HP Omen Transcend 16 (2024) dizüstü bilgisayar incelemesi: OLED ekranlı bir RTX 4070 oyun makinesi

Name: HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Brand: HP

Güçlü bir resim.

Omen 16 ile alıcılar, "normal" versiyon ile Transcend olarak adlandırılan ve birçok açıdan birbirinden neredeyse hiç farklı olmayan varyant arasında seçim yapmakta zorlanıyor. İncelememizi okuyarak 16 inçlik cihazın rakipleri karşısında nasıl bir performans sergilediğini keşfedin.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (Çeviren DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/15/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Geforce Intel Raptor Lake

Omen Transcend 16 inceleme modeli - u1095ng ile biten - şu anda 3.000 doların biraz altında bir fiyata sahip olunabilir. Bu fiyat karşılığında alıcı bir Core i9-14900HX ile birlikte GeForce RTX 4070 oldukça yetersiz 8 GB VRAM nedeniyle üst düzey kategoriye değil, daha çok orta sınıfa ait olma eğilimindedir. Buna 32 GB DDR5-5600 RAM (2x 16 GB SO-DIMM) ve 1 TB M.2 NVMe SSD eşlik ediyor. Öne çıkan özellik ise 2.560 x 1.600 piksel, 240 Hz, 400 cd/m² ve %100 DCI P3'e sahip olduğu söylenen canlı OLED panel. Paket Windows 11 Home ile tamamlanmıştır.

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng (Omen Transcend 16 Seri)

İşlemci

Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh

Grafik kartı

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Çekirdek: 1980 MHz, Bellek: 2000 MHz, 130 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 546.56, Optimus

Bellek

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (both in use)

Görüntü

16.00 inç 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, WQXGA, parlak: hayır, HDR, 240 Hz

Anakart

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Harddisk

Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, 1024 GB

, NVMe SSD, one M.2 slot (in use)

Ses kartı

Intel Raptor Point-S PCH - HD Audio (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Bağlantılar

2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Ses çıkışları: Combo (Headset/Mic)

Network

Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Boyut

yükseklik x genişlik x derinlik (mm): 20 x 356 x 269

Batarya

97 Wh Lithium-Polymer

İşletim sistemi

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 2 MP

Ek özellikler

Hoparlörler: 2.0, Klavye: Chiclet, Klavye ışığı: evet, 230 W Power Supply, Hyper X Cloud II Core Wireless Gaming Headset, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Ay Garanti

Ağırlık

2.284 kg, Güç kaynağı: 790 g

Fiyat

3000 EUR

Amazon

$1,459.99

Bağlantılar

HP anasayfa

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Omen Transcend 16 rakibi, GeForce RTX 4070 ile donatılmış diğer 16 inçlik oyuncuların yanı sıra Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 (Ultra 7 155H), ve Schenker XMG Core 16 L23 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) ve Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (Ryzen 7 7745HX) hepsi karşılaştırma cihaz tablomuzda yer almaktadır.

Kasa çoğunlukla bir önceki modelle aynı olduğu için Core i9-13900HX (bkz inceleme), sadece kısaca kasa, özellikler ve giriş cihazı kategorilerine gireceğiz.

Karşılaştırmalı olarak olası rakipler

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	02/2024	HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	20 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	09/2023	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	19.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
92.3 % v7 ^(old)	02/2024	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1.8 kg	16.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.2 % v7 ^(old)	10/2023	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	26.1 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	07/2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	26.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

Dava

Transcend 16 göz alıcı bir tasarıma sahip ve görsel açıdan etkileyici derecede ince bir figür oluşturuyor (Zephyrus G16 dışında tüm rakip cihazlar daha kalın). Stabilite söz konusu olduğunda, ana ünite en azından sağlam bir performans sunmayı başarıyor. Buna karşın, kapak - pek çok cihazda olduğu gibi - daha iyi bir burulma sertliğine sahip olabilirdi. İlk bakışta mat yüzey birinci sınıf bir görünüme sahip, ancak HP çoğunlukla sadece plastik kullanmış. Yapı kalitesi açısından herhangi bir şikâyette bulunulamaz. Üretici 180°'lik cömert açılma açısı için övgüyü hak ediyor, ancak menteşeler daha güçlü olabilirdi. Ağırlık söz konusu olduğunda, cihaz 2,3 kg ile paketin ortasında yer alıyor ve bu da 16 inçlik cihazı ne özellikle hafif ne de ağır yapıyor.

Boyut ve ağırlık karşılaştırması

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) HP Omen Transcend 16 HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M DIN A4 ❌

Özellikler

Port seçimi oldukça modern olarak tanımlanabilir. Arka tarafta bir RJ45 portu (ne yazık ki 2,5 Gbit LAN değil), bir HDMI 2.1 çıkışı ve bir USB 3.0 portu (A tipi) bulunurken, sol tarafta iki Thunderbolt 4 portu (Power Delivery dahil) ve bir ses jakı yer alıyor. Sağ tarafta ise yalnızca bir adet yalnız USB 3.0 bağlantı noktası (A tipi) bulunuyor. Alıcılar Kensington kilidi ve kart okuyucu olmadan idare etmek zorunda.

