Notebookcheck Logo

XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) incelemesi: Kompakt bir oyun dizüstü bilgisayarında tam RTX 4090 gücü

Suyu getirin.

Neo 16 şu anda en güçlü dizüstü bilgisayarlardan biri: Core i9 14900HX ve GeForce RTX 4090 bilgisayarı oyun, yayın ve render için hazırlar. Opsiyonel harici su soğutma sistemi donanımın son damlasına kadar soğutulmasını sağlıyor.

Neo 16 ile Schenker üst düzey segmente hizmet ediyor ve buna göre yarım önlem yok: Core i9, GeForce RTX 4090 ve 32 GB RAM, dizüstü bilgisayarı zorlu uygulama senaryoları (akış, render, oyun) için donatıyor. Ancak bunun bir bedeli var: İnceleme modeli için yaklaşık 4.000 $ (mevcut dolar / euro döviz kuru) ödemeniz gerekecek, ancak daha ucuz varyantlar da 2.000 $ 'dan alınabilir. Temel, Tongfang barebone (GM6IX9B) tarafından sağlanmaktadır. Rakipler, örneğin şu şekilde geliyor Razer Blade 16, the Medion Erazer Beast X40 ve Asus ROG Strix Scar 17.

Cihaz 2023 modeline benziyor ancak bazı yeni özelliklere sahip: Daha parlak bir ekran, elden geçirilmiş bir soğutma sistemi ve daha geniş bir açılma açısı. Önceki modelde bulunan (isteğe bağlı) mekanik klavye, 2024 modelinin sunduklarının bir parçası değil.

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (XMG Neo 16 Seri)
İşlemci
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 205 W PL2 / Short Burst, 205 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Grafik kartı
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Çekirdek: 2040 MHz, Bellek: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 32.0.15.5599, Advanced Optimus, MUX-Switch
Bellek
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Görüntü
16.00 inç 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE NE160QDM-NZA, IPS, G-Sync, parlak: hayır, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Anakart
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Harddisk
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2 2280, 865 GB Boş
Bağlantılar
4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Ses çıkışları: Headset combined port, Kart okuyucular: SD, SDHC, SDXC, , TPM 2.0
Network
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Boyut
yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 26.6 x 356.7 x 253
Batarya
99.8 Wh, 6450 mAh Lithium-Polymer
İşletim sistemi
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Ek özellikler
Hoparlörler: Stereo, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, USB Thumbdrive (Drivers, Manuals), Stickers, Mousepad, 24 Ay Garanti
Ağırlık
2.52 kg, Güç kaynağı: 970 g
Fiyat
3800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Karşılaştırmalı olarak olası rakipler

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
85.5 %v8
06/2024
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.6 mm16.00"2560x1600
91.1 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
02/2024
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.2 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
02/2024
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg36 mm17.00"2560x1600
87.2 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg28.3 mm17.30"2560x1440

Kasa - XMG dizüstü bilgisayar alüminyum bir kasaya sahiptir

2023 modelinin kasası mevcut Neo modelinde kullanılmıyor. Yeni kapak, en son XMG dizüstü bilgisayarlarda görülen kasa ile daha fazla ortak noktaya sahip - doğru yönde atılmış bir adım: Üretici, plastik ve metal karışımı yerine tamamen metalden yapılmış bir kasa tercih etti (İstisna: Ekran çerçeveleri plastikten yapılmıştır). Kasa beklediğiniz kadar sağlam. Ana ünite ve kapak sadece hafifçe bükülebilir. Kapak 180 dereceye kadar açılma açısına izin verir (2023 modeli: 135 derece). Bu, birkaç kişi varken içeriği görüntülemeyi kolaylaştırır. Sıkı menteşeler kapağı güvenli bir şekilde yerinde ve neredeyse her açıda tutar. Cihazı tek elle açmak mümkündür.

Göz alıcı tasarım öğeleri hiçbir yerde görülmez, yani mat siyah bilgisayar oldukça ciddi bir figür oluşturur. Renkli ışık, arkadan aydınlatmalı tuşlara (RGB) ek olarak kullanıcı tarafından tanımlanan, ayrı ayrı özelleştirilebilen bir LED şerit ile sağlanır.

XMG Neo 16 (Erken 24)
XMG Neo 16 (Erken 24)
XMG Neo 16 (Erken 24)
XMG Neo 16 (Erken 24)
XMG Neo 16 (Erken 24)
XMG Neo 16 (Erken 24)
XMG Neo 16 (Erken 24)
XMG Neo 16 (Erken 24)
XMG Neo 16 (Erken 24)
XMG Neo 16 (Erken 24)
XMG Neo 16 (Erken 24)
XMG Neo 16 (Erken 24)

En yeni Neo 16 bir öncekinden biraz daha kompakt görünüyor, ancak ağırlıkları açısından dizüstü bilgisayarlar birbirinden ayırt edilemiyor. Sadece Bıçak 16 daha fazla kompaktlık sunuyor - ve neredeyse aynı ağırlıkta.

Boyut ve ağırlık karşılaştırması

395 mm 282.1 mm 28.3 mm 2.9 kg383 mm 272 mm 36 mm 2.9 kg357 mm 268 mm 29.9 mm 2.5 kg356.7 mm 253 mm 26.6 mm 2.5 kg355 mm 244 mm 22 mm 2.5 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Özellikler - USB 4 yerleşiktir

Neo 16'nın beş USB portundan dördü (3x USB-A, 2x USB-C) USB 3.2 Gen 1 standardına göre çalışır. Yalnızca arkadaki USB-C bağlantı noktası, Güç Dağıtımı ve Ekran Alt modu desteği de dahil olmak üzere Thunderbolt 4'ü (USB 4) masaya getiriyor. Toplam iki video çıkışı mevcuttur (1x HDMI, 1x DP). Bir ses jakı ve bir Gigabit Ethernet portu (2,5 GBit/s) teklifi tamamlıyor.

USB portları arasındaki mesafe (sağ taraf: 12 mm, sol taraf: 8 mm) uygun bir şekilde orantılı görünüyor: İki tipik büyüklükteki bellek (konektör) aynı anda takılabiliyor (galeri resimlerine bakın). Video çıkışları ve güç konektörleri cihazın arkasında bulunabilir. İlgili kablolar arkaya doğru uzanır ve bu nedenle araya girmez.

Sol taraf: Kablo kilidi için yuva, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C), ses kombinasyonu
Sol taraf: Kablo kilidi için yuva, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C), ses kombinasyonu
Sağ taraf: Bellek kartı okuyucu (SD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
Sağ taraf: Bellek kartı okuyucu (SD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
Arka: Su soğutma için 2x konektör, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; Güç Dağıtımı, Displayport, G-Sync), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s), güç konektörü
Arka: Su soğutma için 2x konektör, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; Güç Dağıtımı, Displayport, G-Sync), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s), güç konektörü

SD Kart Okuyucu

SD kart okuyucu (referans: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) orta hızlı modellerden biridir: Aktarım hızları 76 MB/s (250 jpg görüntünün aktarımı, dosya başına 5 MB) ve 87 MB/s (büyük veri bloklarının kopyalanması) kabul edilebilir olarak tanımlanabilir. Bu Razer Blade 16 önemli ölçüde daha yüksek rakamların mümkün olduğunu göstermektedir.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
171 (169.48min - 194.55max) MB/s +125%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
96 MB/s +26%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
76 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
71 MB/s -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
181.81 MB/s +109%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years)
120.4 MB/s +38%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
87 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
83 MB/s -5%

İletişim

Optimum koşullar altında (yakınlarda Wi-Fi cihazı yok, dizüstü bilgisayar ile sunucu bilgisayar arasında kısa mesafe) iyi ila mükemmel veri hızlarına ulaşılabilir - bir WiFi 6E çipi (Intel AX211) bunu mümkün kılar. Kablolu bağlantılar bir Realtek Gigabit Ethernet denetleyicisi (RTL8125, 2,5 GBit/s) tarafından gerçekleştirilir.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1585 (642min - 1670max) MBit/s +56%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
1577 (796min - 1617max) MBit/s +55%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=242)
1231 MBit/s +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)
1228 MBit/s +21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1018 (656min - 1248max) MBit/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
636 (501min - 571max) MBit/s -38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1689 (843min - 1714max) MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1665 (839min - 1716max) MBit/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1650 (1031min - 1711max) MBit/s -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
1604 (1554min - 1623max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)
1397 MBit/s -17%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=242)
1382 MBit/s -18%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1018 (656-1248)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1550 (796-1617)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø636 (601-671)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1564 (642-1670)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1661 (843-1714)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1604 (1554-1623)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1671 (1585-1711)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (839-1716)

Web kamerası

Web kamerası (2,1 MP) ortalama kalite sunar ve Windows Hello desteği sağlanır. Bunun da ötesinde, mekanik bir deklanşör var.

