Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) incelemesi - Ryzen 8000 ve daha parlak ekrana sahip kompakt AMD subnotebook

Name: SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Brand: SCHENKER

Birçok liman ve iyi bakım seçenekleri. Schenker VIA 14 Pro güncellendi ve şimdi AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ve daha parlak bir IPS ekran ile geliyor. Üretici ayrıca kirlenmeye eğilimli kasaya yönelik eleştirileri de dikkate aldı ve şimdi farklı bir kaplama kullanıyor. Kapsamlı bağlantı ve M.2 SSD'ler için iki yuva korunmuştur.

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (Çeviren DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/13/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD AI Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Windows Zen 4

Schenker, kompakt AMD alt dizüstü bilgisayarı VIA 14 Pro'yu güncelledi ve eski modelle karşılaştırıldığında (Linux sürümünü test ettik - Smokin Nabız 14), yeni bir işlemci, daha parlak bir ekran ve kire karşı daha az duyarlı olması gereken yeni bir kasa kaplaması.

Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) için taban fiyat, üç yıllık garantiyle (işletim sistemi olmadan) 1.099 €'dur. Bunun için standart olarak aşağıdakilerle birlikte geliyor AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS32 GB RAM, 500 GB SSD ve mat 2.8K IPS panel standart olarak sunulmaktadır. Test konfigürasyonumuz Samsung 990 Pro'nun 2 TB versiyonu ve fiyatı 1.275 €'ya yükselten Windows ön kurulumu ile yapılandırılmıştır.

Bu makalede, eski modele göre farklılıklara, daha parlak ekrana ve elbette performans ile emisyonlar üzerindeki etkilere odaklanacağız. Kasa, özellikler ve giriş aygıtları hakkında kapsamlı bilgi, aşağıdaki incelememizde bulunabilir Smokin Nabız 14.

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

VIA 14 Pro (M24) Performance 54W

İşlemci

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

Grafik kartı

AMD Radeon 780M, Çekirdek: 2700 MHz, Bellek: 1067 MHz, Adrenalin 24.5.1

Bellek

32 GB

, LPDDR5x-6400, Dual-Channel. onboard

Görüntü

14.00 inç 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, parlak: hayır, 120 Hz

Anakart

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Harddisk

Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB, 2048 GB

, 1802 GB Boş

Ses kartı

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Bağlantılar

1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: 3.5 mm Stereo, Kart okuyucular: microSD

Network

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 18.5 x 313.5 x 222

Batarya

60 Wh Lithium-Polymer

İşletim sistemi

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: HD + IR
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: Stereo, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, 100W PSU, 36 Ay Garanti

Ağırlık

1.4 kg, Güç kaynağı: 260 g

Fiyat

1275 Euro

Bağlantılar

SCHENKER anasayfa
SCHENKER notebook kısmı

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Karşılaştırmalı olarak olası rakipler

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.1 %	v8	07/2024	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1.4 kg	18.5 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
83.5 %	v8	06/2024	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.3 kg	17.08 mm	14.20"	2880x1920
85.5 %	v8	07/2024	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.4 kg	15.9 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
88.6 %	v7 ^(old)	05/2024	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	1.2 kg	14.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1200
88.1 %	v7 ^(old)	03/2024	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1.5 kg	16 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
89 %	v7 ^(old)	01/2024	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1.4 kg	18 mm	14.00"	2880x1800

Not: Derecelendirme sistemimizi yakın zamanda güncelledik ve 8. versiyonun sonuçları 7. versiyonun sonuçları ile karşılaştırılamaz. Daha fazla bilgi için burada.

Önceki modele göre farklılıklar

Yeni kaplama bile parmak izlerini tamamen önleyemiyor.

Temel olarak, kasada hiçbir şey değişmedi. Test ederken bizden gelen bir eleştiri noktası Smokin Nabız 14 parmak izlerinin ve kirin hızlı bir şekilde görülebildiği ve temizlemenin de kolay olmadığı çok hassas yüzeylerdi. Bu sorunu ortadan kaldırmak için şimdi parmak izlerini azaltacak yeni bir kaplama kullanılıyor. Sonuç da biraz daha iyi, ancak parmak izleri hala daha iyi ve kasayı sık sık temizlemeniz gerekecek. Yine de gümüş renkli bir versiyon daha görmek isterdik.

Tuxedo Pulse 14'te web kamerasının yeşil durum LED'ini fark ettik, bu da resimlerde hafif bir yeşil ışıltıya neden oldu. Öte yandan Via 14 Pro, resimlerde de fark edilmeyen beyaz bir LED kullanıyor. Bununla birlikte, 720p web kamerasının görüntü kalitesi genel olarak düşük kalıyor.

Boyut ve ağırlık karşılaştırması

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA DIN A4 ❌

Sol: USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT modu 1.4a, Güç Dağıtımı), HDMI 2.0b, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 GBit/s), USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT modu 1.4a)

Sağ tarafta: Kensington Kilidi (Nano Saver), microSD okuyucu, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s), 3,5 mm ses

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	76.2 MB/s +314%
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years)	53.2 MB/s +189%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	19.5 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	18.4 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	90.8 MB/s +304%
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years)	65.4 MB/s +191%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	23.6 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	22.5 MB/s

Networking
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1257 (min: 1208) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1625 (min: 1557) MBit/s ∼95%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	968 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	951 (min: 782) MBit/s ∼56%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1416 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1667 (min: 1606) MBit/s ∼97%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1737 (min: 1638) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1712 (min: 1684) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 MediaTek RZ616
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1746 (min: 1647) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1706 (min: 1678) MBit/s ∼100%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 MediaTek RZ608
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	943 (min: 884) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	949 (min: 932) MBit/s ∼55%

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1257 (1208-1302)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1625 (1557-1675)

ColorChecker SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24): 14.94 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.35 ∆E

Ekran - IPS panel artık daha parlak

VIA 14 Pro hala 16:10 formatında 2.880 x 1.800 piksel çözünürlüğe ve 120 Hz frekansa sahip mat bir IPS panele dayanıyor. Tuxedo Pulse 14 ile aynı panel kimliğine sahip ancak parlaklık artırılmış. Schenker 400 cd/m² değerini belirtiyor, ancak test cihazımız ortalama 467 cd/m² ile bu değeri açıkça aşıyor. Bu da onu Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3'ten 100 cd/m²'nin üzerinde daha parlak yapıyor. Siyah seviyesi iyi bir 0,29 cd/m²'dir ve bu da yaklaşık 1.600:1 gibi çok iyi bir kontrast oranıyla sonuçlanır.

