Crosscall Stellar-X5
Notebook Özellikleri
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Price comparison
İnceleme Yapılan Cihaz: Crosscall Stellar-X5
Kaynak: DxOMark EN→TR
The Crosscall Stellar-X5 showed an average overall battery performance with good autonomy, and decent efficiency, but a poor charging experience. When used moderately, the Stellar-X5 managed to last more than two and a half days, which is above average in our database. The Stellar-X5 performed well during our typical usage scenario, but it struggled during our tests when settings such as screen brightness were calibrated. The Stellar-X5’s charging experience was quite slow, with the 20W charger never delivering above 18W. Using a wired charger, the device took more than 3 hours to reach a full charge. A quick 5-minute battery top-up recovered on average a bit more than 2 hours and 30 minutes of autonomy.
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Uzun, Tarih: 09/17/2024
Kaynak: DxOMark EN→TR
The Crosscall Stellar-X5 is the French brand’s entry into the Ultra-premium realm, with a sleeker look and feel as well as better camera specifications than prior models in an aim to bridge the gap between the rugged work phone and the personal phone. The higher-resolution sensor and a better chipset than the previously tested Action-X5 indeed resulted in significant improvements in all aspects of our image quality evaluation. The Stellar-X5’s camera score also improved considerably thanks to images that were consistently well exposed and that showed an extended dynamic range. In addition, the camera has an efficient zero shutter lag capability in most tested conditions, meaning the user is likely to capture the intended moment, particularly fast-action scenarios like sports.
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Uzun, Tarih: 06/11/2024
Kaynak: DxOMark EN→TR
The Crosscall Stellar-X5’s screen provided a very uneven performance in our Display protocol, with a screen experience that was affected by a pinkish cast in all conditions. Although the Stellar-X5’s display luminance and contrast levels were able to match most ultra-premium phones in indoor conditions, the device’s display was still difficult to read, especially in bright outdoor environments. In complete darkness, the screen’s luminance remained much too bright to offer a comfortable viewing experience. Watching HDR10 video was also a mixed experience. Although there were no frame drops, it was sometimes hard to make out the dark tones in the video content due to the lack of brightness.
Tek İnceleme, online bulunabilirlik, Uzun, Tarih: 06/04/2024
Yorum
Qualcomm Adreno 710:
Çok seçici olmayan oyunlar akıcı olarak oynanabilir. Ama düşük çözünürlüğe ve dolayısıyla düşük detaylara hazır olun. Yine de bu kartlar ofis ve video görüntüleme (HD Videolar içinde uygun olduğu söylenebilir) konularında yeterli performansı veriyor.
>> Daha fazla bilgi Mobil grafik kartları karşılaştırmamızda bulunabilir. ilgili Benchmark Listesi.
SD 6 Gen 1: Orta sınıf SoC, 8 Kryo çekirdeği (4x ARM Cortex A78 2,2 GHz performans kümesi, 4x ARM Cortex A55 1,8 verimlilik kümesi) ve bir X62 5G modem (2900 Mbps'ye kadar indirme) ile. Çip, modern 4nm süreci kullanılarak üretilmiştir.
>> Daha fazla bilgi Mobil işlemciler karşılaştırmamızda bulunabilir..
6.58":
Sadece bazı modellerde bu büyüklükte ekran bulunmakta.
Büyük ekran boyutları yüksek çözünürlükleri mümkün kılıyor. Bu sayede yazım boyutu da büyüyebiliyor. Öte yandan küçük boyutlarda güç tüketimi azalmakla beraber; cihaz boyutu ve ağırlığın yanı sıra fiyat da ucuzluyor.
>> Görüntünün ne kadar iyi olduğunu görmek için DPI Listemize bakın.
>> Daha fazla bilgi Notebook alma rehberimizde bulunabilir.