ColorChecker
11.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
12 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24): 8.7 ∆E min: 3.45 - max: 13.19 ∆E

Aksesuarlar

Dizüstü bilgisayar bir USB bellek (sürücüler, talimatlar), çıkartmalar ve bir mousepad ile birlikte geliyor. İsteğe bağlı bir aksesuar olarak harici su soğutma ($230).

Harici su soğutma (Oasis Mk2)
Harici su soğutma (Oasis Mk2)
Harici su soğutma (Oasis Mk2)
Harici su soğutma (Oasis Mk2)
Su borusu manyetik olarak sabitlenmiştir
Su borusu manyetik olarak sabitlenmiştir

Bakım

Cihazın tabanındaki tüm vidaları çıkardıktan sonra, taban kapağı bir mızrap ya da düz bir spatula yardımıyla ayrılabilir. Bu sayede RAM yuvalarına (her ikisi de dolu), fanlara ve bataryaya erişebilirsiniz. SSD ve SSD yuvaları (PCIe 4, M.2 2280) ve Wi-Fi modülü ek, vidalı plakalarla kaplıdır.

XMG Neo 16 (E24) donanımı
XMG Neo 16 (E24) donanımı
XMG Neo 16 (E24) donanımı
XMG Neo 16 (E24) donanımı
XMG Neo 16 (E24) donanımı
XMG Neo 16 (E24) donanımı
XMG Neo 16 (E24) donanımı
XMG Neo 16 (E24) donanımı
XMG Neo 16 (E24) donanımı

Garanti

AB'de Schenker, teslim alma hizmeti ve 6 aylık hızlı onarım hizmeti (48 saat içinde onarım) dahil olmak üzere iki yıllık temel garanti sunmaktadır. 36 aylık bir garanti, seçilen hızlı onarım süresine bağlı olarak size yaklaşık 100 ila 160 dolar arasında bir maliyet getirecektir.

Giriş cihazları - Ayrı tuş aydınlatmasına sahip bir klavye

Klavye

Geçen yılki Neo 16'yı isteğe bağlı bir mekanik klavye ile sipariş edebiliyordunuz, ancak mevcut modelde yalnızca chiclet klavye var. Klavye dizüstü bilgisayarın tüm genişliğini kaplıyor ve bir sayısal tuş takımı ve bireysel tuş aydınlatması (RGB) da mevcut. İçbükey, kavisli tuşlar orta hareket mesafesi, iyi tanımlanmış bir basınç noktası ve çok hoş bir direnç sunuyor. Klavye yazı yazarken esnemiyor. Dikkat çekici olan, merkezden uzak, tam boyutlu ok tuşlarının kullanımının ne kadar rahat olduğudur - geçen yılki modele göre bir gelişme.

Dokunmatik yüzey

Fare alternatifi olarak, pürüzsüz yüzeyleri kaydırma hareketlerini olabildiğince kolay hale getiren çoklu dokunma özellikli bir clickpad (yaklaşık 12,3 x 7,7 cm) sunuluyor. Kısa hareket mesafesi ve belirgin bir basınç noktası sunuyor.

XMG Neo 16 (E24) klavye
XMG Neo 16 (E24) klavye

Ekran - Schenker parlak bir IPS panel tercih etti

Kurulu 16 inç ekran (2.560 x 1.600 piksel) parlaklık (~ 500 cd/m²) açısından hiçbir eksiklik göstermiyor ancak kontrast (1.000:1) daha yüksek olabilirdi. Bu alanla ilgili olarak Bıçak 16'lar OLED panel daha iyi bir genel paket sunuyor - tasarımı sayesinde harika siyah değerler ve kontrast sağlıyor. Genel olarak, Neo 16 tarafından elde edilen rakamlar, cihazı iç mekanda kullanabilmek için fazlasıyla yeterli. Dışarıda ise güneş çok parlak olmadığı sürece ekran okunabilir. Son derece duyarlı, görüş açısı dengeli 16:10, 240 Hz panelin (IPS, G-Sync) parlaklık ayarından bağımsız olarak herhangi bir PWM titremesi belirtisi göstermemesi bazı olumlu yönleridir. Alternatif ekran seçenekleri mevcut değil.

Alt pikseller
Alt pikseller
Işık kanaması
Işık kanaması
Dış mekan
Dış mekan
Görüş açısı
Görüş açısı
517
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
Parlaklığın yayılımı
BOE NE160QDM-NZA tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maksimum: 530 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 497.3 cd/m² Minimum: 26 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 85 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 530 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1000:1 (Siyah: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.44
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.226
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
BOE NE160QDM-NZA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung SDC41AB (ATNA60DL03-0), OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
BOE0AF0 NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
26%
-1%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
70.2
99.1
41%
68.1
-3%
67.3
-4%
sRGB Coverage
98
99.9
2%
99.5
2%
96.7
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.6
95.6
35%
69
-2%
68.9
-2%
Response Times
95%
-20%
-49%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
11.2 ?(5.2, 6)
0.24 ?(0.15, 0.09)
98%
11.7 ?(5.7, 6)
-4%
14.5 ?(7.1, 7.4)
-29%
Response Time Black / White *
5.1 ?(1.6, 3.5)
0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2)
92%
6.9 ?(2.8, 4.1)
-35%
8.6 ?(3.9, 4.7)
-69%
PWM Frequency
960
Screen
251%
25%
15%
Brightness middle
530
418
-21%
422
-20%
372
-30%
Brightness
497
420
-15%
388
-22%
349
-30%
Brightness Distribution
85
98
15%
87
2%
88
4%
Black Level *
0.53
0.02
96%
0.42
21%
0.32
40%
Contrast
1000
20900
1990%
1005
1%
1163
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.21
1.07
67%
1.42
56%
2.06
36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.8
4.04
30%
1.97
66%
3
48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.44
1.07
26%
0.7
51%
1.5
-4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.2
1.12
73%
1.2
71%
1.9
55%
Gamma
2.226 99%
2.29 96%
2.078 106%
2.312 95%
CCT
6448 101%
6417 101%
6581 99%
6747 96%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
124% / 181%
1% / 13%
-12% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Kutudan çıktığı haliyle ekran iyi bir renk üretimi sunuyor: DeltaE 3,2 ile sapma hedef değeri (DeltaE < 3) biraz ıskalıyor. Kalibrasyon bunu 1,44'e düşürüyor - iyi bir rakam. Tüm standart renk alanlarında (AdobeRGB, sRGB, DCI P3) panel - tıpkı Erazer Beast X40'lar ekran - yalnızca sRGB alanını neredeyse tamamen görüntüleyebilir. Her üç renk alanını da görüntülemek, aşağıdakilerde bulunan OLED panel için ayrılmıştır Bıçak 16.

Oluşturduğumuz renk profili ücretsiz olarak indirilebilir ve kullanılabilir. Ekranın bilgi kutusunda bir bağlantı bulunabilir.

