -25%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H
6251 Points -31%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
5909 Points -35%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
5606 Points -38%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
5159 Points -43%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
34846 Points +36%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
30309 Points +18%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
26413 Points +3%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
25706 Points
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
23326 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
21480 Points -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (19143 - 24662, n=40)
21459 Points -17%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
19670 Points -23%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
19187 Points -25%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 4800H
16937 Points -34%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H
13927 Points -46%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
12620 Points -51%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
18934 Points +44%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
16523 Points +26%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13742 Points +5%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 4800H
13223 Points +1%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
13126 Points
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
12192 Points -7%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
12069 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
11818 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (1107 - 14726, n=40)
11688 Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
10603 Points -19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H
9885 Points -25%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
6839 Points -48%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
38139 puan
3DMark Vantage P Result
18582 puan
3DMark 11 Performance
21400 puan
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
76143 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
36805 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16652 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score
6610 puan
Yardım

Gaming Performance

Of course, 3DMark never tells the whole story. Real-world performance in games is most similar to the mobile GeForce RTX 2060 if not slightly lower by a few percentage points in most games. Still, it's a noticeable improvement over last year's Radeon RX 5500M.

See our dedicated page on the Radeon RX 5600M for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3 | Borderlands 3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
108 (86min) fps +59%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
78 fps +15%
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
75 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (54 - 86, n=22)
74.6 fps +10%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
74 fps +9%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
68 fps
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
54 (43min) fps -21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
51 (39min) fps -25%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
37 fps -46%
MSI Prestige 14 A10RD
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
11 fps -84%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
85.1 (71min) fps +29%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
66.1 (62min - 70max) fps
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
62.4 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (50.6 - 74, n=40)
61.1 fps -8%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
58.4 fps -12%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
58.4 fps -12%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
45.4 (38min) fps -31%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
38.3 (29min) fps -42%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
29.8 (27min - 34max) fps -55%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
28.1 fps -57%
MSI Prestige 14 A10RD
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
14 (7min - 18max) fps -79%
Borderlands 3 - 1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
70.6 fps +48%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
52 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (47.5 - 57.3, n=7)
50.7 fps +6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
48.3 fps +1%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
47.8 fps
Eluktronics RP-15
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
47.5 fps -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)
39 fps -18%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
35.9 fps -25%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
32.3 fps -32%
Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
26.1 fps -45%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
25.1 fps -47%
MSI Prestige 14 A10RD
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
12.6 fps -74%

Idling on Witcher 3 shows steady frame rates except towards the end where frame rates jarringly jumped between ~85 FPS to ~95 FPS for seemingly no reason.

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU: Ø91.3 (80-107)
düşükortayüksekultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 266.4 103.6 66.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 124 119 106 102
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 48.2 37.6 33.7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 122 89 83 68
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 78 67 60 49
Apex Legends (2019) 143.7 137.1 110.7 104.1
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 91 77 74 67
Metro Exodus (2019) 146.4 75.5 55.2 44.9
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 215 135 113.6 77.3
The Division 2 (2019) 129 93 75 57
Anno 1800 (2019) 80.4 79.1 63.5 40
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 196.8 96.9 64.9 44.2
F1 2019 (2019) 191 140 114 106
Control (2019) 176.7 72.3 53.1
Borderlands 3 (2019) 105.2 81.7 61.2 47.8
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 96 76 68 50
GRID 2019 (2019) 186.2 134.3 116.6 88.6
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 86.9 76.6 70.1 60.1
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 76 68.4 67.1
Hunt Showdown (2020) 150.7 91.3 66.2
Doom Eternal (2020) 232.3 144.7 124 114.6
Gears Tactics (2020) 137.8 135.7 96.1 70.6

Emissions

System Noise

Fan noise is both surprisingly quiet and way too loud depending on the workload. When browsing or playing video on the Power Saver or Balanced profiles, the fans will almost always be silent. In fact, we had to run the first benchmark scene of 3DMark 06 twice just to trigger the fans up to 32 dB(A). The G5 15 SE is one of the quieter gaming laptops in this regard.

When gaming, however, "quiet" immediately goes out the window. Fan noise will jump to 39 dB(A) before eventually stabilizing at 50.6 dB(A) to be very close to what we recorded on the Dell G5 15 5590 or Asus TUF A15 FA506IV. The G5 15 SE doesn't run any quieter than many of its closest competitors when under high loads.

