Schenker XMG Evo 14 (M24) dizüstü bilgisayar incelemesi - Ryzen 8000 ve 96 GB'a kadar RAM ile çok yönlü iyi bir dizüstü bilgisayar
Schenker'in yeni XMG Evo 14'ü, çok çeşitli bağlantılarının yanı sıra iyi bakım seçenekleriyle kalabalığın arasından sıyrılmayı amaçlayan 14 inçlik kompakt bir dizüstü bilgisayardır. Kullanıcı olarak AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (yaklaşık 1.060 ABD dolarından başlayan fiyatlarla) veya Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (yaklaşık 1.223 ABD dolarından başlayan fiyatlarla) ve bunlara karşılık gelen iGPU'lar arasında seçim yapabilirsiniz. Test cihazımız, 32 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD ve önceden yüklenmiş Windows ile AMD varyantıdır ve yaklaşık 1.335 ABD dolarına satın alınabilir. Ayrıca Schenker, son derece ayrıntılı bir deep-dive yayınladı evo 14 ve Evo 15 ile ilgili tüm bilgileri içerir.
Alternatif olarak Tuxedo, Linux ile aynı şekilde oluşturulmuş cihazlar olan InfinityBook Pro 14 Gen9'u sunuyor. AMD modeli yaklaşık 1.345 ABD dolarından alınabilirken, Intel varyantı maliyeti yaklaşık 1.470 ABD dolarıdır.
Karşılaştırmalı olarak olası rakipler
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.9 % | v8 | 09/2024 | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 84.9 % | v8 | 08/2024 | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 85.5 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 85.1 % | v8 | 07/2024 | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 83.5 % | v8 | 06/2024 | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 17.08 mm | 14.20" | 2880x1920 | |
| 85.3 % | v8 | 09/2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE R5 7535U, Radeon 660M | 1.6 kg | 23 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
Lütfen dikkat: Derecelendirme sistemimizi yakın zamanda güncelledik ve 8. sürümün sonuçları 7. sürümün sonuçlarıyla karşılaştırılabilir değildir. Daha fazla bilgi için burada.
Kasa ve bağlantı
Daha büyük olanlarla aynı XMG Evo 15üretici, sağlam bir alüminyum kasa kullanmayı tercih etmiş - ancak Evo 14 siyah değil, koyu gri. Bu nedenle parmak izi toplama konusunda çok daha az hassas. Genel stabilitesi çok iyi ve menteşeler de güzel ve sıkı, bu yüzden kapağın açısını ayarlarken sadece minimum sallanma oluyor. Maksimum açılma açısı neredeyse 180 derecedir.
Diğer mevcut 14 inçlik dizüstü bilgisayarların çoğuyla karşılaştırıldığında Evo 14, Gigabit Ethernet ve tam kart okuyucu dahil olmak üzere çok sayıda bağlantıya sahiptir. Bununla birlikte, üç normal USB-A bağlantı noktasından birinin neden yalnızca eski 2.0 standardını desteklediği bizim için bir gizem. RAM için iki yuva (maksimum 96 GB) ve M.2 2280 SSD'ler için iki yuva bulunduğundan bakım seçenekleri de harika. Bununla birlikte, kasa genel olarak oldukça kompakt ve 1,46 kg ağırlığında, çok ağır da değil.
WLAN modülü (Intel AX210) çok iyi ve istikrarlı aktarım hızları sunuyor, ancak henüz Wi-Fi 7'yi desteklemiyor. Microsoft'un Studio Effects'ini destekleyen web kamerası iyi fotoğraflar çekiyor ve IR sensörü sayesinde Windows Hello üzerinden yüz tanıma özelliği de mevcut. Tam teşekküllü kart okuyucu, referans kartımızı (maks. 90 MB/s) pek sevmemiş gibi görünüyor; başka bir kart (ADATA V90) kullanarak 250 MB/s'den daha fazlasını başardı. Bu, hangi kartı kullandığınıza bağlı olarak oldukça önemli farklılıklar bekleyebileceğiniz anlamına gelir.