CalMAN: Gri pullar
CalMAN: Gri pullar
CalMAN: Renk doygunluğu
CalMAN: Renk doygunluğu
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Gri ölçekler (kalibre edilmiş)
CalMAN: Gri ölçekler (kalibre edilmiş)
CalMAN: Renk doygunluğu (kalibre edilmiş)
CalMAN: Renk doygunluğu (kalibre edilmiş)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibre edilmiş)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibre edilmiş)
XMG Neo 16 E24 vs sRGB
XMG Neo 16 E24 vs sRGB
XMG Neo 16 E24 vs AdobeRGB
XMG Neo 16 E24 vs AdobeRGB
XMG Neo 16 E24 vs DCI P3
XMG Neo 16 E24 vs DCI P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 3.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

100 parlaklık
100 parlaklık
75 parlaklık
75 parlaklık
50 parlaklık
50 parlaklık
25 parlaklık
25 parlaklık
0 parlaklık
0 parlaklık

Performans - Raptor Lake ve Ada Lovelace bir ton güç sağlıyor

Neo 16 (Early 24) oyunculara, yaratıcılara ve genel olarak çok fazla güce ihtiyaç duyan tüm kullanıcı gruplarına yöneliktir. Her özellik varyantı bir Core i9 14900HX ile donatılmıştır ve GPU paleti RTX 4060 ile RTX 4090 arasında değişmektedir - modelimiz bir RTX 4090'dır. Bireysel konfigürasyonlar ve dizüstü bilgisayarı satın almak Bestware.com (Almanca) üzerinden mümkündür. Elimizdeki inceleme cihazı yaklaşık 4.000 $'a alınabilirken giriş seviyesi model (RTX 4060) yaklaşık 2.000 $'a mal oluyor. İsteğe bağlı olarak sunulan su soğutma (Oasis MK2) RTX 4080 veya RTX 4090 Neo 16 modellerine dahildir.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia sistem bilgisi
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 
 

Test koşulları

Üreticiye özel üç performans modundan birini seçebilirsiniz (tabloya bakın). Test sırasında "Overboost" (kıyaslamalar) ve "Balanced" (pil testi) modlarını kullandık. GPU modu "Hybrid" (= Optimus) olarak ayarlanmıştı. Bireysel profilleri Kontrol Merkezi üzerinden yönetebilirsiniz. Bu, CPU Güç Limitini, GPU'nun TGP'sini ve/veya sıcaklık üst limitini ayarlayabileceğiniz anlamına gelir. Ayrı bir tuş (güç düğmesinin yanında) modlar arasında hızlı geçiş yapılmasını sağlar.

İsteğe bağlı olarak sunulan harici su soğutması (Oasis Mk2) elimizin altındaydı ancak test sırasında kullanmadık. Bununla birlikte, resmi testlerden bağımsız olarak bazı ölçümler yaptık (karşılaştırma tablosuna bakın).

Overboost Enthusiast Balanced
Güç Sınırı 1 (HWInfo) 205 Watt 205 Watt 205 Watt
Güç Sınırı 2 (HWInfo) 205 Watt 205 Watt 205 Watt
Gürültü (Witcher 3) 54 dB(A) 51 dB(A) 32 dB(A)
Performans (Witcher 3) 214fps 198fps 30fps (kilit)
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi
Kontrol Merkezi

İşlemci

Dizüstü bilgisayar bir Core i9 14900HX (Raptor Lake) - diğer CPU'lar mevcut değildir. Core i9, maksimum 5,8 GHz (P) ve 4,1 GHz (E) hızında tam 24 çekirdek (8P + 16E = 32 iş parçacığı) sunar. Sürekli çoklu iş parçacığı yükü (CB15 döngüsü), sürekli ancak hafifçe azalan performansla (Overboost) sonuçlanır - Oasis su soğutmasının kullanılması bu etkiye karşı koyar. Diğer iki güç modu, su soğut ması olmadan da tutarlı performans sağlar - tabii ki düşük seviyede.

"Overboost" ortalamanın üzerinde CPU rakamları sunarken "Enthusiast" ortalamanın biraz altındadır - bu çoğunlukla çoklu iş parçacığı performansı için geçerlidir. Üç profilin her birinde, tek iş parçacığı performansı benzer şekilde yüksek seviyededir. İsteğe bağlı su soğutma (Oasis) küçük bir performans artışına neden olur.

Çoklu iş parçacığı (PSU)
Çoklu iş parçacığı (PSU)
Tek iş parçacıklı (pil)
Tek iş parçacıklı (pil)

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

02805608401120140016801960224025202800308033603640392042004480476050405320Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø5001 (4861.45-5267.14)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4396 (4349.72-4455.83)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3224 (3189.54-3263.11)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D: Ø5282 (5177.32-5599.89)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4121 (3925.8-4598.23)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX; Overboost, Oasis: Ø5559 (5506.61-5589.71)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4469 (4358.72-4684.94)
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2753 (2708.56-2857.35)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4439 (4357.3-4809.43)
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4648 (4505.52-4878.64)
CB15 döngüsü (Overboost)
CB15 döngüsü (Overboost)
CB15 loop (Meraklı)
CB15 loop (Meraklı)
CB15 döngü (Dengeli)
CB15 döngü (Dengeli)
CB15 döngüsü (Overboost, Oasis)
CB15 döngüsü (Overboost, Oasis)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
86.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
81.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
79.8 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
76.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 -2!
Intel Core i9-13900HX
75.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 -2!
Intel Core i9-13900HX
75.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
75.2 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
70.1 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
69.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
61.5 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
51 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
36249 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
36200 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
32782 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
31889 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
31109 Points -14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30411 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
29082 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28867 Points -20%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17078 - 36249, n=38)
28781 Points -21%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
22238 Points -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
22015 Points -39%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18338 (17139.2min - 18337.8max) Points -49%
Single Core
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2227 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2209 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
2205 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2193 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1720 - 2245, n=39)
2146 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2117 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2076 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2039 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
1935 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1894 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1720 Points -22%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1620 Points -27%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis, Overboost, Oasis)
13832 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
13824 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
13033 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11960 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
11637 Points -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11604 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
11010 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10968 Points -21%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6579 - 13832, n=37)
10930 Points -21%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8495 Points -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8361 Points -40%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7081 Points -49%
CPU (Single Core)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
855 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis, Overboost, Oasis)
847 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
844 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
839 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (657 - 859, n=37)
824 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
810 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
797 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
780 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
755 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
727 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
657 Points -22%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
622 Points -26%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
5600 (5177.32min - 5599.89max) Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
5589 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
5267 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4879 (4505.52min - 4878.64max) Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4809 (4357.3min - 4809.43max) Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4685 (4358.72min - 4684.94max) Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4598 (3925.8min - 4598.23max) Points -13%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4456 (4349.72min - 4455.83max) Points -15%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 5589, n=38)
4424 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3441 Points -35%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3263 Points -38%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2857 (2708.56min - 2857.35max) Points -46%
CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
318 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
316 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
314 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
311 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
310 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (247 - 323, n=37)
305 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
301 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
289 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
247 Points -20%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
238 Points -23%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
178 Seconds * -87%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
169.1 Seconds * -78%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
143 Seconds * -51%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (91 - 206, n=37)
121.2 Seconds * -28%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
117 Seconds * -23%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
113 Seconds * -19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
110 Seconds * -16%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
106 Seconds * -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105 Seconds * -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
95 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
95 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
91 Seconds * +4%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
136645 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
136201 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
135229 MIPS
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
125676 MIPS -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
122148 MIPS -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
121465 MIPS -10%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
115695 MIPS -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
115262 MIPS -15%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (66769 - 136645, n=37)
111239 MIPS -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
92386 MIPS -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85859 MIPS -37%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
67227 MIPS -50%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
7573 MIPS +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7442 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
7441 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7406 MIPS
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7340 MIPS -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
7070 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (5452 - 7545, n=37)
7021 MIPS -5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7018 MIPS -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6931 MIPS -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6320 MIPS -15%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
5452 MIPS -26%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
4502 MIPS -39%
Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost, Oasis)
19665 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
19451 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
18590 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
17559 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
17499 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13158 - 19665, n=37)
17321 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
16957 Points -13%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
15849 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=113, last 2 years)
14205 Points -27%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (6.2.1)
12825 Points -34%
Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3129 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost, Oasis)
3109 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3077 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3025 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2419 - 3129, n=37)
2967 Points -5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2964 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
2916 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=113, last 2 years)
2649 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2419 Points -23%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (6.2.1)
2199 Points -30%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
23194 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
23086 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21642 Points -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21335 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
21075 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
20510 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
19875 Points -14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 23194, n=37)
19449 Points -16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19372 Points -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17082 Points -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15118 Points -35%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
12759 Points -45%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2210 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
2210 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2195 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2168 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
2133 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2131 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=37)
2092 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2049 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2012 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1898 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1729 Points -21%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1700 Points -23%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
38.9 fps +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
36.4 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
35.3 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
32.2 fps -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
32 fps -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
31 fps -12%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.7 fps -13%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.1 fps -15%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (16.8 - 38.9, n=37)
29.3 fps -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
23.7 fps -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.6 fps -33%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20.7 fps -41%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
53.6 s * -63%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)
48.2 s * -47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
47.9 s * -46%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
47.5 s * -44%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (31.4 - 199, n=37)
47.5 s * -44%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (6.3.4.2)
45.9 s * -40%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
42.8 s * -30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
40.6 s * -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
39 s * -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
37.3 s * -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
32.9 s *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2, Overboost, Oasis)
31.4 s * +5%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.503 sec * -38%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.4859 sec * -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.4364 sec * -19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
0.4127 sec * -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.401 sec * -10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=37)
0.385 sec * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis, Overboost, Oasis)
0.3826 sec * -5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3789 sec * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.375 sec * -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3717 sec * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3699 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3658 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
5267 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
281 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
310 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
844 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
13824 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
36249 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2209 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1940 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
131.7 Points
Yardım
Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
73.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
70.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
65.2 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
65.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
63.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
61.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
60.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
59.7 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
51.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
50.3 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
47.1 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
53908 KRay/s +75%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
33474 KRay/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
30829 KRay/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
27535 KRay/s -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
27200 KRay/s -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
26280 KRay/s -15%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
25682 KRay/s -17%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13098 - 33474, n=36)
24763 KRay/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
22497 KRay/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)
21996 KRay/s -29%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
20114 KRay/s -35%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
18676 KRay/s -39%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
222115 Points +47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
166040 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
150728 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
136486 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
135707 Points -10%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
127908 Points -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
125593 Points -17%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (67573 - 166040, n=36)
124114 Points -18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
115346 Points -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)
107132 Points -29%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
103901 Points -31%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
96463 Points -36%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
9582 MB/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
7979 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
7588 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
7000 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
6705 MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
6666 MB/s -12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
6188 MB/s -18%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3589 - 7979, n=36)
6130 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
6112 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)
4927 MB/s -35%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4905 MB/s -35%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4534 MB/s -40%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
181270 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
148966 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
148609 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
144073 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
138473 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148966, n=36)
138261 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
135672 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
134965 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
132613 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
130803 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)
117304 Points -21%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
94794 Points -36%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
29487 Points +63%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
18517 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
18114 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
16268 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
16108 Points -11%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
15857 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
15447 Points -15%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (10475 - 18517, n=36)
15241 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
14811 Points -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13541 Points -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)
13306 Points -27%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
11095 Points -39%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
118813 Points +55%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
83662 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
76668 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
68467 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
67013 Points -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
64437 Points -16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
64134 Points -16%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (32543 - 83662, n=36)
61081 Points -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
55564 Points -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)
53901 Points -30%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
50393 Points -34%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
48020 Points -37%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
328679 MB/s +126%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
226181 MB/s +56%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
210913 MB/s +45%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
152317 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
145389 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=36)
139038 MB/s -4%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
133395 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
128778 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
122937 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)
109375 MB/s -25%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
99333 MB/s -32%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
88763 MB/s -39%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
2292 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
2239 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
2043 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
2043 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
1936 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1863 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1861 MB/s -17%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1054 - 2292, n=36)
1791 MB/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
1772 MB/s -21%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1443 MB/s -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)
1372 MB/s -39%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1298 MB/s -42%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
29140 KRay/s +75%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
18349 KRay/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
16655 KRay/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
14791 KRay/s -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
14508 KRay/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
14033 KRay/s -16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13993 KRay/s -16%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6809 - 18349, n=36)
13332 KRay/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
12069 KRay/s -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)
11845 KRay/s -29%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
10990 KRay/s -34%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
10078 KRay/s -39%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
54702 MPixel/s +11%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
53242 MPixel/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
50637 MPixel/s +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49769 MPixel/s +1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49616 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
49399 MPixel/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49305 MPixel/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49089 MPixel/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
48753 MPixel/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (23903 - 54702, n=36)
46878 MPixel/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)
40439 MPixel/s -18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.88.6413 Beta)
36406 MPixel/s -26%