Panelin öznel görüntü izlenimi genel olarak iyi ve parlak alanlar hala biraz grenli görünüyor ve ayrıca hafif haleler var. PWM kullanılmıyor ve tepki süreleri göze çarpmıyor, ancak özellikle hızlı değil.


474 cd/m²	478 cd/m²	483 cd/m²
462 cd/m²	466 cd/m²	469 cd/m²
452 cd/m²	467 cd/m²	454 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

TL140ADXP24-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 483 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 467.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16.2 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 94 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 466 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1607:1 (Siyah: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24

Download ICC Dosyası (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2"	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14"	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"
Display		2%	1%	21%	27%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	70.1	72.42 3%	70.3 0%	98.6 41%	99.9 43%	71.1 1%
sRGB Coverage	97.7	99.79 2%	99.7 2%	99.9 2%	100 2%	98.7 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	72.3	73.94 2%	72.1 0%	87.3 21%	98.9 37%	73.2 1%
Response Times		24%	3%	95%	97%	-29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	31.1 ?(14.9, 16.2)	7 ?(3.5, 3.5) 77%	32.7 ?(14.8, 17.9) -5%	1.31 ?(0.69, 0.62) 96%	0.61 ?(0.31, 0.3) 98%	37.9 ?(17.4, 20.5) -22%
Response Time Black / White *	17.1 ?(7, 10.1)	22 ?(18.5, 3.5) -29%	15.2 ?(5.1, 10.1) 11%	1.2 ?(0.61, 0.59) 93%	0.67 ?(0.34, 0.33) 96%	23.1 ?(11.4, 11.7) -35%
PWM Frequency		238 ?(100)		480 ?(99)	240 ?(99)
Screen		181%	13%	320%	-5%	14%
Brightness middle	466	373 -20%	418 -10%	387 -17%	411 -12%	340 -27%
Brightness	467	377 -19%	408 -13%	386 -17%	414 -11%	338 -28%
Brightness Distribution	94	94 0%	90 -4%	98 4%	99 5%	84 -11%
Black Level *	0.29	0.015 95%	0.3 -3%	0.01 97%		0.16 45%
Contrast	1607	24867 1447%	1393 -13%	38700 2308%		2125 32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.5	1.47 41%	1.6 36%	1 60%	2.8 -12%	1.7 32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.1	2.49 59%	2.5 59%	2.4 61%	5.5 10%	3 51%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.3	1.78 -37%	1.1 15%		2.2 -69%	1.3 -0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.1	1.7 59%	2 51%	1.4 66%	1.8 56%	2.9 29%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.179 ^101%	2.14 ^103%	2.24 ^98%	2.21 ^100%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	7386 ^88%	6556 ^99%	6851 ^95%	6466 ^101%	6319 ^103%	6729 ^97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		69% / 120%	6% / 9%	145% / 217%	40% / 20%	-5% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Paneli profesyonel CalMAN yazılımıyla ölçtük ve fabrika çıkışında panelin çok soğuk bir renk sıcaklığıyla birlikte görünür bir mavi tonlaması var, ancak bunun maksimum parlaklık üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi var. Bununla birlikte, renklerin gösterimi zaten iyi. Kalibrasyonumuzla (profil yukarıda ücretsiz olarak indirilebilir) ekranı önemli ölçüde iyileştirebiliriz, ancak maksimum parlaklık yaklaşık 425 cd/m²'ye düşer. Tam sRGB kapsamı ile birlikte, dizüstü bilgisayar görüntüleri / videoları düzenlemek için de uygundur.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
17.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
17.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.9 ms rise
31.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Dış mekan (parlak gün, doğrudan güneş ışığı yok)

Doğrudan güneş ışığı dışında, mat panel parlak günlerde açık havada da kullanılabilir. IPS ekranın görüş açısı kararlılığı iyidir.

Performans - AMD Ryzen 8000 ve 32 GB RAM

Test koşulları

VIA 14 Pro (M24) Schenker'in Komuta Merkezi olmayan ilk dizüstü bilgisayarıdır; bunun yerine enerji profilleri F3 tuşu ile değiştirilebilir. Aktif enerji profili daha sonra ekranda kısa bir süre görüntülenir. Toplam üç profil mevcuttur: Sessiz, Dengeli ve Performans. İlgili TDP değerlerini ve performans verilerini aşağıdaki tabloda özetledik. Performans profili ile aşağıdaki kıyaslamaları ve ölçümleri gerçekleştirdik.

Enerji profili	CPU TDP	CB R23 Multi	Time Spy Grafik	maks. Fan hacmi
Sessiz	25 -> 15 watt	10.593 puan	2.492 puan	30,6 dB(A)
Dengeli	45 -> 35 watt	15.250 puan	2.877 puan	36,2 dB(A)
Güç	54 watt	16.330 puan	2.915 puan	43,6 dB(A)

İşlemci - Ryzen 7 8845HS

İşlemci, bir önceki AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS maksimum 5,1 GHz saat hızına sahip 8 Zen4 çekirdeği (16 iş parçacığı) kullanan Ryzen 7 8845HS ile karşılaştırılabilir. Şaşırtıcı olmayan bir şekilde, performans da bu nedenle karşılaştırılabilir ve tüm karşılaştırma cihazları genel olarak birbirine çok yakın. Performans hem çok çekirdekli hem de tek çekirdekli testlerde çok iyi ve burada zorlu görevlerde bile herhangi bir darboğaz yok. Pil modunda, maksimum tüketim 35 watt ile sınırlıdır, bu nedenle çok çekirdekli performans %12 daha düşüktür.