Sol taraf: 2x Thunderbolt 4 (PD), 3,5 mm ses jakı

Arka: ağ konektörü, RJ45 LAN, HDMI 2.1, USB-A 3.0

İletişim

Wi-Fi performansı yüksek seviyededir ve yaklaşık 1.400 Mbit/s gönderme hızı ve veri alma söz konusu olduğunda yaklaşık 1.700 Mbit/s ile (referans yönlendiriciden 1 m mesafe) performans iyi ile çok iyi arasında bir yerdedir. Wi-Fi 6E AX211 ile HP, güncel bir Intel kablosuz modülü kurmuştur.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1654 (1599^min, 1600.16^P1 - 1713^max) MBit/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1494 (1257^min - 1548^max) MBit/s +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1444 (1170^min - 1766^max) MBit/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1411 (1327^min - 1472^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1921, n=238)	1233 MBit/s -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1173 (839^min - 1366^max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1697 (849^min - 1712^max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1600 (1564^min, 1564.87^P1 - 1627^max) MBit/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1583 (1176^min - 1662^max) MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1438 (767^min - 1513^max) MBit/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s -19%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=238)	1379 MBit/s -19%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1339 (1216^min - 1449^max) MBit/s -21%

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (1327-1472)

HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1170-1766)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1654 (1599-1713)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1257-1548)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1174 (839-1366)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1668 (849-1712)

HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1216-1449)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1600 (1564-1627)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1582 (1176-1662)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1412 (767-1513)

Web kamerası

2 MP web kamerası ile ilgili karışık duygularımız var. Görüntü netliği ortalamanın üzerinde olsa da, renk doğruluğu arzulanan çok şey bırakıyor. İyi olan şey, gizlilik için manuel deklanşördür.

ColorChecker HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng: 11.02 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 23.85 ∆E

Aksesuarlar

İnceleme cihazımız ayrıca 230 watt'lık çok ince bir PSU ve bir HyperX kulaklık (Cloud II Core kablosuz) ile birlikte geldi.

Bakım

Bakım açısından, Omen 16 özellikle karmaşık değildir. Altı adet küçük, çapraz başlı vidaya dikkat ettikten sonra, taban plakası düz bir alet yardımıyla sabitlenmiş konumundan kaldırılabilir. Cihazın içinde RAM bankaları, pil, M.2 yuvası, fanlar veya kablosuz modül gibi tüm önemli bileşenlere erişilebilir.

Garanti

Garanti süresi 24 aydır.

Giriş cihazları

Klavye

Şeffaf WASD tuşları ile HP belirli bir oyuncu görünümüne sahip. Düzen çok benzersiz ve hatta alışması biraz zaman alıyor. Üretici, sayısal bir tuş takımı kurmayı tercih etmemiş ve bunun yerine 16 inçlik cihaza ayrı, iyi boyutlandırılmış ok tuşları vermiştir. Diğer kararları (örneğin, güç düğmesinin konumu) anlamak gerçekten zor. Yazma deneyimi vasat ve HP daha iyi geri bildirim için mekanik bir model kullanmak zorunda kalmış. Arkadan aydınlatmalı tuşların hayranları birden fazla rengi dört gözle bekleyebilirler.

Dokunmatik yüzey

Yaklaşık 13,5 x 8,5 cm boyutlarındaki hoşa giden büyük dokunmatik yüzey, hassasiyet, pürüzsüzlük ve tıklama alanları söz konusu olduğunda mütevazi olarak tanımlanabilir. Aynı şekilde, hareket desteği de sezgisel.

Ekran

OLED paneller söz konusu olduğunda görüşler farklılık gösteriyor. Olumsuz yanları ise çok yansıtıcı yüzeyler (dış mekanda kullanımı zorlaştırabilir), ekranın her parlaklık seviyesinde titremesi ve potansiyel yanma sorunudur.


393 cd/m²	393 cd/m²	391 cd/m²
393 cd/m²	390 cd/m²	389 cd/m²
392 cd/m²	395 cd/m²	390 cd/m²

Parlaklığın yayılımı

ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maksimum: 395 cd/m² (Nits) Ortalama: 391.8 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Aydınlatma: 98 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 390 cd/m²
Kontrast: 19500:1 (Siyah: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.21
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.221

Download ICC Dosyası (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	HP Omen Transcend 16 AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) BOE0AF0 (), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display		-4%	0%	-20%	-18%
Display P3 Coverage	99.8	99.2 -1%	99.9 0%	68.3 -32%	70.4 -29%
sRGB Coverage	100	100 0%	100 0%	98.6 -1%	99.6 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	97	87.6 -10%	96.9 0%	69.6 -28%	72.6 -25%
Response Times		-8093%	222%	-4850%	-3925%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)	26.4 ?(15, 11.4) -13100%	0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11) -10%	13.2 ?(6.1, 7.1) -6500%	7 ?(3.2, 3.8) -3400%
Response Time Black / White *	0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)	28.2 ?(21.6, 6.6) -14000%	0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12) -25%	6.6 ?(2.5, 4.1) -3200%	9.1 ?(4.9, 4.2) -4450%
PWM Frequency	120 ?(100)	3506 ?(100) 2822%	960 ?(60) 700%
Screen		-47%	0%	-203%	-161%
Brightness middle	390	791.1 103%	416 7%	376 -4%	355.3 -9%
Brightness	392	800 104%	418 7%	358 -9%	340 -13%
Brightness Distribution	98	95 -3%	96 -2%	88 -10%	91 -7%
Black Level *	0.02	0.04 -100%		0.33 -1550%	0.32 -1500%
Contrast	19500	19778 1%		1139 -94%	1110 -94%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.94	4.37 -125%	1.6 18%	2.74 -41%	1.13 42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.26	10.39 -144%	2.1 51%	6.78 -59%	2.78 35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.21	1.04 75%		0.88 79%	0.32 92%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	6.5 -333%	2.7 -80%	3.57 -138%	1.4 7%
Gamma	2.221 ^99%	2.28 ^96%	2.16 ^102%	2.4 ^92%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	6395 ^102%	6000 ^108%	6331 ^103%	7246 ^90%	6372 ^102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-2715% / -1647%	74% / 56%	-1691% / -828%	-1368% / -668%

* ... smaller is better

Buna karşılık OLED teknolojisi harika siyah seviyeleriyle (neredeyse 0,0 cd/m²) IPS panellerin yaklaşamadığı mükemmel bir kontrast oranı sağlıyor. Aynı durum görüş açısı kararlılığı için de geçerli.