Sistem performansı

Özellikler listesi zaten onu ele veriyor: Bilgi işlem gücü konusunda hiçbir sıkıntı yok - en azından PCMark skorlarının çok iyi olması bunu doğruluyor. Oyun, yayın ve render işlemleri bu hızlı bilgisayarın ana çalışma alanları olmalı. RAM'in aktarım hızları DDR5 5600 RAM için normal seviyede.

RAM çift kanal modunda çalışır.
RAM çift kanal modunda çalışır.
PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
9117 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9017 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
8963 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (8230 - 9234, n=13)
8674 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8401 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
8374 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
8239 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8158 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7817 Points -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
7703 Points -15%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7251 Points -20%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11617 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
11561 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (10778 - 11628, n=13)
11125 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11091 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11065 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
11007 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
10972 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10915 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
10871 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)
10832 Points -2%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10036 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
11759 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11681 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11150 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10881 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9458 - 11759, n=13)
10610 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10202 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)
9912 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
9837 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9089 Points -22%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7934 Points -32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6662 Points -43%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
16348 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
16027 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
15394 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
15287 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (13219 - 16462, n=13)
15042 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
14764 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
14614 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
13516 Points -12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
13219 Points -14%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
12994 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)
12183 Points -21%
CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2344 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2149 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2144 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1877 - 2344, n=10)
2119 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2113 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2086 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2037 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1939 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=143, last 2 years)
1912 Points -18%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1589 Points -32%
CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2162 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2070 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2007 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1738 - 2162, n=10)
1968 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1957 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1948 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1874 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=143, last 2 years)
1811 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1755 Points -19%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1584 Points -27%
CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2660 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2430 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2418 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2415 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (2195 - 2660, n=10)
2387 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2327 Points -13%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2323 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2207 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=143, last 2 years)
2101 Points -21%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1583 Points -40%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2045 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
1874 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1478 - 2327, n=10)
1862 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1851 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1769 Points -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1756 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1750 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=143, last 2 years)
1709 Points -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1649 Points -19%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1621 Points -21%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
480 Points +43%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
336 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
331 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
330 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
326 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (279 - 339, n=10)
323 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
310 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years)
304 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
279 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
266 Points -21%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
237 Points -29%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
328 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
308 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
306 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
304 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
295 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (246 - 309, n=8)
291 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
269 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 328, n=150, last 2 years)
267 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
246 Points -20%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
237 Points -23%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
594 ms * -39%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
535 ms * -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=176, last 2 years)
502 ms * -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
500 ms * -17%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (428 - 535, n=11)
456 ms * -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
453 ms * -6%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
450 ms * -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
443 ms * -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
437 ms * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
428 ms *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
421.3 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
9017 puan
Yardım
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
89701 MB/s +14%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
81940 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78897 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
78885 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78799 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78589 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78367 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77961 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77217 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (38028 - 83392, n=36)
75105 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)
65752 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
50335 MB/s -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
87507 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86939 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86932 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86790 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86387 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85340 MB/s -2%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85092 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84390 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84192 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43306 - 87568, n=36)
81377 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)
69626 MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
59921 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
80589 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77688 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77562 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77444 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77302 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76779 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
75421 MB/s -3%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
73199 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (37146 - 80589, n=36)
72406 MB/s -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
71877 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)
67472 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
58774 MB/s -24%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
142.3 ns * -87%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
96.2 ns * -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)
94.1 ns * -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
88.6 ns * -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86 ns * -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85.4 ns * -12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (76.1 - 105, n=36)
84.7 ns * -11%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.4 ns * -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
80.9 ns * -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
79.9 ns * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78 ns * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76.1 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC gecikme süreleri

Standartlaştırılmış Latency Monitor testi (internette gezinme, 4k video oynatma, Prime95 yüksek yük) bazı anormallikler ortaya çıkardı. Sistem gerçek zamanlı video ve ses düzenleme için uygun görünmüyor. Gelecekteki yazılım güncellemeleri bunu etkileyebilir.

Gecikme Monitörü
Gecikme Monitörü
Gecikme Monitörü
Gecikme Monitörü
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
5340 μs * -115%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2478.6 μs *
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1389.7 μs * +44%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
1305.5 μs * +47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1100.8 μs * +56%

* ... smaller is better

Yığın depolama

Her zamanki gibi Schenker, müşterilerine çevrimiçi mağazasında geniş bir SSD yelpazesi sunuyor - Neo'nun içinde iki tane için yer var. RAID 0/1 desteği de sunulmaktadır. İnceleme cihazının Samsung SSD'si (1 TB, PCIe 4, M.2 2280) iyi aktarım hızları sunuyor. Olumlu bir özellik de termal azaltmanın olmaması.