Siyah arkadan aydınlatmalı klavye gri kasaya iyi bir kontrast sağlıyor ve ortalama bir yazma hissi veriyor, ancak daha büyük tuşları oldukça yüksek bir ses çıkarıyor. Cam clickpad (12,3 x 7,7 cm) genel olarak iyi çalışıyor, ancak girişler için sadece pad'e dokunmanızı tavsiye ederiz. Mekanik tıklamalar yüksek ses çıkarır ve özellikle yüksek kaliteli hissettirmez.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (ADATA V90) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (ADATA V90) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Networking | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Ekran - 400 nit ve %100 sRGB ile IPS
Evo 14'ün 14 inç IPS ekranı, 16:10 en boy oranında 2.880 x 1.800 piksel sayesinde çok keskin bir görüntü sergiliyor. Mat yüzeyi yansımaları önlemeye yardımcı oluyor, ancak görüntü neyse ki grenli görünmüyor. Renkler canlı, ancak OLED panellerle karşılaştırılamaz. Buna karşılık, PWM kullanılmıyor ve 120 Hz yenileme hızı yumuşak hareketler sağlıyor. Parlaklığı 400 cd/m²'den fazla ve iyi siyah seviyesiyle birlikte bu, 1.300:1'den fazla maksimum kontrast oranıyla sonuçlanıyor. Ancak ne parlaklık ne de renk sıcaklığı otomatik olarak ayarlanabiliyor.
Kontrol Merkezi'nden önceden kalibre edilmiş bir profil indirilebilir ve bu profil testimiz sırasında çok iyi bir izlenim bıraktı. Profesyonel CalMAN yazılımını kullanarak yaptığımız analizde, renk ve gri tonlama sapmaları zaten önemli sınır olan 3'ün altındaydı. Kendi kalibrasyonumuzla (sağdaki kutudan ücretsiz olarak indirilebilir) ekranı daha da iyileştirebiliriz, ancak bu kesinlikle gerekli değildir. Tam sRGB kapsamı ile birlikte panel, herhangi bir kısıtlama olmaksızın görüntüleri düzenlemek için uygundur.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aydınlatma: 90 %
Batarya modunda parlaklık: 421 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1316:1 (Siyah: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE NV140WUM-N49, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 25% | -1% | -1% | 1% | -46% | 26% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 71 | 99.9 41% | 70.3 -1% | 70.1 -1% | 72.42 2% | 37.7 -47% | 99.9 41% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 97.7 -2% | 99.79 0% | 56.1 -44% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.8 | 97.2 34% | 72.1 -1% | 72.3 -1% | 73.94 2% | 39 -46% | 98.9 36% |
| Response Times | 93% | -19% | -23% | 5% | -15% | 97% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26.3 ? | 1.3 ? 95% | 32.7 ? -24% | 31.1 ? -18% | 7 ? 73% | 23.5 ? 11% | 0.61 ? 98% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 13.4 ? | 1.2 ? 91% | 15.2 ? -13% | 17.1 ? -28% | 22 ? -64% | 18.8 ? -40% | 0.67 ? 95% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 238 ? | 240 ? | ||||
| Screen | 92% | -7% | -44% | 197% | -250% | -52% | |
| Brightness middle | 421 | 385 -9% | 418 -1% | 466 11% | 373 -11% | 419 0% | 411 -2% |
| Brightness | 412 | 382 -7% | 408 -1% | 467 13% | 377 -8% | 399 -3% | 414 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 95 6% | 90 0% | 94 4% | 94 4% | 89 -1% | 99 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.03 91% | 0.3 6% | 0.29 9% | 0.015 95% | 0.31 3% | |
| Contrast | 1316 | 12833 875% | 1393 6% | 1607 22% | 24867 1790% | 1352 3% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.99 -53% | 1.6 -23% | 2.5 -92% | 1.47 -13% | 7.5 -477% | 2.8 -115% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.4 | 3.69 -54% | 2.5 -4% | 6.1 -154% | 2.49 -4% | 28.3 -1079% | 5.5 -129% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.79 -63% | 1.1 -0% | 1.3 -18% | 1.78 -62% | 6.2 -464% | 2.2 -100% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 0.8 43% | 2 -43% | 4.1 -193% | 1.7 -21% | 4.6 -229% | 1.8 -29% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.204 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.179 101% | 2.02 109% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6446 101% | 6474 100% | 6851 95% | 7386 88% | 6556 99% | 6057 107% | 6319 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 70% /
78% | -9% /
-7% | -23% /
-32% | 68% /
127% | -104% /
-172% | 24% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Performans - Ryzen 7 8845HS ve 96 GB'a kadar RAM
XMG Evo 14'ün seçilebilecek üç performans profili vardır(Balanced, Enthusiast, Overboost) ve verileri aşağıdaki tabloda özetledik. Kıyaslamalarımız ve ölçümlerimiz için varsayılan Enthusiast modu kullanıldı.