Diğer CPU kıyaslamalarını bulabilirsiniz burada.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2543 (2508.31-2568.38)

Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2224 (2132.08-2595.21)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2436 (2302.42-2731.12)

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø2166 (2149.96-2176.16)

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2535 (2513.19-2555.42)

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2424 (2389.2-2482.31)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	85.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	85.1 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	83.6 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	82.7 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	80.9 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	80.1 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	77.8 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	67.6 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17077 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (15889 - 18037, n=6)	16600 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16387 Points
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16145 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	15889 Points -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	15515 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	13888 Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 21058, n=60, last 2 years)	11408 Points -30%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1776 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1774 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1755 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1746 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1742 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=6)	1742 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1716 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (598 - 2001, n=60, last 2 years)	1654 Points -7%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6575 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (6231 - 7026, n=6)	6483 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6424 Points
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6251 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6231 Points -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6061 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	5414 Points -16%
Average of class Subnotebook (810 - 8233, n=56, last 2 years)	4462 Points -31%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	690 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (677 - 698, n=6)	687 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	685 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	679 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	678 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	677 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	674 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (222 - 790, n=56, last 2 years)	632 Points -8%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2731 (2302.42^min - 2731.12^max) Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2537 - 2908, n=6)	2628 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2595 (2132.08^min - 2595.21^max) Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2568 (2508.31^min - 2568.38^max) Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2555 (2513.19^min - 2555.42^max) Points -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2482 (2389.2^min - 2482.31^max) Points -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2176 (2149.96^min - 2176.16^max) Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook (953 - 3345, n=62, last 2 years)	1983 Points -23%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	280 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	277 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=6)	277 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	274 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	268 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	258 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	250 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (151.5 - 307, n=56, last 2 years)	247 Points -11%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Subnotebook (163 - 1600, n=60, last 2 years)	348 Seconds * -78%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	226 Seconds * -15%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	218 Seconds * -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	216 Seconds * -10%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	208 Seconds * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=6)	196.5 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	196 Seconds *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	193 Seconds * +2%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64759 - 74664, n=6)	69087 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	68354 MIPS
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	67444 MIPS -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66807 MIPS -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	65072 MIPS -5%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	61780 MIPS -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	61047 MIPS -11%
Average of class Subnotebook (16223 - 75402, n=53, last 2 years)	48879 MIPS -28%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6403 MIPS +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=6)	6280 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6278 MIPS
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6274 MIPS 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	6205 MIPS -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (3874 - 6403, n=55, last 2 years)	5476 MIPS -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5372 MIPS -14%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5245 MIPS -16%

Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13417 Points +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12940 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12700 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=10)	12844 Points -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	12796 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12643 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12578 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (6796 - 15059, n=47, last 2 years)	11792 Points -9%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	11279 Points -13%

Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2540 - 2698, n=8)	2625 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2612 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2555 Points -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2604 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2552 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2540 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (2003 - 3130, n=42, last 2 years)	2505 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2372 Points -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2369 Points -9%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13137 Points +12%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12189 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11754 - 12726, n=7)	12070 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11802 Points 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11780 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11754 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (4457 - 14608, n=56, last 2 years)	10037 Points -15%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	9897 Points -16%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1965 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1945 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1942 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=7)	1933 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1875 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (1426 - 2350, n=56, last 2 years)	1763 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1754 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1750 Points -11%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	20.7 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=6)	20.5 fps -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.5 fps -6%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	19.4 fps -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	18.6 fps -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.3 fps -16%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	17 fps -18%
Average of class Subnotebook (1.5 - 21.3, n=55, last 2 years)	12.7 fps -39%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	79.2 s * -78%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.5 - 77, n=6)	51.9 s * -17%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 115.5, n=55, last 2 years)	51.7 s * -16%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	50.4 s * -13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	47.8 s * -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47.1 s * -6%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	44.5 s *
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	43.9 s * +1%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.011, n=55, last 2 years)	0.515 sec * -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.478 sec * -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4753 sec * -1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4716 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4336 - 0.4935, n=6)	0.4538 sec * +4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	0.4521 sec * +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4477 sec * +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4464 sec * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2568 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

176.4 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

277 Points

Yardım

... kıyaslama

Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	92.6 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	92.4 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	90.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	85.6 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	75 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	68.7 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	67.1 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	55 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (25916 - 29544, n=6)	26817 KRay/s +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	26362 KRay/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	25961 KRay/s -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	24712 KRay/s -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	22269 KRay/s -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14196 KRay/s -46%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13188 KRay/s -50%
Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 32888, n=55, last 2 years)	11905 KRay/s -55%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (107613 - 125873, n=6)	113028 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	110027 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	107613 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	103755 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	93550 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75664 Points -30%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69098 Points -36%
Average of class Subnotebook (14650 - 123315, n=55, last 2 years)	58251 Points -46%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4627 - 5180, n=6)	4830 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4732 MB/s
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	4646 MB/s -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4627 MB/s -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	4132 MB/s -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3507 MB/s -26%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3348 MB/s -29%
Average of class Subnotebook (453 - 5287, n=55, last 2 years)	2787 MB/s -41%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (114899 - 124695, n=6)	117185 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	115682 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	114899 Points -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	114236 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	99874 Points -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89759 Points -22%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	82364 Points -29%
Average of class Subnotebook (15447 - 115682, n=55, last 2 years)	81816 Points -29%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	15226 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14876 - 15519, n=6)	15181 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	14941 Points -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	14385 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	13731 Points -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9873 Points -35%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9291 Points -39%
Average of class Subnotebook (1223 - 18418, n=55, last 2 years)	8028 Points -47%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (57671 - 67367, n=6)	60417 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	58765 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	57671 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	55540 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	49687 Points -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	37090 Points -36%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	33802 Points -41%
Average of class Subnotebook (7704 - 65433, n=55, last 2 years)	30216 Points -48%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	161430 MB/s +87%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	124284 MB/s +44%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (67393 - 172642, n=6)	98619 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	86256 MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	76247 MB/s -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	73336 MB/s -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	67393 MB/s -22%
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=55, last 2 years)	60374 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1085 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1058 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1021 MB/s -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1005 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=6)	946 MB/s -11%
Average of class Subnotebook (398 - 1379, n=55, last 2 years)	742 MB/s -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	627 MB/s -41%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	468 MB/s -56%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (13875 - 15911, n=6)	14329 KRay/s +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13999 KRay/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13896 KRay/s -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13100 KRay/s -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	11637 KRay/s -17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7521 KRay/s -46%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	6835 KRay/s -51%
Average of class Subnotebook (204 - 17495, n=55, last 2 years)	6162 KRay/s -56%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	51390 MPixel/s +33%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	40779 MPixel/s +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (38580 - 41668, n=6)	40214 MPixel/s +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	39002 MPixel/s +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	38837 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	38580 MPixel/s
Average of class Subnotebook (7622 - 53954, n=55, last 2 years)	38450 MPixel/s 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	35861 MPixel/s -7%

