Notebookcheck Logo

Kısa inceleme: Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE (i9-8950HK, GTX 1050 Ti, 4K UHD) Laptop

Çift görüş. Asus, Apple'ın Tocuh Bar özelliğini daha çılgın bir fikirle touchpad yerine 1080plik ikinci bir ekran koyarak bir üste taşıyor. Şaşırtıcı olan ise kullanışlı olması.
Coffee Lake Geforce Ultrabook
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE (Zenbook Pro 15 Seri)
İşlemci
Intel Core i9-8950HK 6 x 2.9 - 4.8 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafik kartı
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Çekirdek: 1493 MHz, Bellek: 7008 MHz, GDDR5, 397.31, Optimus
Bellek
16 GB 
, Dual-Channel, 1333.3 MHz, 17-17-17-39
Görüntü
15.60 inç 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, 10-point capacitive, AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, AUO31EB, parlak: evet
Anakart
Intel HM370
Harddisk
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), 1024 GB 
Ses kartı
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Bağlantılar
4 USB 3.0, 4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm combo, Kart okuyucular: MicroSD, Brightness Sensor
Network
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 18.9 x 365 x 251
Batarya
71 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 8-cell
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: VGA
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: Stereo, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, Asus Sync, 12 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
1.88 kg, Güç kaynağı: 529 g
Bağlantılar
Asus anasayfa
Asus notebook kısmı
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

❌
365.8 mm 252.8 mm 20.2 mm 2.1 kg365 mm 251 mm 18.9 mm 1.9 kg365 mm 251 mm 18.9 mm 1.9 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 250 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg355.6 mm 251 mm 17.8 mm 2 kg349 mm 241 mm 16 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, HDMI, 2x Thunderbolt 3
Left: AC adapter, HDMI, 2x Thunderbolt 3
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, MicroSD reader, 2x USB 3.1
Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, MicroSD reader, 2x USB 3.1
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
191 MB/s +198%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)
156.4 MB/s +144%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
64.2 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
584 MBit/s
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
539 MBit/s -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
379 MBit/s -35%
iperf3 receive AX12
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
682 MBit/s +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
662 MBit/s
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
542 MBit/s -18%
348.4
cd/m²		378.6
cd/m²		371.5
cd/m²
328.1
cd/m²		357.6
cd/m²		348.3
cd/m²
323.3
cd/m²		351.8
cd/m²		341.9
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 378.6 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 349.9 cd/m² Minimum: 19.1 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 85 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 357.6 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1022:1 (Siyah: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.23
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160		Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
Sharp SHP149A LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6", 1920x1080		Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD
B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160		HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
BOE06C3, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
15.4", 2880x1800
Display
-20%
0%
-24%
-22%
Display P3 Coverage
85.9
66
-23%
86.6
1%
66.6
-22%
63.6
-26%
sRGB Coverage
100
96.5
-3%
100
0%
86.9
-13%
93.8
-6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
99.1
66.7
-33%
99.5
0%
63.5
-36%
64.9
-35%
Response Times
-22%
-23%
-12%
57%
-10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 ?(22, 22)
49 ?(25, 40)
-11%
52 ?(25, 27)
-18%
41.2 ?(23.2, 18)
6%
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
62%
42.4 ?(20.4, 22)
4%
Response Time Black / White *
22.8 ?(12, 10.8)
30 ?(16, 14)
-32%
29 ?(15, 14)
-27%
29.6 ?(16.4, 13.2)
-30%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
51%
28 ?(14.8, 13.2)
-23%
PWM Frequency
961 ?(10)
1000
Screen
13%
-2%
-22%
14%
25%
Brightness middle
357.6
413
15%
380
6%
338.7
-5%
313
-12%
534
49%
Brightness
350
378
8%
371
6%
325
-7%
300
-14%
502
43%
Brightness Distribution
85
86
1%
87
2%
91
7%
78
-8%
86
1%
Black Level *
0.35
0.29
17%
0.28
20%
0.28
20%
0.33
6%
0.31
11%
Contrast
1022
1424
39%
1357
33%
1210
18%
948
-7%
1723
69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.12
2.44
41%
4.38
-6%
4.9
-19%
1.29
69%
1.8
56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.91
4.46
55%
7.59
23%
8.7
12%
2.04
79%
3.8
62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.23
2.48
41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
2.48
-38%
3.6
-100%
5.5
-206%
0.69
62%
2.4
-33%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.43 91%
2.32 95%
2.08 106%
2.43 91%
2.27 97%
CCT
6613 98%
7006 93%
6860 95%
7498 87%
6550 99%
6563 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87.5
62
-29%
88
1%
63.5
-27%
60
-31%
77.92
-11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
96
-4%
100
0%
86.92
-13%
94
-6%
99.94
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-10% / 3%
-8% / -4%
-19% / -21%
16% / 12%
8% / 19%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

