Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T İnceleme - Küçük fark ile akıllı telefon

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Brand: Xiaomi

Jolly good.

Redmi Note 8'in kardeş modelini batı pazarları için test ediyoruz. Ekipman nominal olarak aynıdır, ancak NFC'ye ek olarak, müşteriyi memnun etmek için başka uyarlamalar da vardır. Ancak akıllı telefonun bagajında hoş olmayan bir sürpriz de var.

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Published 01/28/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Österreich

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T (Redmi Note 12 Seri)

İşlemci

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260

Grafik kartı

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Bellek

4 GB

Görüntü

6.30 inç 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, parlak: evet, 60 Hz

Harddisk

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 56 GB Boş

Bağlantılar

1 USB 2.0, Ses çıkışları: 3.5mm, Kart okuyucular: microSD bis zu 256 GB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Parmak izi okuyucu, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Alıcılar: Proximity sensor, Ambient light sensor, Acceleration sensor, Gyroscope, Digital Compass

Network

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1,800 and 1,900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (bands 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8), LTE (bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38 and 40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 8.6 x 161.15 x 75.4

Batarya

4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

İşletim sistemi

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (1/2.0", 0.8 µm, f/1.75, 79.4°) + 8 MPix (ultra wide angle, 1.12 µm, f/2.2, 120°) + 2 MPix (macro, 1.75 µm, f/2.4) + 2 MPix (depth optics, 1.75 µm, f/2.4), Camera2 API level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (1.12 µm, f/2.0), 1.080p-Video

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: Mono, Klavye: Virtual, Power supply (5V-3A/9V-2A/12V-1.5A), USB cable, SIM tool, protective cover, documentation, MiUI 10, 12 Ay Garanti, DRM Widevine L1, FM radio, IR blaster, head SAR: 0.74 W/kg, body SAR: 1.30 W/kg, fanless

Ağırlık

200 g

Fiyat

249 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison Devices

Bewertung	Rating Version	Datum	Modell	Gewicht	Laufwerk	Groesse	Aufloesung
79.3 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	01/2020	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T SD 665, Adreno 610	200 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.30"	2340x1080
80.2 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	01/2020	TCL Plex SD 675, Adreno 612	192 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.53"	2340x1080
78.4 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	12/2019	Motorola Moto G8 Plus SD 665, Adreno 610	188 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.30"	2280x1080
79.8 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	03/2019	Samsung Galaxy A50 Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3	166 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080

Boyut Karşılaştırma

TCL Plex Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Motorola Moto G8 Plus Samsung Galaxy A50 DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
TCL Plex 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	287 (250^min - 308^max) MBit/s +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	278 (218^min - 305^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A50 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	272 (250^min - 285^max) MBit/s -2%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	152 (1^min - 254^max) MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AX12
TCL Plex 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	359 (330^min - 369^max) MBit/s +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	315 (157^min - 352^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A50 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	294 (278^min - 302^max) MBit/s -7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	182 (11^min - 259^max) MBit/s -42%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø315 (157-352)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø278 (218-305)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


631 cd/m²	648 cd/m²	653 cd/m²
628 cd/m²	628 cd/m²	646 cd/m²
618 cd/m²	608 cd/m²	621 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 653 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 631.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.09 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 93 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 628 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1163:1 (Siyah: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"	TCL Plex IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5"	Motorola Moto G8 Plus IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3"	Samsung Galaxy A50 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Response Times		11%	36%	85%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	56 ?(27.2, 28.8)	56 ?(29.2, 26.8) -0%	36 ?(17, 19) 36%	8 ?(5, 3) 86%
Response Time Black / White *	36.8 ?(20.4, 16.4)	29.2 ?(12.8, 16.4) 21%	24 ?(9, 15) 35%	6 ?(3, 3) 84%
PWM Frequency		2358 ?(49)	463 ?(20)	119
Screen		-19%	-42%	-13%
Brightness middle	628	432 -31%	597 -5%	644 3%
Brightness	631	418 -34%	596 -6%	628 0%
Brightness Distribution	93	93 0%	93 0%	91 -2%
Black Level *	0.54	0.43 20%	0.52 4%
Contrast	1163	1005 -14%	1148 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2	3.4 -70%	5.93 -197%	2.64 -32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.1	6 -18%	9.42 -85%	9.23 -81%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.7	3.8 -3%	5.3 -43%	2.5 32%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.14 ^103%	2.232 ^99%	2.024 ^109%
CCT	6230 ^104%	6151 ^106%	7632 ^85%	6649 ^98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-4% / -13%	-3% / -26%	36% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.4 ms rise
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 27.2 ms rise
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 28.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 5.0 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	313 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	492 Points +57%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	315 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (313 - 315, n=3)	314 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (703 - 1668, n=10, last 2 years)	928 Points +196%
5.0 Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1392 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	939 Points -33%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1379 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1327 - 1392, n=3)	1366 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 4353, n=10, last 2 years)	3014 Points +117%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8186 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	7029 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10)	8163 Points
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6587 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	7950 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6534 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5827 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12)	6985 Points +6%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	23388 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	22767 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	23253 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16037 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22445 - 25046, n=11)	23846 Points +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24871 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	26320 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24992 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16593 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15403 - 25351, n=11)	24085 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19349 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	15461 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	18698 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14353 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (17865 - 24652, n=11)	20749 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1744 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1618 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1765 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1430 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1675 - 1795, n=12)	1751 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +141%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1616 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1594 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1634 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1279 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1564 - 1663, n=12)	1623 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +193%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2412 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1708 Points -29%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2452 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2432 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2282 - 2596, n=12)	2427 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1785 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1621 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1790 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1667 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1754 - 1810, n=12)	1787 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +522%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1663 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1611 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1670 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1553 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1650 - 1692, n=12)	1669 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +1085%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2399 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1657 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2393 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2241 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2199 - 2503, n=12)	2369 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +108%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1076 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	937 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1128 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1296 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1076 - 1152, n=12)	1119 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	927 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	829 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	979 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1149 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (927 - 999, n=12)	970 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +252%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2468 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1724 Points -30%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2424 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2351 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2212 - 2580, n=12)	2418 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1139 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1057 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1126 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1328 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1097 - 1151, n=11)	1135 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +582%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	990 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	955 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	981 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1188 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (980 - 999, n=11)	988 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +1065%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2410 Points
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	1684 Points -30%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2341 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2266 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2154 - 2541, n=11)	2377 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +91%