Sistem performansı

Sistem kıyaslamalarındaki sonuçlar genel olarak iyi ve VIA 14 Pro günlük kullanımda her zaman duyarlı bir yol arkadaşı oldu. RAM yükseltilemese de, standart olarak 32 GB yüklüdür ve bu da kullanıcıların büyük çoğunluğu için yıllarca yeterli olacaktır.

PCMark 10 / Score
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	7428 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7120 - 7641, n=4)	7352 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	7216 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7157 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	7120 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	7045 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	7028 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (4528 - 7646, n=48, last 2 years)	6265 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	11168 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10685 - 11570, n=4)	10983 Points +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	10946 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	10894 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	10855 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10732 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	10685 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (9143 - 11331, n=48, last 2 years)	10484 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10449 Points +7%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	10279 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9787 - 10482, n=4)	10174 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	9969 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	9787 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	8837 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	8804 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10449, n=48, last 2 years)	8350 Points -15%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	9823 Points +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	9812 Points +5%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	9691 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9367 - 10009, n=4)	9654 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	9423 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	9367 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	8873 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (4220 - 10983, n=48, last 2 years)	7701 Points -18%

CrossMark / Overall
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1779 - 1939, n=4)	1861 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1852 Points +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1840 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1810 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1779 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1698 Points -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1694 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1971, n=55, last 2 years)	1580 Points -11%

CrossMark / Productivity
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1716 - 1872, n=4)	1794 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1784 Points +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1770 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1745 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1716 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1658 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1598 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1875, n=55, last 2 years)	1527 Points -11%

CrossMark / Creativity
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1999 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1942 - 2040, n=4)	1992 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1978 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1942 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1925 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1909 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1842 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2210, n=55, last 2 years)	1718 Points -12%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1721 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1703 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1523 - 1849, n=4)	1698 Points +11%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1612 Points +6%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1523 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1428 Points -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1377 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=55, last 2 years)	1373 Points -10%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	440 Points +43%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	324 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (295 - 334, n=4)	309 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	308 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (225 - 448, n=56, last 2 years)	304 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	295 Points -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	278 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	276 Points -10%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	319 Points +30%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	254 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 266, n=4)	254 Points +4%
Average of class Subnotebook (67.2 - 325, n=54, last 2 years)	250 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	248 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	247 Points +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	247 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	245 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1913, n=62, last 2 years)	548 ms * -6%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	544 ms * -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	531 ms * -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	530 ms * -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	518 ms * -0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	516 ms *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (501 - 531, n=4)	516 ms * -0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	508 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7120 puan
Yardım

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	93396 MB/s +35%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	76766 MB/s +11%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76483 MB/s +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	69522 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	69160 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (67615 - 69523, n=6)	68647 MB/s -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	67660 MB/s -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 96791, n=55, last 2 years)	66483 MB/s -4%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	84853 MB/s +70%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	70384 MB/s +41%
Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 122210, n=55, last 2 years)	64342 MB/s +29%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	58321 MB/s +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=6)	57529 MB/s +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	50572 MB/s +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	49971 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	49866 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	107658 MB/s +15%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	93323 MB/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	93239 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	93229 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (85464 - 93239, n=6)	88778 MB/s -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 107658, n=55, last 2 years)	68558 MB/s -26%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	67847 MB/s -27%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	58692 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	187.8 ns * -75%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	139.4 ns * -30%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	114.5 ns * -7%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	107.1 ns *
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	106 ns * +1%
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=55, last 2 years)	104 ns * +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	101.8 ns * +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (85.6 - 107.1, n=6)	95.5 ns * +11%

* ... smaller is better

DPC gecikme süreleri

Standartlaştırılmış gecikme testimizde (internette gezinme, 4K YouTube oynatma, CPU yükü), mevcut BIOS sürümüne sahip test cihazı hiçbir sınırlama göstermiyor. Bir sürücü biraz başarısız olsa da, önemli kesmeden işleme gecikme değeri çok düşük.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1219.5 μs * -156%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1102.5 μs * -131%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1045.4 μs * -119%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	848.9 μs * -78%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	476.5 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Yığın depolama