 
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
5358 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5059 Points -6%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
4479 Points -16%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
4249 Points -21%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3673 Points -31%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4504 Points +23%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
4030 Points +10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
3661 Points
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3614 Points -1%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3457 Points -6%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5676 Points +27%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
5271 Points +18%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
4456 Points
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
4401 Points -1%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4217 Points -5%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3661 puan
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4456 puan
PCMark 10 Score
5358 puan
Yardım
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)		Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11		Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
AS SSD
-234%
-4%
17%
-46%
Copy Game MB/s
728
465.9
-36%
878
21%
1134
56%
Copy Program MB/s
430.9
117.2
-73%
393.4
-9%
534
24%
Copy ISO MB/s
1045
632
-40%
1533
47%
1936
85%
Score Total
4065
750
-82%
3548
-13%
3781
-7%
2536
-38%
Score Write
1547
58
-96%
1515
-2%
1556
1%
939
-39%
Score Read
1679
492
-71%
1342
-20%
1493
-11%
1092
-35%
Access Time Write *
0.036
0.889
-2369%
0.033
8%
0.026
28%
0.046
-28%
Access Time Read *
0.04
0.086
-115%
0.059
-48%
0.04
-0%
0.119
-198%
4K-64 Write
1273
19.19
-98%
1278
0%
1262
-1%
742
-42%
4K-64 Read
1431
301.8
-79%
1153
-19%
1206
-16%
847
-41%
4K Write
100.9
5.12
-95%
110.9
10%
141.1
40%
80.4
-20%
4K Read
37.78
32.5
-14%
51.5
36%
51.9
37%
23.36
-38%
Seq Write
1729
340.3
-80%
1262
-27%
1530
-12%
1163
-33%
Seq Read
2099
1574
-25%
1373
-35%
2342
12%
2213
5%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2171 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1763 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 614 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 507 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 772 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1059 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 44.68 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600
15182 Points +71%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
14975 Points +69%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, i7-8809G
14302 Points +62%
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
13871 Points +57%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
9824 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (8304 - 10402, n=36)
9591 Points +8%
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
9240 Points +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK
8854 Points
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H
7133 Points -19%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points -45%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, i7-8809G
10391 Points +19%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
9333 Points +7%
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
8788 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK
8709 Points
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
8503 Points -2%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7952 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600
7838 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (6104 - 9172, n=35)
7823 Points -10%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H
7025 Points -19%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points -49%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
79420 Points +82%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
71431 Points +63%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600
70020 Points +60%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, i7-8809G
59162 Points +35%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
50205 Points +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (43721 - 53978, n=37)
50013 Points +14%
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
48597 Points +11%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK
43721 Points
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H
38881 Points -11%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
25986 Points -41%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11733 Points +61%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600
11512 Points +58%
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
10970 Points +50%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, i7-8809G
10248 Points +41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (6792 - 8376, n=38)
7743 Points +6%
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
7457 Points +2%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7321 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK
7291 Points
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H
6356 Points -13%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points -43%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
5106 Points +48%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, i7-8809G
4405 Points +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (3452 - 3945, n=15)
3692 Points +7%
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3649 Points +6%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
3517 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK
3452 Points
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H
2733 Points -21%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
1988 Points -42%
3DMark 11 Performance
8990 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
24182 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6504 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
3372 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score
2281 puan
Yardım
BioShock Infinite | Rise of the Tomb Raider
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-8300H, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
112 fps +68%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
74.4 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (61 - 97, n=23)
73.2 fps +10%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
67.5 fps +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
66.5 fps
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
39.4 fps -41%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-8300H, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
59 fps +70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (27.8 - 40.7, n=16)
36.3 fps +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
34.8 fps
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
33.2 fps -5%
düşükortayüksekultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 270.5 157.4 149.9 66.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 88.3 44.6 24.2 15.8
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 95 50 29 15
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 75.5 39.6 34.8 14.1
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 51.4 36.2 28.5
Overwatch (2016) 108.3 58.7 31.4