Cooling solution consists of three heat pipes and twin ~45 mm fans
Cooling solution consists of three heat pipes and twin ~45 mm fans
Fans are able to remain silent during low to low-medium loads
Fans are able to remain silent during low to low-medium loads
Accessible 2x SODIMM slots. We can notice only very slight electronic noise on our test unit
Accessible 2x SODIMM slots. We can notice only very slight electronic noise on our test unit
CPU and GPU temperature will be very warm when gaming
CPU and GPU temperature will be very warm when gaming
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU		Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG		Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB		HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G		MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
Noise
-20%
-10%
0%
-32%
-10%
off / environment *
28
30
-7%
30.2
-8%
28.8
-3%
29
-4%
30
-7%
Idle Minimum *
28
32
-14%
30.2
-8%
28.8
-3%
36
-29%
31.3
-12%
Idle Average *
28
33
-18%
30.2
-8%
29.5
-5%
37
-32%
31.3
-12%
Idle Maximum *
28
34
-21%
30.2
-8%
31.1
-11%
46
-64%
31.3
-12%
Load Average *
28
50
-79%
40
-43%
35.2
-26%
50
-79%
42
-50%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50.6
50
1%
49
3%
35.2
30%
51
-1%
42.1
17%
Load Maximum *
50.6
52
-3%
49
3%
41
19%
57
-13%
46.5
8%

* ... smaller is better

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
28 / 28 / 28 dB
Çalışırken
28 / 50.6 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm uzaklık)   environment noise: 28 dB(A)

Temperature

Surface temperatures are not anything to write home about. When gaming, hot spots can become as warm as 56 C to even 64 C as shown by our temperature maps below. These areas are thankfully towards the rear or keyboard center away from the palms rests and WASD keys. Even so, this is one of the warmer 15.6-inch gaming laptops we've seen. The competing Asus TUF A15, for example, runs warm as well but certainly not as hot as the Dell when under similar conditions.

Dual rear exhaust
Dual rear exhaust
AC adapter after running Witcher 3 for an hour
AC adapter after running Witcher 3 for an hour
Maksimum yük
 50.8 °C53 °C49.4 °C 
 40.6 °C51.4 °C34 °C 
 28.8 °C36.8 °C25.6 °C 
Maksimum: 53 °C
Ortalama: 41.2 °C
57.4 °C54.4 °C57.6 °C
36.6 °C48.6 °C32.4 °C
26.2 °C30 °C28.2 °C
Maksimum: 57.6 °C
Ortalama: 41.3 °C
Güç kaynağı  44 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57.6 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.3 °C / -15 F).
System idle (top)
System idle (top)
System idle (bottom)
System idle (bottom)
Witcher 3 stress (top)
Witcher 3 stress (top)
Witcher 3 stress (bottom)
Witcher 3 stress (bottom)
Prime95+FurMark stress (top)
Prime95+FurMark stress (top)
Prime95+FurMark stress (bottom)
Prime95+FurMark stress (bottom)

Stress Test

We stress the system with synthetic loads to look for any potential stability or throttling issues. When running Prime95, the CPU can be observed boosting to 4.3 GHz for the first minute or so until stabilizing at 4 GHz and at a very warm core temperature of 92 C. Though the high CPU performance sustainability is appreciated, the high core temperature will likely turn off a lot of enthusiasts.

Temperature results are unfortunately similar when gaming. Running Witcher 3, for example, causes the CPU and GPU to stabilize at 99 C and 93 C, respectively, to be much warmer than expected. These readings also explain the very warm surface temperatures we recorded above. Other 15.6-inch gaming laptops with comparable GeForce GTX 1660 Ti graphics are able to run cooler than our Dell. The Razer Blade 15 Base Model and Maingear Vector 15, for example, each hover around the low to mid 80 C range when under the same gaming loads.

Running on battery power will limit performance especially because the system will automatically switch to the integrated Radeon GPU when disconnected from AC power. A Fire Strike test on batteries returns Physics and Graphics scores of 20266 and 3613 points, respectively, compared to 22299 and 18807 points when on mains.

System idle
System idle
System idle
System idle
Witcher 3 stress
Witcher 3 stress
Witcher 3 stress
Witcher 3 stress
Prime95 stress
Prime95 stress
Prime95 stress. SmartShift shifts to the CPU
Prime95 stress. SmartShift shifts to the CPU
FurMark stress
FurMark stress
FurMark stress
FurMark stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
CPU Clock (GHz) GPU Clock (MHz) Average CPU Temperature (°C) Average GPU Temperature (°C)
System Idle -- -- 59 58
Prime95 Stress 4.0 -- 92 57
FurMark Stress -- 1107 91 91
Prime95 + FurMark Stress ~1.5 770 100 93
Witcher 3 Stress 1.4 - 3.0 1352 99 93

Speakers

Stereo speakers near front corners. Palm rest will vibrate slightly to the touch if volume is set to high
Stereo speakers near front corners. Palm rest will vibrate slightly to the touch if volume is set to high
Pink noise at maximum volume. Audio quality feels balanced if not unremarkable
Pink noise at maximum volume. Audio quality feels balanced if not unremarkable

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Nvidia laptops with the comparable GeForce RTX 2060 still have the performance-per-watt advantage. When running Witcher 3, for example, our Dell would consume an average of 153 W compared to 144 W and 134 W on the Asus TUF A15 FA506IV and Eluktronics RP-15, respectively, each with the same Ryzen 7 CPU but RTX 2060 GPU.

We're able to record a maximum demand of 180 W from the large (~20 x 10 x 2.9 cm) 240 W AC adapter. Dell could have probably went with a smaller and more portable adapter without having to compromise performance.