VIA 14 Pro, M.2 2280 SSD'ler için iki hızlı PCIe 4.0 yuvası sunmaktadır. Temel yapılandırmada 500 GB SSD takılıdır, ancak test cihazımız Samsung 990 Pro'nun 2 TB versiyonunu içermektedir (ek ücret 138 Euro). 990 Pro yüksek aktarım hızlarına ulaşıyor ve performans uzun süreli yük altında bile tamamen sabit kalıyor. İlk çalıştırmadan sonra kullanıcının emrinde 1,76 TB bulunmaktadır. Diğer SSD kıyaslamalarını bulabilirsiniz burada.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7124 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6890 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 459 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 463 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 118.2 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 388 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1211 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	89.7 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	87.6 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	71.2 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	70.9 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	69.6 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	54.1 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	45.1 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	44.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4269 (4234.28^min - 4269.44^max) MB/s +29%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4057 (4023.18^min - 4057.01^max) MB/s +22%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3322 (3294.63^min - 3322.45^max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3300 (3279.05^min - 3299.87^max) MB/s -1%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (2985 - 3322, n=2)	3154 MB/s -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (1147 - 4501, n=55, last 2 years)	2961 MB/s -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2498 (2465.72^min - 2497.5^max) MB/s -25%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2379 (2365.59^min - 2378.73^max) MB/s -28%
seq write
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4695 (4542.57^min - 4694.68^max) MB/s +13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (4138 - 5099, n=2)	4619 MB/s +12%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4317 (4288.28^min - 4317.37^max) MB/s +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	4138 (4046.54^min - 4137.79^max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3660 (3614.13^min - 3659.97^max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Subnotebook (1000 - 5344, n=55, last 2 years)	3024 MB/s -27%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2604 (2525.41^min - 2604.03^max) MB/s -37%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2211 (2136.92^min - 2210.59^max) MB/s -47%
seq q8 t1 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	6844 (6027.53^min - 6843.85^max) MB/s +19%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (5761 - 7102, n=2)	6432 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	5761 (5244.77^min - 5760.67^max) MB/s
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	5251 (4849.66^min - 5251.27^max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Subnotebook (2450 - 7134, n=55, last 2 years)	5107 MB/s -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	4911 (4608.27^min - 4910.87^max) MB/s -15%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4504 (3696.49^min - 4504.05^max) MB/s -22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3857 (3120.3^min - 3857.29^max) MB/s -33%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	6810 (6778.41^min - 6809.87^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (6801 - 6810, n=2)	6806 MB/s 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4955 (4919.92^min - 4955.1^max) MB/s -27%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4676 (4556.48^min - 4675.9^max) MB/s -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	4467 (4437.85^min - 4466.6^max) MB/s -34%
Average of class Subnotebook (1469 - 6810, n=55, last 2 years)	4066 MB/s -40%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3105 (3076.1^min - 3105.46^max) MB/s -54%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2871 (2734.06^min - 2871.34^max) MB/s -58%
4k q1 t1 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	82.2 (81.81^min - 82.16^max) MB/s +22%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	77.8 (73.1^min - 77.81^max) MB/s +16%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (67.3 - 80.7, n=2)	74 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	67.3 (66.81^min - 67.29^max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (29.4 - 88.6, n=55, last 2 years)	63.5 MB/s -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	62.2 (61.77^min - 62.19^max) MB/s -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	58.8 (58.1^min - 58.81^max) MB/s -13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	34.6 (34.41^min - 34.64^max) MB/s -49%
4k q1 t1 write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (159.4 - 352, n=2)	256 MB/s +61%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	245 (242.81^min - 244.56^max) MB/s +54%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	221 (220.34^min - 221.44^max) MB/s +39%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	205 (203.95^min - 205.23^max) MB/s +29%
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 360, n=55, last 2 years)	165.2 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	159.4 (155.73^min - 159.37^max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	157.7 (151.37^min - 157.68^max) MB/s -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	112.5 (111.01^min - 112.51^max) MB/s -29%
4k q32 t16 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4286 (4274.43^min - 4286.07^max) MB/s +313%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3460 (3433.29^min - 3460.15^max) MB/s +234%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (1037 - 5735, n=2)	3386 MB/s +227%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	3048 (2829.43^min - 3047.69^max) MB/s +194%
Average of class Subnotebook (283 - 4286, n=55, last 2 years)	1400 MB/s +35%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1037 (1017.69^min - 1037.34^max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	909 (848.35^min - 908.51^max) MB/s -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	850 (824.69^min - 850.28^max) MB/s -18%
4k q32 t16 write
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4189 (4136.14^min - 4188.97^max) MB/s +769%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3266 (3227.93^min - 3265.61^max) MB/s +578%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	2980 (2752.98^min - 2980.38^max) MB/s +518%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (482 - 4869, n=2)	2676 MB/s +455%
Average of class Subnotebook (213 - 4189, n=55, last 2 years)	1001 MB/s +108%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	482 (476.35^min - 481.55^max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	435 (416.7^min - 435.33^max) MB/s -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	375 (355.65^min - 375.1^max) MB/s -22%

AS SSD
Score Total
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	8892 Points +36%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (6556 - 10745, n=2)	8651 Points +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	7325 Points +12%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	6556 Points
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4927 Points -25%
Average of class Subnotebook (1993 - 8892, n=54, last 2 years)	4576 Points -30%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3819 Points -42%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3408 Points -48%
Score Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3307 Points +138%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2782 Points +100%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (1391 - 3980, n=2)	2686 Points +93%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1784 Points +28%
Average of class Subnotebook (780 - 3307, n=54, last 2 years)	1480 Points +6%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1391 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1217 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1195 Points -14%
Score Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (4469 - 4734, n=2)	4602 Points +3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	4469 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3972 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3203 Points -28%
Average of class Subnotebook (549 - 4469, n=54, last 2 years)	2394 Points -46%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	2223 Points -50%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2070 Points -54%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1632 Points -63%
Seq Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	5525 MB/s +27%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (4336 - 5066, n=2)	4701 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	4336 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	4310 MB/s -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4109 MB/s -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (1903 - 5525, n=54, last 2 years)	3973 MB/s -8%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3675 MB/s -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3304 MB/s -24%
Seq Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (3714 - 5119, n=2)	4416 MB/s +19%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4104 MB/s +11%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4004 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3714 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2791 MB/s -25%
Average of class Subnotebook (998 - 4961, n=54, last 2 years)	2630 MB/s -29%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2172 MB/s -42%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1828 MB/s -51%
4K Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	72.3 MB/s +13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (64.2 - 77.8, n=2)	71 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	64.2 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (19.9 - 96.2, n=54, last 2 years)	59.9 MB/s -7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	58.5 MB/s -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	57.8 MB/s -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	51 MB/s -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	49.9 MB/s -22%
4K Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (192.8 - 307, n=2)	250 MB/s +30%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	192.8 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	180.6 MB/s -6%
Average of class Subnotebook (71.4 - 256, n=54, last 2 years)	179.6 MB/s -7%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	177.1 MB/s -8%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	173.1 MB/s -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	167.9 MB/s -13%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	161 MB/s -16%
4K-64 Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	2682 MB/s +200%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2301 MB/s +158%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (893 - 3395, n=2)	2144 MB/s +140%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1315 MB/s +47%
Average of class Subnotebook (349 - 2682, n=54, last 2 years)	1023 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	893 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	806 MB/s -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	798 MB/s -11%
4K-64 Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (3905 - 3915, n=2)	3910 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3905 MB/s
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3410 MB/s -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2743 MB/s -30%
Average of class Subnotebook (242 - 3905, n=54, last 2 years)	1947 MB/s -50%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1719 MB/s -56%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1639 MB/s -58%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1238 MB/s -68%
Access Time Read
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	0.058 ms * -190%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.02 - 0.16, n=54, last 2 years)	0.05417 ms * -171%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (0.02 - 0.052, n=2)	0.036 ms * -80%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.027 ms * -35%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	0.024 ms * -20%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.023 ms * -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	0.022 ms * -10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	0.02 ms *
Access Time Write
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.11 ms * -450%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	0.108 ms * -440%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.1 ms * -400%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.016 - 0.352, n=54, last 2 years)	0.07452 ms * -273%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	0.025 ms * -25%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	0.022 ms * -10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	0.02 ms *
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (0.013 - 0.02, n=2)	0.0165 ms * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5739 (4853.38-5771.79)