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
28.6 / 29.9 / 30.5 dB
Çalışırken
42.5 / 44.8 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm uzaklık)   environment noise: 28 dB(A)
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)		Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11		HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
Radeon Pro 560, i7-7820HQ		Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Noise
1%
6%
-11%
2%
-3%
off / environment *
28
30.3
-8%
28.4
-1%
29
-4%
30.8
-10%
28.3
-1%
Idle Minimum *
28.6
30.3
-6%
28.4
1%
30
-5%
31
-8%
30.4
-6%
Idle Average *
29.9
30.3
-1%
28.4
5%
31
-4%
31
-4%
31
-4%
Idle Maximum *
30.5
30.3
1%
28.4
7%
35
-15%
31
-2%
31.2
-2%
Load Average *
42.5
37.1
13%
41.6
2%
49
-15%
31.3
26%
43.3
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44.8
43.3
3%
36.1
19%
51
-14%
46.2
-3%
Load Maximum *
44.8
43
4%
41.6
7%
54
-21%
41.8
7%
46.2
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Maksimum yük
 35.8 °C40 °C41.2 °C 
 32.6 °C42.4 °C31 °C 
 29.2 °C28 °C30.8 °C 
Maksimum: 42.4 °C
Ortalama: 34.6 °C
45 °C50.8 °C44.6 °C
39.4 °C45.6 °C39.2 °C
35.4 °C37.4 °C35.6 °C
Maksimum: 50.8 °C
Ortalama: 41.4 °C
Güç kaynağı  41.4 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3 °C / -5.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.437.92536.135.93134.633.54033.732.35032.632.76331.834.88030.930.91003031.512529.533.116028.644.420027.952.425027.359.331526.662.64002667.950025.667.26302569.780024.47510002472125023.769.5160023.674.8200023.671.7250023.370.2315023.169.1400023.372.1500023.170.7630023.175.4800022.979.91000022.876.41250022.768.41600022.768.9SPL35.985.4N2.666median 23.7median 69.5Delta1.2640.638.132.233.332.633.833.739.534.339.629.448.828.652.227.35927.968.126.458.925.46723.967.922.666.123.374.922.875.721.573.42069.620.174.719.476.618.779.81873.318.173.217.874.717.871.817.874.318.17718.37018.272.318.268.318.572.131.5871.676.6median 19.4median 73.22.93.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GEApple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.11 / 0.56 Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 11.7 / 18.5 / 22.8 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 97.5 / 111.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"		Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6"		HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
i7-7820HQ, Radeon Pro 560, , , 2880x1800, 15.4"		Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption
42%
28%
-17%
32%
32%
Idle Minimum *
11.7
2.9
75%
11.6
1%
14
-20%
3.7
68%
6.3
46%
Idle Average *
18.5
5.8
69%
13.8
25%
18
3%
16.2
12%
7.9
57%
Idle Maximum *
22.8
7.5
67%
14.2
38%
22
4%
18
21%
8.1
64%
Load Average *
97.5
77.5
21%
67.9
30%
91
7%
58.4
40%
84.9
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
102.9
84
18%
59
43%
142
-38%
96.3
6%
Load Maximum *
111.1
107
4%
76.9
31%
173
-56%
89.6
19%
102.4
8%