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.4 fps
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	8.3 fps +12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.6 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.2 fps +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.2 - 15, n=12)	9.14 fps +24%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=202, last 2 years)	50.5 fps +582%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.1 fps
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	9.1 fps +12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.2 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9 fps +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7.8 - 8.4, n=12)	8.13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	80.3 fps +891%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4.4 fps
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	4.9 fps +11%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4.5 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4.9 fps +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (3.9 - 9.1, n=12)	5.53 fps +26%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.6 fps +755%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps
TCL Plex Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144	3 fps +7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.1 fps +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2.7 - 2.8, n=12)	2.78 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	32.3 fps +1054%

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T	TCL Plex	Motorola Moto G8 Plus	Samsung Galaxy A50	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		30%	4%	3%	-16%	414%
Sequential Read 256KB	315.8	522 65%	302.5 -4%	507 61%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=203) -13%	1847 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 485%
Sequential Write 256KB	173.9	199.7 15%	217.4 25%	192.1 10%	176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203) 1%	1436 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 726%
Random Read 4KB	90.4	130.8 45%	59.9 -34%	98.9 9%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=203) -34%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 206%
Random Write 4KB	91.2	130.1 43%	124.9 37%	18.2 -80%	32 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=203) -65%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 238%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	71.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	74.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 5%	72.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	73.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144) 8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	52.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	56.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	52.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 15%	58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144) 10%

Maksimum yük

Bekleme


32.4 °C	32.6 °C	32.5 °C
32.5 °C	32 °C	32.8 °C
31.9 °C	32.3 °C	31.9 °C

Maksimum: 32.8 °C
Ortalama: 32.3 °C


30.1 °C	30.4 °C	32.6 °C
30.2 °C	30.5 °C	33.3 °C
29.8 °C	30.7 °C	31.9 °C

Maksimum: 33.3 °C
Ortalama: 31.1 °C

Güç kaynağı 27 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T 4000 mAh	TCL Plex 3820 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 Plus 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Average of class Smartphone
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing	764	616 -19%	980 28%	701 -8%	985 ?(476 - 3244, n=204, last 2 years) 29%

Batarya ömrü


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 78)		12h 44min

Artılar

+ fast SoC

+ good IPS panel

+ well-rounded equipment package

Eksiler

- Camera quality needs for optimization

- higher SAR values

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T - 01/21/2020 v7 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

İşcilik

84%

Klavye

67 / 75 → 89%

Mouse

91%

Bağlanılabilirlik

49 / 70 → 69%

Ağırlık

88%

Batarya

90%

Görüntü

88%

Oyun performansı

15 / 64 → 23%

Uygulama performansı

64 / 86 → 74%

Isınma

94%

Ses

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 86%

Camera

60%

Ortalama

74%

79%

Smartphone - Ortalama Ağırlık

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 460014 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T İnceleme - Küçük fark ile akıllı telefon

Daniel Schmidt, 2020-01-28 (Update: 2020-01-28)

Comparison Devices

Boyut Karşılaştırma

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis

Artılar

Eksiler

More articles related to this device

Price comparison