Grafik kartı

Ryzen 8000 serisi hala tanıdık özelliklere dayanıyor Radeon 780MrAM'in çift kanallı yapılandırmasından yararlanır. IGPU günlük kullanım için çok uygundur ve oyun oynamak da mümkündür, ancak mevcut oyunlarda genellikle düşük ayrıntılarla tatmin olmanız gerekir. Sentetik kıyaslamalarda, yeni Intel Arc Graphics iGPU (8 Xe çekirdekli) 780M'den biraz daha iyi performans gösterebilir, ancak oyun performansı eşittir.

Grafik performansı uzun süreli yük altında bile tamamen sabit kalıyor ve Cyberpunk 2077 testimiz (30 dakika) de performans kaybı göstermiyor. Ancak pil modunda GPU performansı minimum düzeyde (~%11) azalıyor. Diğer GPU kıyaslamaları şurada mevcuttur teknoloji̇ bölümümüz.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 6.2

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	95.3 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	93 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	90 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	87.7 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	85.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	84.5 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M	81.9 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	69.5 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13734 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13524 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13321 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13316 Points -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	12999 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (7868 - 14249, n=48)	12419 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12375 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (2979 - 16904, n=52, last 2 years)	9291 Points -32%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9548 Points +14%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8538 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8513 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	8441 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8438 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8345 Points
Average AMD Radeon 780M (4550 - 8816, n=48)	7703 Points -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (2837 - 12349, n=56, last 2 years)	6756 Points -19%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3671 Points +26%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3411 Points +17%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3027 Points +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2915 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2876 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2847 Points -2%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (1496 - 3196, n=48)	2702 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (811 - 4773, n=55, last 2 years)	2319 Points -20%

Geekbench 6.2 - GPU OpenCL
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	34669 Points +12%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	31025 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	30818 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	27410 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	29233 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (15316 - 33077, n=45)	28695 Points -7%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	28473 Points -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (10340 - 52427, n=42, last 2 years)	26481 Points -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	26058 Points -15%

3DMark 11 Performance		13077 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7731 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score		3234 puan
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		2788 puan
Yardım

... kıyaslama

Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Subnotebook (256 - 1153, n=58, last 2 years)	573 Seconds * -82%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	385 Seconds * -23%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (305 - 664, n=46)	377 Seconds * -20%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	369 Seconds * -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	352 Seconds * -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	341 Seconds * -9%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	336 Seconds * -7%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	314 Seconds *

Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
Average of class Subnotebook (223 - 364, n=2, last 2 years)	294 Seconds *
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	223 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	93.6 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	92.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	88.3 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	87.6 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	87.2 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	72.4 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	71.7 pt

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.2 (3.56^min, 19.2^P1) fps +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 (3.98^min, 18.9^P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26.1 (3.05^min, 18.2^P1) fps
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.7 (2.69^min, 16.4^P1) fps -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.6 (2.88^min, 15.9^P1) fps -21%
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 67.5, n=47, last 2 years)	18.2 fps -30%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	31.6 fps +10%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.4 fps +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.8 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.4 fps -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.6 fps -4%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	26.5 fps -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 50.1, n=53, last 2 years)	22 fps -24%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	58 fps +18%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49.6 (35.6^min, 39^P1) fps +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49 fps 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49 fps
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	48.9 (6.3^min, 16.2^P1) fps 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	48.1 (10.9^min, 15.3^P1) fps -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 86, n=53, last 2 years)	36.8 fps -25%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	85.1 (75.2^min) fps +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	76.8 (67.2^min) fps +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	75.1 (65.6^min) fps
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	75 (63.4^min) fps 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	74 (46.7^min) fps -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (29.4 - 109.1, n=55, last 2 years)	60.8 fps -19%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	35.2 (33.9^min) fps -53%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	39.5 fps +28%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	35.4 fps +15%
Average of class Subnotebook (22.1 - 97.1, n=49, last 2 years)	34.4 fps +11%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	32.3 fps +5%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	31.7 fps +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	31 fps 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.9 fps

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS chart

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.6 (19.5-22)

	düşük	orta	yüksek	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	147.5	133.8	64.1	26.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	122.9	102.7	84.1	75.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	75.6	38.2	28.8		20.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	53	38.1	30.9
Strange Brigade (2018)	155	66	57	49
F1 23 (2023)	85.9	76.7	53	11.6
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	40.1	31.5	25.8	25.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	41.5	32.2	25.8	22.4
F1 24 (2024)	85.9	71.9	51.4	11.1

Emisyonlar ve Enerji

Gürültü emisyonları

VIA 14 Pro'nun soğutmasında iki fan kullanılıyor ve ses seviyesi büyük ölçüde seçilen enerji profiline bağlı. Rölanti modunda ve basit görevlerde, cihaz performans modunda bile çoğunlukla sessiz kalır. Ancak daha yüksek yük altında, iki fan açıkça fark edilir ve maksimum 43,6 dB(A) özellikle sessiz değildir. Diğer enerji profillerindeki sonuçlar aşağıdaki tabloda listelenmiştir. Fanlar özellikle Sessiz profilinde çok uzun süre devre dışı kalmaktadır. Test cihazımızda başka hiçbir elektronik ses yoktu.