İki adet PCIe 4 SSD için alan bulunmaktadır.
İki adet PCIe 4 SSD için alan bulunmaktadır.
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7108 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6863 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 805.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 570.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3277 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4984 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 75.33 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 284.7 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
90.2 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
 
83.9 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
83.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
74.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
61.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
55.1 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3795 (3693.04min - 3794.8max) MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3478 MB/s +15%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2556 - 4234, n=19)
3283 MB/s +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3238 (3056.39min - 3237.58max) MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3015 (2943.98min - 3014.55max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2945 (2911.9min - 2945.45max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2570 (2552.37min - 2570.06max) MB/s -15%
seq write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4826 (4760.33min - 4825.54max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3598 - 5842, n=19)
4816 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3940 (3577.56min - 3940.13max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3831 MB/s -21%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3794 (3745.51min - 3793.5max) MB/s -21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2991 (2423.86min - 2991.17max) MB/s -38%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1690 (1454.82min - 1690.3max) MB/s -65%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7140 (5903.9min - 7139.54max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4958 - 7148, n=19)
6979 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6971 (6127.67min - 6971.35max) MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
6929 (6183.66min - 6928.97max) MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6673 (5801.28min - 6672.72max) MB/s -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
6551 (5445.88min - 6551.19max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6319 MB/s -11%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6860 (6824.33min - 6859.91max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (6531 - 6898, n=19)
6796 MB/s -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
5740 (5704.67min - 5740.32max) MB/s -16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4936 (4909.47min - 4936.28max) MB/s -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4867 MB/s -29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
4562 (4255.12min - 4561.93max) MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2382 (920.86min - 2382.42max) MB/s -65%
4k q1 t1 read
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (55.3 - 99, n=19)
77.1 MB/s +27%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
71.4 (66.19min - 71.35max) MB/s +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
60.5 (49.54min - 60.46max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
54.5 (53.38min - 54.47max) MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
54.3 (54.23min - 54.34max) MB/s -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
49.8 (49.12min - 49.75max) MB/s -18%
4k q1 t1 write
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
324 (322.91min - 324.37max) MB/s +86%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (133.9 - 343, n=19)
235 MB/s +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +28%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
205 (202.97min - 204.75max) MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
183.8 (182.06min - 183.78max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
174.4 (160.08min - 174.38max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
119.3 (117.59min - 119.29max) MB/s -32%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4920 (4883.21min - 4920.02max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3726 (3704.12min - 3725.6max) MB/s -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3653 (3636.8min - 3652.63max) MB/s -26%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (818 - 4926, n=19)
3398 MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2589 MB/s -47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1350 (1194.53min - 1349.82max) MB/s -73%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1331 (1250.04min - 1330.81max) MB/s -73%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4522 (4451.05min - 4521.93max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3548 (3533.85min - 3548.33max) MB/s -22%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3447 (3336.65min - 3446.75max) MB/s -24%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (413 - 4683, n=19)
2584 MB/s -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2144 MB/s -53%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
730 (694.74min - 729.67max) MB/s -84%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
601 (540.73min - 601.05max) MB/s -87%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9365 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
8462 Points -10%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (5405 - 10591, n=19)
8285 Points -12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7040 Points -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6759 Points -28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6546 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
5751 Points -39%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3496 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3033 Points -13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1349 - 4721, n=19)
2874 Points -18%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2848 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2451 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1890 Points -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1689 Points -52%
Score Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4073 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4062 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2308 - 4852, n=19)
4041 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3948 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3117 Points -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
3007 Points -26%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2766 Points -32%
Seq Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5739 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5684.15 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
5459.84 MB/s -4%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4362 - 5760, n=19)
5223 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4958 MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
4823 MB/s -15%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4371 MB/s -23%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5612.29 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3376 - 5651, n=19)
4740 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3972 MB/s -29%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3914.76 MB/s -30%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3791 MB/s -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3780 MB/s -33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2496 MB/s -56%
4K Read
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
82.84 MB/s +40%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (52.7 - 90.9, n=19)
71.9 MB/s +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
61.1 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
59.28 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
56 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
49.34 MB/s -17%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
248.48 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
237.11 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (172.3 - 306, n=19)
221 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
192.1 MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
160.6 MB/s -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
149.1 MB/s -40%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2933.61 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
2404.46 MB/s -18%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2350 MB/s -20%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (787 - 3182, n=19)
2235 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1885 MB/s -36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
1358 MB/s -54%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1059 MB/s -64%
4K-64 Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3484 MB/s +7%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1592 - 4090, n=19)
3352 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
3319.37 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3252.43 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
2608 MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2530 MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2226 MB/s -32%
Access Time Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
0.085 ms * -254%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.062 ms * -158%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
0.057 ms * -138%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05545 ms * -131%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.018 - 0.074, n=19)
0.03384 ms * -41%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.033 ms * -38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.024 ms *
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04715 ms * -195%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.025 ms * -56%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
0.024 ms * -50%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.012 - 0.053, n=19)
0.01995 ms * -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.019 ms * -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
0.016 ms * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.016 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7118 (6337.06-7142.46)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5414 (3853.78-6701.45)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6943 (5621.29-6984.69)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø6593 (4837.89-6648.18)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8: Ø6442 (5614.61-6552.24)

Grafik kartı

Şu anda GeForce RTX 4090 nvidia'nın mobil GPU'ları arasında en yüksek performansı sunar. 9.728 shader, 256-bit veri yolu ve hızlı GDDR6 RAM (16.384 MB) piksel hızlandırıcıyı karakterize eder. Maksimum TGP 175 watt (150 watt + 25 watt Dynamic Boost) - daha fazlası mümkün değil.

Kıyaslama sonuçları şimdiye kadarki RTX 4090 ortalamasının üstünde (Overboost) ve altında (Enthusiast, Balanced). Oasis su soğutması performansta küçük bir artış elde edilmesine yardımcı oluyor. Her durumda, ana rakip olan Bıçak 16kol mesafesinde tutulur. DGPU ve Optimus arasında geçiş yapmak için yeniden başlatma gerekmez: Gelişmiş Optimus desteklenmektedir.