CalMAN: renk doygunluğu (kalibre edilmiş)

Ek bir özellik de zengin renk alanı: %100 DCI P3 ve %97 AdobeRGB oyun dünyasında hafife alınacak şeyler değil. Kalibrasyondan önce zaten etkileyici olan renk doğruluğu alanında da durum benzer.

Övgü aynı zamanda kısa tepki süreleri için de ayrılmıştır: Klasik IPS paneller yalnızca 0,2 ms'yi hayal edebilir. Önceki modelin mini LED ekranı oldukça parlaktı (800'e karşı 392 cd/m²) ama aynı zamanda önemli ölçüde daha yavaştı.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.1 ms rise
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.1 ms rise
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Performans

Fiyat açısından Omen Transcend 16 yaklaşık 1.600 dolardan başlıyor. Giriş seviyesi varyantı bir Core i7-13700HX, a GeForce RTX 406016 GB RAM ve düşük çözünürlüklü IPS ekran. İnceleme modelimiz, fiyat ve teknik özellik skalasının daha üst ucunda yer alıyor.

Test koşulları

Önceden yüklenmiş oyun merkezinin performans yönetimine erişmek biraz zor. İlgili menüde üç enerji modu ve bir ısı yöneticisi bekliyor. Performans modu - çoğu oyun dizüstü bilgisayarında olduğu gibi - hem daha iyi performans hem de orantısız gürültü üretimi sağladığından, tüm ölçümler dengeli mod kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu nedenle, belirlenen değerler yalnızca sınırlı bir ölçüde önceki modelle karşılaştırılabilir. Buna ek olarak, otomatik fan kontrolü ve otomatik grafik geçişi de aktifti.

Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra)	Eco	Ausgegleichen	Leistung
Gürültü	39 dB(A)	44 dB(A)	53 dB(A)
Performans	60 fps kilit	114 fps	126 fps

İşlemci

Core i9-14900HX, GPU gücüne ve kasa kalınlığına kıyasla neredeyse devasa boyutta. Raptor Lake serisi 10 nm model, hiper iş parçacıklı 8 performans çekirdeği ve HT'siz 16 verimlilik çekirdeği sunarak toplam 32 iş parçacığı sağlıyor. Dengeli modda, CPU potansiyeline yalnızca sınırlı bir ölçüde ulaşır. Buna en iyi örnek Cinebench döngümüzdür: İlk birkaç çalıştırmada performans nispeten yüksek olmasına rağmen, kısa bir süre sonra skor oldukça keskin bir şekilde düştü (ancak daha sonra sabit bir seviyede kaldı). Sonuç olarak, sadece Ultra 7 155H (ROG Zephyrus G16) veya Ryzen 7 7840HS (Schenker XMG Core 16) seviyesine ulaşmak için yeterli.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2840 (2582.31-3904.72)

HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2657 (2635.57-2681.14)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX: Ø2918 (2861.03-2977.96)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX	86.6 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 ^-2! Intel Core i9-13900HX	79.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	75.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	69.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 ^-2! AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	66.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	61.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	60.2 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (17078 - 36249, n=34)	29130 Points +41%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	25932 (23977.8^min - 25931.6^max) Points +25%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)	21651 Points +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	20702 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	18060 (17729.5^min - 18059.9^max) Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17267 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	17205 Points -17%
Single Core
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	2182 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1720 - 2245, n=34)	2157 Points -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2105 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)	1877 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	1846 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1767 Points -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1681 Points -23%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6579 - 13832, n=34)	11084 Points +32%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	9895 Points +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	8427 Points
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	7072 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6682 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6656 Points -21%
CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	836 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (657 - 859, n=34)	826 Points -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	805 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	717 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	693 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	686 Points -18%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3263 - 5589, n=35)	4462 Points +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4100 (3846.15^min - 4100.04^max) Points +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	3905 (2582.31^min - 3904.72^max) Points
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	2978 (2861.03^min - 2977.96^max) Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2681 (2635.57^min - 2681.14^max) Points -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2679 (2383.65^min - 2679.17^max) Points -31%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (247 - 323, n=34)	306 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	299 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	298 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	294 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	270 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	264 Points -11%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	193 Seconds * -18%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	186 Seconds * -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	174 Seconds * -6%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	164 Seconds *
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	123 Seconds * +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (91 - 206, n=34)	119.5 Seconds * +27%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (66769 - 136645, n=34)	112494 MIPS +28%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	105001 MIPS +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	88012 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	75557 MIPS -14%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	73035 MIPS -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	68500 MIPS -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	7244 MIPS +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	7142 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (5452 - 7545, n=34)	7017 MIPS -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6866 MIPS -4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6632 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5439 MIPS -24%