| Enerji profili | CPU TDP | CPU TDP pil | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy Grafik | maks. fan gürültü emisyonları |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dengeli | 25 watt | 25 watt | 12,318 puan | 2,661 puan | 29 dB(A) |
| Meraklı | 45 watt | 35 watt | 15.494 puan | 2.860 puan | 37,6 dB(A) |
| Overboost | 60 watt | 50 watt | 16.315 puan | 2.914 puan | 44,6 dB(A) |
XMG Evo 14 süper hızlı bir dizüstü bilgisayar ve AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Zen 4) genel olarak çok iyi ve istikrarlı bir performans sunsa da yeni Zen 4'e ayak uyduramadı Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Zen 5). Yine de Zen 5 CPU'lar şu anda yalnızca lehimli RAM ile kullanılabiliyor. Testimiz sırasında Evo 14 her zaman duyarlı bir cihazdı ve sistem kararlılığıyla ilgili hiçbir sorun yaşamadık, ayrıca gecikme süreleri de çok düşüktü. Test cihazımızda Samsung 990 Pro'nun çok yüksek aktarım hızlarına ulaşan 1 TB'lık versiyonu kullanıldı. Bunlar aynı zamanda uzun süreli yük altında da sabit kaldı, ki bu elbette bir mesele değil.
Entegre Radeon 780M iGPU iyi performans değerleri elde etti ve özellikle oyun oynarken etkileyici olduğunu kanıtladı Intel Arc Graphics 8 Xe çekirdeklisentetik testler sırasında hala oldukça açık bir şekilde lider konumdaydı. Ancak, yeni Radeon 890M standart oyun kıyaslamalarımızda fark edilir derecede daha hızlıydı. Grafik performansı uzun süreli yük altında sabit kaldı.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14895 - 18037, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=10) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5808 - 7026, n=10) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (673 - 698, n=10) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2342 - 2908, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (62669 - 74664, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=10) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 22544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=14) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2510 - 2698, n=12) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11256 - 12726, n=11) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=11) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=10) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.4 - 77, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4336 - 0.4935, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (23708 - 29544, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (99659 - 125873, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4332 - 5180, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (109458 - 124695, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14062 - 15519, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (53436 - 67367, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64515 - 172642, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (12361 - 15911, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (33826 - 41668, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7120 - 7641, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10685 - 11570, n=7) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9787 - 10482, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9009 - 10009, n=7) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1633 - 1939, n=7) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1562 - 1872, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1734 - 2040, n=7) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1437 - 1849, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (295 - 334, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 314, n=7) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (501 - 664, n=7) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7284 puan | |
Yardım | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (61459 - 71873, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (68425 - 93239, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (82.5 - 117, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13295 puan | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7728 puan | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3215 puan | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 500 puan | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2816 puan | |
Yardım | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (308 - 683, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (189 - 946, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (300 - 664, n=52) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (203 - 215, n=3, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
| düşük | orta | yüksek | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 164.4 | 152.9 | 65 | 27.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 147 | 47 | 36 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 160.1 | 127.5 | 85.9 | 78.6 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 78 | 38.3 | 27.6 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 65.6 | 46.7 | 39.8 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 83 | 49 | 45 | 43 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 161.3 | 66.7 | 56 | 48.2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 41.4 | 32.6 | 26.3 | 23 |
Emisyonlar ve güç
Evo 14 iki fan kullanır ve günlük kullanım sırasında çok sessiz bir cihazdır. Oyun oynarken veya stres testinde bile, Enthusiast modunda maksimum 37,6 dB(A) ölçtük. Ancak Dengeli modu kullanırken, önceliğiniz bu ise cihaz daha da sessiz hale gelir (maks. 29 dB(A)). Overboost modunda, 44,6 dB(A) gibi yüksek bir ses kaydettik ki bu da çok daha fazla güç elde etmediğiniz için buna değmez. Test cihazımızdan gelen başka hiçbir elektronik ses yoktu.
Alt taraftaki bir sıcak nokta dışında yüzey sıcaklıkları tamamen zararsızdı. Özellikle klavye bölgesi her zaman hoş bir sıcaklıkta kaldı. Yine de, yoğun kullanım sırasında alt tarafla cilt temasından kaçınılmalıdır.
Yüksek çözünürlüklü 120 Hz paneline rağmen, dizüstü bilgisayarın boşta tüketimi çok düşük ve yük altında da herhangi bir sorun yaşamadık. Maksimum 83 watt ölçtük ve stres testi sırasında değer hızla ~76 watt'ta dengelendi. 100 watt'lık güç kaynağı ünitesi mükemmel derecede yeterli. Cihazın 80 Wh bataryası iyi bir batarya çalışma süresi sağlıyor, ancak bu değerler bazı rakipler tarafından bile aşıldı. WLAN testinde 12 saatin biraz altında (150 cd/m²) ve 9:40 saat (maks. parlaklık) ölçtük. 120 Hz'de her durumda yaklaşık 60 dakika daha azdı. Video testinde ise 15,5 saat gibi çok iyi bir süre dayandı.