Time Spy (PSU, Overboost)
Time Spy (PSU, Overboost)
Time Spy (Batarya, Aşırı Güçlendirme)
Time Spy (Batarya, Aşırı Güçlendirme)
Time Spy (PSU, Overboost, Oasis)
Time Spy (PSU, Overboost, Oasis)
Time Spy (PSU, Meraklı)
Time Spy (PSU, Meraklı)
Time Spy (PSU, Dengeli)
Time Spy (PSU, Dengeli)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
99.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
98 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
97.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
92.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
90.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
89.6 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
89.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
88.8 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
87.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
81.5 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
80.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
59.9 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
72178 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
72070 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
69606 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
65956 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (54073 - 73027, n=42)
65041 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
64540 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
64341 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
64166 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
62862 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
58713 Points -16%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
56772 Points -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43982 Points -37%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
51946 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
50743 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
49422 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
48556 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
46527 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (40259 - 53059, n=41)
46365 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
45696 Points -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
44366 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
43518 Points -16%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
42558 Points -18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
41431 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)
31524 Points -39%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
22717 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
22529 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
22134 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
21353 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
21279 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16950 - 23292, n=43)
20950 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20806 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20416 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19878 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18954 Points -14%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18627 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)
13169 Points -41%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
62889 puan
3DMark 11 Performance
43829 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score
38597 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score
20588 puan
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
5102 puan
Yardım
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)
20.7 Seconds * -59%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (3.3.3)
15 Seconds * -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.0)
13 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
13 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
13 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
13 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9 - 19, n=39)
12.1 Seconds * +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
12 Seconds * +8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
12 Seconds * +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost, Oasis)
12 Seconds * +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (3.3.3)
11 Seconds * +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
11 Seconds * +15%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)
36.6 Seconds * -115%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
22 Seconds * -29%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (3.3.3)
22 Seconds * -29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16 - 24, n=39)
18.3 Seconds * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.0)
18 Seconds * -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
18 Seconds * -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (3.3.3)
18 Seconds * -6%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
18 Seconds * -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
18 Seconds * -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
17 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
17 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost, Oasis)
16 Seconds * +6%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (3.3.3)
305 Seconds * -83%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)
293 Seconds * -75%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
253 Seconds * -51%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.0)
205 Seconds * -23%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
202 Seconds * -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (144 - 305, n=39)
199.1 Seconds * -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
198 Seconds * -19%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
193 Seconds * -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
187 Seconds * -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
167 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost, Oasis)
155 Seconds * +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (3.3.3)
150 Seconds * +10%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
237138 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
228074 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
221004 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
204326 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
201625 Points -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (6841 - 237138, n=39)
201434 Points -12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
196962 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
190565 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
170505 Points -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
170225 Points -25%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
163242 Points -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=188, last 2 years)
127929 Points -44%
Vulkan Score 5.5
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
163089 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
154063 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
148841 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
133971 Points -18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
119323 Points -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost, Oasis)
117457 Points -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (49663 - 163089, n=28)
102459 Points -37%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
82123 Points -50%
Average of class Gaming
  (7995 - 163089, n=118, last 2 years)
73057 Points -55%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
63400 Points -61%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
52951 Points -68%
Geekbench 6.3
GPU Vulkan
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
178909 Points +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
178630 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
164105 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
157614 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost, Oasis)
149336 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
148584 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9584 - 196201, n=17)
146803 Points -11%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (6.2.1)
115199 Points -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
110302 Points -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (4286 - 196201, n=106, last 2 years)
82352 Points -50%
GPU OpenCL
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
207373 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost, Oasis)
199154 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
192262 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
190820 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
190540 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (159127 - 209521, n=20)
187721 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
167047 Points -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
157282 Points -18%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (6.2.1)
153327 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=112, last 2 years)
116335 Points -39%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
3744 mpaths +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (5.0.1)
3715 mpaths +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
3588 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1982 - 3824, n=29)
3476 mpaths -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
3424 mpaths -5%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (5.0.1)
2653 mpaths -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=111, last 2 years)
2212 mpaths -38%
GPU CUDA
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
2710 mpaths +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (5.0.1)
2708 mpaths +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
2603 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1454 - 2797, n=29)
2537 mpaths -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
2489 mpaths -4%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (5.0.1)
1967 mpaths -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=113, last 2 years)
1589 mpaths -39%
CPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (5.0.1)
25424 mpaths +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
24595 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
23364 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (12404 - 25897, n=27)
20296 mpaths -13%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
15489 mpaths -34%
Average of class Gaming
  (3562 - 26944, n=115, last 2 years)
15230 mpaths -35%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (5.0.1)
12388 mpaths -47%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
1334 mpaths +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
1317 mpaths +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
1296 mpaths
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (v4.10.07 )
1276 mpaths -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
1258 mpaths -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (873 - 1334, n=30)
1213 mpaths -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
1191 mpaths -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
1170 mpaths -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
1036 mpaths -20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
873 mpaths -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=151, last 2 years)
714 mpaths -45%
CPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (v4.10.07 )
37621 ksamples +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
37055 ksamples +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
36438 ksamples
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
31870 ksamples -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
30971 ksamples -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
30073 ksamples -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (18206 - 37629, n=30)
29643 ksamples -19%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
29082 ksamples -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
29032 ksamples -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
23314 ksamples -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (5413 - 37629, n=151, last 2 years)
21560 ksamples -41%

* ... smaller is better

Oyun performansı

XMG bilgisayar, maksimum ayarlarda QHD oyun deneyimi için tasarlanmıştır. Kare hızları RTX 4090 (Overboost) için ortalamanın üzerinde ve su soğutması performansı biraz artırıyor. GPU işlevleri, Frame Generation ve DLSS 3, yalnızca bu özellikleri sunan oyunlarda olsa da, maksimum ayarlarda ve ışın izleme ile daha yüksek çözünürlüklere izin verecektir.

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
97.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
94.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
94.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
88.8 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
88.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86.1 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
84.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.9 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82.8 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F -1!
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
66.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
62.8 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
214 (181min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (Overboost, Oasis)
214 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
210 (170min) fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
207 fps -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
204 fps -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
203.4 fps -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
200 (174min) fps -7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
200 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (139.2 - 216, n=35)
198.5 fps -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
185.6 (170min, 170.31P1) fps -13%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
166.3 (154min) fps -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=161, last 2 years)
129 fps -40%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
167.7 (1.87min, 111.1P1) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (Overboost, Oasis)
163 (4.23min, 125P1) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
159.3 (3.25min, 125P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
148.2 (7.32min, 100P1) fps -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
143.6 (4.39min, 100P1) fps -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141.5 (3.53min, 100P1) fps -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
139 (6.45min, 100P1) fps -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (91.1 - 167.7, n=40)
138.6 fps -13%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138.1 (4.19min, 83.3P1) fps -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136.2 (0.938min, 111.1P1) fps -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.9 fps -28%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, Oasis)
201 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
196.9 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
184.9 fps -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
181.2 fps -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
181.1 fps -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
180 fps -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)
178 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (122.2 - 201, n=40)
173.4 fps -12%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
165.1 fps -16%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)
139.8 fps -29%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
137.5 fps -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
120.3 fps -39%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
420 (64.7min, 302P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, Oasis)
415 (139.4min, 305P1) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
403 (101.2min, 295P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
384 (116.1min, 281P1) fps -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
371 (5min, 273P1) fps -8%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
369 (5min, 269P1) fps -8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
359.8 (30.2min, 253P1) fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (233 - 421, n=39)
357 fps -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
347 (87.7min, 252P1) fps -14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
337 (16.7min, 246P1) fps -16%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
293 (38.3min, 184.1P1) fps -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=177, last 2 years)
230 fps -43%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
220 (175min) fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
194.6 (165.7min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (Overboost, Oasis)
193.3 (166.3min) fps -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
189.9 (162.8min) fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
188.1 (155.2min) fps -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
182.6 (154.9min) fps -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
182.1 (154.2min) fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
177.4 (149.3min) fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (115.7 - 220, n=42)
176.3 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
164.5 (136min) fps -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)
151.3 fps -22%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
133 (114.6min) fps -32%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
166.2 fps +15%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
146.2 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
144.5 fps
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
143.9 fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
141.3 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis)
139.6 fps -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136.4 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
133 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (77.8 - 166.2, n=46)
130.7 fps -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
125.6 fps -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
108.5 fps -25%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
89.3 fps -38%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost, Oasis)
96.8 (61.1min) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02)
93.8 (53.7min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (68.1 - 103.9, n=19)
89.9 fps -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02)
87.5 (56.4min) fps -7%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.12)
86 (70.4min) fps -8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.39 (67.14min) fps -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2.12)
77.6 (64min) fps -17%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2.02)
75.4 (25.4min) fps -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.8 - 110, n=72, last 2 years)
64.9 fps -31%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost, Oasis)
133.1 (56.2min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02)
131.5 (62.2min) fps
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.12)
127 (70.6min) fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2.12)
123.1 (100.1min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (93.1 - 144.7, n=19)
120.8 fps -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02)
118.9 (49.7min) fps -10%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2.02)
99.7 (13.5min) fps -24%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95.35 (70.51min) fps -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=81, last 2 years)
86.3 fps -34%
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost, Oasis)
77.7 (39.8min) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02)
75.5 (49.8min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (65.5 - 77.7, n=11)
72.2 fps -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2.02)
68.3 (47.6min) fps -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2.12)
62.4 (54.1min) fps -17%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2.02)
58.4 (15.2min) fps -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.9 - 77.7, n=55, last 2 years)
45.5 fps -40%
F1 24
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1119215)
127 (78min, 90P1) fps
XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
120 (77min) fps -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1118244)
113.6 (14min, 69P1) fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (88 - 127, n=4)
112.2 fps -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (54.1 - 127, n=14, last 2 years)
78.2 fps -38%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1119215)
84.7 (69min, 68P1) fps
XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
79 (63min) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (58.5 - 84.7, n=4)
73.6 fps -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1118244)
72.1 (2min, 56P1) fps -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (36.7 - 84.7, n=12, last 2 years)
55.8 fps -34%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1119215)
129.5 (76min, 87P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (88.3 - 129.5, n=2)
108.9 fps -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.2 - 129.5, n=9, last 2 years)
78.4 fps -39%
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78.8 (51min, 56.6P0.1, 64.4P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (74 - 78.8, n=2)
76.4 fps -3%
XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74 (31.1min, 50.5P0.1, 62.7P1) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.4 - 78.8, n=5, last 2 years)
49.4 fps -37%
2560x1440 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
57.3 (43min, 46.4P0.1, 50.4P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (51.8 - 57.3, n=2)
54.6 fps -5%
XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
51.8 (36.2min, 41.4P0.1, 46.1P1) fps -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.1 - 57.3, n=3, last 2 years)
39.2 fps -32%
2560x1440 High Preset + Quality DLSS
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.1 (40.3min, 63.5P0.1, 72.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
83.1 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (42.2 - 83.1, n=3, last 2 years)
57.7 fps -31%
Horizon Forbidden West
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
125.2 (73.2min, 82.8P0.1, 91.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (81 - 125.2, n=3)
100 fps -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.7 - 125.2, n=10, last 2 years)
66.7 fps -47%
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
98 (65.7min, 67.6P0.1, 76.8P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (66 - 98, n=3)
79.7 fps -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.1 - 98, n=9, last 2 years)
57.1 fps -42%
Alone in the Dark
1920x1080 Cinematic Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
189.9 (28.2min, 84.5P0.1, 113.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (141 - 189.9, n=2)
165.5 fps -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.6 - 189.9, n=6, last 2 years)
126.3 fps -33%
2560x1440 Cinematic Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
133.6 (25.7min, 66.5P0.1, 87.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (99 - 133.6, n=2)
116.3 fps -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (64.7 - 133.6, n=4, last 2 years)
91.6 fps -31%
Alan Wake 2
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
123.3 (50.5min, 68.4P0.1, 84.1P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (108.6 - 124.7, n=6)
118.1 fps -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
108.6 (26.3P0.1, 67P1) fps -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.1 - 123.3, n=18, last 2 years)
70.8 fps -43%
2560x1440 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
87.1 (51.7min, 55.3P0.1, 66.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (78.4 - 87.1, n=6)
82.9 fps -5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78.4 (17P0.1, 52.8P1) fps -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (22.5 - 87.1, n=13, last 2 years)
62 fps -29%
1920x1080 High Preset + High Ray Tracing
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (60.3 - 70.3, n=2)
65.3 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
60.3 (38.8min, 40.2P0.1, 46.9P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (42.9 - 60.3, n=2, last 2 years)
51.6 fps -14%