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (13158 - 19665, n=34)	17369 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	16011 Points
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=110, last 2 years)	14171 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13323 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13088 Points -18%
Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (2419 - 3129, n=34)	2973 Points +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	2800 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2694 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=110, last 2 years)	2641 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2410 Points -14%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (8618 - 23194, n=34)	19540 Points +11%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	19012 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	17612 Points
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12905 Points -27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	12378 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11803 Points -33%
Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1669 - 2210, n=34)	2092 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2058 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	2053 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	2040 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1951 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1755 Points -15%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (16.8 - 38.9, n=34)	29.7 fps +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	26.2 fps +15%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	23.2 fps +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	22.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	21.6 fps -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.9 fps -12%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	68.1 s * -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	53.1 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	49.6 s * +7%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	43.8 s * +18%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (31.4 - 85.1, n=34)	43.4 s * +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	37.9 s * +29%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4654 sec * -18%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4352 sec * -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	0.421 sec * -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4028 sec * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3955 sec *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=34)	0.3845 sec * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

3905 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

270 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

298 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

8427 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

836 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2182 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

20702 Points

Yardım

... kıyaslama

Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX	95.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	79.1 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	65.2 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	29656 KRay/s +72%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	27731 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (13098 - 33474, n=33)	25096 KRay/s +46%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	23600 KRay/s +37%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)	21640 KRay/s +25%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17244 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	16431 KRay/s -5%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (67573 - 166040, n=33)	125765 Points +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120974 Points +37%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	118600 Points +34%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117390 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)	106090 Points +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88537 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	85461 Points -3%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3589 - 7979, n=33)	6212 MB/s +46%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	5888 MB/s +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4974 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4920 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)	4852 MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4267 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3814 MB/s -11%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (118405 - 148966, n=33)	138709 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126954 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126217 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	118405 Points
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)	116237 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105028 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90347 Points -24%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15887 Points +30%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (10475 - 18517, n=33)	15369 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15189 Points +24%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13440 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)	13175 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	12217 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10641 Points -13%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	64255 Points +48%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	63114 Points +46%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (32543 - 83662, n=33)	61872 Points +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58716 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)	53471 Points +23%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	43302 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41806 Points -3%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (86964 - 241777, n=33)	137399 MB/s +58%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	111789 MB/s +29%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)	109176 MB/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88619 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86964 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	79475 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71191 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1054 - 2292, n=33)	1815 MB/s +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1689 MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)	1349 MB/s +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1265 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1147 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1128 MB/s -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1099 MB/s -13%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15975 KRay/s +74%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	14776 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6809 - 18349, n=33)	13525 KRay/s +47%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	12891 KRay/s +41%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)	11654 KRay/s +27%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9170 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8449 KRay/s -8%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50609 MPixel/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49507 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49238 MPixel/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (23903 - 54702, n=33)	46637 MPixel/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	39928 MPixel/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)	39919 MPixel/s -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	28499 MPixel/s -42%

Sistem performansı

Sistem performansı, önde gelenler arasında yer almadan iyi bir rakam keser. RAM hızı söz konusu olduğunda, Transcend karşılaştırma alanında ikinci sırayı alıyor.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7866 - 8550, n=6)	8253 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8206 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	8183 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	8153 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	7866 Points
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7123 Points -9%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	11302 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10621 - 11815, n=6)	11079 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11074 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10934 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)	10836 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	10621 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10038 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10526 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9701 - 11103, n=6)	10493 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	10268 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10235 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)	9878 Points -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	9735 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	9208 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	13370 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	13229 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12114 - 14827, n=6)	13153 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	12920 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	12114 Points
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)	12030 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10612 Points -12%

CrossMark / Overall
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2002 - 2312, n=5)	2179 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2027 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1970 Points
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)	1899 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1721 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1694 Points

CrossMark / Productivity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1827 - 2191, n=5)	2042 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1930 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1812 Points
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)	1801 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1629 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1624 Points

CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2287 - 2458, n=5)	2385 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	2316 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2222 Points
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)	2083 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1942 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1862 Points

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1734 - 2330, n=5)	2028 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1785 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)	1699 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1557 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1435 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1424 Points

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	345 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	342 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (319 - 342, n=6)	333 Points -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	331 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=165, last 2 years)	303 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	288 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	283 Points -17%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	300 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (291 - 301, n=4)	298 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	283 Points
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=153, last 2 years)	266 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	256 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	548 ms * -25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	533 ms * -22%
Average of class Gaming (421 - 779, n=179, last 2 years)	506 ms * -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	471 ms * -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	455 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (431 - 461, n=6)	443 ms * -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	438 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7866 puan
Yardım

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89414 MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	78330 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77103 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (38028 - 83392, n=33)	74739 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67907 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)	64907 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50007 MB/s -36%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86576 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	85070 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84131 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (43306 - 87568, n=33)	80919 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)	68658 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	60730 MB/s -29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50703 MB/s -40%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84517 MB/s +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77579 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76244 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73337 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (37146 - 80589, n=33)	71949 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)	66727 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54587 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	140 ns * -62%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * -9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.9 ns * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.8 ns * -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.5 ns * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.5 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (76.1 - 105, n=33)	84.8 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

DPC gecikme süreleri

Önceki modelde olduğu gibi yeni Omen 16 da nispeten yüksek gecikme süreleriyle mücadele etmek zorunda ve bu durum bazı uygulama senaryolarında (örneğin gerçek zamanlı ses ve video işleme) sorunlara yol açabilir.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2484.4 μs * -59%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	1566 μs *
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1518 μs * +3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	673.1 μs * +57%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	603 μs * +61%