Low and steady consumption when running the first benchmark scene of 3DMark 06
Low and steady consumption when running the first benchmark scene of 3DMark 06
Average power consumption of 152.9 W when idling on Witcher 3
Average power consumption of 152.9 W when idling on Witcher 3
Prime95 initiatedat 10s mark. Consumption spikes to 105.6 W before falling and stabilizing at 79.3 W
Prime95 initiatedat 10s mark. Consumption spikes to 105.6 W before falling and stabilizing at 79.3 W
Prime95+FurMark initiatedat 10s mark. Consumption spikes to 180.4 W with constant fluctuations between 140 W and 180 W
Prime95+FurMark initiatedat 10s mark. Consumption spikes to 180.4 W with constant fluctuations between 140 W and 180 W
Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.05 / 0.88 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 6.5 / 10.6 / 11 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 84.1 / 180.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU, WVA, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption
-24%
-1%
22%
-57%
-16%
Idle Minimum *
6.5
5
23%
5.4
17%
4.04
38%
14
-115%
9
-38%
Idle Average *
10.6
13
-23%
10
6%
7.2
32%
18
-70%
12
-13%
Idle Maximum *
11
23
-109%
10.5
5%
11.4
-4%
32
-191%
18
-64%
Load Average *
84.1
121
-44%
135
-61%
80.8
4%
64
24%
86
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
152.9
133
13%
144
6%
93.6
39%
123
20%
126
18%
Load Maximum *
180.4
184
-2%
147
19%
144.5
20%
193
-7%
173
4%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Two battery capacities are available: 51 Wh for the lower-end SKUs and 68 Wh for the higher-end SKUs. Our test unit comes with the 51 Wh option, but both are downgrades when compared to the 90 Wh option on the last generation G5 15 5590.

Runtimes are still slightly above average for a gaming laptop at just over 6 hours of real-world WLAN use despite the reduction in battery capacity. Charging from empty to full capacity, however, is slower than expected at 2 to 2.5 hours. The system cannot be recharged via USB-C.

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
11h 11min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 12min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
1h 27min
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M, 51 Wh		Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 90 Wh		Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh		HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 52.5 Wh		MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M, 51 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh
Battery Runtime
-8%
6%
9%
-42%
-52%
Reader / Idle
671
513
-24%
587
-13%
951
42%
349
-48%
WiFi v1.3
372
344
-8%
370
-1%
385
3%
245
-34%
179
-52%
Load
87
95
9%
116
33%
71
-18%
49
-44%
Witcher 3 ultra
59

Artılar

+ kolay servis kolaylığı; 2x SODIMM, 2x M.2 2280
+ minimum gölgelenme, yüksek yenileme hızı
+ etkileyici işlemci performansı
+ dört bölgeli RGB klavye aydınlatması
+ dolar başına yüksek performans
+ iyi pil ömrü

Eksiler

- çok sıcak CPU ve GPU sıcaklıkları
- Neredeyse tüm parlaklık seviyelerinde PWM
- çok sıcak yüzey sıcaklıkları
- parmak izi seven tıklama yüzeyi tuşları
- düzensiz arka ışık kanaması
- yavaş SD kart okuyucu
- uyarlanabilir senkronizasyon yok
- süngerimsi tıklama yüzeyi
- yüksek fan gürültüsü

Verdict

In review: Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F. Test unit provided by Dell US
In review: Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F. Test unit provided by Dell US

A 15.6-inch gaming laptop with Core i7-9750H CPU and GeForce RTX 2060 GPU will typically run about $1200 USD. The all-AMD Dell G5 15 SE can be configured with the Ryzen 5 4600H CPU and Radeon RX 5600M GPU for very similar results for about $300 less. Performance-per-dollar is therefore the biggest advantage of the system in a market still dominated by Intel-Nvidia options.

There are notable disadvantages to keep in mind with temperature and fan noise being the most striking. Warm processors are expected from gaming laptops, but when you're reaching ~95 C when gaming with fans on full blast, this doesn't leave very strong first impressions especially in regard to the longevity of the system.

Other drawbacks relate mostly to the inexpensive price point. The noticeable backlight bleeding, USB 2.0 ports, lack of adaptive sync, and all-plastic chassis are the usual compromises on most ~$1000 gaming laptops. From a performance, serviceability, and display perspective, however, these features could easily be part of a laptop retailing for several hundreds more.

It's a lot of power for not a lot of money. Users will want to keep in mind that the impressive performance comes at the cost of both very warm temperatures and loud fans as a result.

Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F - 06/24/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

İşcilik
74 / 98 → 75%
Klavye
79%
Mouse
83%
Bağlanılabilirlik
61 / 80 → 76%
Ağırlık
60 / 10-66 → 90%
Batarya
70 / 95 → 73%
Görüntü
84%
Oyun performansı
93%
Uygulama performansı
92%
Isınma
80 / 95 → 84%
Ses
89 / 90 → 99%
Audio
73%
Camera
37 / 85 → 44%
Ortalama
75%
84%
Gaming - Ortalama Ağırlık

More articles related to this device

Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F (G5 15 SE 5505 Seri)

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Tam gaz AMD: Dell G5 15 Special Edition Radeon RX 5600M Laptop incelemesi
Allen Ngo, 2020-06-29 (Update: 2024-11- 4)