Kare hızı kararlılığını kontrol etmek için Witcher 3 adresini kullandık: Oyun (maksimum ayarlar, FHD) yaklaşık 1 saat boyunca çalıştı, oyun karakteri hareket etmedi ve kare hızında herhangi bir düşüş gözlemlemedik.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø204 (195-211)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø192.6 (177-211)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø190.8 (167-207)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø205 (192-219)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Overboost, Oasis: Ø206 (193-218)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø196 (185-206)
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø154.7 (132-167)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø178.8 (173-185)
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø195.6 (67-209)
Witcher 3 (Overboost)
Witcher 3 (Overboost)
Witcher 3 (Overboost, Oasis)
Witcher 3 (Overboost, Oasis)
düşükortayüksekultraQHD DLSSQHD FSRQHD
GTA V (2015) 187.6 187.4 185.7 159.3 156
The Witcher 3 (2015) 643 562.3 412.7 214 169.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 248 221 210 194.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 233 225 196.9 162.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 208 184.2 144.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 194 184 172 156
Strange Brigade (2018) 579 444 397 403 305
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 168.5 157.8 138 131.5 93.8
Alan Wake 2 (2023) 128.5 128 123.3 87.1
Alone in the Dark (2024) 219 217 216 189.9 133.6
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) 165.4 160.5 126.2 125.2 98
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) 122.3 103.3 78.8 83.1 82.1 57.3
F1 24 (2024) 346 369 302 127 84.7

Emisyonlar - XMG dizüstü bilgisayar sınıfa özgü emisyonlara sahiptir

Gürültü emisyonları

56 dB(A)'ya kadar gürültü seviyeleri mümkündür ancak oyun oynarken bu rakam biraz daha düşüktür (Overboost). "Balanced" kullanılarak önemli ölçüde daha düşük bir gürültü seviyesi elde edilebilir - performans pahasına. Oyun oynamak mümkün olacaktır. Günlük kullanımda (ofis, internet) ve boşta çalışırken, bilgisayar aktif performans modundan bağımsız olarak genellikle sessiz çalışır.

Harici su soğutmanın kullanılması bir miktar gürültü üretimine neden olur: Pompa çok sessiz çalışır ve fanlar çok daha belirgindir. Öznel olarak baktığımızda, harici su soğutması kullanıldığında gürültü seviyesinin daha hoş olduğunu ancak daha sessiz olmadığını düşünüyoruz.

Arada sırada, örneğin Diskspd testi sırasında dizüstü bilgisayarın içinden elektronik çatırtılar geliyor. Muhtemelen bunun nedeni SSD'dir.

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta
28 / 29 / 31 dB
Çalışırken
51 / 56 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
sessiz
40 dB(A)
duyulabilirlik
50 dB(A)
gürültülü
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm uzaklık)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.535.635.738.135.52532.333.531.232.833.93144.344.642.844.1424029.928.126.127.831.95039.222.923.320.533.26336.22827.226.435.78033.320.419.817.435.31004627.323.721.531.412530.921.120.218.429.216029.620.121.219.230.620030.623.722.722.232.725031.621.922.419.133.531531.119.21917.534.540033.519.417.91637.350035.819.218.315.538.363036.919.716.913.439.980037.917.816.11242.1100038.818.715.713.242.4125041.519.716.312.845.3160041.719.315.91445.8200041.518.617.513.345.9250041.517.515.312.845.5315041.316.515.513.146.1400039.217.616.813.243.8500037.415.214.61341.4630036.814.116.713.543.2800032.114.615.813.938.51000029.814.915.914.436.61250027.515.916.11334.61600022.31515.112.529.1SPL51.43028.625.955.7N7.81.31.10.810.3median 36.8median 18.7median 16.7median 13.5median 38.5Delta4.52.11.325.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
Noise
14%
3%
3%
-12%
off / environment *
26
23
12%
25
4%
23
12%
25
4%
Idle Minimum *
28
23
18%
28
-0%
23
18%
31
-11%
Idle Average *
29
23
21%
29
-0%
27.7
4%
33
-14%
Idle Maximum *
31
27.66
11%
32
-3%
34.7
-12%
42
-35%
Load Average *
51
43.76
14%
48
6%
53.4
-5%
58
-14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54
46.81
13%
50
7%
53.4
1%
57
-6%
Load Maximum *
56
50.37
10%
52
7%
53.4
5%
59
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Sıcaklık

Dizüstü bilgisayar yük altında belirgin şekilde ısınıyor (stres testi ve Witcher 3 testi): Bazı bölgelerde sıcaklık bazen 50 °C'nin üzerine çıkıyor. Bununla birlikte, avuç içi dayanağında sıcaklıklar orta seviyede kalıyor. Günlük kullanımda (ofis, internet), rakamlar yeşil bölgede yer alıyor.

Witcher 3 testi, isteğe bağlı su soğutmanın etkisini vurgulamaktadır: GPU sıcaklığı yaklaşık 17 °C farklılık gösteriyor (80,7 °C'ye karşı 63,4 °C).

Maksimum yük
 45 °C47 °C46 °C 
 44 °C45 °C44 °C 
 29 °C31 °C30 °C 
Maksimum: 47 °C
Ortalama: 40.1 °C
54 °C55 °C56 °C
50 °C50 °C44 °C
29 °C31 °C34 °C
Maksimum: 56 °C
Ortalama: 44.8 °C
Güç kaynağı  57 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat
2%
-7%
8%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
45
4%
47
-0%
40.1
15%
50
-6%
Maximum Bottom *
56
45
20%
54
4%
46.7
17%
51
9%
Idle Upper Side *
27
29
-7%
30
-11%
26.5
2%
28
-4%
Idle Bottom *
27
30
-11%
32
-19%
27.7
-3%
26
4%

* ... smaller is better

Stres testi

Stres testi aşırı senaryosu (Prime95 ve Furmark sürekli çalışmada) tam yük altında sistem kararlılığını kontrol eder. CPU hızı testin ilk dakikasında yaklaşık 4,3 ila 4,5 GHz (P) ve 3,5 ila 3,6 GHz'den (E) 2,5 GHz (P) ve 2,3 GHz'e (E) düşer. Aynı zamanda GPU hızı 1.600 MHz'lik başlangıç noktasından 2.000 MHz'in üzerine çıkmaktadır.

Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

Konuşmacılar

Stereo hoparlörler bas seslerden yoksundur. Bunun dışında, çoğunlukla iyi ses üretirler. Kulaklık veya harici hoparlör kullanarak daha iyi kalite elde edilebilir.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.136.52532.836.83144.146.54027.830.55020.533.66326.4328017.438.710021.549.812518.447.616019.255.420022.260.825019.163.231517.561.74001664.550015.570.963013.475.28001275.1100013.275.6125012.875.916001475.6200013.373.2250012.873.1315013.174.7400013.273.250001377.8630013.574.9800013.972.71000014.465.3125001360.61600012.555.5SPL25.986.4N0.871.1median 13.5median 72.7Delta27.13032.83030.931.430.935.742.935.723.728.123.726.219.726.231.216.431.245.113.845.145.919.845.951.414.551.45913.95964.117.864.168.614.368.667.19.667.167.68.567.672.97.572.977.47.477.4717.77164.88.164.865.88.265.867.58.867.568.89.868.868.710.568.77010.67066.410.966.467.311.267.36411.56464.711.664.767126763.211.863.25510.75581.222.581.254.70.454.7median 67median 10.7median 673.62.53.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.16 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Enerji yönetimi - Schenker Neo iyi bir pil ömrü sunar

Güç tüketimi

Güç tüketimi, elimizdeki kurulu donanım için normal bir seviyede. Witcher 3 testi ve stres testi biraz azalan güç tüketimi ile çalıştı. PSU (330 watt) uygun büyüklükte.

Anlık tüketim
Kapalı / Bekleme modudarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Boştadarkmidlight 6 / 16 / 28 Watt
Çalışırken midlight 130 / 361 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-22%
-1%
-23%
-9%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
6
16.9
-182%
7
-17%
15.4
-157%
8
-33%
Idle Average *
16
17.8
-11%
15
6%
21.6
-35%
18
-13%
Idle Maximum *
28
19.6
30%
33
-18%
22.2
21%
28
-0%
Load Average *
130
128
2%
134
-3%
116.7
10%
133
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
302
243
20%
280
7%
262
13%
294
3%
Load Maximum *
361
328
9%
294
19%
327.1
9%
399
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø302 (250-321)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø298 (280-349)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16.5 (6.12-27.9)

Power consumption with an external monitor

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø194.9 (175.3-205)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø288 (258-296)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø232 (216-240)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø297 (280-309)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø23.4 (21.8-29.1)

Pil ömrü

Wi-Fi ve video testlerinde (bir komut dosyası yardımıyla web sitelerinin yüklenmesi ve bir döngüde kısa Big Buck Bunny (H.264 kodlama, FHD) videosu), 16 inçlik makine 5 saat 50 dakika ve 6 saat 58 dakikalık çalışma süreleri elde etti. Sonuç olarak, bunlar iyi rakamlar.

Batarya 99,8 Wh kapasite sunuyor.
Batarya 99,8 Wh kapasite sunuyor.
Batarya ömrü
Boşta (WLAN kapalı, minimum parlaklık)
10h 00min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 125)
5h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 58min
Çalışırken (maksimum parlaklık)
2h 02min
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X
R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-11%
7%
-34%
-2%
-7%
Reader / Idle
600
H.264
418
456
9%
302
-28%
349
-17%
WiFi v1.3
350
329
-6%
374
7%
287
-18%
399
14%
Load
122
79
-35%
55
-55%
Witcher 3 ultra
84

Artılar

+ parlak, 16:10, QHD+ ekran (240 Hz, G-Sync)
+ yüksek sistem performansı
+ iki SSD yuvası (PCIe 4, M.2 2280)
+ RAM değiştirilebilir/genişletilebilir
+ RGB bireysel tuş aydınlatması
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ Güç Dağıtımı
+ sağlam metal kasa
+ Gelişmiş Optimus
+ sıvı metal termal macun
+ opsi̇yonel su soğutma

Eksiler

- renk alanı kapsamı daha büyük olabilir
- tam yük altında yüksek emisyonlar
- ara sıra iç mekan elektronik çatırtıları

Karar - Üst düzey bir ateş topu

XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Schenker tarafından sağlanmıştır.
XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Schenker tarafından sağlanmıştır.

Neo 16 vaat ettiklerini yerine getiriyor: Performans ölçeğinin üst ucundaki donanım (Core i9, RTX 4090) video düzenleme, işleme, akış ve elbette QHD oyun oynamaya olanak tanır. Beklenen yüksek emisyonlar, uygun performans modu seçilerek daha ılımlı bir seviyeye düşürülebilir.

XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) ile Schenker, kompakt bir form faktöründe çok fazla güç sunuyor.

Ödün vermeyen bir çözüm arayanlar, isteğe bağlı olarak temin edilebilen harici su soğutmaya (230 $) başvurmak zorunda kalacaklar: Bu, küçük bir performans artışı ve daha düşük emisyon elde edilmesine yardımcı olur. Bunu söyledikten sonra, dizüstü bilgisayar sabit bir yere bağlanır.

Mat, 16 inç, 16:10 ekran (2.560 x 1.600 piksel, sRGB, IPS, 240 Hz), özellikle hoş bir nokta olan yüksek parlaklığı ile büyük ölçüde iyi bir izlenim bıraktı. Renk alanı kapsamının yanı sıra kontrast söz konusu olduğunda iyileştirme için biraz yer var. RAID 0/1 desteği de dahil olmak üzere iki SSD yuvası (PCIe 4), tonlarca depolama alanı ve kısa yükleme süreleri sağlar.

Tek bir pil şarjı (99,8 Wh), gerçek hayatta yaklaşık 6 ila 7 saatlik çalışma süreleri için yeterlidir - iyi rakamlar. Pozitif: Batarya bir USB-C şarj cihazı (100 watt, 20 V, 5 A) ile şarj edilebilir - TB4 portu Güç Dağıtımını destekler, yani PSU (330 watt) teorik olarak evde kalabilir.

Bir alternatif de şu olabilir Razer Blade 16 (2024). Bu bilgisayar biraz daha az işlem gücü sunuyor ancak Neo'dan farklı olarak daha yüksek kontrast sunuyor ve daha canlı bir OLED ekrana sahip.

Fiyat ve bulunabilirlik

XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) bireysel olarak yapılandırılabilir ve Schenker çevrimiçi mağazasından (Almanca) satın alınabilir ve fiyatlar test sırasındaki dolar/euro kurunu temsil eder. İnceleme modelimizin fiyatı yaklaşık 4.000 dolardır. Giriş seviyesi modeller (RTX 4060 ile) yaklaşık 2.000 dolardan başlıyor. Schenker bu modellerin Haziran sonunda (RTX 4090) ve Temmuz ortasında (RTX 4060/70/80) satışa sunulacağını belirtti. İsteğe bağlı su soğutması için yaklaşık 230 dolar ödemeniz gerekecek.

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) - 06/19/2024 v8
Sascha Mölck

İşcilik
85 / 98 → 87%
Klavye
85%
Mouse
86%
Bağlanılabilirlik
70 / 80 → 87%
Ağırlık
60 / 10-68 → 86%
Batarya
68 / 95 → 71%
Görüntü
84%
Oyun performansı
92%
Uygulama performansı
93%
AI Performance
100%
Isınma
81 / 95 → 86%
Ses
62 / 90 → 69%
Audio
84%
Camera
41 / 75 → 55%
Ortalama
63%
86%
Gaming - Ortalama Ağırlık
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
80.6%
Repairability
65%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 32.2%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) incelemesi: Kompakt bir oyun dizüstü bilgisayarında tam RTX 4090 gücü
Sascha Mölck, 2024-06-25 (Update: 2024-06-25)