Ses yüksekliği
| Boşta |
| 24.7 / 24.7 / 26.3 dB |
| Çalışırken |
| 37.6 / 37.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB sessiz 40 dB(A) duyulabilirlik 50 dB(A) gürültülü |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm uzaklık) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE Radeon 660M, R5 7535U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -2% | -5% | -3% | -2% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
| Idle Average * | 24.7 | 25 -1% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26.3 | 27 -3% | 27.1 -3% | 25.7 2% | 27.2 -3% | 24.5 7% | 23.9 9% |
| Load Average * | 37.6 | 40 -6% | 34.9 7% | 36.2 4% | 31.3 17% | 38 -1% | 44.3 -18% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 37.6 | 39 -4% | 43.7 -16% | 43.6 -16% | 41.4 -10% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 37.6 | 40 -6% | 43.7 -16% | 43.6 -16% | 46.61 -24% | 41.5 -10% | 44.3 -18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.3 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.1 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE AMD Ryzen 5 7535U, AMD Radeon 660M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -11% | -2% | -1% | -6% | 0% | 11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.7 | 49 -18% | 43.7 -5% | 44.6 -7% | 45.2 -8% | 43.1 -3% | 39.6 5% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 50.1 | 59 -18% | 49.4 1% | 50.9 -2% | 49.2 2% | 45.7 9% | 38.6 23% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.1 | 28 -3% | 27.7 -2% | 26.5 2% | 29.6 -9% | 27.9 -3% | 24.8 8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.7 | 29 -5% | 28.6 -3% | 26.3 5% | 30.2 -9% | 28.3 -2% | 25.3 9% |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Kapalı / Bekleme modu | 0.46 / 1.39 Watt |
| Boşta | 4.6 / 7.8 / 8 Watt |
| Çalışırken |
71.7 / 83 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 75 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE R5 7535U, Radeon 660M, 57 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 53% | 20% | -30% | 51% | -8% | 7% | -9% | |
| H.264 | 929 | 1251 35% | 612 -34% | 1031 11% | 821 ? -12% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 715 | 990 38% | 888 24% | 571 -20% | 758 6% | 748 5% | 710 -1% | 625 ? -13% |
| Load | 99 | 165 67% | 101 2% | 64 -35% | 194 96% | 79 -20% | 110 11% | 97.8 ? -1% |
| Reader / Idle | 1902 | 1168 ? | ||||||
| Gaming | 85 | 92 ? |
Artılar
Eksiler
Karar - XMG Evo 14, her zamanki ödünleri vermeden iyi bir toplam pakettir
Schenker'in XMG Evo 14 modeli, modern dizüstü bilgisayarların bile çok sayıda bağlantı ve kapsamlı bakım seçeneklerinden yoksun olmak zorunda olmadığını kanıtlıyor. Her iki RAM yuvasını da kullanarak 96 GB'a kadar artırabiliyorsunuz, SSD kapasitesi çok kolay bir şekilde genişletilebiliyor ve cihazda bir sürü bağlantı var. Ayrıca, cihaz kapsamlı bir şekilde yapılandırılabilir.
AMD işlemci iyi ve her şeyden önce istikrarlı bir performans sunuyor - aynı şey Radeon 780M için de söylenebilir. Cihazın IPS ekranı yüksek çözünürlüğe, 120 Hz yenileme hızına ve doğru renklere sahiptir, yani sRGB renk alanındaki görüntüleri zahmetsizce düzenleyebilirsiniz.
Yeni Schenker XMG Evo 14, 1.000 ABD dolarının biraz üzerinde bir tanıtım fiyatına metal bir kasa da dahil olmak üzere iyi bir toplam paket sunuyor. Nispeten kompakt kasasına rağmen, sağlam performans değerleri, çok sayıda bağlantı ve iyi bakım seçenekleri olmadan yapmanız gerekmez.
Birkaç rakibi daha iyi dayanıklılık sunsa bile çalışma süreleri genel olarak iyidir. Özellikle yeni XMG Evo 14'e, yaklaşık 1.000 ABD doları olan tanıtım fiyatı nedeniyle göz atmalısınız. Intel modeli Thunderbolt 4 desteğine sahip olsa da, sınırlı performans artışı bizim gözümüzde ek ücrete değmez.
Fiyat ve bulunabilirlik
XMG Evo 14 AMD Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nde mevcut değildir, ancak bestware.com gibi uluslararası mağazalardan yaklaşık 1.000 ABD dolarından başlayan fiyatlarla satın alınabilir.
Lütfen dikkat: Derecelendirme sistemimizi yakın zamanda güncelledik ve 8. sürümün sonuçları 7. sürümün sonuçlarıyla karşılaştırılabilir değildir. Daha fazla bilgi için burada.
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24)
- 09/22/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