* ... smaller is better

Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
14h 02min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 15min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
1h 16min
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 71 Wh		Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh		HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 79.2 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
i7-7820HQ, Radeon Pro 560,  Wh		Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 73 Wh
Battery Runtime
101%
42%
44%
35%
18%
Reader / Idle
842
934
11%
762
-10%
1023
21%
WiFi v1.3
375
942
151%
511
36%
513
37%
677
81%
532
42%
Load
76
114
50%
136
79%
156
105%
67
-12%
70
-8%
Witcher 3 ultra
62
76

Artılar

+ 4K UHD dokunmatik ekran
+ Eşşiz 5.5 inçlik 1080p Screenpad
+ Trackpad kolay kullanım sunuyor
+ Çift Thunderbolt 3 bağlantısı
+ Hızlı Intel 9560 WLAN
+ Kolay bakım

Eksiler

- Tam boyutlu SD okuyucu yok
- GTX 1050 Ti performans olarak ortalamanın biraz altında
- Screenbad fare olmadan biraz zor kullanılıyor
- Test cihazımızda elektronik sesi farkediliyor
- Bekleme modunda yüksek güç tüketimi
- RAM lehimli ve arttırılamıyor
- Rekabete kıyasla daha kalın ekran çerçevesi
- Dış mekan kullanımı daha iyi olabilirdi
- Kısa batarya ömrü
In review: Asus Zenbook Pro 15 UX580GE. Test model provided by Asus US
In review: Asus Zenbook Pro 15 UX580GE. Test model provided by Asus US

UX580 hakkında çok aydınlatıcı bir sonuca varmamız pek mümkün değil. Test cihazımız üretim öncesine ait ve Core i9 işlemci beklenen performansı veremiyor. Asıl incelememizi cihaz üretime hazır olduğunda vermemiz yerinde olacaktır. Ama bu incelememizde cihazın eşsiz özellikleri üzerinde durabiliriz.

Screenpad, Apple'ın Touch Bar özelliğinden daha kullanışlı. Fikrin temelinde 16:9 1080p ikinci bir ekranın kullanımı yatıyor. Alanın kullanımı için özel uygulamalara veya uygulama bazında özelleştirmeye de gerek yok. Sadece ikinci bir ekran olarak düşünmek yeterli. İki ekranlı kullanımın keyfini bilen masaüstü kullanıcıları demek istediğimi anlayacaktır. Bu yüzden UX580 en taze fikirlerden biri olarak karşımızda.

Fikrin potansiyeli olmasıyla birlikte ergonomik zorlukları da mevcut. Ekranlar arası yukarı aşağı bakmak yorucu olabilir. Ayrıca harici fare kullanılmazsa ekranın üzerinde fare kullanımı veya ikinci ekran kullanımı şeklinde sürekli değişim yapmak gerekiyor. 

Son olarak ekranın yüzeyi yağlı hissi veriyor ve görüntü keskinliğini yitiriyor. Kalın mat yüzey ekran üzerinde kaydırma kullanımı için gerekli iken ekran kalitesinden ödün verilmesine sebep olmuş. Bu yüzden UX580 Screenpad ilk jenerasyon bir ürün olarak karşımızda.

Bunun dışında UX580, UX550 ile neredeyse birebir aynı. Hoparlörler daha iyi, bakımı kolay, aluminyum kasa sağlam. Batarya ömründe de iyileştirmeler beklemekle beraber, daha keskin AMOLED / OLED ekran kullanımını da bekliyoruz.

Yazının orjinali için tıklayın.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Kısa inceleme: Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE (i9-8950HK, GTX 1050 Ti, 4K UHD) Laptop
Allen Ngo, 2018-07- 1 (Update: 2024-11- 4)