Enerji profili	3DMark 06	Cyberpunk 2077	Stres testi
Sessiz	Fan kapalı	28,8 dB(A)	30,6 dB(A)
Dengeli	36,2 dB(A)	36,2 dB(A)	36,2 dB(A)
Güç	36,2 dB(A)	43,6 dB(A)	43,6 dB(A)

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta		25.7 / 25.7 / 25.7 dB
Çalışırken		36.2 / 43.6 dB

	30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 25.7 dB(A)

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
Noise		1%	3%	2%	1%	9%
off / environment *	25.7	25.11 2%	23.8 7%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	23.5 9%
Idle Minimum *	25.7	25.11 2%	23.8 7%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	23.5 9%
Idle Average *	25.7	25.11 2%	23.8 7%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	23.5 9%
Idle Maximum *	25.7	27.2 -6%	27.1 -5%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	25.1 2%
Load Average *	36.2	31.3 14%	34.9 4%	35.9 1%	44.3 -22%	32.4 10%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	43.6		43.7 -0%
Load Maximum *	43.6	46.61 -7%	43.7 -0%	42.2 3%	44.3 -2%	37.3 14%
Witcher 3 ultra *				39.3	41.3	34.9

* ... smaller is better

Sıcaklık

VIA 14 Pro'nun kasası boş modda ve hafif görevler sırasında neredeyse hiç ısınmıyor, ancak bu durum yük altında değişiyor. Alt tarafta, hem oyun sırasında hem de stres testinde orta alanda neredeyse 50 °C ölçtük, bu nedenle böyle bir senaryoda cihazı uyluklarınıza yerleştirmemelisiniz. Klavye alanı da 43 °C'ye kadar hissedilir derecede ısınıyor, ancak burada herhangi bir sınırlama yok. Stres testinde işlemci sabit 54 watt'ta çalışıyor.

Negatif tarafta, Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 güç kaynağından biraz farklı olan 100 watt'lık güç kaynağını fark ettik. Stres testi sırasında dizüstü bilgisayarın toplam tüketimi 92 watt civarında olmasına ve bu nedenle henüz güç kaynağının sınırında olmamasına rağmen, 60 ° C'nin hemen altındaki sıcaklıklar kesinlikle çok yüksek.

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Cyberpunk


44.1 °C	44.6 °C	43.2 °C
41.7 °C	43.6 °C	40.1 °C
31.9 °C	33 °C	32.8 °C

Maksimum: 44.6 °C
Ortalama: 39.4 °C


44.6 °C	50.9 °C	42.2 °C
39.3 °C	50 °C	34.4 °C
34.3 °C	35.5 °C	32.6 °C

Maksimum: 50.9 °C
Ortalama: 40.4 °C

Güç kaynağı 59.5 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 22.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Cyberpunk


26.3 °C	26.5 °C	26.3 °C
25.7 °C	26.2 °C	26 °C
25.2 °C	25.5 °C	25.3 °C

Maksimum: 26.5 °C
Ortalama: 25.9 °C


26.1 °C	26.3 °C	25.8 °C
25.7 °C	26.3 °C	25.3 °C
25.6 °C	25.6 °C	25.5 °C

Maksimum: 26.3 °C
Ortalama: 25.8 °C

Güç kaynağı 28.7 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Cyberpunk


42.3 °C	42.9 °C	41.4 °C
38.1 °C	42.8 °C	38.2 °C
32.3 °C	33.8 °C	30.7 °C

Maksimum: 42.9 °C
Ortalama: 38.1 °C


43.1 °C	49.5 °C	38.6 °C
37.2 °C	48.3 °C	33.2 °C
32.4 °C	33.5 °C	31.5 °C

Maksimum: 49.5 °C
Ortalama: 38.6 °C

Güç kaynağı 57.8 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.9 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-5.5 °C / -9.9 F).

Yüzey sıcaklıkları stres testi (üst taraf)

Yüzey sıcaklıkları stres testi (alt taraf)

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
Heat		-6%	-2%	2%	11%	7%
Maximum Upper Side *	44.6	45.2 -1%	43.7 2%	43.1 3%	39.6 11%	41.5 7%
Maximum Bottom *	50.9	49.2 3%	49.4 3%	50.2 1%	38.6 24%	45.7 10%
Idle Upper Side *	26.5	29.6 -12%	27.7 -5%	25.8 3%	24.8 6%	24.7 7%
Idle Bottom *	26.3	30.2 -15%	28.6 -9%	26.4 -0%	25.3 4%	24.9 5%

* ... smaller is better

Konuşmacı

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Güç tüketimi

Daha yüksek panel parlaklığı, Tuxedo Pulse 14'e kıyasla olumsuz bir şekilde fark edilmiyor ve 94 watt'lık maksimum tüketim de biraz daha düşük. Sonuç olarak, burada herhangi bir sürpriz yok ve birlikte verilen 100 watt'lık güç kaynağı yeterince boyutlandırılmış. Bununla birlikte, kapalı durumdaki tüketim hala iyileşmemiştir ve 0,8 watt biraz yüksektir.