* ... smaller is better

Yığın depolama

CPU performansı ile karşılaştırıldığında SSD'nin performansında herhangi bir düşüş gözlemlemedik. Takılı Kioxia sürücü, eski Transcend'de bulunan SK hynix sürücüden biraz daha yavaştır, ancak buna rağmen yeterince yüksek hızlar sunar. Üzücü olan ise 16 inçlik cihazın yalnızca bir M.2 yuvasına sahip olması ve bu da depolama alanını genişletmek için dahili SSD'nin değiştirilmesi gerektiği anlamına geliyor.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6967 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5341 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 511.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 400.9 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3599 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3651 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.34 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.3 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	90 pt
Average of class Gaming	73.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	70.8 pt
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	68.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	66.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	61.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	48.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4677 (4664.17^min - 4676.56^max) MB/s +51%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s +12%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (2735 - 4156, n=9)	3471 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3449 (3368.24^min - 3448.79^max) MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3202 (3129.61^min - 3201.93^max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	3102 (3080.64^min - 3101.78^max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3023 (3010.73^min - 3023.25^max) MB/s -3%
seq write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4326 (4313.21^min - 4326.48^max) MB/s +42%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (3038 - 4893, n=9)	3943 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)	3797 MB/s +25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3637 (3591.53^min - 3636.88^max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3152 (3026.22^min - 3152.01^max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	3038 (2862.26^min - 3038.15^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2526 (2498.97^min - 2525.81^max) MB/s -17%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7137 (6595.15^min - 7137.45^max) MB/s +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6899 (5306.42^min - 6899.46^max) MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6660 (6017.57^min - 6659.93^max) MB/s +4%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (6169 - 6985, n=9)	6644 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	6388 (5544.27^min - 6387.72^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5008 (4421.01^min - 5007.74^max) MB/s -22%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6818 (6604.35^min - 6817.63^max) MB/s +30%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5716 (5661.68^min - 5716.31^max) MB/s +9%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (5144 - 5667, n=9)	5420 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	5234 (5167.11^min - 5234.47^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4943 (4926^min - 4942.6^max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)	4823 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3230 (3169.22^min - 3230.03^max) MB/s -38%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	80.1 (78.57^min - 80.12^max) MB/s +56%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	64.2 (63.05^min - 64.22^max) MB/s +25%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (51.3 - 69.6, n=9)	59.2 MB/s +15%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	56.3 (55.9^min - 56.3^max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	52.9 (51.15^min - 52.91^max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	51.3 (50.48^min - 51.25^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	244 (243^min - 243.65^max) MB/s +90%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)	222 MB/s +73%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (116.4 - 219, n=9)	164.7 MB/s +29%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	146.3 (140.58^min - 146.31^max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	128.4 (126.56^min - 128.36^max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	128.1 (123.78^min - 128.05^max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	127 (124.67^min - 127.01^max) MB/s -1%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4173 (4166.98^min - 4173.4^max) MB/s +364%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)	2555 MB/s +184%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (561 - 3829, n=9)	2173 MB/s +141%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1077 (1013.53^min - 1077.14^max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	932 (919.54^min - 932.39^max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	900 (832.36^min - 900.34^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	604 (565.74^min - 603.6^max) MB/s -33%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3552 (3546.24^min - 3551.63^max) MB/s +711%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s +380%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (365 - 2682, n=9)	1414 MB/s +223%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	501 (456.23^min - 501.33^max) MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	438 (405.08^min - 437.5^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	413 (372.31^min - 412.68^max) MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	402 (389.17^min - 402.07^max) MB/s -8%

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8963 Points +74%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)	6737 Points +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6291 Points +22%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (4465 - 8212, n=9)	6264 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6198 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	5138 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3272 Points -36%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3449 Points +137%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)	2441 Points +67%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (1359 - 3403, n=9)	2277 Points +56%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1603 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1523 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	1458 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1020 Points -30%
Score Write
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	4064 Points +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3832 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3812 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)	3113 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	3029 Points
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (2518 - 3244, n=9)	2908 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1808 Points -40%
Seq Read
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	5625.54 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5621.18 MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5588.41 MB/s -1%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (5197 - 5837, n=9)	5560 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)	4944 MB/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4362 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3662 MB/s -35%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4010.3 MB/s +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3875.81 MB/s +8%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (2824 - 5175, n=9)	3759 MB/s +5%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)	3720 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	3587.95 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3376 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1921 MB/s -46%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	73.46 MB/s +48%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s +31%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	61.2 MB/s +23%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (49.8 - 65.6, n=9)	59.3 MB/s +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	54.59 MB/s +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	49.79 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	42.2 MB/s -15%
4K Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	211.54 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	191.79 MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (147.9 - 224, n=9)	189 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	181.9 MB/s -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	177.87 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	157.9 MB/s -18%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2813.87 MB/s +233%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s +122%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (773 - 2766, n=9)	1661 MB/s +96%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1105 MB/s +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	909.92 MB/s +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	845.48 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	612 MB/s -28%
4K-64 Write
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3498.72 MB/s +41%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3293 MB/s +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3219.74 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	2478.06 MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (2083 - 2535, n=9)	2344 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1458 MB/s -41%
Access Time Read
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (0.037 - 0.126, n=9)	0.07367 ms * -36%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)	0.05509 ms * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	0.054 ms *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.032 ms * +41%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.031 ms * +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	0.023 ms * +57%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.022 ms * +59%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.064 ms * -220%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	0.054 ms * -170%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)	0.04843 ms * -142%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (0.018 - 0.071, n=9)	0.03678 ms * -84%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.023 ms * -15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.022 ms * -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	0.02 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6318 (5640.08-6341.89)

HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N: Ø6898 (5515.51-6944.88)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4947 (4458.34-4961.59)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7119 (6237.25-7138.29)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6087 (3287.84-6658.98)

