Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Notebook Özellikleri
Price comparison
Ortalama 10 puan 16 (incelemeden)
İnceleme Yapılan Cihaz: Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Kaynak: Techradar EN→TR Archive.org version
Apple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Uzun, Tarih: 08/11/2017
Puanlama: Total Puan: 80%
Kaynak: Laptop Mag EN→TR Archive.org version
The updated MacBook packs more performance and battery life into a wonderfully thin and light design, but Apple didn't address the biggest drawbacks.
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Çok Uzun, Tarih: 11/28/2016
Puanlama: Total Puan: 70%
Kaynak: Tab Times EN→TR Archive.org version
As a Mac user of many years, the 12-inch Macbook definitely requires a compromise in the way I work. For example, my 15-inch Macbook Pro with Retina Display powers a two screen set up and the Macbook 2016 is incapable of doing that, especially as none of Apple’s official adapters currently offer DisplayPort functionality. Ironically, Google makes a USB Type-C to DisplayPort adapter that is perfect for this task, but with the limitations of a single port, the Macbook doesn’t stack up to my particular usage.
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Çok Uzun, Tarih: 11/09/2016
Puanlama: Total Puan: 83%
Kaynak: Pocket Lint EN→TR Archive.org version
The 12-inch MacBook has divided opinion since day one, having done-away with a full-size USB port for the smaller USB Type-C. A couple of years down the line and this will be a more standard format, but the bigger issue is the MacBook's persistence to offer just one of these ports for both charging and connectivity. If you're a casual or cloud-based user that won't be a big issue though. Just as we said of the first iteration: the 12-inch MacBook is all about portability; it's a laptop so thin, so sleek, so light, that everything else has been pushed by the wayside.
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Kısa, Tarih: 09/21/2016
Puanlama: Total Puan: 80%
Kaynak: Techradar EN→TR Archive.org version
Apple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Orta, Tarih: 09/20/2016
Puanlama: Total Puan: 80%
Kaynak: Laptop Mag EN→TR Archive.org version
The 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard.
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Uzun, Tarih: 05/02/2016
Puanlama: Total Puan: 70%
Kaynak: Slashgear EN→TR Archive.org version
I'll be sticking with my first-gen MacBook, then, though that's not going to stop me recommending it to those who travel frequently, have mainstream needs for processing, and who are willing to pay a premium for OS X on a notebook that's still a relatively rare sight in the wild. Apple doesn't expect it to be the Mac for every user: that's why it's not the only Mac. Just make sure you're going into it with your eyes wide open.
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Orta, Tarih: 05/02/2016
Kaynak: It Pro EN→TR Archive.org version
The 12in Retina MacBook isn’t for everyone. If you value portability and battery life above all and predominately use wireless peripherals as well as cloud apps and storage, then this MacBook will be a great fit. If you use lots of demanding applications, need to connect lots of wired peripherals or just can’t get on with the low-travel keyboard, then one of Apple’s more conventional MacBooks will be a better choice.
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Uzun, Tarih: 04/29/2016
Puanlama: Total Puan: 80%
Kaynak: Engadget EN→TR Archive.org version
Apple deserves credit for improving the MacBook's battery life and disk speeds, but other than that, this is, for better and worse, the same machine as last year's model. If you previously shied away from the 12-inch MacBook because of the "one port" thing, this still isn't the laptop for you.
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Uzun, Tarih: 04/25/2016
Puanlama: Total Puan: 82%
Kaynak: Laptop Mag EN→TR Archive.org version
The 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard.
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Uzun, Tarih: 04/22/2016
Puanlama: Total Puan: 70%
Kaynak: CNet EN→TR Archive.org version
In hands-on use, the new MacBook feels almost exactly like the previous version. If you've got the 2015 MacBook, there's no need to upgrade, but if you were holding off to see what the second generation looked like, the potential boost to performance and battery life makes me feel even more confident about using this as primary laptop, especially for frequent travelers.
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Uzun, Tarih: 04/21/2016
Puanlama: Total Puan: 84% performans: 80% mobilite: 80%
Kaynak: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→TR Archive.org version
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Uzun, Tarih: 06/08/2016
Kaynak: Spiegel Online DE→TR Archive.org version
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Çok Kısa, Tarih: 05/30/2016
Kaynak: Mobileimho.ru RU→TR Archive.org version
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Çok Uzun, Tarih: 04/06/2017
Kaynak: 3DNews.ru RU→TR Archive.org version
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Çok Uzun, Tarih: 07/12/2016
Kaynak: Ferra.ru RU→TR Archive.org version
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Uzun, Tarih: 06/21/2016
Yorum
Intel HD Graphics 515:
Skylake jenerasyonu Core-m işlemcilerde yer alan dahili grafik kartı.
Çok seçici olmayan oyunlar akıcı olarak oynanabilir. Ama düşük çözünürlüğe ve dolayısıyla düşük detaylara hazır olun. Yine de bu kartlar ofis ve video görüntüleme (HD Videolar içinde uygun olduğu söylenebilir) konularında yeterli performansı veriyor.
>> Daha fazla bilgi Mobil grafik kartları karşılaştırmamızda bulunabilir. ilgili Benchmark Listesi.
6Y54:
>> Daha fazla bilgi Mobil işlemciler karşılaştırmamızda bulunabilir..
12.00":
Bu ekran boyutu tabletler için büyük sayılırken, subnotebooklar için küçük kalıyor. Bazı dönüştürülebilir modeller de bu boyutla sunulabiliyor.
Büyük ekran boyutları yüksek çözünürlükleri mümkün kılıyor. Bu sayede yazım boyutu da büyüyebiliyor. Öte yandan küçük boyutlarda güç tüketimi azalmakla beraber; cihaz boyutu ve ağırlığın yanı sıra fiyat da ucuzluyor.
>> Görüntünün ne kadar iyi olduğunu görmek için DPI Listemize bakın.
0.92 kg: Daha çok büyük boyutlu tabletler ve dönüştürülebilir modeller bu ağırlıkta.
>> Daha fazla bilgi Notebook alma rehberimizde bulunabilir.