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.8 / 0.86 Watt
Boşta	4.8 / 8.7 / 9.2 Watt
Çalışırken	63.2 / 94.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
Power Consumption		11%	2%	27%	5%	-8%
Idle Minimum *	4.8	4.4 8%	4.4 8%	3.6 25%	5.3 -10%	5.6 -17%
Idle Average *	8.7	5.6 36%	9.2 -6%	6.6 24%	7.2 17%	9.2 -6%
Idle Maximum *	9.2	12.5 -36%	9.6 -4%	7.4 20%	7.5 18%	9.7 -5%
Load Average *	63.2	52.1 18%	62.6 1%	47.1 25%	65.6 -4%	65.2 -3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	81.3		71.5 12%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	80.2		71.9 10%
Load Maximum *	94.5	67.3 29%	101.7 -8%	54.3 43%	89.6 5%	101 -7%
Witcher 3 ultra *		46.7		47.4	73	70

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / Stress test

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.9 (88.9-94.5)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.24 (6.23-10.7)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø81.3 (78.4-83.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø81.1 (78.4-83.8)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.7 (80-81.3)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.3 (28.2-39)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.6 (78.6-82.8)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø68.1 (56.6-72.3)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.14 (6.7-11.7)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø80.2 (78.5-83.1)

Pil ömrü

Batarya çalışma süreleri 60 Wh batarya ile birlikte kendi içinde kötü değildir, ancak VIA 14 Pro rakipleri tarafından geride bırakılmıştır. Aşağıdaki tabloda da görülebileceği gibi, frekansın pil çalışma süreleri üzerinde yalnızca minimum bir etkisi vardır. WLAN ve video testi için 150 cd/m² parlaklık, test cihazındaki maksimum parlaklığın %32'sine karşılık geliyor.

Frekans	WLAN testi 150 cd/m²	WLAN testi maksimum parlaklık
60 Hz	9:31 saat	6:16 saat
120 Hz	9:28 saat	6:06 saat

Cihaz açıkken tam şarj 141 dakika sürer. yaklaşık 55 dakika sonra kapasitenin %80'i tekrar kullanılabilir hale gelir.

Batarya ömrü

WiFi Websurfing		9h 31min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		6h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 12min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)		1h 04min

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		118%	73%	66%	55%	6%	47%
H.264	612		1251 104%	1046 71%	1031 68%	595 -3%	849 ?(426 - 1251, n=28, last 2 years) 39%
WiFi v1.3	571	758 33%	888 56%	774 36%	710 24%	620 9%	691 ?(312 - 1585, n=58, last 2 years) 21%
Load	64	194 203%	101 58%	123 92%	110 72%	72 13%	115.3 ?(57 - 197, n=47, last 2 years) 80%

Artılar

+ çok yüksek sistem performansı

+ pWM olmadan iyi 120 Hz IPS ekran

+ standart olarak 32 GB RAM

+ 8 TB'a kadar depolama için 2x PCIe-4.0-x4

+ rahat klavye

+ iyi çeşitlilikte bağlantılar

Eksiler

- uSB 4.0 yok

- yavaş microSD kart okuyucu

- Parmak izlerine duyarlı kılıf

- zayıf 720p web kamerası

- RAM lehimli

- yüksek güç kaynağı sıcaklıkları

Karar - Schenker VIA 14 Pro şimdi daha parlak bir ekrana sahip

İncelemede: Schenker Via 14 Pro (M24). Test cihazı tarafından sağlanmıştır: Schenker Almanya

VIA 14 Pro ile Schenker, güçlü Ryzen işlemci ve 32 GB'lık standart RAM yapılandırmasına ek olarak, her şeyden önce iyi genişletme seçenekleriyle (2x M.2-2280) karakterize edilen hızlı ve kompakt bir 14 inç cihaz sunuyor. USB 4.0 gibi modern standartlar olmasa bile yeterli sayıda bağlantı noktası da mevcut. Ancak microSD kart okuyucu çok yavaş ve zayıf 720p web kamerası artık güncel değil. Yeni yüzeye rağmen parmak izleri hala bir sorun.

Yeni Ryzen işlemci bol miktarda performans ve hızlı Radeon 780M GPU sunuyor, ancak önceki modeldeki eski Ryzen 7 7840HS'ye göre hiçbir avantajı yok. 2024 model yılı için en büyük yükseltme, artık önemli ölçüde daha parlak olan IPS ekran. Üreticinin spesifikasyonu 300'den 400 cd/m²'ye çıkıyor ve test cihazımız 470 cd/m²'nin biraz altında bir ortalamaya bile ulaşıyor. Kalibrasyondan sonra görüntü kalitesi de çok iyi.

Schenker VIA Pro 14, 14 inçlik hızlı bir dizüstü bilgisayar ve şimdi üretken faaliyetler için çok uygun olan daha parlak bir IPS ekran sunuyor. Fiyat-performans oranı iyi, ancak fedakarlık yapmanız gereken bazı alanlar var (USB 4.0 yok, zayıf web kamerası, yavaş kart okuyucu).

Rakipleriyle karşılaştırıldığında VIA 14 Pro, 32 GB RAM ve 14 inç modeller için nadir bulunan iki SSD yuvasıyla özellikle iyi puan alıyor. Bununla birlikte, rakiplerin bazıları OLED paneller sunuyor ve pil ömrü açısından da avantajlara sahip. Tuxedo şimdi Linux ile aynı Pulse 14 Gen4'ü de 1.230 €'dan satışa sunuyor.

Not: Derecelendirme sistemimizi yakın zamanda güncelledik ve 8. versiyonun sonuçları 7. versiyonun sonuçları ile karşılaştırılamaz. Daha fazla bilgi için burada.

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) - 2024-07-12 07/12/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

İşcilik

85 / 98 → 87%

Klavye

88%

Mouse

93%

Bağlanılabilirlik

60 / 74 → 81%

Ağırlık

70 / 20-77 → 88%

Batarya

87%

Görüntü

85%

Oyun performansı

53 / 75 → 70%

Uygulama performansı

86 / 92 → 93%

Isınma

81%

Ses

85%

Audio

70 / 91 → 77%

Camera

23 / 75 → 31%

Ortalama

62%

85%

Subnotebook - Ortalama Ağırlık

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
0%

Power Use
76.9%

Repairability
90%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 39.9%

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 429524 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) incelemesi - Ryzen 8000 ve daha parlak ekrana sahip kompakt AMD subnotebook

Andreas Osthoff, 2024-07-13 (Update: 2024-07-13)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit kıyaslama
Toshiba Satellite W30Dt-A-100 (min) A4-1200, Radeon HD 8180	33
...
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2562
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2563
Lenovo Legion Slim 7 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2564
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	2568
HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2575
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2576
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	2581
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	15842

3DMark 11 kıyaslama
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13052
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13075
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13075
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13077
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	13082
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13131
EVGA SC15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	13148
...
(max) i5-14600K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	66828