Grafik kartı

GeForce RTX 4070, Ada Lovelace mimarisini temel alır ve performans açısından kendisini RTX 4060'a göre daha yakın konumlandırır RTX 4080. Cömert 130 watt TGP'ye rağmen Omen 16, rakipleriyle arasındaki fark bazen çok küçük olsa da kıyaslama parkurumuzda ortalamanın biraz altında bir şekilde ilerledi. RTX 4070'in düşük VRAM miktarı nedeniyle geleceğe hazırlığı oldukça zayıf. Bazı oyunlarda 8 GB şimdiden sınırlayıcı bir faktör haline gelebilir. Bize göre, Nvidia GPU'ya en az 12 GB vermeliydi, özellikle de bu tür dizüstü bilgisayarlar pek de ucuz olmadığından.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	100 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	93.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	82.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81.3 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	45606 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41090 Points +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 46434, n=59)	40410 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	39424 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	38784 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	37313 Points -5%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	169253 Points +51%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (54238 - 193851, n=24)	148053 Points +32%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	142796 Points +27%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	112162 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	32810 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	30936 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12242 - 33451, n=62)	29041 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	28461 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	27343 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	26568 Points -7%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13040 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	12617 Points +13%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11960 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5012 - 13391, n=60)	11603 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11181 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10989 Points -2%

3DMark 11 Performance		32528 puan
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		53528 puan
3DMark Fire Strike Score		23683 puan
3DMark Time Spy Score		11682 puan
Yardım

... kıyaslama

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	23 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	22 Seconds * +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 30, n=60)	21.5 Seconds * +7%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)	21 Seconds * +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	20 Seconds * +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	19 Seconds * +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	19 Seconds * +17%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 181, n=63)	40.6 Seconds * -13%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	36.7 Seconds * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	36 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	36 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	34 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	33 Seconds * +8%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	32 Seconds * +11%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	330 Seconds * -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	298 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	298 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)	297 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 - 440, n=59)	290 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	277 Seconds * +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	222 Seconds * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Oyun performansı

Transcend 16, neredeyse tüm oyunları kendi doğal 2.560 x 1.600 çözünürlüğünde ve yüksek ila maksimum ayarlarda oynatabilecek kadar hızlıdır. İşler yalnızca aşağıdaki gibi çok zorlu veya kötü optimize edilmiş oyunlarda sorunlu hale gelir Kefenlenmiş. 4K monitörler için en az bir RTX 4080 öneriyoruz.

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	96.2 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 ^-2! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	93.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	92 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	88.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	87.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H	71.9 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	120 fps +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	119.8 (114^min) fps +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	114 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.8 - 133.7, n=55)	112.2 fps -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	111.8 (102^min) fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H	98.6 (94^min, 94^P1) fps -14%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	119.9 (3.81^min, 76.9^P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	116.1 (4.31^min, 83.3^P1) fps 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	115.8 (21.8^min, 83.3^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)	113 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (48.3 - 140.5, n=55)	110.9 fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H	98.8 (3.78^min, 58.8^P1) fps -15%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	124.8 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	119.9 fps +11%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)	119 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (41 - 131.9, n=57)	111 fps +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	108.3 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H	100.8 fps -7%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)	227 fps +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	223 (89^min, 167.8^P1) fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	218 (57.2^min, 162.5^P1) fps +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	208 (60.7^min, 153.8^P1) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (76.3 - 234, n=58)	196.1 fps +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	194.2 (59.2^min, 144.5^P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H	129.3 (30.4^min, 84.7^P1) fps -33%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	182 (152.8^min) fps +18%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	168.4 (146.6^min) fps +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	154.1 (133.3^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)	149.3 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (89.7 - 187.5, n=59)	147.6 fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	134.8 (119.8^min) fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H	131.6 (114.5^min) fps -15%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	132.9 fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	117.8 fps +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	114.9 fps
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)	107.2 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (58.9 - 144.4, n=61)	104.6 fps -9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	85.5 fps -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H	81.2 fps -29%

Enshrouded | Palworld | Prince of Persia The Lost Crown | Ready or Not | The Finals

Enshrouded - 2560x1440 Max. Quality AA:FX
Average of class Gaming (25.3 - 76, n=6, last 2 years)	55 fps +30%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	42.3 (24.7^min, 28.4^P0.1, 30.5^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (38.9 - 42.3, n=2)	40.6 fps -4%
XMG Pro 15 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	38.9 (26.5^min, 28.9^P0.1, 30.1^P1) fps -8%

Palworld - 2560x1440 Epic Preset AA:TSR
XMG Pro 15 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	81.3 (33.5^min, 35.1^P0.1, 56.1^P1) fps +18%
Average of class Gaming (39.4 - 119.8, n=3, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.1 - 81.3, n=2)	75.2 fps +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	69.1 (19.7^min, 22^P0.1, 49.9^P1) fps

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:SM
XMG Pro 15 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	354 (18.9^min, 190.3^P0.1, 305^P1) fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (325 - 354, n=2)	340 fps +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	325 (13.8^min, 53.2^P0.1, 210^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (35.3 - 355, n=4, last 2 years)	235 fps -28%

Ready or Not - 2560x1440 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming (53.2 - 144.3, n=5, last 2 years)	99.4 fps +17%
XMG Pro 15 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	95.6 (20.2^min, 38.9^P0.1, 55.1^P1) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (84.8 - 95.6, n=2)	90.2 fps +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	84.8 (20.1^min, 21.4^P0.1, 51.1^P1) fps

The Finals - 2560x1440 Epic Preset
XMG Pro 15 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	94.6 (58.2^min, 65.2^P0.1, 71.9^P1) fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (82.8 - 94.6, n=3)	90.2 fps +9%
Average of class Gaming (13.2 - 147.4, n=7, last 2 years)	85.2 fps +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	82.8 (50.1^min, 52.1^P0.1, 61.1^P1) fps

Rol yapma oyununu kullandık, Bu Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) 3D performansının daha uzun bir süre boyunca nasıl ilerlediğini görmek için ve yaklaşık bir saat sonra bile kare hızı çok sabit kaldı.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.2 (109-118)

HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.7 (97-112)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø98.6 (94-104)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø118.4 (110-125)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø112.3 (106-121)

	düşük	orta	yüksek	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)		181.2	175.3	115.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)				114
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	202	178.9	167	154.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		147.5	108.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	166.6	141.7	114.9
Strange Brigade (2018)		272	220	194.2
The Finals (2023)			168	130.2	82.8
Ready or Not (2023)			194.2	134	84.8
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024)			358	358	325
Palworld (2024)			102.2	96.6	69.1
Enshrouded (2024)			66.6	56.5	42.3
Helldivers 2 (2024)			91.5	91.1	69.2

Emisyonlar

Gürültü emisyonları

Kendinizi dengeli modu kullanmakla sınırlarsanız, 16 inçlik cihaz çok gürültülü olmuyor. 3D gürültü seviyesi 44 ila 47 dB(A) duyulabilir ancak rahatsız edici değil (ikincisi 50+ dB'lik bir kayıt ile performans modu için geçerli olacaktır). Rölanti modunda, fanlar sürekli olarak aktif ve duyulabilir 29 ila 31 dB(A) ile çalışıyor ki bu pek de ideal değil.

Ses yüksekliği

Boşta		29 / 30 / 31 dB
Çalışırken		45 / 47 dB

	30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise		-4%	7%	5%	10%
off / environment *	24	22.9 5%	23.9 -0%	23 4%	23.2 3%
Idle Minimum *	29	29.1 -0%	23.9 18%	23 21%	23.2 20%
Idle Average *	30	29.1 3%	27.8 7%	28.48 5%	23.2 23%
Idle Maximum *	31	29.1 6%	30.1 3%	28.48 8%	26.2 15%
Load Average *	45	45.7 -2%	34.2 24%	30 33%	31.4 30%
Witcher 3 ultra *	44	54.3 -23%	46.4 -5%	54.12 -23%	48.4 -10%
Load Maximum *	47	54.3 -16%	46.4 1%	54.12 -15%	53.8 -14%

* ... smaller is better

Sıcaklık

Dizüstü bilgisayarın üst kısmındaki sıcaklıklar grubun ortasında yer alırken, kasanın tabanı yük altında rakiplerinden daha fazla ısınıyor. Maksimum 63 °C (oyun oynarken) kullanıcıların cihazı kucaklarına koyarak kullanmalarını engelleyecektir. Boşta çalışırken durum çok daha rahattır ve kasa maksimum 30 °C'de hoş bir şekilde serin kalır.

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


47 °C	49 °C	45 °C
43 °C	46 °C	42 °C
31 °C	34 °C	33 °C

Maksimum: 49 °C
Ortalama: 41.1 °C


62 °C	63 °C	53 °C
49 °C	49 °C	41 °C
36 °C	37 °C	34 °C

Maksimum: 63 °C
Ortalama: 47.1 °C

Güç kaynağı 50 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


27 °C	30 °C	27 °C
26 °C	27 °C	27 °C
25 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Maksimum: 30 °C
Ortalama: 26.6 °C


29 °C	29 °C	28 °C
26 °C	27 °C	26 °C
25 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Maksimum: 29 °C
Ortalama: 26.7 °C

Güç kaynağı 32 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Maksimum yük

Bekleme

Witcher 3


43 °C	47 °C	44 °C
42 °C	45 °C	42 °C
31 °C	34 °C	35 °C

Maksimum: 47 °C
Ortalama: 40.3 °C


56 °C	56 °C	49 °C
48 °C	49 °C	40 °C
36 °C	35 °C	33 °C

Maksimum: 56 °C
Ortalama: 44.7 °C

Güç kaynağı 48 °C | Oda sıcaklığı 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).

	HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat		5%	6%	4%	12%
Maximum Upper Side *	49	47.4 3%	50.3 -3%	46 6%	41.8 15%
Maximum Bottom *	63	54.4 14%	48 24%	44 30%	41.4 34%
Idle Upper Side *	30	28.4 5%	28.8 4%	32 -7%	29 3%
Idle Bottom *	29	29.2 -1%	29.8 -3%	33 -14%	30.4 -5%

* ... smaller is better

Stres testi

Furmark ve Prime95 araçlarının kullanıldığı stres testinde, 60 dakika sonra CPU yaklaşık 85 °C'ye yerleşirken, GPU 81 °C'ye ulaştı (88 °C'lik bir sıcak nokta) - her ikisi de nispeten yüksek ancak zararsız değerler.

Konuşmacılar

Ses kalitesi genel dizüstü oyun bilgisayarı ortalamasından biraz daha iyi, ancak çoğu zaman olduğu gibi baslar zorlanıyor ve daha güçlü ve hassas olabilirdi. Maksimum 82 dB(A) ses seviyesi makulün de ötesinde.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Enerji yönetimi

Güç tüketimi

Enerji gereksinimleri bu performans kategorisinde bulunan standart değerlere benzerdir. 10 ila 32 watt boşta tüketim ve yük altında 128 ila 242 watt tüketim ne çok yüksek ne de çok düşüktür.

Anlık tüketim

Kapalı / Bekleme modu	0.1 / Watt
Boşta	10 / 18 / 32 Watt
Çalışırken	128 / 242 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-42%	33%	12%	1%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	10	19.2 -92%	8.3 17%	11 -10%	8.1 19%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Average *	18	22.7 -26%	12.5 31%	15.2 16%	15.9 12%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) -5%
Idle Maximum *	32	55.4 -73%	12.8 60%	16 50%	37.2 -16%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) 17%
Load Average *	128	128.4 -0%	71.3 44%	64 50%	90.9 29%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) 17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	148.4	206 -39%	127.5 14%	179 -21%	189.6 -28%
Load Maximum *	242	292 -21%	169.1 30%	280 -16%	263.5 -9%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) -3%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø148.4 (143.6-156)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø186.1 (161-242)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.2 (10.5-31.9)

Power consumption with an external monitor

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø110 (93.2-197)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø159.9 (158.2-163.7)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø137.2 (134-145.6)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø142.9 (132.4-150.1)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø19.3 (11.5-34.3)

Pil ömrü

Pil modundaki enerji gereksinimleri söz konusu olduğunda, HP'nin hala yapması gereken bazı işler var. Güçlü 97 Wh bataryaya rağmen, 16 inçlik makine 150 cd/m²'lik azaltılmış parlaklıkta Wi-Fi testimizde yalnızca 5 saatten biraz kısa bir süre dayanabildi. Bir karşılaştırma olarak: ROG Zyphrus G16 7 saatin üzerinde, XMG Core 16 ise 8 saatin üzerinde dayanabildi.

Batarya ömrü

WiFi Websurfing

4h 52min

	HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-14%	49%	72%	-18%	29%
WiFi v1.3	292	250 -14%	435 49%	501 72%	240 -18%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) 29%
Reader / Idle		375			392	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)
Load		73	71	143	61	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years)
H.264			671	609		408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)

Artılar

+ OLED'in avantajları: tepki süresi, kontrast, görüş açısı

+ iyi hoparlörler

+ 2x Thunderbolt 4

+ mahremiyet panjuru

+ hızlı Wi-Fi

Eksiler

- sınırlı Core i9-14900HX performansı

- OLED'in dezavantajları: titreme, parlak yüzey

- rTX 4070 dizüstü bilgisayar için oldukça pahalı

- pil ömrü daha iyi olabilirdi

- yalnızca bir M.2 yuvası

Karar

Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng: HP Almanya tarafından sağlanan inceleme cihazı

Her şeyden önce Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng, hem oyunculara hem de yaratıcılara hitap eden parlak bir OLED ekranla potansiyel müşterileri çekmeye çalışıyor.

Çok yansıtıcı bir ekranla başa çıkabilirseniz ve titremeyle ilgili bir sorununuz yoksa, mükemmel siyah seviyeleri ve görüş açılarının yanı sıra mükemmel kontrast oranına ve harika tepki sürelerine sahip renkli bir ekran elde edersiniz.

Emisyon ve hız konusunda bazı eksi puanlar var. 16 inçlik makine performans modunda rahatsız edici derecede yüksek ses çıkarırken, dengeli modun performansı ortalamanın biraz altında görünüyor. Bunun dışında Omen Transcend 16, kasa kalitesi, giriş cihazları ve bağlantı noktası seçimi açısından diğer oyun dizüstü bilgisayarlarına benziyor.

Genel olarak, toplam puan, Türkiye'nin XMG Core 16 L23 ya da Legion Pro 5 16ARX8. Özellikle 16 inç kategorisinde hafif ve kompakt bir cihaz arayanlar yeni ROG Zeyphrus G16.

Fiyat ve bulunabilirlik

İncelememiz sırasında Core i9-14900HX ve GeForce RTX 4070'e sahip HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng şu anda HP'nin çevrimiçi mağazasında, Amazon'da veya Best Buy'da bulunmuyordu.

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng - 02/12/2024 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

İşcilik

83 / 98 → 85%

Klavye

81%

Mouse

86%

Bağlanılabilirlik

67 / 80 → 83%

Ağırlık

61 / 10-66 → 91%

Batarya

63 / 95 → 66%

Görüntü

94%

Oyun performansı

99%

Uygulama performansı

97%

Isınma

80 / 95 → 84%

Ses

76 / 90 → 85%

Audio

78%

Camera

42 / 85 → 49%

Ortalama

77%

88%

Gaming - Ortalama Ağırlık

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 114 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebooklar Hakkında Aradığınız Herşey > İnceleme > HP Omen Transcend 16 (2024) dizüstü bilgisayar incelemesi: OLED ekranlı bir RTX 4070 oyun makinesi

Florian Glaser, 2024-02-15 (Update: 2024-02-15)

Karşılaştırmalı olarak olası rakipler

Dava

Boyut ve ağırlık karşılaştırması

Özellikler

İletişim

Web kamerası

Aksesuarlar

Bakım

Garanti

Giriş cihazları

Klavye

Dokunmatik yüzey

Ekran

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Performans

Test koşulları

İşlemci

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Sistem performansı

DPC gecikme süreleri

Yığın depolama

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Grafik kartı

Oyun performansı

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Emisyonlar

Gürültü emisyonları

Sıcaklık

Stres testi

Konuşmacılar

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng audio analysis

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M audio analysis

Enerji yönetimi

Güç tüketimi

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

Pil ömrü

Artılar

Eksiler

Karar

Fiyat ve bulunabilirlik

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison